20.07.2013 Views

Download the Performance Management Fundamentals Guide

Download the Performance Management Fundamentals Guide

Download the Performance Management Fundamentals Guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

<strong>Fundamentals</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

© 2007 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Table of Contents<br />

About this eBook ................................................................................................ 1<br />

Distribution Copyrights ....................................................................................... 1<br />

Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2<br />

What is <strong>Performance</strong>? ........................................................................................ 2<br />

What is <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>? .................................................................. 2<br />

What is Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>? ................................................ 4<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model ................................................ 5<br />

Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis .................................. 7<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework .............................................................. 8<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Best Practices ........................................ 10<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis ......................... 22<br />

The Best Practices Roadmap ........................................................................... 24<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap .............................................................. 25<br />

Government <strong>Performance</strong> Framework ............................................................. 32<br />

Decision Support Systems ............................................................................... 45<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Methodologies .............................................................. 47<br />

Defining Phase ................................................................................................. 48<br />

Planning Phase ................................................................................................ 49<br />

Executing Phase ............................................................................................... 50<br />

Monitoring Phase .............................................................................................. 51<br />

Reporting Phase ............................................................................................... 52<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Templates ............................................................. 53<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Glossary ................................................................ 63<br />

Tables and Figures<br />

Figure 1 - The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model ......................................... 6<br />

Figure 2 - Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework .............................................................. 8<br />

Figure 3 - <strong>Performance</strong> Index Scoring Table .............................................................. 23<br />

Figure 4 - Best Practices Roadmap ............................................................................. 24<br />

Figure 5 - Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap ............................................................... 25<br />

Figure 6 - Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Methodologies ...................................................... 47<br />

© 2007 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved


About this eBook<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Hi and thank you for downloading my Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

<strong>Fundamentals</strong> <strong>Guide</strong>. This eBook will help you approach performance<br />

management more successfully by introducing <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Model and describing <strong>the</strong> best practices and key activities that<br />

make high performing organizations successful. By reading it you will learn<br />

<strong>the</strong> high-level processes necessary to ensure a smooth, successful<br />

performance initiative.<br />

You will also find out <strong>the</strong> essential plans, processes, technology and metrics<br />

to successfully manage your organization’s performance, whe<strong>the</strong>r it is<br />

employee/team performance, process improvement, systems performance,<br />

project performance, financial performance or <strong>the</strong> entire enterprise. This<br />

guide will walk you through <strong>the</strong> chapters of <strong>the</strong> 120 Day Plan: Step by Step<br />

<strong>Guide</strong> to Implementing a World Class <strong>Performance</strong> Solution and provide<br />

a look into <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap and some of my proven,<br />

performance management methodologies.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> complete Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit, including <strong>the</strong><br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework and Roadmap, <strong>the</strong> 300 page step by step<br />

implementation guide, 37 performance management templates and plans, <strong>the</strong><br />

120 Day <strong>Performance</strong> Plan in Microsoft Project, 600 performance metrics and<br />

KPIs, 30 illustrated step by step performance management processes, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Business Intelligence tools guide; all of which complement <strong>the</strong> high level<br />

processes outlined in this eBook, click here<br />

Also, check out my comprehensive and very informative Organizational<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis. It utilizes a performance index<br />

scoring system, a feasibility analysis, and an impact value analysis to identify<br />

cost savings opportunities and provide a custom, step-by-step roadmap for<br />

your organization to implement immediate performance improvements. It is a<br />

must have for organizations that are serious about understanding what makes<br />

<strong>the</strong>m tick.<br />

Distribution Copyrights<br />

This eBook has been provided to you free of charge, on <strong>the</strong> condition that it’s<br />

not copied, modified, published, sold, re-branded, hired out or o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

distributed for commercial purposes. Please feel free to distribute <strong>the</strong> URL<br />

to anybody who may be interested in downloading <strong>the</strong>ir own copy.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 1


Introduction<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

What is <strong>Performance</strong>?<br />

Organizational performance, in basic terms, is <strong>the</strong> actual output or results of<br />

an organization as measured against its intended outputs or goals and<br />

objectives. The key words here are “actual” and “intended”. When<br />

performance is at or above <strong>the</strong> intended goals, accomplishments are<br />

returned. When performance is below <strong>the</strong> intended goals, fewer<br />

accomplishments and more failures are <strong>the</strong> result. The more an organization<br />

can set near and long term goals, <strong>the</strong> more accurate performance can be<br />

measured.<br />

What is <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>?<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> management is <strong>the</strong> foundation of any organization that has a<br />

vision and knows where <strong>the</strong>y want to be in <strong>the</strong> near and long term future. As<br />

today’s rapidly evolving business environment challenges organizations to<br />

adapt to constant change, <strong>the</strong> need for organizations to be sure that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

projects and activities are aligned with overall strategic goals and business<br />

objectives is critical. <strong>Performance</strong> management is <strong>the</strong> gauge that lets you<br />

know whe<strong>the</strong>r or not you are reaching strategic goals and which areas within<br />

your service delivery could use improvement. <strong>Performance</strong> management<br />

also justifies whe<strong>the</strong>r or not your organization is getting its return on<br />

investments. Most important, performance management establishes a culture<br />

of high performance where <strong>the</strong> entire organization is synergistic towards<br />

reaching organizational objectives.<br />

By definition, performance management is <strong>the</strong> systematic process by which<br />

an organization involves its employees and all stakeholders in <strong>the</strong><br />

development and implementation of a plan to improve organizational<br />

effectiveness and reach organizational objectives. In 1883 Lord Kelvin, a<br />

leading physicist of <strong>the</strong> early 19 th century wrote:<br />

“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking<br />

about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it;<br />

but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in<br />

numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind;<br />

it may be <strong>the</strong> beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely in<br />

your thoughts advanced to <strong>the</strong> state of Science, whatever <strong>the</strong><br />

matter may be.”<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 2


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

In a nutshell, we implement performance management so that we can<br />

quantify in numbers how effective we are at what we do. Below is a list of<br />

additional advantages of implementing/re-establishing performance<br />

management in your organization.<br />

• Gains visibility into project execution and effectiveness<br />

• Analysis of process strengths and weaknesses<br />

• Metrics provide inputs for future estimations and planning<br />

• Metrics identify <strong>the</strong> areas for improvements<br />

• Metrics can be used to eliminate problem areas and root causes<br />

• Establishes a continuous improvement culture across <strong>the</strong> company<br />

• Helps management and employees make well-informed and decisions<br />

• Measures at <strong>the</strong> enterprise, divisional, systems, program, project and<br />

employee levels<br />

Why are some performance management initiatives more effective than<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs? Some performance management plans simply lack one or more<br />

considerations or processes that could ensure success. This guide will allow<br />

you to look at your organization’s current performance management<br />

processes and identify processes that can improve service delivery.<br />

This guide explains in simple terms <strong>the</strong> processes for a successful<br />

implementation. It was designed to cover all of <strong>the</strong> decisions and<br />

dependencies that a performance management initiative encounters.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r you are looking to improve your current business intelligence<br />

systems or develop your performance management capabilities from scratch,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit will walk you through a successful<br />

implementation from start to finish.<br />

You can buy <strong>the</strong> best business intelligence tools on <strong>the</strong> market and you can<br />

measure performance based on all <strong>the</strong> best practice metrics for your industry,<br />

but if you don’t have a well organized, proven performance management plan<br />

with detailed steps on how to implement <strong>the</strong> plan, you will only have numbers<br />

with little meaning and a culture of misdirected service delivery.<br />

Your organization may not be ready to implement all of <strong>the</strong>se processes, as<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit introduces some processes that<br />

are for organizations with highly advanced performance programs and well<br />

developed strategic plans. However, <strong>the</strong> kit was developed to guide any<br />

organization through <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Process<br />

regardless of <strong>the</strong>ir current performance level.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 3


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

What is Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>?<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> systematic implementation of an<br />

enterprise-wide performance strategy involving all business units, systems<br />

and personnel. It is a sequence of management processes, when combined,<br />

achieves a complete approach to managing performance from start to finish.<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> focuses on all areas that determine <strong>the</strong><br />

success of an enterprise, including:<br />

• Employees<br />

• Departments / Divisions<br />

• Processes<br />

• Finance<br />

• Programs (e.g. implementing organizational policies)<br />

• Products / Services<br />

• Projects<br />

• Business Units / Teams<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> involves integrating key documents into<br />

a performance plan, aligning performance to organizational goals, applying<br />

best practices, identifying <strong>the</strong> right metrics, developing a plan to act on <strong>the</strong><br />

results, and constantly improving <strong>the</strong> knowledge and performance of your<br />

people, processes and technology.<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is centered on <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Model (illustrated on <strong>the</strong> next page). The Lifecycle<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model is broken down into four areas:<br />

• Integrating supporting organizational management documents<br />

• Aligning performance through management functions<br />

• Implementing performance management best practices, and<br />

• Executing key performance management activities<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 4


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 5


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Figure 1 - The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model<br />

Utilizing <strong>the</strong>se best practices and processes outlined in this guide will enable<br />

you to:<br />

• Develop performance measures that drive decision making<br />

• Assure that your projects and activities are aligned with overall<br />

strategic goals<br />

• Transform your employees into high performers and ensure team<br />

effectiveness<br />

• Identify your mission critical processes and improve those that limit<br />

your organization's performance<br />

• Leverage business intelligence tools<br />

• Manage change through knowledge and insight.<br />

• Get <strong>the</strong> best performance out of your systems and reach your business<br />

objectives<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 6


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis<br />

For less than <strong>the</strong> cost of one day of training for one employee, I can help your<br />

entire organization tap into it's hidden resources and improve performance,<br />

increase productivity and save money!<br />

Here's How It Works<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practice Analysis consists of 15<br />

general questions about your business and your performance goals and<br />

needs, and 36 multiple choice and check all that apply questions which tell<br />

me everything I need to know about how you can transform your<br />

organization's performance. That's it! That's all you have to do.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practice Analysis <strong>the</strong>n develops:<br />

• an evaluation of 280 key performance management processes<br />

• a performance index analysis identifying your performance<br />

strengths, areas for improvement, cost savings opportunities and ways<br />

you can leverage your existing resources<br />

• a feasibility analysis identifying which best practices will drive your<br />

unique organization <strong>the</strong> most, based on mission alignment,<br />

organizational effectiveness, cost impact and ease of<br />

implementation.<br />

• an impact value analysis which identifies which processes will have<br />

<strong>the</strong> greatest impact on your organization based on your current<br />

environment and specified needs,<br />

• and a custom performance roadmap that illustrates which<br />

processes, and <strong>the</strong> order you can implement <strong>the</strong>m, to maximize<br />

performance in <strong>the</strong> shortest amount of time.<br />

The performance analysis is completely interactive and flexible. As your<br />

organization applies <strong>the</strong> best practice processes outlined in your Best<br />

Practice Roadmap and <strong>the</strong> recommendations section of <strong>the</strong> analysis, or if<br />

your organization simply changes it's performance needs and values, <strong>the</strong><br />

analysis will automatically readjust and tell you which processes will continue<br />

to make <strong>the</strong> greatest impact based on your organizational changes.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 7


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework<br />

The key activities in <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model are based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework. The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Framework is a group of performance-related processes and methodologies,<br />

sequenced and integrated to effectively raise organizational awareness of<br />

performance management and simplify <strong>the</strong> execution of performance<br />

management best practices throughout <strong>the</strong> performance lifecycle. The<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework consists of five phases: Defining,<br />

Planning, Executing, Monitoring, and Reporting.<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework<br />

Figure 2 - Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework<br />

The Defining Phase is <strong>the</strong> phase where preliminary management processes<br />

are performed. These preliminary processes are those outside of traditional<br />

performance management, but which are critical to <strong>the</strong> success of your<br />

performance management initiative. They include mission/objective<br />

identification, strategic planning, performance scope development and<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 8


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

performance team development. These are <strong>the</strong> executive processes that<br />

don’t necessarily include participation from all levels within <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />

The focus of <strong>the</strong> Planning Phase is to start <strong>the</strong> buzz and get your<br />

organization prepared for <strong>the</strong> cultural changes that will take place during your<br />

successful performance initiative. This is <strong>the</strong> phase where you gain<br />

employee acceptance into <strong>the</strong> performance initiative and put employees into<br />

a high performance mindset. It also includes baselining current performance<br />

and setting future goals, breaking down functional silos, identifying key<br />

processes that drive business success, and ensuring a successful<br />

performance management implementation through training.<br />

The Executing Phase involves implementing <strong>the</strong> planned activities outlined<br />

in <strong>the</strong> defining and planning phases. This is where we develop metrics, align<br />

performance to organizational objectives, identify cross-functional processes,<br />

and integrate data. During <strong>the</strong> execution phase <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

management team must maintain a climate of open communication with<br />

business unit liaisons and executive management, as this is where executive<br />

goals are transformed into action.<br />

The Monitoring Phase where we track performance in all areas of <strong>the</strong><br />

organization. This phase involves ensuring that key indicators and thresholds<br />

are in acceptable ranges and enforcing quality characteristics. This is where<br />

we develop our quality management plan, identify data quality metrics,<br />

examine information supply chains and improve processes.<br />

The last phase is <strong>the</strong> Reporting Phase. The Reporting Phase is <strong>the</strong> nuts<br />

and bolts of <strong>the</strong> performance management initiative. This is where <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Team analyzes its finding and communicates<br />

system, organizational and individual performance to <strong>the</strong> stakeholders. The<br />

reporting phase is <strong>the</strong> final phase in <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework,<br />

but in many cases it’s <strong>the</strong> first phase of decision- making processes. This<br />

guide covers <strong>the</strong> performance reporting process, business intelligence tools,<br />

performance improvement strategies, SLAs, dashboards and scorecards, and<br />

customer satisfaction.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful enterprise-wide<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 9


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Best Practices<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model is centered on 36 best<br />

practices. These best practices support <strong>the</strong> key processes that must be<br />

addressed in order to ensure a successful performance initiative. In Lifecycle<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, <strong>the</strong>se best practices are measured throughout all<br />

divisions within <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />

Defining Planning Executing Monitoring Reporting<br />

1. Organizational<br />

Goals and Mission<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

2. <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Scope<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

3. <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Team<br />

Development<br />

4. Vendor<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

5. Vendor<br />

Standardization<br />

6. Organizational<br />

Stability<br />

7. IT Cost<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

8. <strong>Performance</strong>-<br />

Based Budgeting<br />

9. Employee<br />

Acceptance<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

10. <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Planning<br />

11. Time<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

(Planning vs<br />

Implementing)<br />

12. Leadership<br />

Development<br />

13. Employee<br />

Training<br />

14. Staff<br />

Motivation<br />

15. Automated<br />

Asset<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

16. Systems<br />

Scalability<br />

17. Capacity<br />

Planning<br />

18. Enterprise<br />

Policy<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

19. IS Training<br />

20. Employee<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

21. Information<br />

Services<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

22. Process<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

23. Data<br />

Integration<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

24. <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Metrics<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

25. <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Alignment<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

26. Crossfunctional<br />

Process<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

27. Systems<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

28. Change<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

29. Procurement<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

30. Quality<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

31. <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Data<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

32. Business<br />

Intelligence<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Best Practices<br />

The definitions and best practice processes are as follows:<br />

33. Project<br />

<strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

34. Scorecard/<br />

Dashboard<br />

Development<br />

35. Customer<br />

Satisfaction<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

36. Service Level<br />

Tracking<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 10


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

DEFINING PHASE BEST PRACTICES<br />

1. Organizational Mission and Goals <strong>Management</strong> – Organizational<br />

Mission and Goals <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> practice of ensuring that<br />

organizational mission and goals are well documented and communicated<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> organization. Identified by executives and executed by<br />

management and staff, Organizational Mission and Goals <strong>Management</strong> is<br />

a process that includes participation at all levels and requires continuous<br />

validation throughout <strong>the</strong> maturation and growth of <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />

Organizational Mission and Goals <strong>Management</strong> includes identifying<br />

objectives throughout all business units, personnel, processes and systems<br />

and monitoring <strong>the</strong> progress of meeting those objectives. The objective is<br />

to control costs by having people, processes and systems within <strong>the</strong><br />

organization working toward supporting <strong>the</strong> mission and goals of <strong>the</strong><br />

organization.<br />

2. <strong>Performance</strong> Scope <strong>Management</strong> – The practice of defining <strong>the</strong><br />

outcomes, documenting assumptions, and defining <strong>the</strong> scope of your<br />

performance initiative. <strong>Performance</strong> Scope <strong>Management</strong> can be<br />

approached in several ways such as defining deliverables, functionality<br />

and data, technical structure, and enterprise/organizational structure.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Scope <strong>Management</strong> involves setting <strong>the</strong> high level<br />

processes for which <strong>the</strong> performance management team will approach<br />

divisions, support teams and individuals in order to align performance to<br />

business objectives. <strong>Performance</strong> Scope <strong>Management</strong> ensures that<br />

expectations are met by clarifying roles, processes and expectations.<br />

3. <strong>Performance</strong> Team Development – <strong>Performance</strong> Team Development is<br />

a critical process in Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>. It involves<br />

ensuring that <strong>the</strong> performance team is well aware of <strong>the</strong> issues facing <strong>the</strong><br />

organization from <strong>the</strong> customer, employee, senior management and key<br />

stakeholders perspectives. <strong>Performance</strong> Team Development includes<br />

ensuring that <strong>the</strong>re is support and commitment from <strong>the</strong> CEO, a direct<br />

reporting line to executive management, access to systems, data,<br />

organizational charts and processes, and liaisons form each of <strong>the</strong><br />

business units to bridge <strong>the</strong> gap in communication and operational<br />

knowledge.<br />

4. Vendor <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – A low risk vendor conforms to <strong>the</strong><br />

GartnerGroup vendor suitability models. The vendor/service provider<br />

model assesses <strong>the</strong> viability of vendors against a set of characteristics<br />

that have been proven a low risk, high quality purchase. An organization<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 11


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

that utilizes low risk, as well as high quality vendors and providers, will be<br />

less likely to encounter quality, reliability, or supply issues. This practice<br />

compares vendors and service providers on <strong>the</strong>ir financial viability,<br />

organizational stability, quality control, stringent testing for compatibility,<br />

independent market support for technology differentiation, and<br />

responsiveness to field service issues.<br />

We believe that vendors that have best in class capabilities will reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

risk and associated costs compared to vendors that may offer lower priced<br />

products without sound testing, field support, or management practices.<br />

5. Vendor Standardization – Vendor standardization limits <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

vendors that an organization purchases from. For given assets, an<br />

organization selects a limited set of vendors from which products or<br />

services can be purchased. Vendor Standardization usually consists of a<br />

primary and secondary vendor. By standardizing on fewer vendors, an<br />

organization can gain purchasing leverage and reduce incompatibility<br />

issues, support issues, vendor liaison requirements, testing of new<br />

technology, and administrative costs of vendor management. While it may<br />

limit <strong>the</strong> available selection of technology and features somewhat, it<br />

enables larger discounts with volume purchasing. Vendor standardization<br />

is part of a comprehensive asset management process that includes<br />

establishment of procurement procedures and policies, and compliance<br />

monitoring and management.<br />

6. Organizational Stability – Stability of an organization is critical to keeping<br />

<strong>the</strong> staff members and teams consistent and focused. It enables <strong>the</strong><br />

maturation of processes, procedures, and talent. Constant reorganization,<br />

management changes, and political infighting takes a toll on moral,<br />

turnover, costs, risk and progress.<br />

7. IT Cost <strong>Management</strong> – IT Cost <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> financial management<br />

of your network that measures <strong>the</strong> total cost of IT services on a regular<br />

basis, compares <strong>the</strong> costs to industry benchmarks, and makes decisions<br />

on changes that include financial, not just technical, objectives. The<br />

process, policies, and tools are continuously and regularly applied to track<br />

progress and optimize spending. With IT Cost <strong>Management</strong> frameworks,<br />

such as TCO Lifecycle <strong>Management</strong>, proper technology refresh cycles can<br />

be established and investments can be verified as having positive financial<br />

impact and returns prior to implementation.<br />

8. <strong>Performance</strong> Based Budgeting – A results focused planning and<br />

budgeting framework which focuses on three elements: <strong>the</strong> strategy (how<br />

to achieve outcome), outputs (activities to achieve final outcome), and <strong>the</strong><br />

result (final outcome). <strong>Performance</strong>-based budgets use missions, goals<br />

and objectives to justify funding. Through <strong>the</strong> allocation of resources,<br />

performance-based budging achieves specific objectives based on<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 12


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

program goals and measured results. As a result, it is possible to<br />

understand which activities are cost-effective in terms of achieving <strong>the</strong><br />

desired result.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful enterprise-wide<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 13


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

PLANNING PHASE BEST PRACTICES<br />

9. Employee Acceptance <strong>Management</strong> – Employee Acceptance<br />

<strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> process of gaining employee buy-in by emphasizing<br />

performance expectations from <strong>the</strong> top level down. Employee Acceptance<br />

<strong>Management</strong> involves transforming employees into a high performance<br />

mindset, communicating employee expectations and enabling <strong>the</strong>m to<br />

understand <strong>the</strong> impact that <strong>the</strong>ir specific role has on <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong><br />

organization.<br />

10. <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Planning – <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Planning is <strong>the</strong> practice of defining <strong>the</strong> performance strategy and<br />

prioritizing activities according to that strategy—to ensure operational<br />

alignment with organizational goals. <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Planning<br />

involves planning, budgeting, forecasting and allocating resources to<br />

support strategy and achieve optimal execution. The <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Plan includes consolidating, monitoring, and reporting on<br />

performance outcomes for management, regulatory, and statutory<br />

purposes. The ultimate goal of <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Planning is <strong>the</strong><br />

ability to plan and budget in real-time with dynamic plans that provide realtime<br />

feedback to everyone who is part of <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

11. Time <strong>Management</strong> (Planning versus Implementing) – Planning is an<br />

essential item on <strong>the</strong> critical path of every project. Our studies have shown<br />

that cutting corners on planning can triple <strong>the</strong> cost and time to implement<br />

enterprise level projects. Planning requires adequate information about <strong>the</strong><br />

current and target states and accurate estimates of <strong>the</strong> time and financial<br />

investments required to perform all <strong>the</strong> steps necessary for change.<br />

Planning also involves putting toge<strong>the</strong>r a team of committed and motivated<br />

individuals with defined team roles, outlining all tasks, assigning<br />

responsibilities, and proactively managing and mitigating risks. The<br />

planning process should include <strong>the</strong> development of a vision/scope<br />

document so that each team member understands <strong>the</strong> project vision, goals,<br />

objectives, schedule, and risks. The planning team should allow adequate<br />

time for team members to understand, investigate, document, and<br />

communicate prior to design and implementation.<br />

12. Leadership Development – Leadership Development is <strong>the</strong> strategic<br />

investment in, and utilization of <strong>the</strong> human capital within <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />

The practice of Leadership Development focuses on <strong>the</strong> development of<br />

leadership as a process. With <strong>the</strong> rapid rate of change in our global<br />

economy, leadership has taken on <strong>the</strong> critical role of adaptation and<br />

innovation in <strong>the</strong> workplace. As companies restructure <strong>the</strong>ir business<br />

processes and employees, <strong>the</strong>y need solid leadership training to<br />

communicate effectively, influence o<strong>the</strong>rs, maximize creativity, and analyze<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 14


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

your business. How leadership is demonstrated within an organization will<br />

determine how successful that organization will be and how successful<br />

those who follow will become.<br />

13. Employee Training – Employee training is one of <strong>the</strong> most powerful cost<br />

reduction drivers. Our research shows that <strong>the</strong> under-trained employee<br />

consumes two to six times <strong>the</strong> amount of technical support (including peer<br />

support) than an adequately trained user. Employee training should be<br />

performed on systems and applications, being careful to match <strong>the</strong><br />

training that is delivered in relation to <strong>the</strong> employee’s job. Training should<br />

include a mix of instructor-led classroom training, computer-based<br />

training, and just-in-time training to help increase user productivity and<br />

reduce support costs.<br />

14. Staff Motivation – A motivated staff is one that will operate as a team and<br />

will pitch in when needed to solve any problem or challenge at hand. They<br />

will often exceed expectations and provide critical back up for each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

A motivated staff works harder to meet <strong>the</strong> goals set by <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />

15. Automated Asset <strong>Management</strong> – Electronically supported life-cycle<br />

driven asset process. Automated asset management consists of<br />

electronically supported procurement, automated inventory, and<br />

centralized data repository that are available to financial, administrative,<br />

technical planners, system administrators, and <strong>the</strong> service desk.<br />

Managed data within <strong>the</strong> asset management system consists of contract<br />

terms, hardware inventory, software inventory, accounting, maintenance<br />

records, change history, support history, and o<strong>the</strong>r technical and financial<br />

information.<br />

16. Systems Scalability – Systems Scalability is a technology infrastructure<br />

that can logically and physically increase in performance and capacity with<br />

continuity to meet reasonable growth and change over time. A scalable<br />

architecture contains a strategic migration plan for continuous growth and<br />

progress. Commitment to scalable architectures enables <strong>the</strong> rollout of<br />

homogeneous hardware and application platforms across users and<br />

departments with different processing requirements, while providing<br />

technical staff with a common platform to support.<br />

17. Capacity Planning – Capacity planning is a process by which <strong>the</strong> capacity<br />

of <strong>the</strong> network and assets is measured, compared against requirements,<br />

and adjusted as appropriate. The process of capacity planning involves<br />

mapping new initiatives to existing infrastructure, understanding <strong>the</strong> cost<br />

dynamics of network bandwidth and storage, memory, and o<strong>the</strong>r system<br />

resources.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 15


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

18. Enterprise Policy <strong>Management</strong> – Enterprise policy management is a<br />

managed user environment in which a network or desktop administrator<br />

can control, with rules-based logic, which applications, settings, network<br />

resources, databases, and o<strong>the</strong>r IT assets a user can use. This<br />

environment is defined by user ID and is not necessarily machine specific.<br />

It is typically implemented by user profiles maintained at <strong>the</strong> server and<br />

synchronized with <strong>the</strong> client device that a user is logged onto.<br />

Enterprise policy management precludes <strong>the</strong> user from making changes to<br />

<strong>the</strong> system; such as introducing unauthorized software or changing<br />

settings that may cause conflict with o<strong>the</strong>r system resources. As well, a<br />

managed environment controls <strong>the</strong> ease of use of <strong>the</strong> desktop, providing a<br />

common set of applications and access for groups of users or individuals.<br />

In this manner, <strong>the</strong> user is presented only with <strong>the</strong> tools <strong>the</strong>y have been<br />

trained on and need for <strong>the</strong> job, and assures that changes are managed.<br />

This process, integrated with a system management and change<br />

management policy, can reduce service desk calls and unplanned<br />

downtime, as well as create a more predictable platform for system<br />

upgrades.<br />

19. IS Training – IS professional training is critical in preparing <strong>the</strong> IS staff that<br />

are delivering support and service to users to confidently plan and<br />

implement initiatives and solutions, and resolve user issues quickly and<br />

effectively. IS professional training should be obtained for all staff<br />

members on <strong>the</strong> systems, tools, and applications that are utilized in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

daily jobs. Training should include instructor-led training classes,<br />

certification courses, seminars, and computer-based training.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful enterprise-wide<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 16


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

EXECUTING PHASE BEST PRACTICES<br />

20. Employee <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – Employee <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> systematic process by which an organization involves<br />

its employees, as individuals and members of a group, in improving<br />

organizational effectiveness in <strong>the</strong> accomplishment of agency mission and<br />

goals. The Employee <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> process includes<br />

planning work and setting expectations, continually monitoring<br />

performance, developing <strong>the</strong> capacity to perform, periodically rating<br />

performance in a summary fashion, and rewarding good performance.<br />

Functions within employee performance management are recruit and hire<br />

management, compensation management, incentive management, goals<br />

management, learning management, competency management and<br />

performance measurement.<br />

21. Information Services <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – Information Services<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> practice of measuring and monitoring<br />

information systems and services and aligning <strong>the</strong>m to organizational<br />

goals and objectives. Information Services <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

involves supporting employees and customers, aligning business unit<br />

objectives to system capabilities and performance, communicating IT<br />

planning and performance data in a way that is useful to business unit<br />

management, and adapting to growing complexities and constant change.<br />

22. Process <strong>Management</strong> – Process <strong>Management</strong> is a series of actions<br />

taken to identify, analyze and improve existing processes within an<br />

organization to meet new goals and objectives. Process <strong>Management</strong><br />

involves identifying key business processes and aligning <strong>the</strong> results of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se processes with <strong>the</strong> strategic goals. Lifecycle Process <strong>Management</strong><br />

consists of baselining <strong>the</strong> current environment, identifying critical success<br />

factors, redesigning inefficient or ineffective processes, automating<br />

processes, identifying process metrics, and training employees on cross<br />

functional process.<br />

23. Data Integration <strong>Management</strong> – Data Integration <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong><br />

practice of gaining business value from information assets through <strong>the</strong><br />

effective use of data management technologies and best practices. Key<br />

components of Data Integration <strong>Management</strong> include data integration,<br />

data quality, database management systems, data warehousing and<br />

enterprise information management. Data Integration <strong>Management</strong><br />

enables an organization to secure a single, accurate, corporate view of<br />

key information.<br />

24. <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics <strong>Management</strong> – <strong>Performance</strong> Metrics <strong>Management</strong><br />

is <strong>the</strong> process of identifying quantifiable, results-driven metrics that enable<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 17


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

informed decision making and encourages improved service delivery.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Metrics <strong>Management</strong> involves understanding <strong>the</strong> business<br />

and complexities of <strong>the</strong> organization, focusing on <strong>the</strong> desired outcomes,<br />

involving all participants for consensus and buy-in, ensuring that formulas<br />

and logic are valid, and storing performance results in a centralized<br />

location for easy access.<br />

25. <strong>Performance</strong> Alignment <strong>Management</strong> – <strong>Performance</strong> Alignment<br />

<strong>Management</strong> facilitates <strong>the</strong> translation of business and functional priorities<br />

into strategy. <strong>Performance</strong> alignment consists of aligning corporate<br />

strategy to four areas: division/departmental, workforce, financial and<br />

resources. Ultimately, <strong>Performance</strong> Alignment <strong>Management</strong> develops a<br />

performance strategy that feeds strategic alignment, reflects<br />

organizational priorities, and leads to successful execution of<br />

organizational goals and objectives.<br />

26. Cross-functional Process <strong>Management</strong> – Cross-functional Process<br />

<strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> process of breaking down functional siloed thinking<br />

and building <strong>the</strong> organization around core processes ra<strong>the</strong>r than specific<br />

functional areas. Cross-functional Process <strong>Management</strong> focuses on those<br />

major processes which require support from multiple functional support<br />

groups. Ultimately, a well managed cross functional process enables<br />

performance tracking throughout each of <strong>the</strong> functional “hand offs” and<br />

weak points within a major process are identified and corrected.<br />

27. Systems <strong>Management</strong> – Systems management is an automated event<br />

management system that proactively and reactively notifies system<br />

operators of failures, capacity issues, traffic issues, virus attacks and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

transient events. The tools allow monitoring of system status,<br />

performance indicators, thresholds, notification of users, and dispatch of<br />

trouble tickets. Systems <strong>Management</strong> provides optimal system<br />

performance, quicker resolution of problems, and minimizes failures.<br />

Automated solutions are used in support of distributed computing<br />

operations processes and policies for performance and failure detection<br />

and correction, as well as optimization.<br />

28. Change <strong>Management</strong> – Change management is <strong>the</strong> procedure, policies,<br />

and tools established to monitor organizational assets to assure that<br />

unauthorized changes are not being implemented. It also affirms that a<br />

database of changes is available so that changes can be easily<br />

recognized during troubleshooting activities<br />

29. Procurement <strong>Management</strong> – Procurement <strong>Management</strong> is a set of<br />

policies and procedures to manage <strong>the</strong> procurement process.<br />

Procurement <strong>Management</strong> does not necessarily designate that all<br />

procurement personnel are centralized in a single location; ra<strong>the</strong>r it<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 18


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

involves <strong>the</strong> development of a common set of procurement policies and<br />

operating procedures, pooling of information about requests, vendor<br />

contracts, asset data, industry information, and qualified procurement skills<br />

to ensure <strong>the</strong> pieces required to get a cost effective deal are properly<br />

considered. As well, centralized procurement assures that standardization<br />

rules are in compliance.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful enterprise-wide<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 19


