30.06.2013 Views

View - Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg

View - Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg

View - Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Working provisional copy - Pls do not circulate<br />

ASTRONOMICAL PUBLISHING 21<br />

universities to push hard for open access for the reasons noted earlier. And<br />

open access has great educational benefits as well as benefits for basic research.<br />

(A disclaimer: I work for Harvard University which now has a strong<br />

internal open access policy aimed at providing free use for non-profit purposes<br />

– education and research – to content produced by university staff<br />

and faculty). And the government has entered the <strong>de</strong>bate by asking for comments<br />

on proposed regulations regarding access to content produced with<br />

Fe<strong>de</strong>ral resources. Most people tend to forget that US Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Employee<br />

and certain state employees are already “exempt” from copyright, i.e. their<br />

work cannot be copyrighted so by <strong>de</strong>finition is freely available. This has not,<br />

as I can again tell you from personal experience as a Smithsonian employee<br />

and civil servant, hin<strong>de</strong>red the ability of Feds to publish.<br />

Congress, the Executive Branch and the Judiciary have been of two<br />

minds on this issue. On one hand they want to protect intellectual property<br />

rights (patents, copyrights) to provi<strong>de</strong> proprietary use of material for gain<br />

and competitive advantage – its good for industry and individuals. On the<br />

other hand, they believe that there should be free access to information paid<br />

for by the taxpayer – which will also lead to economic gain and competitive<br />

advantage. It is quite possible in any compromise that we could get the<br />

worst of both worlds. Fortunately the problem is now un<strong>de</strong>r study and<br />

most (but not all) of the parties involved have gotten together to examine<br />

solutions to the open access question that will provi<strong>de</strong> such access without<br />

<strong>de</strong>stroying the economic basis for refereed scholarly publishing (see the<br />

report of the AAU Roundtable on Scholarly Publishing for a review of the<br />

problem and a list of recommendations, AAU 2010).<br />

5. The Future (The Tomorrowland of Publishing)<br />

So where do we go from here? And better, how can we prepare for the<br />

future? There are only a few drivers: New ways of Communicating, Changes<br />

in the Way We Work, Changes in the World, and lastly Changes in the<br />

Resources Available. Perhaps there will also be legal or legislative issues,<br />

but I cannot predict even in the short term what those might be. The others<br />

we un<strong>de</strong>rstand and can plan to address them.<br />

First we should remember 1. Why are we publishing? And 2. Who are<br />

the users? If we keep the answers to those questions in mind, we can have<br />

a much clearer view of what we need to do.<br />

Next, we can predict, based on recent past performance, important<br />

trends.<br />

1. There will be an increasing move towards open access and very rapid<br />

publication. “Tenure” based on only refereed publications is becoming<br />

less important, especially as more astronomers are employed outsi<strong>de</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!