07.07.2013 Views

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in ... - ProDelphinus

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in ... - ProDelphinus

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in ... - ProDelphinus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 24 <strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Depredation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Bycatch</strong> <strong>in</strong> Pelagic Longl<strong>in</strong>e Fisheries<br />

There were some unique <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g longl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustry attitudes towards shark bycatch <strong>and</strong><br />

depredation that were held by a m<strong>in</strong>ority of respondents. One fisherman <strong>in</strong> the Hawaii-based longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

tuna fishery stated his view that sharks are a renewable natural resource, which should be managed for<br />

optimal yield as are other commercial mar<strong>in</strong>e resources, <strong>and</strong> that managers should <strong>in</strong>stitute a susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

shark management framework. Likewise, some Australian fishermen questioned why regulations restrict<br />

the retention <strong>and</strong> disposition of sharks but not other bycatch species. Some fishers <strong>in</strong> the Chile <strong>and</strong> Peru<br />

artisanal mahi mahi <strong>and</strong> shark longl<strong>in</strong>e fisheries expla<strong>in</strong>ed that dur<strong>in</strong>g the mahi mahi season, they would<br />

prefer to catch fewer sharks <strong>and</strong> more mahi mahi because the latter species is more valuable.<br />

6.2. Industry Practices<br />

Table 6.2 identifies practices that are <strong>in</strong> use by longl<strong>in</strong>e fishers to address shark <strong>in</strong>teractions with longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

gear. A practice is checked for a fishery only when the practice is employed predom<strong>in</strong>antly for the<br />

purpose of reduc<strong>in</strong>g shark <strong>in</strong>teractions, <strong>and</strong> not if the practice is primarily employed as a normal part of<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g operations to maximize catch rates of non-shark target species. Follow<strong>in</strong>g subsections discuss<br />

the results of Table 6.2.<br />

Fishermen identified numerous fish<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>and</strong> gear characteristics that they employ to maximize<br />

catch rates of non-shark target species, which may contribute to reduc<strong>in</strong>g shark catch rates. For<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, the depth of baited hooks; tim<strong>in</strong>g of gear sett<strong>in</strong>g, soak <strong>and</strong> haul<strong>in</strong>g; location of fish<strong>in</strong>g grounds <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to topographic <strong>and</strong> oceanographic features as well as sea surface temperature; type <strong>and</strong> size of<br />

bait <strong>and</strong> hook; selection of material for the leader on branch l<strong>in</strong>es; non-use of lightsticks; <strong>and</strong> other fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods <strong>and</strong> gear designs selected by fishermen to maximize their non-shark target species catch rates<br />

may be effective shark avoidance strategies. More research is needed to improve the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the shark avoidance efficacy of many of these practices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!