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

MONITORING PHASE BEST PRACTICES<br />

30. Quality <strong>Management</strong> – Quality <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> process for ensuring<br />

that all <strong>the</strong> activities necessary to design, develop and implement a<br />

product or service are effective and efficient with respect to <strong>the</strong> system<br />

and its performance. Quality <strong>Management</strong> includes several processes<br />

that enable organizations to ensure quality. Among <strong>the</strong>m are quality<br />

planning, quality assurance, quality control, quality audits and quality<br />

surveillance. The objective of quality management is to define quality<br />

system policies, objectives, and requirements, and to explain how <strong>the</strong>se<br />

policies will be defined.<br />

31. <strong>Performance</strong> Data <strong>Management</strong> - <strong>Performance</strong> Data <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong><br />

practice of helping organizations understand <strong>the</strong> stages of data as it<br />

transforms to meaningful information and is distributed throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

organization. The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Reporting Process consists of 5<br />

phases: data ga<strong>the</strong>ring, data extraction, data integration, reporting and<br />

distribution. Some key tasks within <strong>the</strong> performance reporting process<br />

include gaining buy-in on data ga<strong>the</strong>ring methods, determining scope and<br />

purpose of what to ga<strong>the</strong>r, and utilizing existing data streams and<br />

maximizing current report capabilities, and identifying proper tools to<br />

invest in to ensure meaningful data.<br />

32. Business Intelligence <strong>Management</strong> – Business Intelligence<br />

<strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> identification, implementation, and strategic<br />

application of technologies that are used to ga<strong>the</strong>r, provide access to, and<br />

analyze data and information about company operations and<br />

performance. It includes creating a process for gaining a more<br />

comprehensive knowledge of <strong>the</strong> factors affecting your business, and<br />

helping your company make better informed business decisions.<br />

Business Intelligence <strong>Management</strong> involves carefully identifying which<br />

tools fit best with your type of business, your systems architecture, your<br />

staff technical capabilities, and data complexities. Among <strong>the</strong> many types<br />

of BI tools include: reporting tools, metadata tools, data warehouse tools,<br />

database/hardware tools, ETL tools, and OLAP tools.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful enterprise-wide<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 20


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

REPORTING PHASE BEST PRACTICES<br />

33. Project <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – Project <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

is <strong>the</strong> discipline of organizing and managing resources to ensure that <strong>the</strong><br />

project is completed within <strong>the</strong> defined scope. Project performance<br />

reporting is <strong>the</strong> process of collecting project baseline data and distributing<br />

performance information to stakeholders. Implementing projects<br />

performance measurement ensures that your reporting clarifies how<br />

resources are being used to obtain <strong>the</strong> objectives of <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

34. Scorecard / Dashboard Development – Scorecard / Dashboard<br />

Development is <strong>the</strong> process of planning, identifying and implementing an<br />

easy access view of how well <strong>the</strong> organization is reaching strategic goals.<br />

Scorecard / Dashboard Development is <strong>the</strong> process of displaying whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> activities of a company are meeting its objectives in terms of vision<br />

and strategy through a series of graphs, charts, gauges, and o<strong>the</strong>r visual<br />

indicators that illustrate performance in real time. Scorecard / Dashboard<br />

Development includes identifying actionable indicators, lead indicators,<br />

alerts and thresholds and enabling stakeholders to access data easily.<br />

35. Customer Satisfaction <strong>Management</strong> – Customer Satisfaction<br />

<strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> process of ensuring that customer’s expectations are<br />

met or exceeded over <strong>the</strong> lifetime of <strong>the</strong> product or service. Customer<br />

Satisfaction <strong>Management</strong> involves understanding specifically what, in<br />

customer’s eyes, an organization is doing well and where that organization<br />

needs to improve in order to better support <strong>the</strong>m. Ultimately, Customer<br />

Satisfaction <strong>Management</strong> leads to identifying opportunities for products<br />

and service innovation and serves as a basis for performance appraisal<br />

and reward systems.<br />

36. Service Level Tracking and <strong>Management</strong> – Service levels are<br />

predefined by a service level agreement (SLA) between <strong>the</strong> user<br />

community and <strong>the</strong> IS department and between IS and external service<br />

providers. Ideally this is a seamless contract that will establish specific<br />

services that IS will deliver to <strong>the</strong> end-user community with regards to<br />

various uptime, performance, and problem resolution criteria. The metrics<br />

contained in a SLA need to be specific, measurable, track able, and<br />

meaningful.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit and Organizational <strong>Performance</strong><br />

and Best Practices Analysis provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes, techniques and<br />

frameworks to implement a successful enterprise-wide performance solution.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 21


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis<br />

In most cases, some divisions within an organization manage aspects of<br />

performance management better than o<strong>the</strong>r divisions. As illustrated in <strong>the</strong><br />

example table below, some performance management best practices come<br />

more natural to certain divisions, depending on <strong>the</strong> service provided.<br />

Accounting / Finance<br />

HR<br />

Marketing / Sales<br />

Operations (Production, Customer Service)<br />

Procurement<br />

Research and Development<br />

Information Technology<br />

Communications/Public Relations<br />

Administration<br />

• Cost management<br />

• Employee relations, staff motivation<br />

• Customer management,<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> metrics, customer satisfaction<br />

• Vendor management, asset management<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> Scope management, Change management<br />

• Business intelligence, information systems<br />

• Customer satisfaction management<br />

• Mission and objectives management, policy<br />

The premise of <strong>the</strong> Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis<br />

is to measure all <strong>the</strong> critical performance management processes necessary<br />

to be a high performing organization.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis is a service<br />

provided by Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals which analyzes an<br />

organization's utilization of <strong>the</strong> 35 performance management best practices<br />

and identifies <strong>the</strong>ir performance strengths, areas for immediate<br />

improvements, and cost savings opportunities. By illustrating where strong<br />

performance management best practices exist within an organization,<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> leverages those strengths and<br />

processes to o<strong>the</strong>r areas within <strong>the</strong> organization which require <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Best Practice Scoring Systems<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Professional’s Best Practice Scoring Systems simplify<br />

performance management planning. Our <strong>Performance</strong> Index, Feasibility<br />

Analysis, and Impact Value scoring systems remove <strong>the</strong> grueling analysis and<br />

simplifies decision making.<br />

The <strong>Performance</strong> Index is a scoring system for measuring your performance<br />

management practices and identifying strengths and weaknesses, and<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 22


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

opportunities for cost savings. The <strong>Performance</strong> Index provides a quantitative<br />

method for illustrating <strong>the</strong> cumulative effect of performance improvements as<br />

you move closer to reaching your target performance levels.<br />

Figure 3 - <strong>Performance</strong> Index Scoring Table<br />

The Feasibility Score provides a quantitative value for identifying best<br />

practices that are most aligned to your unique performance management<br />

goals. The criteria for measuring <strong>the</strong> value of each best practice within <strong>the</strong><br />

organization are Mission Alignment, Organizational Effectiveness, Cost<br />

Impact and Ease of Implementation.<br />

The Impact Value is a scoring system for identifying best practices which will<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> greatest impact on your organization once implemented. Impact<br />

Value takes into consideration both your organizational objectives and what<br />

you want to get out of your performance initiatives.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 23


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The Best Practices Roadmap<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis provides a<br />

custom Best Practices Roadmap which illustrates performance management<br />

strengths and weaknesses, and provides a logical path for businesses to<br />

follow in order to achieve high performance levels in <strong>the</strong> shortest amount of<br />

time. The custom roadmap identifies quick wins and <strong>the</strong> most feasible best<br />

practices and processes which yield <strong>the</strong> greatest impact.<br />

Figure 4 - Best Practices Roadmap<br />

The Best Practices Roadmap maps performance management best<br />

practices to performance categories (people, processes and technology) and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework phases. The Best Practices Roadmap<br />

provides a logical path for implementing best practice processes. For<br />

example, many of <strong>the</strong> best practices that fall within <strong>the</strong> Defining phase must<br />

be implemented before best practices in <strong>the</strong> later phases can be fully utilized.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 24


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Take Organizational Mission and Goals <strong>Management</strong>. If <strong>the</strong> processes within<br />

this best practice are not implemented, o<strong>the</strong>r best practices will not be as<br />

effective and <strong>the</strong> performance management initiative will surely fail.<br />

.By understanding which best practices your organization utilizes well and<br />

which divisions and teams have strong processes in place, you can<br />

strategically leverage those processes to assist divisions that do not have<br />

<strong>the</strong>se practices in place.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap contains 90 processes sectioned into 3<br />

performance areas consisting of 10 management functions and spanning<br />

across <strong>the</strong> 5 performance lifecycle phases. The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Roadmap illustrates how performance management relates to various major<br />

management support functions within your organization. The processes<br />

provide a high level approach to managing performance across your various<br />

management functions and helps ensure that your people, processes and<br />

technology are working toge<strong>the</strong>r to achieve your organization’s missions and<br />

goals. The roadmap shows how performance management adds value to<br />

and is directly represented in each of <strong>the</strong>se major management functions and<br />

aligns <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework phases.<br />

Figure 5 - Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 25


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

This section briefly explains how performance management plays a part in<br />

each of <strong>the</strong> major organizational management functions.<br />

Strategic Planning<br />

Strategic planning is <strong>the</strong> process of determining a company's long-term goals<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n identifying <strong>the</strong> best approach for achieving <strong>the</strong>m. Strategic planning<br />

plays a vital role in <strong>the</strong> performance of your organization. In order for<br />

strategic goals to be achieved, strategic planning must be aligned to<br />

performance measurements. These performance measurements allow<br />

executive management to gauge <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> organizational<br />

strategic plan and determine how <strong>the</strong> budget and projects will be setup in <strong>the</strong><br />

future. How do you ensure that your strategic plan aligns <strong>the</strong> proper<br />

performance goals to organizational objectives? The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> discusses this in detail, and <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Kit provides <strong>the</strong> process and templates to ensure your<br />

strategic plan is geared towards performance improvement.<br />

Organizational Development<br />

Often used interchangeably with organizational effectiveness, organizational<br />

development is <strong>the</strong> process through which an organization develops <strong>the</strong><br />

internal capacity to be <strong>the</strong> most efficient towards its mission work and to<br />

sustain itself over <strong>the</strong> long term. This definition highlights <strong>the</strong> explicit<br />

connection between organizational development work and <strong>the</strong> achievement of<br />

organizational mission. <strong>Performance</strong> management directly relates to<br />

organizational development, since OD is primarily focused on improving <strong>the</strong><br />

performance of organizations and <strong>the</strong> people within <strong>the</strong>m. Whatever your<br />

organizational challenges, <strong>the</strong> starting point is to get a clear, objective view of<br />

your organization's performance abilities, such as strengths and limitations.<br />

Identifying proper performance attributes is essential, because sound<br />

management decisions can only be made when performance attributes are<br />

identified and measured accurately.<br />

In order to reach anticipated organizational targets, you must be able to tie<br />

<strong>the</strong> performance and motivation of individuals to <strong>the</strong> overall strategic<br />

objectives. The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework processes illustrate how<br />

performance management, organizational development and strategic<br />

planning share interrelated processes to accomplish organizational goals.<br />

The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> includes a detailed section on<br />

aligning personnel and team performance to strategic objectives. The<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit includes templates for managing<br />

organizational change and measuring organizational impact.<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong><br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 26


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Change management is a systematic approach to dealing with change within<br />

every perspective of an organization, from systems to personnel to projects to<br />

functions. Change management is a comprehensive, often difficult<br />

management function to properly implement.<br />

There’s <strong>the</strong> saying “Organizations don't adapt to change; <strong>the</strong>ir people do.”<br />

With that outlook, it is easy to understand how performance management<br />

plays a critical part in managing change. Implementing change within an<br />

organization often requires a change in how employees execute things. You<br />

can implement <strong>the</strong> most advanced change management tools money can<br />

buy, but if your people don’t buy into or fully support <strong>the</strong> initiatives, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

performance will suffer and ultimately <strong>the</strong> organization will be ineffective, or<br />

less efficient than before. So how do you ensure that your organization is<br />

prepared for change? The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> includes a<br />

detailed section on <strong>the</strong> getting employees ready for change and <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides change management templates to<br />

get started.<br />

Project <strong>Management</strong><br />

Project management is <strong>the</strong> discipline of organizing and managing resources<br />

(e.g. people) in such a way that <strong>the</strong> project is completed within defined scope,<br />

quality, time and cost constraints. A project is a temporary and one-time<br />

endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service, which brings<br />

about beneficial change or added value. <strong>Performance</strong> measurement is an<br />

area within <strong>the</strong> Project <strong>Management</strong> Institute’s Project <strong>Management</strong> Body of<br />

Knowledge (PMBOK). It is <strong>the</strong> link between performance management and<br />

project management, where cost, schedule and scope performance are<br />

measured and monitored throughout each phase of <strong>the</strong> Project Lifecycle.<br />

Project performance reporting is <strong>the</strong> process of collecting project baseline<br />

data and distributing performance information to stakeholders throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

project. How do you make sure that your reporting clarifies how resources<br />

are being used to obtain <strong>the</strong> objectives of <strong>the</strong> project? The 120 Day Plan:<br />

Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> includes a detailed section on <strong>the</strong> project management<br />

performance measurement processes within <strong>the</strong> PMBOK.<br />

Customer Satisfaction<br />

Customer satisfaction is <strong>the</strong> measurement or determination that a product or<br />

service meets a customer's expectations, based on predetermined quality and<br />

service requirements. It is said that customer satisfaction equals perception<br />

of performance divided by expectation of performance. There is a direct<br />

relationship between performance and customer satisfaction, where <strong>the</strong> better<br />

you perform to customer expectations, <strong>the</strong> more satisfied customers will be.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 27


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Customer satisfaction is your organization’s level of performance through<br />

your customers, employees, and/or stakeholders perspective. In fact, many<br />

times customer satisfaction feedback, if requested properly, can provide<br />

information and insight for achieving breakthrough increases in organizational<br />

performance and effectiveness.<br />

When measuring customer satisfaction, organizations should review <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

objectives and ensure that <strong>the</strong> customer service strategy is linked to those<br />

objectives. But how can you ensure that your organizational objectives are<br />

linked to your customer service strategy? The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step<br />

<strong>Guide</strong> includes a detailed section on <strong>the</strong> performance measurement<br />

processes of customer satisfaction and <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Kit includes sample customer satisfaction surveys.<br />

Workforce <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

Workforce performance management is <strong>the</strong> strategic alignment of an<br />

organization’s human capital with its business activities. It is a methodical<br />

process of analyzing <strong>the</strong> current workforce, determining future workforce<br />

needs, identifying <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> present and future, and implementing<br />

solutions so <strong>the</strong> organization can accomplish its mission, goals, and<br />

objectives.<br />

People are <strong>the</strong> most important aspect to any organization. Therefore, <strong>the</strong><br />

performance of <strong>the</strong> people within an organization will greatly impact <strong>the</strong><br />

overall performance of <strong>the</strong> organization. While most employees understand<br />

what <strong>the</strong>y need to do, workforce performance management tells <strong>the</strong>m how<br />

well <strong>the</strong>y must do it. The greatest benefit to workforce performance<br />

management is <strong>the</strong> process of aligning employee performance to<br />

organizational objectives and goals. But how can a manager truly evaluate<br />

individuals on <strong>the</strong>ir alignment with corporate goals and <strong>the</strong>ir contributions to<br />

business results? The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> includes a<br />

section detailing <strong>the</strong> importance of aligning employee performance to<br />

organizational goals and <strong>the</strong> steps to accomplish this.<br />

Functions within workforce performance management are Recruit and Hire<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, Compensation <strong>Management</strong>, Incentive <strong>Management</strong>, Goals<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, Learning <strong>Management</strong>, Competency <strong>Management</strong>, and<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Measurement. Each of <strong>the</strong>se workforce management functions<br />

are described in more detail in The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong>. The<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit includes templates to help manage<br />

workforce performance.<br />

IT <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 28


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

IT performance management assists organizations with <strong>the</strong> increasing<br />

demands of maximizing value creation from technology investments, reducing<br />

risk from IT, decreasing architectural complexity, and optimizing overall<br />

technology expenditures. Behind people, technology is <strong>the</strong> next critical factor<br />

in maximizing efficiency and organizational performance. Many organizations<br />

from small to large are using IT strategically to support profitable growth. IT<br />

performance management includes maximizing technology to improve service<br />

delivery in every area of <strong>the</strong> organization. IT performance management<br />

utilizes such technology as unified management reporting and dashboard<br />

tools to enhance performance and drives business processes. How do you<br />

find <strong>the</strong> right technology to enhance your business intelligence? Choosing<br />

<strong>the</strong> right business intelligence tools and aligning IT/IS systems to business<br />

objectives is discussed in detail in The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong>,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit includes vendor<br />

summaries and templates for performing your own vendor assessments with<br />

weighted criteria.<br />

Knowledge <strong>Management</strong><br />

Knowledge management refers to <strong>the</strong> guidelines, policies, and practices that<br />

an organization uses to create and transfer information to support <strong>the</strong><br />

performance of <strong>the</strong> people in <strong>the</strong> organization. These can include various<br />

documents and copyrights, and intangible processes, models and methods<br />

that <strong>the</strong>ir people use to get work done.<br />

The impact of knowledge management on key business results is seen<br />

through its potential for improving <strong>the</strong> performance of business processes.<br />

