- Page 1 and 2: Changes to the Numbering of Regulat
- Page 6 and 7: Project team Author Marc Hébert, a
- Page 8 and 9: Table of contents Project team ....
- Page 10 and 11: 8.4.1 Criteria.....................
- Page 12: Table 10.3 Other FR spreading const
- Page 15 and 16: • composting in the field of less
- Page 17 and 18: • land application on farms; •
- Page 19 and 20: Guide de référence en fertilisati
- Page 21 and 22: Table 2.2 Guiding principles retain
- Page 24 and 25: 3 Main regulatory bodies This secti
- Page 26 and 27: Table 3.1 Professionals and technol
- Page 28: development of town planning which
- Page 31 and 32: Table 4.1 Activites exempt from sec
- Page 33 and 34: 4.2.4 Agricultural activities - Tra
- Page 35 and 36: Table 4.3 Low environmental risk sp
- Page 37 and 38: • manufacture of soil mixes from
- Page 39 and 40: justified and that supporting docum
- Page 41 and 42: 5.3.2 Processing of CA applications
- Page 43 and 44: Table 5.1 Excerpts from the Environ
- Page 46 and 47: 6 Required analyses The determinati
- Page 48 and 49: 6.2 Number of samples Table 6.2 ind
- Page 50 and 51: Table 6.4 Analyses of residuals and
- Page 52 and 53: 6.6.2 Sampling firms accredited by
- Page 54 and 55:
7 Agricultural value of residuals (
- Page 56:
Table 7.2 Mixes of residuals- possi
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 8.1 Possible uses of FR accor
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 8.2 Maximum limits for chemic
- Page 63 and 64:
If the long-term soil contaminant l
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 8.3 Residual quality criteria
- Page 67 and 68:
offensive odours when stored under
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 8.5 Odour criteria for limed
- Page 72 and 73:
9 Temporary storage 9.1 Duration Th
- Page 74 and 75:
• heaps must be as high and large
- Page 76:
Readers should consult reference do
- Page 79 and 80:
Nitrogen management is also more pr
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 10.2 Separation distances for
- Page 83 and 84:
10.4 Worker protection A survey of
- Page 86 and 87:
11 Soil application for silvicultur
- Page 88 and 89:
12 Other types of applications 12.1
- Page 90 and 91:
13 FR based soil mixes 13.1 General
- Page 92:
Table 13.1 Environmental quality cr
- Page 95 and 96:
14.2 On-farm composting of manures
- Page 98 and 99:
15 Other uses of FRs 15.1 Livestock
- Page 100:
Abbreviations and acronyms AEFP Agr
- Page 103 and 104:
calcareous amendment Soil liming am
- Page 105 and 106:
treatment of livestock waste gives
- Page 107 and 108:
establishments, except bed and brea
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix 1: Supplementary informati
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 6.2: Minimum number of sample
- Page 114 and 115:
• the difference in concentration
- Page 116 and 117:
The most toxic congeners, namely pl
- Page 118 and 119:
Paper mill biosolids not contaminat
- Page 120 and 121:
• ground frost, which increases t
- Page 122 and 123:
(Centre de recherche industrielle d
- Page 124 and 125:
Table 10.3: Spreading - Other const
- Page 126 and 127:
implement in practice. This is part
- Page 128 and 129:
Table A1.1 Table of maximum limit c
- Page 130 and 131:
Appendix 2: Justification of the mo
- Page 132 and 133:
material when these residuals are c
- Page 134 and 135:
not affected during field storage o
- Page 136 and 137:
d’Orléans where soils are subjec
- Page 138 and 139:
• Agronomists responsible for the
- Page 140:
Due to the high prices of all these
- Page 144 and 145:
Appendix 4: Independent quality con
- Page 146 and 147:
Appendix 5: N and P availability in
- Page 148 and 149:
Appendix 6: MDDEP requirements for
- Page 150:
Use of the resulting compost Farm c
- Page 153 and 154:
BIOREX (1994). Bilan massique de de
- Page 155 and 156:
CENTRE DE RÉFÉRENCE EN AGRICULTUR
- Page 157 and 158:
FORTIN, S.H. (2000). Rapport préli
- Page 159 and 160:
HOWARD, A. AND D. JOY (2005). Lime
- Page 161 and 162:
PAYMENT, P. (1993). Risques d'expos
- Page 163 and 164:
QUÉBEC, MINISTÈRE DE L’ENVIRONN
- Page 165 and 166:
SAUERBECK, D. R., AND R. LESCHBER (