Final Report - Claymore - Grand Valley State University
Final Report - Claymore - Grand Valley State University
Final Report - Claymore - Grand Valley State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.2 Estimated Design Score<br />
The design<br />
score depends on the cost, mass, build quality, technical<br />
quality, and number<br />
of targets hit. The estimated contest score is shown in Table<br />
2. The following equation was<br />
used to asses the overall score for the design.<br />
Score = H<br />
Where,<br />
−2<br />
4)<br />
H = targets hit in 2 minutes<br />
C = total cost of<br />
( 10)<br />
parts<br />
L = largest dimensions<br />
(<br />
c<br />
80<br />
−B<br />
( 10)<br />
(inches)<br />
B = build quality (1 = best, 0 = worst)<br />
T = Technical quality (1 = best, 0 = worst)<br />
M = mass of machine (Kg)<br />
−T<br />
( 2)<br />
L<br />
( )<br />
3<br />
M<br />
Table 2: Estimated contest score<br />
H 143<br />
C 98.6<br />
L 12<br />
B 1<br />
T 1<br />
M 0.985<br />
Estimated Score<br />
4<br />
0.0000409205101<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
The machine that was designed and built for the purpose of target acquisition and<br />
elimination,<br />
performed as expected. When a target became active the stepper quickly<br />
moved the barrel into position and a ball was fired at the target. Through the design,<br />
build,<br />
and implementation of this machine, certain conclusions were arrived upon.<br />
17