How the Greek debt reorganisation of 2012 changed ... - Allen & Overy
How the Greek debt reorganisation of 2012 changed ... - Allen & Overy
How the Greek debt reorganisation of 2012 changed ... - Allen & Overy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34 <strong>How</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Greek</strong> <strong>debt</strong> <strong>reorganisation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>changed</strong> <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> sovereign insolvency – September <strong>2012</strong><br />
Derivatives Association are (1) failure to pay,<br />
(2) repudiation/moratorium, and (3)<br />
restructuring. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se have very detailed<br />
and technical definitions.<br />
Thus, if a credit event occurs and <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> a<br />
100 bond is now 20, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> seller <strong>of</strong><br />
protection must pay <strong>the</strong> buyer <strong>of</strong> protection 80,<br />
so that <strong>the</strong> buyer <strong>of</strong> protection ends up with <strong>the</strong><br />
full 100. Unlike an ordinary guarantee, <strong>the</strong> seller<br />
<strong>of</strong> protection does not <strong>the</strong>n take over <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
bond by way <strong>of</strong> subrogation because <strong>the</strong> seller<br />
<strong>of</strong> protection does not pay <strong>the</strong> whole bond. In<br />
addition, <strong>the</strong> seller <strong>of</strong> protection does not have<br />
a right <strong>of</strong> indemnity against Greece as <strong>the</strong> issuer<br />
– a right which a guarantor would have.<br />
Bondholders who buy credit protection are<br />
likely to want a credit event to happen.<br />
There is a separate Intelligence Unit paper <strong>of</strong><br />
October 2011 entitled Sovereign state restructurings<br />
and credit default swaps which contains a<br />
description <strong>of</strong> credit default swaps and a<br />
detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> typical sovereign credit<br />
events.<br />
The politics <strong>of</strong> a restructuring credit<br />
event<br />
The eurozone was initially very reluctant to<br />
contemplate <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> a credit event in<br />
relation to Greece. Presumably, <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
thought that a credit event was likely to be<br />
perceived by <strong>the</strong> market as a default and likely<br />
to affect <strong>the</strong> future credit ratings <strong>of</strong> Greece.<br />
Some sovereign states had hostile views on <strong>the</strong><br />
credit default swap market, which <strong>the</strong>y blamed<br />
for publicising and exaggerating <strong>the</strong>ir financial<br />
woes. Some commentators may have regarded<br />
credit default swaps as exotic speculation<br />
mainly carried out by evil hedge funds<br />
determined to pr<strong>of</strong>it from <strong>the</strong> misery and<br />
misfortune <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, a view perhaps more<br />
consistent with <strong>the</strong> thirteenth century in<br />
Europe than <strong>the</strong> twenty-first.<br />
The attitude <strong>of</strong> regulators tended to depend<br />
upon who <strong>the</strong>y thought were <strong>the</strong> ultimate<br />
beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit default swap and<br />
who, ultimately, would have to pay. If <strong>the</strong>y<br />
thought that banks’ exposures would be<br />
© <strong>Allen</strong> & <strong>Overy</strong> LLP <strong>2012</strong><br />
reduced by credit default swap protection, and<br />
if <strong>the</strong>y thought that banks were not sellers <strong>of</strong><br />
protection, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y would favour <strong>the</strong><br />
crystallising <strong>of</strong> a credit event. A default by a<br />
significant sovereign state could have had<br />
serious repercussions for <strong>the</strong> banking system<br />
and could, in <strong>the</strong> worst case, have resulted in<br />
threats to financial stability and ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
financial crisis. Banks are very vulnerable to<br />
contagion effects and <strong>the</strong> falling <strong>of</strong> one domino<br />
can knock down <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs so as to give rise to<br />
a systemic crisis. Regulators were sensitive to<br />
<strong>the</strong> systemic consequences <strong>of</strong> credit default<br />
swaps partly by reason <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disasters<br />
experienced by <strong>the</strong> United States-based<br />
insurance group AIG in 2008.<br />
If, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> regulators thought<br />
that <strong>the</strong> sellers <strong>of</strong> protection were largely banks<br />
as well, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>ir attitude was likely to be<br />
different: <strong>the</strong>y were unlikely to favour <strong>the</strong><br />
crystallising <strong>of</strong> a credit event.<br />
Greece credit events <strong>2012</strong><br />
Whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>re has been a credit event is<br />
decided quickly by an ISDA Determinations<br />
Committee which also calls for an auction to<br />
determine <strong>the</strong> market price.<br />
On 9 March <strong>2012</strong>, a Determinations<br />
Committee decided that a forcible exchange <strong>of</strong><br />
existing bonds for new bonds, and <strong>the</strong><br />
additional consideration by Greece’s<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new collective action<br />
clauses, was a restructuring credit event in <strong>the</strong><br />
case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Greek</strong> law bonds because <strong>the</strong><br />
exchange was not voluntary and because <strong>the</strong><br />
existing bonds were cancelled by statute. In<br />
substance, <strong>the</strong> existing bonds were <strong>changed</strong>.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> foreign law bonds, <strong>the</strong>re was a<br />
voluntary exchange, but <strong>the</strong> existing collective<br />
action clauses in <strong>the</strong> bonds were implemented<br />
by Greece with <strong>the</strong> result that all bondholders<br />
<strong>of</strong> each series, which were bound by a<br />
successful amending resolution, received new<br />
bonds and o<strong>the</strong>r consideration, and <strong>the</strong><br />
resolutions reduced <strong>the</strong> amounts payable on <strong>the</strong><br />
existing bonds to zero. This was a restructuring<br />
credit event.