Malda Training Diary - Administrative Training Institute

Page 165 of 165
Anil Choudhuri s/o L.Bhupesh Choudhuri of Jadupur and Sunil Singha s/o
L.Bhupesh Singha of Jadupur do not possess agricultural land in Jadupur which they
have wrongly shown in the application as agricultural. They are bargadars and do
“adhi” in the land of Hanif Biswas in Gajol, of which they produced papers from
Hanif Biswas. Total land shown by them in the applications is not correct and they
could not produce any khatiyans or other papers to prove ownership of these lands.
Saukat Ali s/o Tetlu Sk. of Khikirbona never appeared for the enquiry though
asked to. From records it was found that his declaration concerning the land is false.
Md. Taleb Ali Ansari s/o L.Sikandar Ali of Bhagalpur is now under MISA.
His declaration is also false.
From these enquiries the following conclusions can be drawn :-
1. The enquiring officer for CP loans is the A.E.O., Monomohan Biswas, who does not
seem to have done any enquiries into the CP cases of Nauda-Jadupur anchal at all. The
responsibility of double payments, and payment to non-eligible persons rests on the
enquiring officer. He admitted not to have made enquiries and to have acquiesced to the
double payment of loan to Abu Bakar Siddique under another name. The G.S., Sisir
Bhaduri was also in the know of this but neither seem to have asked the BDO before
indulging in such illegal activities.
2. Rigorous enquiries into the declaration of land in the application by loanees is necessary
since many cases have come out to be patently false, and the enquiring officer not to have
discharged his functions at all.
3. The persons who deliberately gave false declaration (see 4 & 5 above) should be
proceeded against strictly under the I.P.C. section 199 in order to stop the defrauding of
public money. These people claimed they had given Rs.50 each to the G.S. in order to get
these loans on basis of the false declarations. They could not produce any evidence to
prove this statement which was denied by the G.S. who has been given a sterling
character by the B.D.O .s he previously worked under (Harishchandrapur-I).
4. Rigorous enquiries are required into the case of the non-existent Safiruddin (see 2 above)
and payment to Hafizuddin.
5. Further enquiry is needed to find out what happened to the original applications in names
of Salam Sk., Halu Sk. & Hafizuddin s/o Abdul Latif, which were obviously in existence
as per G.S. Anil Baran Sen’s and numerous other people’s testimony. The entire office
procedure needs to be checked to find out if these bonds could be destroyed without
knowledge of the Head Clerk and whether fresh bonds were made later and money
disbursed by the H.C. or anyone else.
6. The BDO seems just to have signed blindly wherever the AEO had recommended a case
without ever making any sample check. He should be brought alive to his duties. He can
not escape responsibility simply by pleading that he is not enquiring officer but
disbursing authority only.
Submitted for orders,
Yours faithfully,
Pradip Bhattacharya
Encl: Petition
Proceedings of enquiry
JLRO’s information
4 reports of G.S. A.B. Sen, Safiruddin, Hafizuddin, Salam & Halu
17 CP loan cases
Pradhan’s List