MEETING MINUTES - blogs - Oregon State University

MEETING MINUTES
Submitted By: Jennie Cambier
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY - Student Experience Center/Memorial Union
Project No. 4509-01 m.f. 2.04
Pre-DD Start up Meeting
Meeting Date: Wednesday June 6, 2012
ACTION ITEMS:
OSU Action Items:
General (L.E.)
Schedule pre-development meeting with City
Confirm antenna status with CPC – opsis can update drawings based on whether antennas
should stay on SEC
Provide opsis with campus-wide exterior environment accessibility report
Confirm revised CPC meeting dates for SEC
Confirm CPC meeting date for MU
Confirm HRC date for SEC
Engage commissioning agent
Review project schedule
SEC
Fee-Impact Committee to determine whether SEC need revenue-generating space (retail, not
food service)
Confirm status of DJ booth on level 1
MU
Provide inventory of loading dock equipment (trash, recycling, grease bin etc) – all to be located
outside the building & screened from view
Confirm multipurpose space storage needs
Confirm food service equipment, kitchen requirements
Provide Building Services information for basement
Craft Center
Space Allocation Planning Committee (SAPC) will review storage needs in basement and
determine final Craft Center and storage square footages
Opsis Action Items:
General:
Review OSU Accessibility Best Practices and compile list of questions
Update CPC images with/without antennas pending Larrie’s confirmation
Coordinate budget review meeting in Portland in the next 2 weeks
Provide canopy design narrative for CPC
Review project schedule
Coordinate meetings to review VE logs, technology consultant w/ Larrie

Send Larrie SD Wrap-Up Documents list
SEC
Provide updated sketches of each level for June 15 SD Wrap-Up Package
MU
Provide dimensioned food service plan for Robyn (Option 2D)
Confirm vestibules needed for north porch with PAE
Provide updated sketches for June 15 SD Wrap-Up Package
LEED/Sustainability:
Review credits discussed and update checklists
Prep for sustainability workshop for DD
Craft Center
Update plan, program areas based on SAPC recommendation
Andersen Action Items:
Update MU VE “menu” options
Review project schedule
Determine antenna cost
Page 2 of 4
04.11.2012
4509-01
MEETING MINUTES:
Pre-Meeting:
Opsis will coordinate budget review meeting in Portland in the next 2 weeks
CPC has cancelled the June 25 meeting. Larrie to confirm new date. Michael mentioned the MU
will want to get into the CPC sooner rather than later. Date needs to be confirmed.
Andersen will have MUE costing update early next week
Opsis will provide a canopy design narrative to the CPC
Overall schedule needs more review and input from OSU, opsis, ACCO
July 11 is target start date for DD meetings at OSU.
SEC:
Food service in NW Corner or SW corner presented
o Outcome of discussion is no food service in SEC. Suggest plumbing IRC to support
coffee house events, etc. This would include a sink and countertop—i.e. small galley
kitchen.
Fee-Impact Committee needs to determine whether revenue generation is needed in SEC. If
there is no food service revenue then some alternatives floated included satellite bookstore space
or other retail.
East vestibule access not needed into IRC
o Opsis to confirm second exit requirements
DJ booth status in lounge is still TBD – OSU to confirm
Stair 3 study (moving east one bay) was discussed
o Stair 3 will stay in its current location
o Opsis will work on furniture layouts for lounges in DD to give a better idea of how to
program open spaces
Level 3 – for SD wrap-up the conference room will stay where it is. All offices capped at 150 SF.
In DD opsis will study how AABC and ASOSU Legal (OA/LA) might take advantage of flex space.
SIFC office on Level 2 needs to move – this will be updated in DD.
Level 4 – reception and equipment checkout will be flipped so reception is at the end of the
hallway that goes north-south
opsis architecture LLP

Page 3 of 4
04.11.2012
4509-01
MU:
Three options were presented for ground floor multipurpose layouts. Deb selected Option 3 (one
large MP space)
o AV and storage needs TBD
Trash, recycling, grease containment – all need to be located near loading dock, outside of the
building and screened from view. OSU to provide inventory of equipment, bins etc.
Loading dock infill (1:16 ramp to sidewalk) preferred. Deb would like double doors to storage on
the west wall of the loading area
TBD spaces (currently building services offices and shop) to be storage for Events and Food
Service
o Building Services offices to be demo’d, space shelled with lockable cages for storage
Mezzanine level options for food service at north porch were presented.
