19.07.2013 Views

Belay Zeleke Dilnesa - Eawag-Empa Library

Belay Zeleke Dilnesa - Eawag-Empa Library

Belay Zeleke Dilnesa - Eawag-Empa Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4 FE-CONTAINING HYDRATES IN HYDRATED CEMENT<br />

Thermodynamic calculations<br />

Thermodynamic modeling was performed to calculate the composition of hydrated<br />

synthetic Fe-cement in the presence of varying amounts of gypsum. The model predicted<br />

the formation of C-S-H, portlandite and Fe-siliceous hydrogarnet in the absence of<br />

gypsum (Fig. 86). It should be noted that in the presence of silica, no monosulfate but<br />

only ettringite formation was predicted if more sulfate is present in the system. Fe-<br />

siliceous hydrogarnet is calculated to be more stable than Fe-monosulfate under these<br />

conditions. As the amount of gypsum increased the formation of Fe-ettringite and finally<br />

the presence of unreacted gypsum was calculated. This is consistent with the XRD and<br />

TGA results (Fig. 85) though Fe-siliceous hydrogarnet was not observed. Fe-siliceous<br />

hydrogarnet was calculated to be unstable in the presence of gypsum and Fe-ettringite.<br />

cm 3 /100g<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Fe-Si-hydrogarnet<br />

portlandite<br />

Fe-ettringite<br />

C-S-H<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30<br />

Gypsum %<br />

40 50 60<br />

Gypsum<br />

Fig. 86 Calculated phase diagram of thermodynamic stable hydrate assemblages of synthetic Fe-<br />

cement with different amounts of gypsum.<br />

176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!