Wind Hazard Risk Assessment and Management for Structures

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LIST OF FIGURES xii 4.11 Study area of a residential development of 358 houses in Sarasota County, Florida and simulated storm track of Hurricane Charley of 2004. . . . . . . 90 4.12 Comparison of the estimated wind damage condition of the residential development in Sarasota County, Florida, under a Hurricane Charley wind condition, by time series and maximum wind analyses. . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 4.13 Comparison of subassembly and overall damage ratios between time-series and maximum-wind damage analyses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 5.1 Distribution of Gumbel distribution parameters λ and µ of extreme wind speed data in 129 stations over the contiguous United States. . . . . . . . . 100 5.2 Two sample results of the hazard model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 5.3 Vulnerability curves of the single-limit-state deterministic model. . . . . . . 103 5.4 Mean total discounted repair cost in 36 different climate change scenarios. . 104 5.5 Percentage difference in mean total discounted repair costs between 36 different climate change scenarios and the ‘no climate change’ scenario. . . . . 105 5.6 Mean total discounted repair cost in 36 different climate change scenarios. . 107 5.7 Percentage difference in mean total discounted repair costs between 36 different climate change scenarios and the ‘no climate change’ scenario. . . . . 108 5.8 Ratios of the total mean discounted repair costs attributed to the uncertainty in parameters to that attributed to the mean value of parameters. . . . . . 110 5.9 Ratios of the standard deviations of the discounted repair cost attributed to the uncertainty in parameters to that attributed to the mean value of parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 5.10 Four sample simulations showing the effects of resistance deterioration in two different climate scenarios. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.11 Minimization of life-cycle cost in two different climate scenarios. . . . . . . 114
LIST OF FIGURES xiii 5.12 Examples of vulnerability curves of the modified Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 5.13 Expected total repair cost of a one-story hip-roof concrete-block house over 129 geographic locations in contiguous United States in nine different future climate scenarios. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 5.14 Expected total repair cost related to structural damage: (a) hip roof vs. gable roof (b) tiles vs. shingles (c) shutters vs. no shutters. . . . . . . . . . 119 5.15 Vulnerability curves and total expected repair cost related to structural damage of a concrete-block house at four different geographic locations. . . . . . 120 5.16 Vulnerability curves and total expected repair cost related to structural damage of a wood-frame house at four different geographic locations. . . . . . . 121
Page 1 and 2: Wind Hazard Risk Assessment and Man
Page 3 and 4: Abstract Rising hurricane damages o
Page 5 and 6: me, has given me countless fun time
Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS vii 2.2.4 Mean Boundary La
Page 9 and 10: CONTENTS ix 5.3 Hazard model . . .
Page 11: LIST OF FIGURES xi 3.4 Distribution
Page 15 and 16: 1.1 Overview Chapter 1 Introduction
Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1. Introduction 3 fessions
Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1. Introduction 5 Table 1.3
Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1. Introduction 7 Between 7
Page 23 and 24: 1.2.4 Recent Developments Chapter 1
Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1. Introduction 11 of low-r
Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2 Structural Components and
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 2. Structural Components an
Page 31 and 32: (deg) V (m/s) 60 40 20 0 180 90 0 9
Page 49 and 50: NEGATIVE WALL PRESSURE (COV = 0.509
Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3. Internal Pressure in Low
Page 61 and 62: design guidelines. Chapter 3. Inter
Page 63 and 64:
3.4.3 Eurocode Chapter 3. Internal
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 3. Internal Pressure in Low
Page 67 and 68:
Wind Speed & Wind Direction Chapter
Page 69 and 70:
(a) STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 (b) STEP 1
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Mean Loss Ratio WITHOUT WINDBORNE D
Page 77 and 78:
Maximum Percentage Increase in Mean
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
3.8 Discussion Chapter 3. Internal
Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 4 Integrated Multi-Structur
Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 4. Integrated Multi-Structu
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
LEGEND Roof sheathing onnection ind
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
DAMAGE ANALYIS USING MAXIMUM WIND V
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 5. Long-Term Risk Assessmen
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
(a) Change in Mean Frequency / Year
Page 121 and 122:
(a) Change in Mean Frequency / Year
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
simulated. Chapter 5. Long-Term Ris
Page 131 and 132:
Percentage Change in Mean Frequency
Page 133 and 134:
Expected Total Structural Damage Co
Page 135 and 136:
Structural Damage Ratio 1 0.9 0.8 0
Page 137 and 138:
Chapter 6 Conclusions and Future Wo
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 6. Conclusions and Future W
Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 6. Conclusions and Future W
Page 143 and 144:
Bibliography American Meteorologica
Page 145 and 146:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 131 Federal Emergency
Page 147 and 148:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 133 over the gulf of S
Page 149 and 150:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 135 Lin, N., Vanmarcke
Page 151 and 152:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 137 Rosowsky, D. and C
Page 153:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 139 Vanmarcke, E., Lin
show all

Wind Hazard Risk Assessment and Management for Structures

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?