350 SF is too small for food service
Option 2D was preferred for greatest food service area
o Opsis will send Robyn a dimensioned plan
o Robyn will compile equipment list, provide additional info on kitchen requirements
Exterior NE Ramp will not be required
Most likely the seating and circulation space will want to expand into the north vestibule
(additional 425 SF) – pending costing
The event space will need an AV closet similar to the Journey Room with a sliding AV rack
Opsis will confirm with PAE whether vestibules are required at north porch. Doors should be
added south of the ramp for thermal/energy reasons
Building Services would like wall space in the loading dock for storage
Building Services space in basement needs to be vetted
o Sid will send Larrie a “wish list” / space layout
o Exhaust needs should be determined
Scope based on B&D programming was reviewed. The current AABC space will mostly stay as-is
(walls to remain) with the Men’s restroom becoming storage space for laptops and tech
equipment
LEED/Sustainability:
SEC will be USGBC certified Gold
MU will use LEED guidelines but will not submit for certification
The project checklist was reviewed
Corvallis has a dark sky requirement – opsis will confirm whether SSc8 can be met (Light
Pollution Reduction)
OSU will engage a commissioning agent
Brandon (SSI) would like to determine amount of PV panels on building if EAc2 is pursued (On-
Site Renewable Energy). Opsis will coordinate with PAE to calculate 1% of annual building
energy cost to determine amount (1 point)
OSU agreed EAc5 (Measurement & Verification) can be met
EAc6 (Green Power) can probably be met. OSU currently buys renewable energy certificates that
cover about 95% of campus energy needs. The decision is made on an annual basis and will
most likely be bought to cover the SEC.
Hauling away construction materials to Portland to be recycled might not be cost effective. This
credit may need to be scaled back (MRc2 Construction Waste Management) to 1 point Yes, 1
point yes-maybe
ID credits were discussed. Green Housekeeping is already being used on campus and Kent’s
group can develop graphics for building systems education. Opsis will send a list of ID credits for
OSU to review.
Brandon expressed a desire for more of a process-based approach to determining sustainability
goals and priorities for the SEC, separate from the LEED certification process.
o Opsis will prepare for a 2 hour sustainability workshop to take place during a DD meeting
day
opsis architecture LLP

Page 4 of 4
04.11.2012
4509-01
Craft Center/Basement:
Opsis presented diagrams showing the history of basement space allocation
o The Craft center space has increased while storage space has decreased. The Space
Allocation and Planning Committee (SAPC) will review program needs and provide final
square footage
Sid would like to keep MU storage (1500 SF) for now
Retail storage (500 SF) is TBD, pending outcome of Student Fee Impact Committee revenue
analysis
The Craft Center provided an updated layout based on Option 3 (presented on 5/23).
Bathroom access is a concern. CC would prefer to shorten the distance from the CC to restrooms
for safety reasons.
After-hours access with key cards was a concern to CC
Accessibility in the CC was brought up at the Accessibility Workshop on 5/23. Kent has engaged
the Disability Access Services group on campus to review the space
Opsis will update the plan, square-footage numbers and program spreadsheet based on info from
the SAPC
Ventilation requirements will be reviewed with PAE in DD
Wrap-Up:
Next steps include understanding hours of operation, security, access, recycling program etc.
East entry appears to be a good after-hours entry because of its proximity to the elevators. There
will need to be a gate preventing access to the rest of the building and a security camera.
OSU needs to understand the financial impact of the antenna on the SEC in order to determine
whether it is in or out of the project
DD meetings will get into building system development as well as individual group meetings to
work out office spaces. Larrie proposed coming to Portland on alternate Wednesdays to review
building systems so time in Corvallis can be spent with user groups.
