27.06.2013 Views

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3: Explanation of variance<br />

Jaflah Al-Ammary<br />

Factor R<br />

BI 0.511<br />

PEOU 0.447<br />

PU 0.485<br />

CA 0.210<br />

As expected by the TAM literature, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and subjective norms<br />

have a great impact on the behavioral intention to accept and use educational technology. Three of them<br />

together accounted for a high variance of behavior intention to use educational technology (R=0.511).<br />

Moreover, perceived ease of use affected perceived usefulness. Hence H1, H2, H3, and H4 which are<br />

based on TAM (except hypothesis related to subjective norms) were all supported (0.200 (2.071), 0.455<br />

(2.90), 0.18 (1.47) and 0.246 (2.903), respectively). On the other hand, perceived usefulness was directly<br />

influenced by the computer self efficacy, motivation, and computer anxiety. Thus, H6, H8, and H13 are<br />

supported. However, subjective norms and previous experience has no effect on the perceive usefulness.<br />

Thus H5 and H10 are not supported. Furthermore, the results show that perceived ease of use was<br />

directly influenced by computer self efficacy and previous experience, while motivation has no effect of<br />

this factor. Therefore, H7, H11, and H13 were supported while H9 was rejected. Finally, the results show<br />

that there is a negative impact for previous experience on computer anxiety.<br />

Table 4: Model testing results<br />

Hypothesis Path coefficient T-value<br />

H1 Perceived usefulness - Behavior Intention 0.200 2.071<br />

H2 Perceived ease of use - Perceived usefulness 0.455 5.05<br />

H3 Perceived usefulness - Behavior Intention 0.184 1.472<br />

H4 Subjective Norms - Behavior Intention 0.246 2.903<br />

H5 Subjective Norms - Perceived usefulness 0.064 0.623<br />

H6 Computer self efficacy Perceived usefulness 0.203 1.499<br />

H7 Computer self efficacy Perceived ease of use 0.239 1.570<br />

H8 Motivation Perceived usefulness 0.389 2.95<br />

H9 Motivation Perceived ease of use 0.069 0.525<br />

H10 Previous experience Perceived usefulness 0.091 0.681<br />

H11 Previous experience Perceived ease of use 0.222 1.881<br />

H12 Previous experience Computer anxiety -0.459 5.691<br />

H13 Computer anxiety Perceived usefulness -0.203 1.499<br />

H14 Computer anxiety Perceived ease of use -0.239 1.570<br />

9. Discussion and conclusion<br />

The main conclusion of the current research is that factors which were hypothesized to have an impact<br />

on the acceptance and use of educational technology in schools are fallen within two categories:<br />

behavioral and Information Technology factors. As such behavioral factors include: motivation, subjective<br />

norms and computer anxiety while Information Technology factors include computer self efficacy, and<br />

previous experience. In the first place, the results revealed that teachers and students behavioral<br />

intention to accept and use educational technology is influenced indirectly by the proposed behavioral<br />

and information technology factors via perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Moreover, the<br />

results show that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a great positive effect on both<br />

teachers and student’s behavioral intention to accept and use the educational technology. In addition, it<br />

has been revealed by the results that computer self efficacy and computer anxiety are the only factors<br />

that have a positive indirect effect on the behavioral intention to accept educational technology through<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!