Take call centers for example. They may handle hundreds, even thousands<br />

of calls a day. It would be too much too ask for call center representatives to<br />

be able to resolve <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong>se calls without a knowledge<br />

management system in place. With a knowledge management system, <strong>the</strong><br />

call center representatives have more information and resources to access<br />

and can thus resolve more customer requests. <strong>Performance</strong> benefits can be<br />

seen in such areas as first call resolution, time to resolve, and customer<br />

satisfaction.<br />

Knowledge management drives performance by linking knowledge to critical<br />

functions which impact business and putting <strong>the</strong> supports in place to ensure<br />

knowledge is leveraged across people and circumstances.<br />

Quality <strong>Management</strong><br />

Quality management is a method for ensuring that all <strong>the</strong> activities necessary<br />

to design, develop and implement a product or service are effective and<br />

efficient with respect to <strong>the</strong> system and its performance. Quality management<br />

includes several processes that enable organizations to ensure quality.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 29


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Among <strong>the</strong>m are quality planning, quality assurance, quality control, quality<br />

audits and quality surveillance.<br />

Quality planning is defined as a set of activities whose purpose is to define<br />

quality system policies, objectives, and requirements, and to explain how<br />

<strong>the</strong>se policies will be applied, how <strong>the</strong>se objectives will be achieved, and how<br />

<strong>the</strong>se requirements will be met. It is always future oriented.<br />

Quality assurance (QA) is defined as a set of activities whose purpose is to<br />

demonstrate that an entity meets all quality requirements. QA activities are<br />

carried out in order to inspire <strong>the</strong> confidence of both customers and<br />

managers, confidence that all quality requirements are being met.<br />

Quality control is defined as a set of activities or techniques whose purpose is<br />

to ensure that all quality requirements are being met. In order to achieve this<br />

purpose, processes are monitored and performance problems are solved.<br />

Quality audits examine <strong>the</strong> elements of a quality management system in order<br />

to evaluate how well <strong>the</strong>se elements comply with quality system<br />

requirements.<br />

Quality surveillance is a set of activities whose purpose is to monitor an entity<br />

and review its records to prove that quality requirements are being met.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> measurement is a necessary instrument for quality management<br />

because in order to measure quality, you must first apply performance<br />

expectations and standards. In <strong>the</strong> PMBOK, <strong>the</strong> performance measurement<br />

process group falls under <strong>the</strong> quality management knowledge area. Quality<br />

management is discussed in greater detail in The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit includes<br />

templates for creating quality assurance and quality control plans.<br />

Process Improvement<br />

Process improvement is a series of actions taken to identify, analyze and<br />

improve existing processes within an organization to meet new goals and<br />

objectives. There are many process improvement methodologies that differ in<br />

approach, but <strong>the</strong> one thing <strong>the</strong>y all have in common is <strong>the</strong> outcome of better<br />

performance. In fact, by definition performance improvement is <strong>the</strong> concept<br />

of measuring <strong>the</strong> output of processes or procedures, <strong>the</strong>n modifying <strong>the</strong><br />

processes or procedures in order to increase <strong>the</strong> output, increase efficiency,<br />

or increase <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> processes or procedures.<br />

Often times, <strong>the</strong> most critical processes that impact business success are<br />

those that require support from multiple functional groups. Identifying and<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 30


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

managing cross-functional processes and removing <strong>the</strong> functional silos that<br />

inhibit business culture are discussed in great detail in The 120 Day Plan:<br />

Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong>. The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit<br />

includes a process profile template and a process evaluation scorecard to<br />

help you manage those processes.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 31


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Government <strong>Performance</strong> Framework<br />

Many government agencies struggle to develop performance programs that<br />

meet <strong>the</strong> agency’s strategic objectives and annual goals. An effective<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> system must be in place to ensure that an<br />

agency’s administrative and support functions (budget, financial<br />

management, human resources, information technology, procurement, etc.)<br />

directly and explicitly serve <strong>the</strong> needs of program managers in meeting <strong>the</strong><br />

agency’s strategic and annual goals.<br />

Before you can effectively manage <strong>the</strong> performance of a government agency,<br />

you must first understand <strong>the</strong> laws and regulations, frameworks and<br />

methodologies, and process improvement techniques that are in use today.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Government <strong>Performance</strong> Framework, I have listed some of <strong>the</strong><br />

regulations and methodologies I've encountered in my own experience<br />

managing government performance.<br />

Government <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Framework<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 32


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Controls (Laws, Regulations, Imperatives)<br />

• The 1993 Government <strong>Performance</strong> and Results Act (GPRA) holds<br />

federal agencies accountable for using resources wisely and achieving<br />

program results. GPRA requires agencies to develop plans for what <strong>the</strong>y<br />

intend to accomplish, measure how well <strong>the</strong>y are doing, make appropriate<br />

decisions based on <strong>the</strong> information <strong>the</strong>y have ga<strong>the</strong>red, and<br />

communicate information about <strong>the</strong>ir performance to Congress and to <strong>the</strong><br />

public. GPRA requires agencies to develop a five-year Strategic Plan,<br />

which includes a mission statement and sets out long-term goals and<br />

objectives; Annual <strong>Performance</strong> Plans, which provide annual<br />

performance commitments toward achieving <strong>the</strong> goals and objectives<br />

presented in <strong>the</strong> Strategic Plan; and Annual <strong>Performance</strong> and<br />

Accountability Reports, which evaluate an agency's progress toward<br />

achieving performance commitments.<br />

• Government <strong>Management</strong> Reform Act (GMRA) of requires <strong>the</strong> head of<br />

each agency to submit an audited financial statement to <strong>the</strong> Office of<br />

<strong>Management</strong> and Budget (OMB) annually. The Government<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Reform Act calls for agency financial statements that reflect<br />

<strong>the</strong> results of agency operations and a government-wide financial<br />

statement that includes results of government-wide operations. The<br />

purposes of Government <strong>Management</strong> Reform Act (GMRA) are to<br />

provide a more effective, efficient and responsive government through a<br />

series of management reforms primarily for federal human resources and<br />

financial management.<br />

• Clinger-Cohen Act (CCA) of 1996 provides that <strong>the</strong> government<br />

information technology shop be operated exactly as an efficient and<br />

profitable business would be operated. Acquisition, planning and<br />

management of technology must be treated as a "capital investment."<br />

While <strong>the</strong> law is complex, all consumers of hardware and software in <strong>the</strong><br />

agency should be aware of <strong>the</strong> Chief Information Officer's leadership in<br />

implementing this statute.<br />

• The Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (CFO Act) establishes Chief<br />

Financial Officer responsibilities for systematic measurement of<br />

performance. The CFO Act requires federal agencies to prepare financial<br />

statements and have <strong>the</strong>m audited. Under <strong>the</strong> act, an Office of Federal<br />

Financial <strong>Management</strong> was established in <strong>the</strong> Office of <strong>Management</strong> and<br />

Budget and an eight-part program was started to move toward better<br />

financial management.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 33


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

• The President’s <strong>Management</strong> Agenda (PMA) outlines programs to<br />

radically improve performance by making government agencies more<br />

citizen-centered, results-oriented and market-based. It focuses on five<br />

major issues that all federal organizations must address — budget and<br />

performance integration, strategic human capital, competitive sourcing,<br />

improved financial performance and expanded electronic government.<br />

• The Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) was developed to<br />

assess and improve program performance so that <strong>the</strong> Federal<br />

government can achieve better results. A PART review helps identify a<br />

program’s strengths and weaknesses to inform funding and management<br />

decisions aimed at making <strong>the</strong> program more effective. The PART<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore looks at all factors that affect and reflect program performance<br />

including program purpose and design; performance measurement,<br />

evaluations, and strategic planning; program management; and program<br />

results. Because <strong>the</strong> PART includes a consistent series of analytical<br />

questions, it allows programs to show improvements over time, and<br />

allows comparisons between similar programs.<br />

• OMB Circular A-11 covers <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> President’s budget<br />

and tells you how to prepare and submit materials required for OMB and<br />

Presidential review of agency requests and for formulation of <strong>the</strong> budget.<br />

• The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is known as "<strong>the</strong><br />

investigative arm of Congress" and "<strong>the</strong> congressional watchdog." GAO<br />

supports <strong>the</strong> Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and<br />

helps improve <strong>the</strong> performance and accountability of <strong>the</strong> federal<br />

government for <strong>the</strong> benefit of <strong>the</strong> American people.<br />

• Federal Financial <strong>Management</strong> Improvement Act (FFMIA) - The<br />

purpose of <strong>the</strong> Federal Financial <strong>Management</strong> Improvement Act of 1996<br />

(FFMIA) is to advance Federal financial management by ensuring that<br />

Federal financial management systems provide accurate, reliable, and<br />

timely financial management information to <strong>the</strong> government’s managers.<br />

The intent and <strong>the</strong> requirements of this Act go well beyond <strong>the</strong> directives<br />

of <strong>the</strong> CFO Act and <strong>the</strong> Government <strong>Management</strong> Reform Act of 1994<br />

(GMRA) to publish audited financial reports. Compliance with <strong>the</strong> FFMIA<br />

will provide <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> continuing use of reliable financial<br />

management information by program managers, and by <strong>the</strong> President,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Congress and <strong>the</strong> public.<br />

• The Information Technology <strong>Management</strong> Reform Act of 1996<br />

(ITMRA) is intended to improve <strong>the</strong> ways that agencies acquire, use, and<br />

dispose of information technology (IT) and, <strong>the</strong>reby, to improve <strong>the</strong><br />

productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness of Federal programs. The Act<br />

requires consideration of IT goals in strategic planning and IT<br />

contributions to agency goals and performance.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 34


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful government<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Measures<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework is a group of performance-related<br />

processes and methodologies, sequenced throughout five phases, and<br />

designed to raise organizational awareness of performance management<br />

best practices.<br />

ISO 9000 is a family of standards published by <strong>the</strong> International Organization<br />

for Standardization (“ISO”). The objective of ISO 9001 is to provide a set of<br />

requirements that, if <strong>the</strong>y are effectively implemented, will provide you with<br />

confidence that your supplier can consistently provide goods and services<br />

that meet your needs and expectations and comply with applicable<br />

regulations.<br />

Capability Maturity Model ® Integration (CMMI) is a process improvement<br />

approach that provides organizations with <strong>the</strong> essential elements of effective<br />

processes. It can be used to guide process improvement across a project, a<br />

division, or an entire organization. CMMI helps integrate traditionally separate<br />

organizational functions, set process improvement goals and priorities,<br />

provide guidance for quality processes, and provide a point of reference for<br />

appraising current processes.<br />

The <strong>Performance</strong> Reference Model (PRM) is a standardized framework to<br />

measure <strong>the</strong> performance of major IT initiatives and <strong>the</strong>ir contribution to<br />

program performance. The PRM structure is designed to clearly articulate <strong>the</strong><br />

cause and effect relationship between inputs, outputs, and outcomes. This<br />

“line of sight” is critical for IT project managers, program managers, and key<br />

decision-makers to understand how and to what extent technology is enabling<br />

progress towards outputs and outcomes.<br />

Enterprise Architecture (EA) builds a holistic view of <strong>the</strong> organization's<br />

strategy, processes, information, and information technology assets.<br />

Enterprise Architect ensures that <strong>the</strong> business and IT are in alignment. EA<br />

links <strong>the</strong> business mission, strategy, and processes of an organization to its<br />

IT strategy, and documents this using multiple architectural models or views<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 35


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

that show how <strong>the</strong> current and future needs of an organization will be met in<br />

an efficient, sustainable, agile, and adaptable manner.<br />

Enterprise Architecture operates across organizational and computing "silos"<br />

to drive common approaches and expose information assets and processes<br />

across <strong>the</strong> enterprise. The goal is to deliver an architecture that supports <strong>the</strong><br />

most efficient and secure IT environment meeting a company's business<br />

needs.<br />

Total Quality <strong>Management</strong> (TQM) is a set of management practices<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> organization, geared to ensure <strong>the</strong> organization consistently<br />

meets or exceeds customer requirements. TQM places strong focus on<br />

process measurement and controls as means of continuous improvement. In<br />

a TQM effort, all members of an organization participate in improving<br />

processes, products, services and <strong>the</strong> culture in which <strong>the</strong>y work.<br />

The methods for implementing this approach come from <strong>the</strong> teachings of<br />

such quality leaders as Philip B. Crosby, W. Edwards Deming, Armand V.<br />

Feigenbaum, Kaoru Ishikawa and Joseph M. Juran. A core concept in<br />

implementing TQM is Deming’s 14 points, a set of management practices to<br />

help companies increase <strong>the</strong>ir quality and productivity.<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong> is a systematic approach to dealing with change within<br />

every perspective of an organization, from systems to personnel to projects to<br />

functions. Change management is a comprehensive, often difficult<br />

management function to properly implement.<br />

There’s <strong>the</strong> saying “Organizations don't adapt to change; <strong>the</strong>ir people do.”<br />

With that outlook, it is easy to understand how performance management<br />

plays a critical part in managing change. Implementing change within an<br />

organization often requires a change in how employees execute things. You<br />

can implement <strong>the</strong> most advanced change management tools money can<br />

buy, but if your people don’t buy into or fully support <strong>the</strong> initiatives, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

performance will suffer and ultimately <strong>the</strong> organization will be ineffective, or<br />

worse, less efficient than before.<br />

Every system, personnel, and procedural change within an organization<br />

should be implemented with <strong>the</strong> goal of achieving organizational mission and<br />

goals. The actual improvement should be compared to <strong>the</strong> predicted<br />

improvement to assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> change. This guide<br />

discusses managing your organization during its many changes throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> performance lifecycle.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful government<br />

performance solution.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 36


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Measures<br />

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a strategic planning and management<br />

system that is used extensively in business and industry, government, and<br />

nonprofit organizations worldwide to align business activities to <strong>the</strong> vision and<br />

strategy of <strong>the</strong> organization, improve internal and external communications,<br />

and monitor organization performance against strategic goals. It was<br />

originated by Drs. Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business School) and David<br />

Norton as a performance measurement framework that added strategic nonfinancial<br />

performance measures to traditional financial metrics to give<br />

managers and executives a more 'balanced' view of organizational<br />

performance.<br />

A Logic Model is a tool used to visually describe <strong>the</strong> linkages between<br />

program goals, activities, and expected outcomes. They describe how a<br />

program should work, present <strong>the</strong> planned activities for <strong>the</strong> program, describe<br />

how activities will be documented, and focus on anticipated outcomes. It is<br />

important to remember that logic models present a <strong>the</strong>ory about <strong>the</strong> expected<br />

program outcome. They do not demonstrate whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> program caused <strong>the</strong><br />

observed outcome. Logic Models display <strong>the</strong> sequence of actions that<br />

describe what <strong>the</strong> program is and will do, and how investments link to results.<br />

Logic Maps often include five core components:<br />

1. INPUTS: resources, contributions, investments that go into <strong>the</strong><br />

program<br />

2. OUTPUTS: activities, services, events and products that reach people<br />

who participate or who are targeted<br />

3. OUTCOMES: results or changes for individuals, groups, communities,<br />

organizations, communities, or systems<br />

4. Assumptions: <strong>the</strong> beliefs we have about <strong>the</strong> program, <strong>the</strong> people<br />

involved, and <strong>the</strong> context and <strong>the</strong> way we think <strong>the</strong> program will work<br />

5. External Factors: <strong>the</strong> environment in which <strong>the</strong> program exists<br />

includes a variety of external factors that interact with and influence <strong>the</strong><br />

program action.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 37


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Key <strong>Performance</strong> Indicators (KPIs) are quantifiable measurements that<br />

reflect <strong>the</strong> critical success factors of an organization. Based on beforehand<br />

agreed measures, <strong>the</strong>y reveal a high-level snapshot of <strong>the</strong> organization. To<br />

achieve a particular target level of Key <strong>Performance</strong> Indicators for a company,<br />

every department has to work in synergy towards it. For this purpose, all <strong>the</strong><br />

units of an organization need to define <strong>the</strong>ir respective KPIs, which should in<br />

turn work towards accomplishing <strong>the</strong> overall KPIs of <strong>the</strong> organization.<br />

Critical Few is <strong>the</strong> concept that focusing on <strong>the</strong> critical few objectives (CFOs)<br />

that add <strong>the</strong> most organizational value and channels energy to consistently<br />

deliver results that meet organizational objectives will, in turn, yield positive<br />

results. Establishing critical few objectives helps organizations manage time<br />

effectively as well as sets priorities based upon those “Critical few”<br />

responsibilities and activities needed to achieve its goals<br />

Inputs, Processes, Outputs, Outcomes<br />

A project involves <strong>the</strong> transformation of inputs into an output or product.<br />

Project inputs are <strong>the</strong> various needs and resources that projects can draw<br />

upon as it sets out to accomplish its work. Processes plan and control <strong>the</strong><br />

performance or execution of a project. Processes deliver OUTPUTS. In<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r words, what pops out of <strong>the</strong> end of a process is an output. Outputs are<br />

only produced (or should only be produced) because <strong>the</strong>re is a customer of<br />