Andersen would like to meet with KPFF to work through VE list (braced frames are a big cost
item)
PAE needs to assist the MU with water volume concerns
Opsis will look into LEED-EB for the MU
Opsis will coordinate technology consultant review in Portland with Larrie
Opsis will deliver SD Wrap-Up documents on June 15
o (1) full sized set will be delivered to OSU
o PDFs will go on FTP site
o The set will have sheets fully updated with sketches – no loose 8 ½ x 11—and will not
include previous SD sheets from 2011
opsis architecture LLP

MEETING AGENDA
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY - Student Experience Center/Memorial Union
Project No. 4509-01 m.f. 2.04
Pre-Start up Meeting
Meeting Date: Wednesday June 6, 2012
8:30 – 9:00 Pre-Meeting with Michael Henthorne and Larrie Easterly
Discuss objectives for day
Review agenda
CPC update
Confirm DD meeting schedule
Discuss SD closeout
Review SEC VE log
Review MUE costs
9:00 – 10:00 SEC First Floor
Review food service, lounge, IRC, vending machines
Review Stair 3 study
10:00 – 12:00 B&D Recap, MU East Wing & Kitchen Discussion
Review B&D programming from 5/29
Review north porch options
Review multipurpose space options
12:30 – 1:00 Break
1:00 – 2:00 LEED / Sustainability Discussion
Review scorecard
Review sustainability objectives / goals
2:00 – 3:00 Craft Center
Review program and square footages
3:00 – 3:30 Wrap-Up with Michael Henthorne, Opsis, OSU, Andersen

Item Current Design Description Proposed Cost Revision Item Description
Cost Impact
Add/(Deduct)
Largest
Possible
Savings
Recommended
by OPSIS
Discussion Items
(on the fence)
STRUCTURE
001 Cast in Place concrete shear walls with architectural finish Braced Frames with reduced Mat Foundation ($763,035) ($763,035) ($763,035)
002 Cast in Place concrete structural flat slab at ground floor Steel Framed Ground Floor with slab on metal deck,
gypboard ceiling, and additional 1'-0" depth to basement
003 Atrium opening framed with no exposed columns, with Simplify steel structure at atrium framing, allow for 1.0 lb
long cantelevered portions
per sf of steel framing area savings
004 Stair No. 4 included per addendum at a total cost of
$121,800 including support cables, wood treads and
railings
005 Slab on Grade included at 6" thick per Schematic Design
Documents
006 Cast in Place concrete structural flat slab at ground floor
included as 14" thick per Schematic Design Documents
007 Floating Floor System included at Radio studios as well
as TV studios per Schematic Design Documents
008
FAÇADE & ROOFING
001 Mechanical screen included inside mansard roof area Omit mechanical screening inside mansard roof area,
assume equipment hidden by mansard roof
002 Mechanical screen included inside mansard roof area Go to Equipment Mounted Screen Panels in lieu of
separate framed mechanical screen
003 Fritted Horizontal Glass Sunshades included per window
details at all window types except type A
004 Fritted Horizontal Glass Sunshades included per window
details at all window types except type A
005 Fritted Horizontal Glass Sunshades included per window
details at all window types except type A
006 Fritted Horizontal Glass Sunshades included per window
details at all window types except type A
007 Precast Vertical Sunshades included per window details at
window types B & E
NOT
Recommended
by OPSIS
PRELIMINARY
Accepted
Date
Accept/
Reject
Action
Required
By
Action
Due By Notes
($74,787) ($74,787) ($74,787) ######## Potentially review areas where ceiling is required, minimize amount of ceiling
to get additional savings
($101,340) ($101,340) ($101,340)
Set allowance for Stair No. 4 at $50,000 all inclusive ($71,800) ($71,800) ($71,800) ########
Reduce Slab on Grade to 4" thick ($20,451) ($20,451) ($20,451) ########
Reduce CIP Ground Floor structural slab to 12" thick ($24,024) Accepted other item ########
Omit Floating Floor System at Radio studios ($31,020) ($31,020) Rejected ########
Omit glass sunshades completely from project ($131,984) ($131,984)
($1,086,457) ($1,062,433) $0 ($864,375) $0 ($167,038)
($151,235) ($151,235) Accepted other item ########
($94,456) ($94,456) ########
Omit glass sunshades at all windows on East elevation ($22,141) ($22,141) ########
