27.06.2013 Views

Structural Grading of Foveal Hypoplasia Using Spectral-Domain ...

Structural Grading of Foveal Hypoplasia Using Spectral-Domain ...

Structural Grading of Foveal Hypoplasia Using Spectral-Domain ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

controls and incursion <strong>of</strong> the inner retinal layers. This suggests<br />

that the centrifugal displacement <strong>of</strong> the inner retinal<br />

layers is not complete in some patients with achromatopsia.<br />

In summary, a structural grading system for foveal hypoplasia<br />

that relates to developmental stages and visual prognosis<br />

and that can be applied to most disorders associated<br />

with foveal hypoplasia was developed. Atypical forms <strong>of</strong><br />

Thomas et al <strong>Structural</strong> <strong>Grading</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foveal</strong> <strong>Hypoplasia</strong><br />

Figure 5. A, Bar graph showing the number <strong>of</strong> patients within each grade <strong>of</strong> foveal hypoplasia; the proportion <strong>of</strong> different disorders within each grade<br />

are shown with different shades. B, Box plots <strong>of</strong> visual acuity (VA) for each grade <strong>of</strong> foveal hypoplasia. The results <strong>of</strong> multiple comparisons <strong>of</strong> how grade<br />

<strong>of</strong> foveal hypoplasia affects VA are shown with the respective P values and median difference (d) in VA measured in logarithm <strong>of</strong> the minimum angle<br />

<strong>of</strong> resolution (logMAR) units. C, Box plot showing that similarly, there was a significant difference in visual acuity between the typical forms <strong>of</strong> foveal<br />

hypoplasia and atypical foveal hypoplasia. The other features that were significantly different between the controls and typical and atypical forms <strong>of</strong> foveal<br />

hypoplasia were: (D) retinal thickness at the fovea, (E) outer nuclear layer thickness, and (F) foveal depth. For all box plots, the whiskers represents the<br />

maximum and minimum range <strong>of</strong> observations, whereas the box represents the interquartile range and the line dividing the box represents the median.<br />

All multiple comparisons are shown with the box plots with the significance values and median differences (d), units for which are logMAR (for B and<br />

C) or micrometers (for D, E, and F).<br />

foveal hypoplasia seen with achromatopsia that are associated<br />

with worse visual prognosis resulting from photoreceptor<br />

degeneration also were investigated. This grading is<br />

especially suitable for clinical use because it is qualitative<br />

and fast, does not need measurements or specialized analytical<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware, and hence can be used just by visualizing<br />

the OCT.<br />

1659

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!