<strong>the</strong> process who wants <strong>the</strong>m. Outputs can usually be seen, felt, or moved<br />

about. An OUTCOME is a level of performance, or achievement. It may be<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> process, or <strong>the</strong> output. Outcomes imply quantification of<br />

performance.<br />

Scorecards and Dashboards have become <strong>the</strong> popular method for<br />

communicating and displaying complex data in visual, more simplistic views.<br />

Often <strong>the</strong> two terms get used interchangeably. While both scorecards and<br />

dashboards display organizational performance in a visual output, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

important distinctions between <strong>the</strong> two.<br />

Scorecards often illustrate performance data over a period of time. They<br />

represent a broader organizational strategy and are designed to show<br />

progress toward objectives and goals; kind of like a report card.<br />

Dashboards are simply a series of graphs, charts, gauges and o<strong>the</strong>r visual<br />

indicators that illustrate performance in real time. While dashboards don’t<br />

always have to be in real time, <strong>the</strong>y often represent up-to-<strong>the</strong>-minute<br />

information depending on <strong>the</strong> situation. For example, a sales team manager<br />

may not need to see real time information and daily information may be just<br />

fine. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a call center manager may need up to <strong>the</strong> second<br />

knowledge of a critical system going down.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 38


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Diagnostic Indicators are performance events determined to be <strong>the</strong> signs of<br />

an overlying problem. In <strong>the</strong> performance field, diagnostic indicators give<br />

analysts clues for what problems may be arising within an organization.<br />

Diagnostic indicators are <strong>the</strong> clues that identify performance management<br />

problems.<br />

Exception Reporting is <strong>the</strong> selection and highlighting of objects that are in<br />

some way different or critical. Results that fall outside a set of predetermined<br />

threshold values (exceptions) are highlighted in color. This enables you to<br />

identify immediately any results that deviate from <strong>the</strong> expected results.<br />

Exception reporting allows you to determine <strong>the</strong> objects that are critical for<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis. Exception reporting can be extremely complex, but in it’s<br />

simplest project management form, an exception report mainly highlights <strong>the</strong><br />

differences between <strong>the</strong> planned results and <strong>the</strong> actual results and is<br />

prepared when such differences are substantial.<br />

Decision Support Tools are software, frameworks and o<strong>the</strong>r tools that can<br />

be used as part of a structured decision-making process. A few decision<br />

support tools include statistical analysis, sampling plan development, data<br />

acquisition, ranking systems, data management, compliance/emergency<br />

response, modeling, visualization, risk assessment, remedial process<br />

selection, cost estimation and long term monitoring and system optimization.<br />

Benchmarking is <strong>the</strong> process of comparing <strong>the</strong> cost, cycle time, productivity,<br />

or quality of a specific process or method to ano<strong>the</strong>r that is widely considered<br />

to be an industry standard or best practice. The result is often a business<br />

case for making changes in order to make improvements. Benchmarking is<br />

most used to measure performance using a specific indicator (cost per unit of<br />

measure, productivity per unit of measure, cycle time of x per unit of measure<br />

or defects per unit of measure) resulting in a metric of performance that is<br />

<strong>the</strong>n compared to o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

A service-level agreement (SLA) is a negotiated agreement between two<br />

parties where one is <strong>the</strong> customer and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong> service provider. This<br />

can be a legally binding formal or informal 'contract'. The SLA records a<br />

common understanding about services, priorities, responsibilities, guarantees<br />

and warranties. Each area of service scope should have <strong>the</strong> 'level of service'<br />

defined. The SLA may specify <strong>the</strong> levels of availability, serviceability,<br />

performance, operation, or o<strong>the</strong>r attributes of <strong>the</strong> service such as billing. The<br />

'level of service' can also be specified as 'target' and 'minimum', which allows<br />

customers to informed what to expect (<strong>the</strong> minimum), whilst providing a<br />

measurable (average) target value that shows <strong>the</strong> level of organization<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 39


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

performance. In some contracts penalties may be agreed in <strong>the</strong> case of non<br />

compliance of <strong>the</strong> SLA (but see 'internal' customers below).It is important to<br />

note that <strong>the</strong> 'agreement' relates to <strong>the</strong> services <strong>the</strong> customer receives, and<br />

not how <strong>the</strong> service provider delivers that service.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful government<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

Process Level Improvements<br />

Business process reengineering (BPR) is <strong>the</strong> analysis and redesign of<br />

workflow within and between enterprises. BPR reached its heyday in <strong>the</strong> early<br />

1990's when Michael Hammer and James Champy published <strong>the</strong>ir bestselling<br />

book, "Reengineering <strong>the</strong> Corporation". The authors promoted <strong>the</strong> idea<br />

that sometimes radical redesign and reorganization of an enterprise (wiping<br />

<strong>the</strong> slate clean) was necessary to lower costs and increase quality of service<br />

and that information technology was <strong>the</strong> key enabler for that radical change.<br />

Hammer and Champy felt that <strong>the</strong> design of workflow in most large<br />

corporations was based on assumptions about technology, people, and<br />

organizational goals that were no longer valid. They suggested seven<br />

principles of reengineering to streamline <strong>the</strong> work process and <strong>the</strong>reby<br />

achieve significant levels of improvement in quality, time management, and<br />

cost:<br />

1. Organize around outcomes, not tasks.<br />

2. Identify all <strong>the</strong> processes in an organization and prioritize <strong>the</strong>m in order<br />

of redesign urgency.<br />

3. Integrate information processing work into <strong>the</strong> real work that produces<br />

<strong>the</strong> information.<br />

4. Treat geographically dispersed resources as though <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

centralized.<br />

5. Link parallel activities in <strong>the</strong> workflow instead of just integrating <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

results.<br />

6. Put <strong>the</strong> decision point where <strong>the</strong> work is performed, and build control<br />

into <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

7. Capture information once and at <strong>the</strong> source.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 40


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Lean Six Sigma a business improvement methodology that maximizes<br />

shareholder value by achieving <strong>the</strong> fastest rate of improvement in customer<br />

satisfaction, cost, quality, process speed, and invested capital. The fusion of<br />

Lean and Six Sigma improvement methods is required because:<br />

• Lean cannot bring a process under statistical control<br />

• Six Sigma alone cannot dramatically improve process speed or reduce<br />

invested capital<br />

• Both enable <strong>the</strong> reduction of <strong>the</strong> cost of complexity<br />

Ironically, Six Sigma and Lean have often been regarded as rival initiatives.<br />

Lean enthusiasts note that Six Sigma pays little attention to anything related<br />

to speed and flow, while Six Sigma supporters point out that Lean fails to<br />

address key concepts like customer needs and variation. Both sides are right.<br />

Yet <strong>the</strong>se arguments are more often used to advocate choosing one over <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, ra<strong>the</strong>r than to support <strong>the</strong> more logical conclusion that we blend Lean<br />

and Six Sigma.<br />

The project level indicators are to be used in conjunction with <strong>the</strong> project<br />

standards and management experience as an aid in assessing a project's risk<br />

and complexity level. Once <strong>the</strong> project risk level is determined <strong>the</strong> Process,<br />

Methodology, and Documentation guidelines will suggest <strong>the</strong> rigor and detail<br />

appropriate for that project risk level.<br />

Quality Assurance / Quality Control - Quality assurance (QA) is a set of<br />

activities whose purpose is to demonstrate that an entity meets all quality<br />

requirements. QA activities are carried out in order to inspire <strong>the</strong> confidence<br />

of both customers and managers, that all quality requirements are being met.<br />

Quality control is a set of activities or techniques whose purpose is to ensure<br />

that all quality requirements are being met. In order to achieve this purpose,<br />

processes are monitored and performance problems are solved.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful government<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 41


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Activity Level Improvements<br />

Strategy Mapping is <strong>the</strong> process of diagramming how an organization<br />

creates value by connecting strategic objectives in explicit cause-and-effect<br />

relationship with each o<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> four BSC objectives (financial, customer,<br />

processes, learning and growth). Strategy Maps are a strategic part of <strong>the</strong><br />

Balanced Scorecard framework to describe strategies for value creation.<br />

Budget Crosswalks, commonly used in finance and budgeting, convert one<br />

set of values to ano<strong>the</strong>r by applying a specific set of business rules and can<br />

describe <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> budget’s allocated funds and <strong>the</strong><br />

programs those funds are expected to impact. Used in <strong>the</strong> Federal Budget<br />

Process, Budget Crosswalks are defined as a, “term for <strong>the</strong> allocation of<br />

budget authority and outlay amounts in a budget resolution to congressional<br />

committees according to <strong>the</strong>ir jurisdictions and <strong>the</strong> committees' subdivision of<br />

those amounts among <strong>the</strong>ir programs or subcommittees.”<br />

Activity Based Costing (ABC) is an alternative to <strong>the</strong> traditional way of<br />

accounting. Traditionally it is believed that high volume customers are<br />

profitable customers, a loyal customer is also a profitable one, and profits will<br />

follow a happy customer. Studies on customer profitability have unveiled that<br />

<strong>the</strong> above is not necessarily true. ABC is a costing model that identifies <strong>the</strong><br />

cost pools, or activity centers, in an organization and assigns costs to<br />

products and services (cost drivers) based on <strong>the</strong> number of events or<br />

transactions involved in <strong>the</strong> process of providing a product or service. As a<br />

result, Activity Based Costing can support managers to see how to maximize<br />

shareholder value and improve corporate performance.<br />

Activity Based <strong>Management</strong> (ABM) is a discipline that focuses on <strong>the</strong><br />

management of activities as a way to improve customer value and profit. ABM<br />

includes cost driver analysis, activity analysis, and performance<br />

measurement. This technique uses activity based costing information to<br />

identify strategies for removing resource waste from operating activities. Main<br />

tools employed include: strategic analysis, value analysis, cost analysis, lifecycle<br />

costing, and activity based budgeting.<br />

The Most Efficient Organization (MEO) is management’s “bid” to perform a<br />

certain function. If <strong>the</strong> MEO wins an A-76 competition, it succeeds or takes<br />

over <strong>the</strong> work of <strong>the</strong> existing government function.<br />

The President’s <strong>Management</strong> Agenda urges federal leadership to “compete”<br />

functions that are commercial in nature. To be competitive with private<br />

industry, <strong>the</strong> team responsible for developing <strong>the</strong> MEO must design a<br />

streamlined, more efficient work organization than is in place today. The MEO<br />

generally performs <strong>the</strong> same work as <strong>the</strong> government function it is meant to<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 42


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

succeed but aims to use fewer resources while maintaining or exceeding <strong>the</strong><br />

quality level defined in <strong>the</strong> PWS.<br />

Financial <strong>Management</strong> is <strong>the</strong> [planning, directing, monitoring, organizing,<br />

and controlling of <strong>the</strong> monetary resources of an organization. The Office of<br />

Federal Financial <strong>Management</strong> (OFFM) was created within <strong>the</strong> Office of<br />

<strong>Management</strong> and Budget (OMB) by <strong>the</strong> Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of<br />

1990. OFFM, led by <strong>the</strong> OMB Controller under <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> Deputy<br />

Director for <strong>Management</strong>, is responsible for <strong>the</strong> financial management policy<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Federal Government. OFFM responsibilities include implementing <strong>the</strong><br />

financial management improvement priorities of <strong>the</strong> President, establishing<br />

government-wide financial management policies of executive agencies, and<br />

carrying out <strong>the</strong> financial management functions of <strong>the</strong> CFO Act.<br />

The Strategic Prioritization and Planning (SP2) process is an evolution of<br />

Quality Engineering Methods, including Quality Function Deployment and<br />

Design for Six Sigma, and incorporates various dynamic aspects to form a<br />

portable and powerful decision making environment. The process can be<br />

tailored to any desired level of detail to enhance <strong>the</strong> decision making process<br />

for investment strategies as more information becomes available. The end<br />

product allows for “what if” games to be played through a dynamic and<br />

interactive environment and <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> process can be <strong>the</strong> foundation<br />

for detailed strategic road mapping and quantitative technology assessments<br />

and tracking. SP2 is a living process that should guide strategic planning and<br />

be continuously updated as a program evolves.<br />

Portfolio Analysis is a method to improve Government business practices<br />

by analyzing a portfolio of systems as a whole, ra<strong>the</strong>r than analyzing<br />

individual acquisition programs. Portfolio analysis is <strong>the</strong> art and science of<br />

allocating scarce resources to satisfy strategic objectives. In literature, this<br />

form of analysis is described as a dynamic decision process, a resource<br />

allocation process, or a manifestation of a business strategy. In government,<br />

as well as in <strong>the</strong> private sector, portfolio analysis helps senior management<br />

determine where and how to invest for <strong>the</strong> future. In short, it is a technique to<br />

determine how to best spend limited dollars. Portfolio analysis steps include<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>ring life cycle cost data for <strong>the</strong> various systems that will be analyzed,<br />

establishing a scoring system using subject matter experts to determine how<br />

effectively current and future systems match capabilities to requirements,<br />

and developing a means to display results by which decision makers can<br />

examine risk-reward analysis and conduct trade-offs.<br />

Business Case Analysis is a method companies use for project selection. It<br />

analyzes how fulfilling <strong>the</strong> business case for <strong>the</strong> project will implement <strong>the</strong><br />

corporate strategy and sustain <strong>the</strong> competitive advantage of <strong>the</strong> company.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 43


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The business case can fur<strong>the</strong>r be developed into <strong>the</strong> business plan with <strong>the</strong><br />

addition of more details. Your can convert <strong>the</strong> business case to action steps<br />

and major milestones in order to develop a plan that will guide your venture<br />

through <strong>the</strong> entire project lifecycle, including that of <strong>the</strong> project outcome.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong>-Based Budgeting is a results focused planning and budgeting<br />

framework which focuses on three elements: <strong>the</strong> strategy (how to achieve<br />

outcome), outputs (activities to achieve final outcome), and <strong>the</strong> result (final<br />

outcome). <strong>Performance</strong> budgets use missions, goals and objectives to justify<br />

funding. Through <strong>the</strong> allocation of resources, performance-based budging<br />

achieves specific objectives based on program goals and measured results.<br />

As a result, it is possible to understand which activities are cost-effective in<br />

terms of achieving <strong>the</strong> desired result.<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> processes,<br />

techniques and frameworks to implement a successful government<br />

performance solution.<br />

The Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> and Best Practices Analysis will identify your<br />

strengths, weaknesses, and cost savings opportunities, and will plan out <strong>the</strong><br />

exact steps to reaching your performance goals.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 44


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Decision Support Systems<br />

Decision Support Systems include software, frameworks and o<strong>the</strong>r tools that<br />

can be used as part of a structured decision-making process. Types of<br />

decision support systems include information control models, paradigm<br />

models, decision models, simulation models, visualization models and<br />

process models.<br />

My Organizational <strong>Performance</strong> Analysis measures your organization’s<br />

utilization of various decision making processes and decision support<br />

systems and tools.<br />

The <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit provides all of <strong>the</strong> tools, templates and<br />

methodologies to implement performance management processes in-house,<br />

leveraging your current resources, and saving you thousands in consulting<br />

fees and expensive tools.<br />

See Decision Support Systems and Tools Framework on <strong>the</strong> next page.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 45


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Learn details about each of <strong>the</strong>se decision support systems here<br />

http://lifecycle-performancepros.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=10&<br />

Itemid=52<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 46


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Methodologies<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Methodologies (some shown in <strong>the</strong> image below)<br />

are discussed in detail throughout The 120 Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong><br />

and in <strong>the</strong> Methodologies <strong>Guide</strong>. Each of <strong>the</strong> 43 methodologies is a step by<br />

step process to managing performance throughout <strong>the</strong> five phases of<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>.<br />

Figure 6 - Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Methodologies<br />

The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit is sectioned into <strong>the</strong> five<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> phases. As you will quickly find out, your<br />

organization probably has some or many of <strong>the</strong>se processes already in place.<br />

The goals should be to identify which process your organization is in need of<br />

<strong>the</strong> most and follow <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model to help<br />

you implement <strong>the</strong>m. The <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit includes several<br />

templates and methodologies within each of <strong>the</strong> phases to help your<br />

organization document it’s planning and processes and successfully execute<br />

<strong>the</strong>se performance management best practices.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 47


Defining Phase<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The topics discussed in <strong>the</strong> defining phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Identifying/re-examining organizational mission and business<br />

objectives<br />

• Defining Business Objectives<br />

• Developing a strategic plan that will lay <strong>the</strong> foundation of your<br />

performance plan<br />

• An exercise for linking corporate strategy to executive, managerial, and<br />

individual goals<br />

• Determining <strong>the</strong> scope of your performance initiative<br />

• Developing a winning performance management team<br />

The templates included in <strong>the</strong> defining phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Business Objectives Alignment<br />

• Organizational Impact Assessment<br />

• Risk Assessment<br />

• Roles and Responsibilities Checklist<br />

• Strategic Alignment Template<br />

• SWOT Analysis Template<br />

• Vision and <strong>Performance</strong> Scope Definition Template<br />

The processes included in <strong>the</strong> defining phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Model<br />

• Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework<br />

• Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Roadmap<br />

• Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Methodologies<br />

• Strategic Planning Lifecycle<br />

• Strategic <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Planning Process<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 48


Planning Phase<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The topics discussed in <strong>the</strong> planning phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Breaking down “functional” thinking within your organization<br />

• Identifying key processes that drive <strong>the</strong> success of your business<br />

• Base lining your current level of performance and setting future<br />

performance goals<br />

• Developing a performance metrics repository and storing<br />

organizational performance data<br />

• Ensuring a successful performance management implementation<br />

through training<br />

The templates included in <strong>the</strong> planning phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Communication Plan<br />

• Gaining Employee Acceptance Checklist<br />

• Metrics Repository Template<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan<br />

• Planning Session Template<br />

• Process Evaluation Scorecard<br />

• Process Profile Template<br />

• Report Repository Template<br />

The processes included in <strong>the</strong> planning phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

•<br />

• Siloed vs Cross Functional <strong>Management</strong><br />

• Process <strong>Performance</strong> Lifecycle<br />

• OLAP Database - Star Schemas<br />

• Sample Metrics Repositories<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 49


Executing Phase<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The topics discussed in <strong>the</strong> executing phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Developing simple, unique measurements that go beyond industry<br />

standards<br />

• The anatomy of a performance measurement<br />

• Aligning performance to corporate strategy<br />

• Aligning business units to organizational objectives<br />

• Aligning workforce performance to organizational objectives<br />

• Aligning financial performance to organizational goals<br />

• Aligning IT/IS performance to organizational objectives<br />

• Avoiding common pitfalls in aligning performance to organizational<br />

strategy<br />

• Identifying <strong>the</strong> cross-functional processes that affect product / service<br />

delivery<br />

• Integrating data collection into existing workflows<br />

The templates included in <strong>the</strong> executing phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Data <strong>Management</strong> Tool Evaluation Template<br />

• Data Warehouse Tool Evaluation Template<br />

• LPP Methodologies Implementation Template<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> Methodology Implementation Template<br />

• Vendor Assessment Weighted Criteria Assessment<br />

The processes included in <strong>the</strong> executing phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step<br />

by Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> Lifecycle<br />

• Workforce <strong>Performance</strong> Lifecycle<br />

• IT/IS <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Lifecycle<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 50


Monitoring Phase<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The topics discussed in <strong>the</strong> monitoring phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Developing a Quality <strong>Management</strong> Plan for accurately measuring<br />

performance<br />

• Identifying Data Quality Metrics<br />

• Measuring <strong>the</strong> overall contribution of your Information Supply Chains to<br />

business objectives<br />

• Continuously improving processes and performance based on data<br />

collection and reporting<br />

• Ensuring a successful Project <strong>Management</strong> Program through<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Measurement<br />

The templates included in <strong>the</strong> monitoring phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step<br />

by Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Change <strong>Management</strong> Template<br />

• Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template<br />

• Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Checklist<br />

• Quality Control Checklist<br />

• Quality <strong>Management</strong> Plan<br />

The processes included in <strong>the</strong> monitoring phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step<br />

by Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Lifecycle Data Quality <strong>Management</strong> Process<br />

• Information Supply Chains<br />

• Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Improvement Process<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 51


Reporting Phase<br />

Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

The topics discussed in <strong>the</strong> reporting phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• The <strong>Performance</strong> Reporting Process<br />

• Choosing <strong>the</strong> right Business Intelligence Tools for your data<br />

needs/architecture<br />

• Developing a strategy for identifying performance improvement<br />

opportunities<br />

• Establishing and implementing service level agreements<br />

• 7 key steps in establishing a Service Level Agreement<br />

• Service Level Agreement checklist<br />

• Choosing key performance indicators for report automation and<br />

dashboard reporting<br />

• Ten characteristics of a good KPI<br />

• Scorecards versus Dashboards<br />

• Planning your dashboard/scorecard implementation<br />

• 3 steps to creating a performance dashboard/scorecard in Microsoft<br />

Excel<br />

• Measuring and reporting customer satisfaction<br />

• Bringing it all toge<strong>the</strong>r for a successful performance initiative<br />

The templates included in <strong>the</strong> reporting phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• Dashboard Template<br />

• Data Warehouse Data Model<br />

• Employee Appraisal Form Template<br />

• Employee <strong>Performance</strong> Indicators Template<br />

• Lessons Learned Template<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Report Log<br />

• Training Needs Analysis Template<br />

The processes included in <strong>the</strong> reporting phase of The 120 Day Plan: Step by<br />

Step <strong>Guide</strong> include:<br />

• <strong>Performance</strong> Reporting Process<br />

• ETL, OLAP and Data Warehouse Models<br />

• SLA Process<br />

• KPI Metric Flow<br />

• Dashboard Implementation Process<br />

• Excel Dashboards<br />

• Lifecycle Customer Satisfaction<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 52


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Templates<br />

This guide has illustrated <strong>the</strong> topics that are discussed throughout The 120<br />

Day Plan: Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong>. This section outlines <strong>the</strong> templates that are<br />

included in The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Kit and brief<br />

descriptions of each.<br />

The performance management templates bring structure and organization to<br />

any performance management initiative. These templates are designed to<br />

save you time on developing and formatting performance deliverables and<br />

money researching what information is most valuable to capture. Created to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework, <strong>the</strong>se templates will help<br />

make your performance initiative go smoothly. This section provides a<br />

description of each template included in The Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> Kit.<br />

Defining Phase Templates<br />

Business Objectives and Alignment - The Business Objectives and<br />

Alignment Matrix is a description of <strong>the</strong> business justification for implementing<br />

a performance initiative. This includes <strong>the</strong> high-level objectives that <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative is intended to satisfy and <strong>the</strong> anticipated business benefit of those<br />

objectives. Objectives include both enhanced execution of business<br />

processes and performance throughout your organization. The objectives are<br />

described in terms of <strong>the</strong> capability expected from <strong>the</strong> initiative, <strong>the</strong> business<br />

benefit, and <strong>the</strong> estimated value of that benefit in terms of increased revenue,<br />

reduced cost, or some key intangible, such as improved customer relations.<br />

These objectives guide <strong>the</strong> business and system scope of <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

initiative.<br />

Organizational Impact Assessment – The organizational Impact<br />

Assessment Template provides a description of <strong>the</strong> magnitude of changes to<br />

roles, responsibilities, skills, and reporting structures should <strong>the</strong>y take place.<br />

It is organized by performance activity or interrelated groups of performance<br />

activities. The assessment estimates <strong>the</strong> number of affected staff positions,<br />

and identifies <strong>the</strong> training, staffing, and cultural implications of <strong>the</strong> changes as<br />

well. If alternatives are identified, <strong>the</strong> relative impacts of each alternative are<br />

specified.<br />

Risk Assessment Template – The Risk Assessment Template will help your<br />

organization determine <strong>the</strong> quantitative and/or qualitative value of risks<br />

related to recognized threats. The risk assessment template contains a<br />

probability/impact matrix and a risk log that captures risk impact, trigger<br />

events, probability of occurrence, and mitigation and response strategies.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 53


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

This tool calculates <strong>the</strong> two components of risk, <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

loss, and <strong>the</strong> probability that <strong>the</strong> loss will occur. This is a valuable template<br />

for organizations/teams taking a proactive approach to managing risks<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> performance initiative.<br />

Roles and Responsibilities Template – The Roles and Responsibilities<br />

Template identifies <strong>the</strong> roles and responsibilities of <strong>the</strong> individuals within <strong>the</strong><br />

performance management initiative. It includes <strong>the</strong> common performance<br />

management team member titles and <strong>the</strong>ir typical roles, so that you only need<br />

to insert <strong>the</strong> actual team members and additional responsibilities customized<br />

to your service delivery. A useful template for organizations engaging in a<br />

performance initiative for identifying who is <strong>the</strong> most qualified to tackle<br />

necessary responsibilities for a successful implementation.<br />

Strategic Alignment Template – The Strategic Alignment Template is a<br />

scorecard that takes a look at your strategic objectives and strategic<br />

measures and how <strong>the</strong>y relate to <strong>the</strong> four perspectives of <strong>the</strong> Balanced<br />

Scorecard: Customer Service, Financial, Internal Processes, and Learning<br />

and Growth. This template will help your organization organize your strategic<br />

objectives and document goals and performance. The Strategic Alignment<br />

Template provides example objectives and measures for each of <strong>the</strong><br />

performance perspectives.<br />

SWOT Analysis Template – The SWOT Analysis Template is a strategic<br />

planning tool used to evaluate <strong>the</strong> Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities,<br />

and Threats involved in your projects or performance initiative. This template<br />

will help you identify <strong>the</strong> internal and external factors that are favorable and<br />

unfavorable to achieving your objectives. This template will help you identify<br />

negative factors in order to turn <strong>the</strong>m into positive factors. To simplify <strong>the</strong><br />

process, included are criteria examples to help you identify those factors.<br />

Vision and <strong>Performance</strong> Scope Definition Template –The Vision and<br />

Scope Definition Template is a deliverable style template that simplifies <strong>the</strong><br />

process of defining <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> performance initiative. Understanding<br />

<strong>the</strong> scope of your performance initiative is vital to managing performance and<br />

<strong>the</strong> success of your performance initiative. This template helps organizations<br />

document exactly what <strong>the</strong>y will be delivering and what <strong>the</strong> boundaries of <strong>the</strong><br />

performance initiative are.<br />

Planning Session Template – The Planning Session Template allows you to<br />

manage <strong>the</strong> planning sessions outlined in <strong>the</strong> defining and planning stages of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework. This template includes meeting<br />

agendas, agenda item descriptions, discussion leaders and meeting<br />

objectives.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 54


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Methodology Implementation Template – The <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Methodology Implementation Template is designed to help you plan and<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> processes identified in <strong>the</strong> Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> to Implementing<br />

a World Class <strong>Performance</strong> Solution. The template simplifies <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

by letting you list <strong>the</strong> steps outlined in <strong>the</strong> guide, and document <strong>the</strong> actions,<br />

responsibilities, anticipated results, business objectives supported, and<br />

dependencies.<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist – The Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist is<br />

designed for <strong>Performance</strong> Managers and <strong>Performance</strong> Team Members to<br />

help determine <strong>the</strong> impact of potential change requests within <strong>the</strong><br />

performance initiative. The checklist examines <strong>the</strong> changes that alter <strong>the</strong><br />

scope of <strong>the</strong> initiative and require analysis in order to understand <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan and <strong>the</strong> stakeholders.<br />

Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template – Some performance<br />

management changes are huge and impact your people, processes and<br />

organizational culture. These changes can include anything from how <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative will affect systems, employees and processes, individual and team<br />

roles and responsibilities to communication procedures, key performance<br />

indicators and <strong>the</strong> shift of employee expectations and workforce performance.<br />

The Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template allows you to see how<br />

your change proposal will affect <strong>the</strong> performance initiative, staff and <strong>the</strong><br />

organization as a whole.<br />

Planning Phase Templates<br />

Communication Plan – The Communication Plan Template is a deliverable<br />

style document that provides a framework to ensure successful execution of<br />

<strong>the</strong> performance initiative. This Communication Plan Template will help your<br />

organization document <strong>the</strong> methods used to ga<strong>the</strong>r and store information.<br />

The plan includes a Communication Matrix which contains a distribution<br />

structure detailing whom <strong>the</strong> information will flow to and what methods will be<br />

used to distribute it. The Communication Plan Template will help you<br />

describe <strong>the</strong> information to be distributed including specific document names<br />

and standard formats to be used. The template will help you manage<br />

production schedules and specify <strong>the</strong> communication processes and<br />

structures among team members.<br />

Gaining Employee Acceptance Checklist – The Gaining Employee<br />

Acceptance Checklist can be used to assist you in ensuring <strong>the</strong> proper<br />

elements are in place to maximize employee acceptance of your performance<br />

initiative. This template is linked to <strong>the</strong> first step of <strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Framework planning phase. The checklist involves a set of questions<br />

regarding <strong>the</strong> employee’s views of <strong>the</strong> initiative, which <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 55


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

management team must know in order to ensure a smooth transition with<br />

minimal pushback.<br />

Metrics Repository Templates – Developing a metrics repository is one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> first steps in managing performance. The Metrics Repository Template<br />

includes three metric repository templates that illustrate <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

measures and methods to track <strong>the</strong>m. These templates will help your<br />

organization define and classify metrics, validate <strong>the</strong> parameters and<br />

calculations, specify when and how <strong>the</strong> metrics will be measured, and<br />

document baseline performance and performance variances.<br />

Report Repository Template – Reporting is <strong>the</strong> most visible output in <strong>the</strong><br />

performance management process. As your performance initiative gains<br />

momentum and stakeholder’s begin to understand <strong>the</strong> value and necessity of<br />

analyzing performance, <strong>the</strong> demand for reports from all areas of your<br />

organization will increase. The Report Repository Template provides a<br />

comprehensive list of all routine reports generated by your organizational<br />

departments. This list will be used as a basis for determining reporting<br />

requirements in your performance initiative. This report comes with<br />

instructions on how to populate <strong>the</strong> template.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Methodology Implementation Template– The <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Methodology Implementation Template is designed to help you plan and<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> processes identified in <strong>the</strong> Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> to Implementing<br />

a World Class <strong>Performance</strong> Solution. The template simplifies <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

by letting you list <strong>the</strong> steps outlined in <strong>the</strong> guide, and document <strong>the</strong> actions,<br />

responsibilities, anticipated results, business objectives supported, and<br />

dependencies.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Pre-Implementation Template – The preimplementation<br />

questionnaire template increases <strong>the</strong> success of your<br />

performance implementation and <strong>the</strong> overall understanding of <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative will have on your organization through a series of questions<br />

designed to ensure that all stakeholders have buy-in and confidence in <strong>the</strong><br />

success of <strong>the</strong> initiative. This questionnaire requested feedback from <strong>the</strong>se<br />

stakeholders and captures potential roadblocks.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan - The <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan<br />

Template is a deliverable style document that provides a framework for your<br />

performance management approach and performance tracking. The plan<br />

includes a performance management activities matrix which reflects by<br />

functional role <strong>the</strong> assigned responsibilities for key performance management<br />

activities. Also included are a performance objectives section and a section for<br />

documenting performance standards and management processes.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 56


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Logic Model Template – The Logic Model Template is a decision support<br />

tool used to visually describe <strong>the</strong> linkages between program goals, activities,<br />

and expected outcomes. It describes how a program should work, presents<br />

<strong>the</strong> planned activities for <strong>the</strong> program, describes how activities will be<br />

documented, and focuses on anticipated outcomes. The Logic Model<br />

Template includes five main components: inputs, outputs, outcomes,<br />

assumptions and external factors.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Matrix Template – The <strong>Performance</strong> Matrix Template is<br />

designed to increase an organization’s effectiveness and productivity by<br />

helping leaders plan and manage performance. The performance matrix<br />

utilizes a Nine-Point <strong>Performance</strong> / Importance Scale to help you make<br />

clearer, more informed decisions and provides <strong>the</strong> criteria and processes for<br />

developing and populating your performance matrix.<br />

Planning Session Template – The Planning Session Template allows you to<br />

manage <strong>the</strong> planning sessions outlined in <strong>the</strong> defining and planning stages of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> Framework. This template includes meeting<br />

agendas, agenda item descriptions, discussion leaders and meeting<br />

objectives.<br />

Process Evaluation Scorecard – The process evaluation scorecard is a<br />

checklist that helps you determine <strong>the</strong> value of a process implemented for<br />

performance improvement in terms of positive impact, cost savings,<br />

knowledge management and training. The process evaluation scorecard can<br />

serve as a survey for employees to gain feedback on <strong>the</strong> perception and buyin<br />

of <strong>the</strong> process initiative.<br />

Process Profile Template – The Process Profile Template is a useful tool<br />

designed to help organizations get a complete understanding of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

processes. The template enables detailed documentation of processes<br />

including expected outcomes, impacts, requirements, ownership, security<br />

considerations and more.<br />

SMART Metrics Template – The SMART method is a valuable technique to<br />

use when identifying performance metrics. SMART metrics are those that are<br />

Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely). The SMART<br />

Metrics Template will help your organization ensure that <strong>the</strong> metrics <strong>the</strong>y<br />

consider encompass <strong>the</strong>se characteristics.<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist – The Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist is<br />

designed for <strong>Performance</strong> Managers and <strong>Performance</strong> Team Members to<br />

help determine <strong>the</strong> impact of potential change requests within <strong>the</strong><br />

performance initiative. The checklist examines <strong>the</strong> changes that alter <strong>the</strong><br />

scope of <strong>the</strong> initiative and require analysis in order to understand <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan and <strong>the</strong> stakeholders.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 57