Omit glass sunshades at all windows on North elevation ($38,229) ($38,229) ########
Omit glass sunshades at all windows on West elevation ($21,277) Look at omitting the first floor sunshades on the west that may be shaded by the canopy
Omit Precast Vertical Sunshades at all window types ($78,925) ($78,925) ($78,925)
008 Precast Gutter included per detail 10/A6.11 Go to copper gutter to match mansard roof ($60,320) ($60,320) ($60,320) ########
009 Precast included per Schematic Design Documents Reduce projection of precast window surrounds to 3" in
lieu of 6"
($16,320) ($16,320) ($16,320)
010 Precast included per Schematic Design Documents Go to Arcis type panel at 4th floor flat panel locations ($88,078) ($88,078) ($88,078) ########
011 Precast included per Schematic Design Documents Go to Brick Veneer in lieu of Precast Flat Panels at North-
East corner, ground to level 2
012 Precast included per Schematic Design Documents Go to Brick Veneer in lieu of Precast Flat Panels at East
Elevation, level 2 to 4 between grids A.5 and B
013 Precast included per Schematic Design Documents Omit Precast Frame/Border at Ground to Level 2 and go
to full brick veneer
Student Experience Center
Cost Revision Log - July 7, 2011 Schematic Estimate
8/12/2011 - Rev 4/19/12 - Rev 5/29/12
($10,185) ($10,185) ($10,185) ########
($7,182) ($7,182) ($7,182) ########
($46,114) ($46,114) ($46,114)
Page 1 of 4

Item Current Design Description Proposed Cost Revision Item Description
014 Precast Soffit panels at West Entry (detail 1/A4.35)
included per Schamtic Design Documents
Go to Plaster Soffit at West Entry (detail 1/A4.35) from
line of precast column covers to face of building/windows
Cost Impact
Add/(Deduct)
Student Experience Center
Cost Revision Log - July 7, 2011 Schematic Estimate
8/12/2011 - Rev 4/19/12 - Rev 5/29/12
Largest
Possible
Savings
Recommended
by OPSIS
Discussion Items
(on the fence)
NOT
Recommended
by OPSIS
PRELIMINARY
Accepted
Date
Accept/
Reject
Action
Required
By
Action
Due By Notes
($15,210) ($15,210) ($15,210) ######## Price copper as an alternate add to the project
015 Mansard Roofing included as copper panel system Go to painted Kynar metal roofing system ($89,810) ($89,810) ($89,810) ########
016 Aluminum Clad Wood Windows included per Schematic
Design Documents
017
INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION & FINISHES
001 Railings at Atrium included at budget allowance of $500
per lineal foot
002 Acoustic Wall Panel No. 2 included in Schematic
Estimate as wood panel at $38.00 per square foot
003 Wood Scrim included per Schematic Design documents at
interior windows facing Atrium
004 Kitchenette casework allowances included at $20,000 per
Schematic Design Documents
005 Wood Framed window system included at all interior
windows above basement
006 Ceiling C2 included per Schamtic Design documents as
50% Wood Ceiling with 50% Radiant Panel Ceiling
007 Stained & Polished concrete flooring included in public
areas per Schamtic Design documents
007 Stained & Polished concrete flooring included in public
areas per Schamtic Design documents
008 Horizontal Sliding Fire Door included at Stair No. 1 from
Basement to Ground Floor
009 Toilet Accessories included in Schematic Design Estimate
as CFCI
010 Standard grab bars included at GN restrooms and Men's
and Women's restrooms
011 Standard non-power assisted swing doors included at GN
restrooms and Basement Men's and Women's
012
CONVEYING SYSTEMS
001
002
003
Go to Aluminum Window System equal to Kawneer
Trifab VG 451T as specified in Section 08 41 13
Set design allowance at $300 per lineal foot for Railings
at Atrium
Revise AWP 2 to a fabric wrapped panel at design
allowance of $10.00 per square foot
($36,795) ($36,795) ($36,795)
($908,261) ($732,158) $0 ($178,154) $0 ($425,611)
($45,400) ($45,400) ($45,400) ########
($37,030) ($37,030) ($37,030) ########
Omit Wood Scrim from project ($169,275) ($169,275) ($169,275)
Reduce allowance to $5,000 for casework at Kitchenettes ($42,700) ($42,700) ($42,700) ########
Go to Aluminum Framed interior window system ($454,382) ($454,382) ($454,382)
Revise Ceiling C2 to 50% Painted Gypboard Ceiling with
50% Radiant Panel Ceiling (No Wood Ceiling)
Go to Sheet Vinyl/Marmoleum flooring in lieu of
stained/polished concrete
