For printing - MSP
For printing - MSP
For printing - MSP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS<br />
Vol. 198, No. 1, 2001<br />
NIELSEN ROOT THEORY AND HOPF DEGREE THEORY<br />
Robert F. Brown and Helga Schirmer<br />
The Nielsen root number N(f; c) of a map f : M → N at<br />
a point c ∈ N is a homotopy invariant lower bound for the<br />
number of roots at c, that is, for the cardinality of f −1 (c).<br />
There is a formula for calculating N(f; c) if M and N are<br />
closed oriented manifolds of the same dimension. We extend<br />
the calculation of N(f; c) to manifolds that are not orientable,<br />
and also to manifolds that have non-empty boundaries and are<br />
not compact, provided that the map f is boundary-preserving<br />
and proper. Because of its connection with degree theory, we<br />
introduce the transverse Nielsen root number for maps transverse<br />
to c, obtain computational results for it in the same setting,<br />
and prove that the two Nielsen root numbers are sharp<br />
lower bounds in dimensions other than 2. We apply these<br />
extended root theory results to the degree theory for maps<br />
of not necessarily orientable manifolds introduced by Hopf in<br />
1930. Thus we re-establish, in a new and modern treatment,<br />
the relationship of Hopf’s Absolutgrad and the geometric degree<br />
with homotopy invariants of Nielsen root theory, a relationship<br />
that is present in Hopf’s work but not in subsequent<br />
re-examinations of Hopf’s degree theory.<br />
1. Introduction.<br />
The goal of this paper is two-fold. We will extend results from Nielsen root<br />
theory for maps between orientable n-manifolds so as to remove the orientability<br />
hypothesis. Then we will use the extended theory to re-establish<br />
the connection between Nielsen root theory and two variants of the degree<br />
of a map, namely, Hopf’s Absolutgrad and the geometric degree. By using<br />
methods from present-day Nielsen theory, we will provide new ways of<br />
understanding some of the basic concepts of Hopf’s theory as well as more<br />
direct proofs for some of the results. We next describe these goals in more<br />
detail.<br />
If f : M → N is a map between two manifolds and c ∈ N, then a root<br />
of f at c is a point in f −1 (c). The Nielsen root number N(f; c) is a lower<br />
bound for the cardinality of f −1 (c), and it is homotopy invariant. While it<br />
is possible to define N(f; c) even if M and N are not manifolds, it is usually<br />
not possible to compute it in such general settings. If, however, M and N<br />
49