06.07.2013 Views

Final Report - Claymore - Grand Valley State University

Final Report - Claymore - Grand Valley State University

Final Report - Claymore - Grand Valley State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 Estimated Design Score<br />

The design<br />

score depends on the cost, mass, build quality, technical<br />

quality, and number<br />

of targets hit. The estimated contest score is shown in Table<br />

2. The following equation was<br />

used to asses the overall score for the design.<br />

Score = H<br />

Where,<br />

−2<br />

4)<br />

H = targets hit in 2 minutes<br />

C = total cost of<br />

( 10)<br />

parts<br />

L = largest dimensions<br />

(<br />

c<br />

80<br />

−B<br />

( 10)<br />

(inches)<br />

B = build quality (1 = best, 0 = worst)<br />

T = Technical quality (1 = best, 0 = worst)<br />

M = mass of machine (Kg)<br />

−T<br />

( 2)<br />

L<br />

( )<br />

3<br />

M<br />

Table 2: Estimated contest score<br />

H 143<br />

C 98.6<br />

L 12<br />

B 1<br />

T 1<br />

M 0.985<br />

Estimated Score<br />

4<br />

0.0000409205101<br />

4. Conclusions<br />

The machine that was designed and built for the purpose of target acquisition and<br />

elimination,<br />

performed as expected. When a target became active the stepper quickly<br />

moved the barrel into position and a ball was fired at the target. Through the design,<br />

build,<br />

and implementation of this machine, certain conclusions were arrived upon.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!