Go to Polished ONLY, no staining Pending Pending Pending
Revise Framing to allow Stair No. 1 from Basement to
Ground Floor to be closed off by Total Door System
swinging doors
Toilet Accessories to be provided by OSU, and to be
Installed by Andersen (OFCI)
ADD PT Rails at ADA stalls in GN restrooms and Men's
and Women's restrooms
ADD Infrared Access Operators to GN restrooms and
Basement Men's and Women's doors
($132,924) ($132,924) ($66,462) ($66,462) ########
($145,565) ($145,565) ($145,565) First floor to be polished concrete, remainder of areas (upper) to be marmolium
($68,500) ($68,500) ($68,500) ########
($3,025) ($3,025) Rejected ########
$6,000 Rejected ########
$52,500 $52,500 ########
($1,040,301) ($1,098,801) $0 ($835,684) $0 ($207,592)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Page 2 of 4

Item Current Design Description Proposed Cost Revision Item Description
FIRE PROTECTION
001 Fire Pump included in Schmatic Design Estimate, based
upon assumption that flow testing may require one
002 Inergen Clean Agent included at the MDF room 27 in the
basement and IT Equip 427, Small TV Control 158, and
Large TV Control 413 on the 4th Floor per the Schematic
Design Documents
003 Tyco WS Sprinklers included at Atrium Glass system on
both sides of glass
004 Tyco WS Sprinklers included at Atrium Glass system on
both sides of glass
005
MECHANICAL (PLUMBING & HVAC)
001 Radiant Panel Ceiling system included per Mechanical
Narrative in Schematic Design Documents
002 Radiant Panel Ceiling system included per Mechanical
Narrative in Schematic Design Documents with 10,000 sf
of inactive panels
003 Cooling Tower capacity included to allow for future work
at Memorial Union
Omit Fire Pump from scope based upon assumption that
flow testing WILL NOT REQUIRE one
Omit Inergen Clean Agent systems and go to Pre-Action
systems at all of these locations
Omit Tyco WS Sprinklers at Atrium Glass system, based
upon assumption that no special fire sprinkler protection
is required
Apply for a variance with Fire Mashall and go to fire
sprinklers spaced every 6' on center on both sides of glass
in soffits in lieu of Tyco WS Sprinklers
Revise Radiant Panel Ceilings per updated sketches and
panel specifications from Opsis
Omit inactive panels and create clouds of only active
panels
Reduce Cooling Tower by 15% with allowance for future
expansion
Cost Impact
Add/(Deduct)
Student Experience Center
Cost Revision Log - July 7, 2011 Schematic Estimate
8/12/2011 - Rev 4/19/12 - Rev 5/29/12
Largest
Possible
Savings
Recommended
by OPSIS
Discussion Items
(on the fence)
($62,553) ($62,553) ($62,553)
NOT
Recommended
by OPSIS
PRELIMINARY
Accepted
Date
Accept/
Reject
($94,836) ($94,836) ($94,836) ########
($35,175) ($35,175)
($14,070) ($14,070) ########
($206,634) ($192,564) $0 ($62,553) $0 ($108,906)
Pending Pending
($119,000) ($119,000) ($119,000)
004 Air Cooled Chillers vs Water Cooled Chillers Pending Pending
005
ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE
001 Security and Access Control not included in Schematic
Design Estimate for Electrical/Low Voltage
002 Campus Inter-Ties not included in Schematic Design
Estimate for Electrial/Low Voltage
003 Audio Visual Equipment and Cabling not included in
Schematic Design Estimate for Electrical/Low Voltage
004 Lighting & Lighing Control included at a value equal to
$11.20/GSF
005
($59,340) ($59,340) ($59,340) ########
($178,340) ($178,340) $0 ($119,000) $0 ($59,340)
Action
Required
By
Action
Due By Notes
ADD Security and Access Control bsed upon 20 doors $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 ######## Verify amount
ADD Campus Inter-Ties Allowance $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 ######## Verify amount and location to pull from
ADD Audio Visual Equipment and Cabling not included
in Schematic Design Estimate for Electrical/Low Voltage
ADD Lighting & Lighting Control to create a unit cost
equal to $13.00/GSF
$170,000 $170,000 $170,000 ########
$167,362 $167,362 Verify amount
$547,362 $380,000 $0 $167,362 $0 $380,000
Page 3 of 4

Item Current Design Description Proposed Cost Revision Item Description
SITEWORK
001 Canopy included per Addendum No. 3 of the Schematic
Design Documents
002 Canopy included per Addendum No. 3 of the Schematic
