03.07.2013 Views

SHELL, NIGERIA AND THE OGONI. A STUDY IN UNSUSTAINABLE ...

SHELL, NIGERIA AND THE OGONI. A STUDY IN UNSUSTAINABLE ...

SHELL, NIGERIA AND THE OGONI. A STUDY IN UNSUSTAINABLE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>SHELL</strong>, <strong>NIGERIA</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>OGONI</strong> I<br />

In Ogoni a powerful example of such a<br />

movement emerged to agitate for Ogoni selfdetermination<br />

in order to bring an end to<br />

perceived ‘economic strangulation, environmental<br />

degradation and political marginalisation’<br />

(Saro-Wiwa, 1995a). With the established<br />

Nigerian political system having<br />

largely failed the Ogoni, they believed they<br />

had little choice but to revert to direct social<br />

action. The Ogoni movement decided to<br />

engage in a non-violent struggle drawing<br />

on the language of minority/indigenous<br />

peoples’ rights and social and ecological justice.<br />

In October 1990 they launched the<br />

Ogoni Bill of Rights. In the Bill, the Ogoni<br />

people, while underlining their loyalty to<br />

the Nigerian nation, asserted their right to<br />

self-determination and articulated their demands<br />

for environmental, social and economic<br />

justice (for a full text of the Bill, see<br />

MOSOP Canada, 1998b).<br />

The oil question was very prominent in<br />

the Ogoni Bill of Rights. Seven of its 20<br />

listed points dealt with the exploration of<br />

oil, the distribution of the revenue it generated<br />

and the relative poverty and neglect of<br />

Ogoni in contrast to the money oil resources<br />

generated for the Federation. Their frustration<br />

was illustrated by the following extract<br />

from the Bill, which notes:<br />

[I]n over 30 years of oil mining, the Ogoni<br />

nationality have provided the Nigerian<br />

nation with a total revenue estimated at<br />

over forty billion Naira, thirty billion dollars.<br />

That in return for the above contribution,<br />

the Ogoni people have received<br />

NOTH<strong>IN</strong>G (quoted in Saro-Wiwa, 1995a<br />

– original emphasis).<br />

Shortly after the proclamation of the<br />

Ogoni Bill of Rights, the signatories of the<br />

Bill established the Movement for the Survival<br />

of the Ogoni People (MOSOP), which<br />

soon became the main social movement organization<br />

voicing the demands articulated<br />

in the Bill of Rights (MOSOP Canada,<br />

1998a,b).<br />

In July 1992 Ken Saro-Wiwa, as the<br />

MOSOP spokesperson, presented the first international<br />

speech on the plight of the<br />

Ogoni people to the United Nations Working<br />

Group on Indigenous Populations. This<br />

began the linking of the Ogoni with international<br />

allies in the form of human rights organizations,<br />

minority rights organizations<br />

and indigenous peoples’ support groups<br />

world-wide (for example, Amnesty International,<br />

1994a,b,c,d; Rowell and Goodal, 1994;<br />

Human Rights Watch/Africa, 1995). In January<br />

1993, MOSOP was admitted as a member<br />

to the Unrepresented Nations and<br />

Peoples Organisation (UNPO). UNPO is an<br />

organization of nations and peoples not adequately<br />

represented in international fora<br />

such as the UN. With their UNPO admission<br />

the Ogoni received their first major<br />

global press exposure from outlets such as<br />

CNN and Time Magazine. The international<br />

media were only too happy to carry<br />

MOSOP’s accusations against Shell (see, for<br />

example, O’Sullivan, 1995; Hammer, 1996;<br />

Vidal, 1995).<br />

<strong>SHELL</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>OGONI</strong> <strong>IN</strong> DIRECT<br />

CONFLICT<br />

In December 1992, MOSOP issued a ‘demand<br />

notice’ to Shell, the Nigerian National<br />

Petroleum Corporation and Chevron, which<br />

gave them 30 days to respond to a list of<br />

demands that included payment of compensation<br />

for past damage and impacts of the<br />

oil activities (Saro-Wiwa, 1995a). Shell and<br />

the others did not respond and as a result<br />

they were declared ‘persona non grata’ by<br />

MOSOP on 4 January 1993, which was declared<br />

Ogoni Day. 300000 people peacefully<br />

marked the United Nations Year of Indigenous<br />

People. There was not a single reported<br />

incident of violence (Boele, 1995).<br />

However, that day, chants of ‘Say no to<br />

Shell!’ were heard at rallies throughout<br />

Ogoni.<br />

Shell had found tensions rising in Ogoni<br />

rising even before this (Boele, 1995) and officially<br />

withdrew all their staff from Ogoni in<br />

January 1993 after a worker was allegedly<br />

beaten (Boele, 1995). The Ogoni denied that<br />

staff were physically hurt but admit that<br />

Shell facilities were closed down.<br />

Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. Sust. Dev. 9, 74–86 (2001)<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!