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template – Some performance<br />

management changes are huge and impact your people, processes and<br />

organizational culture. These changes can include anything from how <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative will affect systems, employees and processes, individual and team<br />

roles and responsibilities to communication procedures, key performance<br />

indicators and <strong>the</strong> shift of employee expectations and workforce performance.<br />

The Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template allows you to see how<br />

your change proposal will affect <strong>the</strong> performance initiative, staff and <strong>the</strong><br />

organization as a whole.<br />

Executing Phase Templates<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Methodology Implementation Template – The <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Methodology Implementation Template is designed to help you plan and<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> processes identified in <strong>the</strong> Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> to Implementing<br />

a World Class <strong>Performance</strong> Solution. The template simplifies <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

by letting you list <strong>the</strong> steps outlined in <strong>the</strong> guide, and document <strong>the</strong> actions,<br />

responsibilities, anticipated results, business objectives supported, and<br />

dependencies.<br />

Vendor Assessment Weighted Criteria Template – The Vendor<br />

Assessment Weighted Criteria Template will help you formulate criteria/<br />

standards for vendor evaluation and evaluate vendors' qualifications and<br />

capabilities effectively. To simplify <strong>the</strong> process of identifying criteria for<br />

valuable analysis, this template includes sample rating criteria.<br />

All you have to do is identify <strong>the</strong> vendors and rank <strong>the</strong> criteria by order of<br />

importance and you’re ready to go.<br />

Data <strong>Management</strong> Tool Evaluation – The Data <strong>Management</strong> Tool<br />

Evaluation is a detailed analysis of several data management tools and<br />

provides ratings in areas such as technical support, data extraction, data<br />

cleansing, data exporting, company stability, metadata functionality, training,<br />

performance, and much more. An excellent analysis for when your<br />

organization is ready to purchase and implement a data management<br />

solution.<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist – The Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist is<br />

designed for <strong>Performance</strong> Managers and <strong>Performance</strong> Team Members to<br />

help determine <strong>the</strong> impact of potential change requests within <strong>the</strong><br />

performance initiative. The checklist examines <strong>the</strong> changes that alter <strong>the</strong><br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 58


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

scope of <strong>the</strong> initiative and require analysis in order to understand <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan and <strong>the</strong> stakeholders.<br />

Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template – Some performance<br />

management changes are huge and impact your people, processes and<br />

organizational culture. These changes can include anything from how <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative will affect systems, employees and processes, individual and team<br />

roles and responsibilities to communication procedures, key performance<br />

indicators and <strong>the</strong> shift of employee expectations and workforce performance.<br />

The Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template allows you to see how<br />

your change proposal will affect <strong>the</strong> performance initiative, staff and <strong>the</strong><br />

organization as a whole.<br />

Monitoring Phase Templates<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist – The Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist is<br />

designed for <strong>Performance</strong> Managers and <strong>Performance</strong> Team Members to<br />

help determine <strong>the</strong> impact of potential change requests within <strong>the</strong><br />

performance initiative. The checklist examines <strong>the</strong> changes that alter <strong>the</strong><br />

scope of <strong>the</strong> initiative and require analysis in order to understand <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan and <strong>the</strong> stakeholders.<br />

Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template – Some performance<br />

management changes are huge and impact your people, processes and<br />

organizational culture. These changes can include anything from how <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative will affect systems, employees and processes, individual and team<br />

roles and responsibilities to communication procedures, key performance<br />

indicators and <strong>the</strong> shift of employee expectations and workforce performance.<br />

The Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template allows you to see how<br />

your change proposal will affect <strong>the</strong> performance initiative, staff and <strong>the</strong><br />

organization as a whole.<br />

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Checklist – The Quality<br />

Assurance Surveillance Plan Checklist provides guidelines for planning your<br />

quality assurance surveillance plan. It identifies steps and questions that will<br />

help you manage <strong>the</strong> process and verify <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

initiative. The QASP Checklist is formatted and all you must do is fill in <strong>the</strong><br />

questions in italics.<br />

Quality Control Checklist – The Quality Control Checklist provides<br />

guidelines for planning your vendor relationship. It identifies who is<br />

responsible for specific deliverables that you will manage in <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 59


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

management plan and what is expected of <strong>the</strong> vendors responsible for<br />

delivering <strong>the</strong> service.<br />

Quality <strong>Management</strong> Plan – The Quality <strong>Management</strong> Plan Template is a<br />

deliverable that documents how an organization will plan, implement, and<br />

assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of its quality assurance and quality control<br />

operations. Specifically, it describes how an organization structures its quality<br />

system, <strong>the</strong> quality policies and procedures, areas of application, and roles,<br />

responsibilities, and authorities. To simplify <strong>the</strong> process for you, <strong>the</strong> template<br />

includes a list of common performance management roles and responsibilities<br />

and directions on how to populate each of <strong>the</strong> sections.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Methodology Implementation Template – The <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Methodology Implementation Template is designed to help you plan and<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> processes identified in <strong>the</strong> Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> to Implementing<br />

a World Class <strong>Performance</strong> Solution. The template simplifies <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

by letting you list <strong>the</strong> steps outlined in <strong>the</strong> guide, and document <strong>the</strong> actions,<br />

responsibilities, anticipated results, business objectives supported, and<br />

dependencies.<br />

Reporting Phase Templates<br />

Dashboard Template – The dashboard template is an excellent tool for when<br />

your organization is ready to display your performance results in graphical<br />

form. This template includes data values and charts for customer<br />

satisfaction, expense to revenue ratio, net profit after tax, sales/production,<br />

operational efficiency, return on capital employed and many more. The<br />

template is ready for you to input <strong>the</strong> appropriate data into <strong>the</strong> data tables and<br />

copy <strong>the</strong> charts to your reports and deliverables.<br />

Data Warehouse Data Model – The Data Warehouse Data Model provides a<br />

clear, understandable, and consensus-driven logical data model for your data<br />

warehouse implementation. This data model is useful to both <strong>the</strong> business<br />

units as a tool to understand <strong>the</strong> design of <strong>the</strong> operational data store and to<br />

<strong>the</strong> technical implementation team as a tool to generate <strong>the</strong> physical<br />

database structures. This deliverable includes project objectives, scope,<br />

deliverables, approach, constraints and assumptions associated with data<br />

warehouse modeling.<br />

Employee Appraisal Form Template – This template allows a mixture of<br />

key skills comprising up to six elements. The Employee Appraisal Form<br />

Template is a questionnaire built from <strong>the</strong> role's key skill areas, and enables<br />

you to break down <strong>the</strong>se roles into elements, and measure each via carefully<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 60


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

worded questions, which <strong>the</strong> respondents answer and <strong>the</strong>reby grade <strong>the</strong><br />

performance, i.e., give feedback, in respect of <strong>the</strong> person in question.<br />

Employee <strong>Performance</strong> Indicators Template – The Employee <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Indicators Template is designed to help plan performance discussions with<br />

employees. It can be used to ensure that <strong>the</strong> your employees understand<br />

where <strong>the</strong>ir strengths and weaknesses are in terms of <strong>the</strong> organizational and<br />

performance objectives and what <strong>the</strong>y must do in order to exceed<br />

performance expectations.<br />

Lessons Learned Template – The Lessons Learned Template enables your<br />

organization to document what went well in <strong>the</strong> performance initiative and<br />

what could have been better. The template lists common subject areas<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> project and is also customizable so that you may change any<br />

of <strong>the</strong> scheduled review items to best match <strong>the</strong> variables that are important<br />

to your project management efforts.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Report Log – As your performance initiative<br />

gains momentum and stakeholder’s begin to understand <strong>the</strong> value and<br />

necessity of analyzing performance, <strong>the</strong> demand for reports from all areas of<br />

your organization will increase. The <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Report Log<br />

will help you document <strong>the</strong>se reports. While <strong>the</strong> Report Repository contains<br />

<strong>the</strong> actual reports, <strong>the</strong> Report Log documents <strong>the</strong> details of <strong>the</strong> reports, such<br />

as <strong>the</strong> owner(s) of <strong>the</strong> report, type, frequency, etc.<br />

Training Needs Analysis Template – The Training Needs Analysis<br />

Template is designed to show collective and individual training needs and<br />

priorities. Complete with a set of predefined common element descriptions,<br />

<strong>the</strong> template only requires you to input scores. Or, you can customize <strong>the</strong><br />

elements to meet your specific business objectives.<br />

Report Repository Template – Reporting is <strong>the</strong> most visible output in <strong>the</strong><br />

performance management process. As your performance initiative gains<br />

momentum and stakeholder’s begin to understand <strong>the</strong> value and necessity of<br />

analyzing performance, <strong>the</strong> demand for reports from all areas of your<br />

organization will increase. The Report Repository Template provides a<br />

comprehensive list of all routine reports generated by your organizational<br />

departments. This list will be used as a basis for determining reporting<br />

requirements in your performance initiative. This report comes with<br />

instructions on how to populate <strong>the</strong> template.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Methodology Implementation Template – The <strong>Performance</strong><br />

Methodology Implementation Template is designed to help you plan and<br />

implement <strong>the</strong> processes identified in <strong>the</strong> Step by Step <strong>Guide</strong> to Implementing<br />

a World Class <strong>Performance</strong> Solution. The template simplifies <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

by letting you list <strong>the</strong> steps outlined in <strong>the</strong> guide, and document <strong>the</strong> actions,<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 61


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

responsibilities, anticipated results, business objectives supported, and<br />

dependencies.<br />

Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist – The Change <strong>Management</strong> Checklist is<br />

designed for <strong>Performance</strong> Managers and <strong>Performance</strong> Team Members to<br />

help determine <strong>the</strong> impact of potential change requests within <strong>the</strong><br />

performance initiative. The checklist examines <strong>the</strong> changes that alter <strong>the</strong><br />

scope of <strong>the</strong> initiative and require analysis in order to understand <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan and <strong>the</strong> stakeholders.<br />

Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template – Some performance<br />

management changes are huge and impact your people, processes and<br />

organizational culture. These changes can include anything from how <strong>the</strong><br />

initiative will affect systems, employees and processes, individual and team<br />

roles and responsibilities to communication procedures, key performance<br />

indicators and <strong>the</strong> shift of employee expectations and workforce performance.<br />

The Organizational Change <strong>Management</strong> Template allows you to see how<br />

your change proposal will affect <strong>the</strong> performance initiative, staff and <strong>the</strong><br />

organization as a whole.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 62


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Glossary<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> first steps to facilitating performance management success is to<br />

ensure that your organization has a common language for talking about<br />

performance. Below is a guide to key performance management terminology<br />

and concepts to help get everyone on <strong>the</strong> same page.<br />

Alerts: Notifications to email or to a home page, updating users to changes to<br />

items that <strong>the</strong>y have subscribed. Examples might include notifications about<br />

performance changes or commentary.<br />

Alignment: The act or state of being properly positioned, especially in<br />

relation to one ano<strong>the</strong>r; see also operational alignment.<br />

Balanced Scorecard: One of <strong>the</strong> more prevalent methodologies in use<br />

today, <strong>the</strong> Balanced Scorecard framework has three main tenets: 1)<br />

emphasis on outcomes and objectives to be achieved, ra<strong>the</strong>r than measures;<br />

2) separation of objectives into disparate, supporting points of view such as<br />

Customer, Financial, Process, and Employee; and 3) consideration of nonfinancial<br />

assets such as processes and intellectual property so that leading<br />

and qualitative measures are also included.<br />

Benchmarking: The comparison of similar processes across organizations<br />

and industries to measure progress, identify best practices, and set<br />

improvement targets. Results may serve as potential targets for key<br />

performance indicators.<br />

BHAGs (Big Hairy Audacious Goals): Often used to describe an<br />

organization’s high-level, long-term aspirations, or vision.<br />

Business performance management: A brand of performance management<br />

that includes finance — covering compliance issues, competition, risk and<br />

profitability — and human resources performance management —<br />

encompassing employee performance appraisals and incentive<br />

compensation. O<strong>the</strong>r types of performance management include operational<br />

performance management and IT performance management.<br />

Cascading: The process of developing aligned goals throughout an<br />

organization, connecting strategy to operations to tactics, allowing each<br />

employee to demonstrate a contribution to overall organizational objectives.<br />

Methods of cascading include identical (objectives and measures are<br />

identical), contributory (translated, but congruent, objectives and measures),<br />

unique (unique objectives and measures; do not link directly to parent) and<br />

shared (jointly-shared unique objective or measure).<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 63


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Cause and effect: The way perspectives, objectives, and/or measures<br />

interact in a series of cause-and-effect relationships demonstrate <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

of achieving an outcome. For example, organizations may hypo<strong>the</strong>size that<br />

<strong>the</strong> right employee training (Employee, Learning and Growth Perspective) will<br />

lead to increased innovation (Internal Process Perspective), which will in turn<br />

lead to greater customer satisfaction (Customer Perspective) and drive<br />

increased revenue (Financial Perspective).<br />

Comments: Used to provide fur<strong>the</strong>r information about a performance<br />

management object including questions, issues or background.<br />

Composite Measure: A measure based on a number of performance<br />

measures, weighted to reflect relative importance. Composite measures<br />

provide summary level information to higher management.<br />

Customer-facing operations: Encompasses those facets of <strong>the</strong> organization<br />

that interface directly with customers; typically an organization’s sales, service<br />

and marketing functions. Customer-facing operations are also referred to as<br />

<strong>the</strong> demand chain.<br />

Customer Perspective: One of <strong>the</strong> four standard perspectives used with <strong>the</strong><br />

Balanced Scorecard. Measures are developed based on <strong>the</strong> answer to two<br />

fundamental questions - who are our target customers and what is our value<br />

proposition in serving <strong>the</strong>m? The role of <strong>the</strong> Customer perspective is often<br />

elevated in public sector and not for profit applications of <strong>the</strong> Balanced<br />

Scorecard.<br />

Customer Relationship <strong>Management</strong> (CRM) - CRM entails all aspects of<br />

interaction a company has with its customer. It includes methodologies,<br />

software, and usually Internet capabilities that help an organization manage<br />

customer relationships in an organized way. The Customer Perspective of <strong>the</strong><br />

Balanced Scorecard may contain references to a CRM program.<br />

Dashboard: A visualization of important information, often tailored to a<br />

specific role or point of view, consolidated and arranged on a single screen so<br />

<strong>the</strong> information can be monitored at a glance. For most deployments, this<br />

information contains actual results represented as metrics.<br />

Economic Value Added (EVA): A financial performance measure aiming to<br />

determine whe<strong>the</strong>r a company or activity has truly created shareholder value;<br />

in o<strong>the</strong>r words, EVA aims to distinguish real profit from paper profit. EVA is<br />

determined by calculating a business’s after-tax cash flow minus <strong>the</strong> cost of<br />

<strong>the</strong> capital it deployed to generate that cash flow.<br />

Effectiveness Enhancement System: An approach to performance<br />

management developed by Bacal & Associates. Its strength is that it<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 64


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

recognizes that BOTH manager and employee need to define how<br />

performance is to be planned and evaluated. The employee becomes <strong>the</strong><br />

"customer" of <strong>the</strong> process. And this puts <strong>the</strong> employee and manager on <strong>the</strong><br />

same side.<br />

Employee Learning and Growth Perspective: One of <strong>the</strong> four standard<br />

perspectives used with <strong>the</strong> Balanced Scorecard. Measures in this perspective<br />

are often considered "enablers" of measures appearing in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three<br />

perspectives. Employee skills, availability of information, and organizational<br />

climate are often measured in this perspective.<br />

Financial Perspective: One of <strong>the</strong> four standard perspectives used with <strong>the</strong><br />

Balanced Scorecard. Financial measures inform an organization whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

strategy execution, which is detailed through measures in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three<br />

perspectives, is leading to improved bottom line results. In public sector and<br />

not for profit applications of <strong>the</strong> Balanced Scorecard measures in <strong>the</strong><br />

Financial perspective are often viewed as constraints within which <strong>the</strong><br />

organization must operate.<br />

Forecast: Forecast usually refers to a projected value for a metric.<br />

Organizations will often create a forecast that is different than <strong>the</strong>ir target for a<br />

given metric. There are multiple types of forecasting methods for creating<br />

forecasts based on past data and usage of <strong>the</strong>m varies widely across<br />

organizations.<br />

Goal: See objective below.<br />

Goal plan: Used primarily in <strong>the</strong> public and not-for-profit sector, a goal plan is<br />

a performance plan outlining an organization’s goals and/or objectives. Also<br />

see Strategy plan below.<br />

Goal diagram: Generically used to describe <strong>the</strong> one-page visualization that<br />

shows <strong>the</strong> different goals of <strong>the</strong> organization and how <strong>the</strong>y are related.<br />

Examples of goal diagrams include strategy plans, strategy maps and<br />

process diagrams.<br />

Government <strong>Performance</strong> and Results Act (GPRA): Enacted in 1993, <strong>the</strong><br />

