13.07.2013 Views

PDF 3.08 MB

PDF 3.08 MB

PDF 3.08 MB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 2.4: Ostrom’s Design Principles<br />

These case studies indicate that operational rules of CPR institutions may vary from<br />

one institution to another, but there are certain design principles that are common to<br />

each ‘successful’ CPR organisation. By design principles, Ostrom refers to the<br />

conditions that must exist for the CPR regime to be successful.<br />

“By “design principle” I mean an essential element, or condition, that help to account<br />

for the success of these institutions in sustaining the CPRs and gaining the<br />

compliance of generation after generation of the appropriators to the rules in use.” 8<br />

These design principles are:<br />

1) The presence of clearly defined boundaries. The set of individuals or households<br />

who enjoy the right to appropriate from the resource stock must be clearly defined.<br />

Clear demarcation of the boundaries of the CPR is also necessary.<br />

2) Congruence between appropriation and provision9 rules and local conditions.<br />

Appropriation rules defining the time, place, technology and amount of resource that<br />

can be withdrawn should be related both to local conditions and to provision rules<br />

requiring contribution of labour, time and financial resources to maintain the<br />

resource.<br />

3) The existence of collective choice arrangements. Most individuals affected by the<br />

operational rules can participate in modifying the operational rules.<br />

4) Undertaking of monitoring activities. Monitors who actively audit CPR conditions<br />

and behaviour are accountable to the resource community, or are themselves<br />

resource appropriators.<br />

5) The presence of a system of graduated sanctions. Those members of the<br />

resource community who violate operational rules are likely to be sanctioned by<br />

other resource appropriators, by officials accountable to the community, or both. The<br />

sanctions are graduated according to the seriousness and context of he offence.<br />

This ensures quasi-voluntary compliance.<br />

8 Ostrom (1990) pp. 90.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!