Design Documents
003 Vehicular Mortar Set Concrete Unit Pavers & Brick
Pavers with reinforced concrete subsurface slab included
per Schematic Design Documents
004 Excavation Shoring included on North and West sides of
Building
Omit Canopy from project completely. Bid the Canopy as
an Alternate Add to the project
Revise Canopy & reduce in size per sketches received in email
from Opsis dated July 20, 2011
Revise site plaza paving to Vehicular Concrete Paving
with Broom Finish
Omit Excavation Shoring on West side of Building, allow
open cut and reduction of laydown area in Plaza area
005 Stone Column design allows for liquifaction in soil Omit allowance for liquifaction in Stone Columns,
pending confirmation of Geotechnical Report
Cost Impact
Add/(Deduct)
Student Experience Center
Cost Revision Log - July 7, 2011 Schematic Estimate
8/12/2011 - Rev 4/19/12 - Rev 5/29/12
Largest
Possible
Savings
Recommended
by OPSIS
006 Add "offsite" ADA parking - add'l 11 spaces Pending Pending
007
GENERAL ITEMS
001 Building Gross Area included per Andersen Take-Off in
Schematic Design Documents at 93,082 GSF
002 Craft Center is included in the Basement per the
Schematic Design Documents
003 Building Floor to Floor Heights are included at 15'-0"
from Ground to 2nd, 13'-0" from 2nd to 3rd, 13'-0" from
3rd to 4th, and 13'-6" from 4th to Roof, per Schematic
Design Documents
004 Escalation addumed to be at an annual rate of 3.0%, with
the assumption that bidding tosubcontractors would
occurr in Jan/Feb or 2012, therefore 1.5% escalation was
included in Schematic Design Estimate
005
Reduce Building Gross Area to 89,641 GSF (area
reduction of 3,779 GSF)
Shell the Craft Center in the Basement. Omit all
mechanical and electrical equipment as well as finishes.
Stair No. 1 from Basement to Ground Level will be
omitted and a block out left in the Ground Level slab.
Vertical mechanical shafts will be built with ductwork
installed.
Reduce overall Building Height by 1'-6", possibly by
reducing the Floor to Floor Height by 6" at each level
from 2nd floor to Roof.
Revise Escalation to 12 months from time of SD Estimate
(assumed subcontractor bidding in mid 2012), go to 3.0%
escalation in lieu of 1.5%
Discussion Items
(on the fence)
NOT
Recommended
by OPSIS
PRELIMINARY
Accepted
Date
Accept/
Reject
Action
Required
By
Action
Due By Notes
($1,812,391) ($1,812,391) Revised from August 2011 - omitted based upon understanding that the
smaller canopy is desired to be kept
($501,028) ($501,028) ######## Revised from August 2011 -ACCEPTED based upon understanding that the
smaller canopy is desired to be kept, so savings can be taken for smaller
canopy
($148,943) ($148,943) ($148,943) ########
($60,284) ($60,284) ($60,284) ########
($75,000) ($75,000) Rejected ######## Revised from August 2011 - omitted based upon further information from
Austin Hall site and requirement for liquifaction mitigation
($2,597,646) ($2,096,618) $0 $0 $0 ($710,255)
($377,900) ($377,900) ($377,900) ######## Pending how the area is reduced. This item could range from $50.00/GSF
direct cost to $150.00/GSF direct cost. $100.00 per GSF plugged into
spreadsheet at this time.
($1,237,828) ($1,237,828) Rejected ########
($70,783) ($70,783) ($70,783)
$510,118 Carried in OSU Budget This number will fluctuate depending upon the final Cost Revision Items
accepted. The base number represents no accepted Cost Revision Items.
($1,176,393) ($1,686,511) $0 ($70,783) $0 ($377,900)
Subtotal Direct Cost of Cost Revisions ($6,667,425) $0 ($1,963,187) $0 ($1,676,642)
Builders Risk Ins/Sub Bonds/GC Bonds ($160,018) $0 ($47,705) $0 ($40,742)
Construction Contingency ($200,023) $0 ($58,896) $0 ($50,299)
Contractor's Fee & Liability Insurance ($221,365) $0 ($65,198) $0 ($55,682)
Estimate Contingency ($362,442) $0 ($106,749) $0 ($91,168)
Escalation ($108,732) $0 ($32,025) $0 ($27,350)
Revised Cost Revisions incorporating Add-ons ($7,720,005) $0 ($2,273,760) $0 ($1,941,884)
Andersen Schematic Design Estimate (7/6/11) $36,218,396 $36,218,396
Less Cost Revisions Total ($7,720,005) ($1,941,884)
Revised EstimateTotal incorporating Cost Revisions $28,498,391 $34,276,512
PROJECT DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST GOAL $33,000,000 $33,000,000
Page 4 of 4