30.06.2013 Views

ANNALS ANNALES - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

ANNALS ANNALES - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

ANNALS ANNALES - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mărgărit Pavelescu, Alexandru Octavian Pavelescu, Ioan Ursu 50<br />

The suggested approach was to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the characteristics of the IRC of a type of a<br />

high isolation site -HIS- that would be intrinsically safe and to then look for its<br />

characteristics signature worldwi<strong>de</strong> (McCombie , 2001).<br />

3. IDEAL REPOSITORY CONCEPT<br />

There is one way to substitute the sophisticated engineered barriers, namely to take<br />

into account a site with simple geological structure and minimal groundwater<br />

movement. In<strong>de</strong>ed, in this case the geological conditions in these regions would give<br />

high assurance that the wastes are isolated from the environment and provi<strong>de</strong> the<br />

main component of a safety case, thus avoi<strong>din</strong>g the requirement for complex<br />

engineered solutions.<br />

Therefore, in such cases it is much easier and not consuming time to fully<br />

characterize the site. The following characteristics of the IRC might be i<strong>de</strong>ntified:<br />

1) simple and stable geology;<br />

2) arid climate stable over hundreds of thousands of years with minimal<br />

infiltration water to the rock;<br />

3) minimal movements of groundwater and no direct groundwater pathways from<br />

the repository level to the surface;<br />

4) absence of ice cover in recent or future glaciating;<br />

5) extremely low recor<strong>de</strong>d seismic activity and negligible uplift or erosion rates;<br />

6) low population <strong>de</strong>nsity;<br />

7) absence of significant of mineral or water resources;<br />

8) minimal potential for inadvertent future human intrusion.<br />

The performance assessment of the IRC may be much simpler that of the CRC. This<br />

is because much of the safety case for high isolation site which is IRC will consists of<br />

<strong>de</strong>monstrating that the conventional processes of transport by moving groundwater,<br />

which must be quantified at conventional sites, will not significantly affect the performance<br />

of the IRC.<br />

The <strong>de</strong>monstration will be based on quantitative interpretations of the measured data<br />

sets, but also on the consi<strong>de</strong>ration of the fundamental physics and chemistry of<br />

transport processes and on direct <strong>de</strong>termination of the age of the site groundwater.<br />

Fundamental characteristics of high isolation site -HIS- that will simplify the safety<br />

assessment are the spatial homogeneity resulting from the simpler geological<br />

structure and their extrapolation in time resulting from the geological stability.<br />

However, there will be important technical issues to resolve.<br />

One is that at IRC the impacts of the repository itself cannot initiate any significant<br />

transport of radioactive waste. The repository generates heat for the first few<br />

thousand years and it will have to <strong>de</strong>monstrate that this heat will not cause damage<br />

to any of the barriers, nor cause groundwater convections cells, which could<br />

transport radioactivity to the biosphere.<br />

Finally, another great advantage of the IRC is the retreavability. This implies<br />

implementing a repository that allows for the possibility that a future society might<br />

want to recover the disposed wastes.<br />

One possible explanation for such an intention could be, for instance, to recover the<br />

unburned energy in once through nuclear power systems where less than 10% of the<br />

potential energy is extracted from the fuel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!