Government <strong>Performance</strong> and Results Act (GPRA) requires federally-funded<br />

agencies to develop and implement an accountability system based on<br />

performance measurement, including setting goals and objectives and<br />

measuring progress toward achieving <strong>the</strong>m. Emphasizes<br />

accomplishments/outcomes and performance-based budgeting versus<br />

expenditures and zero-based budgeting.<br />

Human capital: A metaphor for <strong>the</strong> transition in organizational value creation<br />

from physical assets to <strong>the</strong> capabilities of employees ― knowledge, skills,<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 65


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

and relationships, for example. Closely related to terms such as intellectual<br />

capital and intangible assets. Some experts suggest that as much as 75<br />

percent of an organization’s value is attributable to human capital.<br />

Index KPIs: Index KPIs are an index of multiple KPIs. Often times <strong>the</strong>se KPIs<br />

might actually be measured in completely different units and an index KPI<br />

normalizes <strong>the</strong> underlying KPIs to provide a single score. Sometimes used in<br />

<strong>the</strong> public sector, an example might be a Health Index, which is composed of<br />

multiple health related KPIs.<br />

The information supply chain (ISC): The full set of elements, technologybased,<br />

process-specific and organizational in nature, which is necessary to<br />

collect information from discrete processes, transform this information from<br />

data into knowledge, and deliver <strong>the</strong> right data to <strong>the</strong> right stakeholders in <strong>the</strong><br />

right way and at <strong>the</strong> right time.<br />

Initiatives: The lifeblood of an organization’s operations, initiatives organize<br />

people and resources and dictate which activities are required to accomplish<br />

a specific goal by a particular date; initiatives provide <strong>the</strong> how while goals<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> what. As differentiated from projects, initiatives directly support an<br />

organization’s strategic goals; projects may or may not have strategic impact.<br />

Examples: Supporting <strong>the</strong> objective “Ensure 100% in-stock merchandise”<br />

might be initiatives such as “Upgrade of inventory management software to<br />

include demand chain and “Migration to store-specific assortment plans from<br />

uniform assortments.” Initiative management solutions help ensure that<br />

activities are aligned with goals, increase coordination of resources, and allow<br />

prioritization based on importance, not just urgency.<br />

Inputs: Commonly used within <strong>the</strong> Logic Model to describe <strong>the</strong> resources an<br />

organization invests in a program, such as time, people (staff, volunteers),<br />

money, materials, equipment, partnerships, research base, and technology,<br />

among o<strong>the</strong>r things.<br />

Initiatives - The specific programs, activities, projects or actions an<br />

organization will undertake in an effort to meet performance targets.<br />

Internal Process Perspective - One of <strong>the</strong> four standard perspectives used<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Balanced Scorecard. Measures in this perspective are used to<br />

monitor <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of key processes <strong>the</strong> organization must excel at in<br />

order to continue adding value for customers, and ultimately, shareholders.<br />

IT performance management: A brand of performance management that<br />

assists organizations with <strong>the</strong> increasing demands of maximizing value<br />

creation from technology investments; reducing risk from IT; decreasing<br />

architectural complexity; and optimizing overall technology expenditures.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 66


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r types of performance management include operational performance<br />

management and business performance management.<br />

Key outcome indicator (KOI): Often used in <strong>the</strong> public sector to describe<br />

key performance indicators, those metrics most critical to gauging progress<br />

toward objectives. KOIs are metrics that are: tied to an objective; have at<br />

least one defined time-sensitive target value; and have explicit thresholds<br />

which grade <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> actual value and <strong>the</strong> target.<br />

Key performance indicator (KPI): Distinguished from o<strong>the</strong>r metrics, key<br />

performance indicators (KPIs) are those metrics most critical to gauging<br />

progress toward objectives. KPIs are metrics that are: tied to an objective;<br />

have at least one defined time-sensitive target value; and have explicit<br />

thresholds which grade <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> actual value and <strong>the</strong> target.<br />

KPI/KOI Scorecard: A specific application of a scorecard, a KPI/KOI<br />

scorecard is used to measure progress toward a given set of KPIs or KOIs.<br />

Lagging indicator: Backward-looking performance indicators that represent<br />

<strong>the</strong> results of previous actions. Characterizing historical performance, lagging<br />

indicators frequently focus on results at <strong>the</strong> end of a time period; e.g., thirdquarter<br />

sales. A balanced scorecard should contain a mix of lagging and<br />

leading indicators.<br />

Leading indicator: Forward-looking in nature, leading indicators are <strong>the</strong><br />

drivers of future performance. Improved performance in a leading indicator is<br />

assumed to drive better performance in a lagging indicator. For example,<br />

spending more time with valued customers (a leading indicator) is<br />

hypo<strong>the</strong>sized to drive improvements in customer satisfaction (a lagging<br />

indicator).<br />

“Letter grade” rating system: A threshold rating system in which letter<br />

grades of A/B/C/D/F are used to describe and/or depict performance (usually<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> target and actual) in easily understandable<br />

terms.<br />

Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />

is <strong>the</strong> systematic implementation of an enterprise-wide performance strategy<br />

involving all business units, systems and personnel. It is a sequence of<br />

management processes, when combined, achieves a complete approach to<br />

managing performance from start to finish. Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong><br />

<strong>Management</strong> focuses on all areas that determine <strong>the</strong> success of an<br />

enterprise, including: Employees, Departments / Divisions, Processes,<br />

Programs (e.g. implementing organizational policies), Products / Services,<br />

Projects, Business Units / Teams.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 67


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Logic Model: Having gained prominence in <strong>the</strong> ’90s largely in response to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Government <strong>Performance</strong> and Results Act (GPRA), <strong>the</strong> Logic Model is<br />

now a widely accepted management tool in <strong>the</strong> public and nonprofit sectors<br />

as well as <strong>the</strong> international arena. The model is a roadmap or picture of a<br />

program that shows <strong>the</strong> logical relationships among resources or inputs (what<br />

an organization invests); activities or outputs (what an organization gets<br />

done); and outcome-impacts (what results or benefits happen as a<br />

consequence).<br />

Malcolm Baldridge: Established by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Congress in 1987, <strong>the</strong> Malcolm<br />

Baldridge performance framework is a rating tool that assesses management<br />

systems and helps identify major areas for improvement in seven categories<br />

of performance criteria: Leadership; Strategic Planning; Customer and Market<br />

Focus; Measurement, Analysis, Knowledge <strong>Management</strong>; Human Resource<br />

Focus; Process <strong>Management</strong>; and Business Results.<br />

Measure (also called metric): Public sector term to describe a standard used<br />

to communicate progress on a particular aspect of a program. Measures<br />

typically are quantitative in nature, conveyed in numbers, dollars,<br />

percentages, etc. (e.g., $ of revenue, headcount number, % increase, survey<br />

rating average, etc.) though <strong>the</strong>y may be describing ei<strong>the</strong>r quantitative (e.g.,<br />

sales made) or qualitative (e.g., employee motivation) information.<br />

Metric (also called measure): Term used in commercial organizations to<br />

describe a standard used to communicate progress on a particular aspect of<br />

<strong>the</strong> business. Measures typically are quantitative in nature, conveyed in<br />

numbers, dollars, percentages, etc. (e.g., $ of revenue, headcount number, %<br />

increase, survey rating average, etc.) though <strong>the</strong>y may be describing ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

quantitative (e.g., sales made) or qualitative (e.g., employee motivation)<br />

information.<br />

Mission: Concise statement that describes, in motivating and memorable<br />

terms, <strong>the</strong> current top-level strategic goal of <strong>the</strong> organization. A mission<br />

provides both an internal rallying cry and external validity. Usually financial-,<br />

process-, or customer service-oriented, with a mid-term (three to five years)<br />

horizon, an effective mission is inspiring as well as easily understood and<br />

communicated.<br />

Objective or outcome scorecard: A specific application of a scorecard,<br />

objective scorecards monitor progress toward a given set of objectives or<br />

outcomes using a threshold-based rating scale. Typically, objective status is<br />

determined by normalizing one or many key performance indicators and<br />

comparing it to a given rating scale.<br />

Objective (also called goal): A concise statement describing specific, critical,<br />

actionable and measurable things an organization must do in order to<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 68


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

effectively execute its strategy and achieve its mission and vision. Objectives<br />

often begin with action verbs such as increase, reduce, improve, achieve, etc.<br />

Whereas <strong>the</strong> vision and mission statements provide an organizing and<br />

mobilizing “rallying cry,” objectives translate <strong>the</strong> vision and mission into<br />

measurable and actionable operational terms. Examples: “Be a one-stop<br />

shop for all my interactions with <strong>the</strong> company” (Customer); “Maximize<br />

customer lifetime value” (Financial); “Integrate disparate customer processes”<br />

(Process); and “Foster a culture that rewards customer intimacy”<br />

(Capabilities).<br />

Ongoing <strong>Performance</strong> Communication: Communication between manager<br />

and employee all throughout <strong>the</strong> year to ensure that problems are identified<br />

early, and so <strong>the</strong>re are NO SUPRPRISES during <strong>the</strong> performance appraisal.<br />

Operational alignment: The means to and/or state of alignment of an<br />

organization’s day-to-day activities with its strategic goals or objectives,<br />

operational alignment helps ensure that an organization’s daily activities are<br />

advancing its longer-term goals and mission.<br />

Operational performance management: A brand of performance<br />

management that addresses <strong>the</strong> growing pressure to increase revenue while<br />

managing costs, while meeting ever-evolving and expanding customer<br />

demands. O<strong>the</strong>r types of performance management include business<br />

performance management and IT performance management.<br />

Operational Reviews: Usually used to describe <strong>the</strong> regularly scheduled<br />

internal status meetings of an organization. Going by different names based<br />

on <strong>the</strong> organization, manufacturing companies typically call <strong>the</strong>m Operational<br />

Excellence (OPX) meetings, o<strong>the</strong>r organizations sometimes just refer to <strong>the</strong>m<br />

as <strong>Performance</strong> reviews.<br />

Outcome: Commonly used within <strong>the</strong> Logic Model, outcomes (also called<br />

outcome-impacts) describe <strong>the</strong> benefits that result as a consequence of an<br />

organization’s investments and activities. A central concept within logic<br />

models, outcomes occur along a path from shorter-term achievements to<br />

medium-term and longer-term achievements.<br />

They may be positive, negative, neutral, intended, or unintended. Examples<br />

of outcomes include changes in knowledge, skill development, behavior,<br />

capacities, decision-making, and policy development.<br />

Output: Commonly applied within <strong>the</strong> Logic Model, outputs describe what an<br />

organization gets done; e.g., “what we do” or “what we offer” and may include<br />

workshops, delivery of services, conferences, community surveys, facilitation,<br />

in-home counseling, etc. Outputs lead to outcomes.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 69


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

PART: See Program Assessment Rating Tool below.<br />

Pathway: Descriptive statement and visualization that describes/depicts <strong>the</strong><br />

progressive stages in realizing an organization’s long-term vision, and<br />

provides an understanding of <strong>the</strong> phases in which particular objectives play<br />

primary contributory roles. Examples: “Launch in NYC”; “Scale in Nor<strong>the</strong>ast”;<br />

“Expand across U.S.”<br />

<strong>Performance</strong>-based budgeting: A performance budget is an integrated<br />

annual performance plan and budget that shows <strong>the</strong> relationship between<br />

program funding levels and expected results. It indicates that a goal or a set<br />

of goals should be achieved at a given level of spending.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Appraisal: The regular (usual annual) process where an<br />

employees performance for <strong>the</strong> year is assessed by manager and/or<br />

employee. It is only one part of <strong>the</strong> performance management approach.<br />

Usually means <strong>the</strong> same as "performance review".<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Gap: The “difference” between actual and target, <strong>the</strong> trend of<br />

<strong>the</strong> performance or target gap shows an organization’s momentum.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Management</strong>: The larger process of defining how people,<br />

processes and systems should be performing, ongoing communication during<br />

<strong>the</strong> year, linking of performance to organization needs, and <strong>the</strong> evaluating of<br />

appraising of performance.<br />

<strong>Performance</strong> Review: Usually refers to a meeting to review and evaluate<br />

performance, involving supervisor and employee. Often done once a year, but<br />

to be effective performance reviews, or at least informal meetings to discuss<br />

performance should be undertaken at least every few months.<br />

Perspective (also called point of view): Representing <strong>the</strong> various<br />

stakeholders, both internal and external, critical to achieving an organization’s<br />

mission. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> perspectives provide a holistic, or balanced,<br />

framework for telling <strong>the</strong> “story of <strong>the</strong> strategy” in cause-and-effect terms.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> traditional Balanced Scorecard includes <strong>the</strong> four perspectives of<br />

Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Employee Learning and Growth,<br />

an organization may choose to modify and/or add to <strong>the</strong>se to adequately<br />

translate and describe <strong>the</strong>ir unique strategy.<br />

PMA: See President’s <strong>Management</strong> Agenda below.<br />

Point of view: See perspective above.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 70


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

President’s <strong>Management</strong> Agenda (PMA): The President’s <strong>Management</strong><br />

Agenda, announced in <strong>the</strong> summer of 2001, is an aggressive strategy for<br />

improving <strong>the</strong> management of <strong>the</strong> federal government. It focuses on five<br />

areas of management weakness across <strong>the</strong> government where <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

improvements and progress can be made.<br />

Process Diagram: Process diagrams typically are used to represent specific<br />

processes that are undertaken in an organization and <strong>the</strong> key steps involved<br />

in <strong>the</strong> process. An example might be a high-level diagram that highlights <strong>the</strong><br />

customer experience.<br />

Program Assessment Rating Tool: Developed by <strong>the</strong> Office of<br />

<strong>Management</strong> and Budget within <strong>the</strong> Office of <strong>the</strong> President of <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States, <strong>the</strong> Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) was developed to<br />

assess and improve program performance so that <strong>the</strong> federal government<br />

can achieve better results. A PART review helps identify a program’s<br />

strengths and weaknesses to inform funding and management decisions<br />

aimed at making <strong>the</strong> program more effective. The PART <strong>the</strong>refore looks at all<br />

factors that affect and reflect program performance including program<br />

purpose and design; performance measurement, evaluations, and strategic<br />

planning; program management; and program results.<br />

Qualitative: Subjective, as opposed to quantitative (measured). A common<br />

source of qualitative metrics are surveys of customers, stakeholders or<br />

employees.<br />

Quantitative: Measured, as opposed to qualitative (subjective). Quantitative<br />

measures often come from transactional systems.<br />

Readiness scorecard: A specific application of a scorecard, a readiness<br />

scorecard can be used to evaluate an organization’s state of<br />

readiness/acceptance of a given strategy.<br />

Reports: Typically show <strong>the</strong> details of performance for a metric or multiple<br />

metrics. Reports are often used to drill down to <strong>the</strong> root cause of performance<br />

issues.<br />

Scorecard: A scorecard is a visual display of <strong>the</strong> most important information<br />

needed to achieve one or more objectives, consolidated and arranged on a<br />

single screen so <strong>the</strong> information can be monitored at a glance. Unlike<br />

dashboards that display actual values of metrics, scorecards typically display<br />

<strong>the</strong> gap between actual and target values for a smaller number of key<br />

performance indicators.<br />

Six Sigma: A quality management and process improvement methodology<br />

particularly well suited to process intensive industries like manufacturing. Six<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 71


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

Sigma measures a given process by its average performance and <strong>the</strong><br />

standard deviation (or variation) of this performance, aiming to reduce <strong>the</strong><br />

occurrence of defects in a given process to a level of “Six Sigma” outside <strong>the</strong><br />

norm; no more than 3.4 times per million.<br />

Standards of <strong>Performance</strong>: Mutually agreed upon criteria used to describe<br />

how WELL an employee must perform, written to reduce subjective judgment.<br />

Strategy: Strategy is <strong>the</strong> way an organization seeks to achieve its vision and<br />

mission. It is a forward-looking statement about an organization’s planned use<br />

of resources and deployment capabilities. Strategy becomes real when it is<br />

associated with: 1) a concrete set of goals and objectives; and 2) a method<br />

involving people, resources and processes.<br />

Strategic <strong>Management</strong> System - Describes <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> Balanced<br />

Scorecard in aligning an organization's short-term actions with strategy. The<br />

Strategic <strong>Management</strong> System is often accomplished by cascading <strong>the</strong><br />

Balanced Scorecard to all levels of <strong>the</strong> organization, aligning budgets and<br />

business plans to strategy, and using <strong>the</strong> Scorecard as a feedback and<br />

learning mechanism.<br />

Strategic Resource Allocation - The process of aligning budgets with<br />

strategy by using <strong>the</strong> Balanced Scorecard to make resource allocation<br />

decisions. Using this method, budgets are based on <strong>the</strong> initiatives necessary<br />

to achieve Balanced Scorecard targets.<br />

Strategy map: A specific version of a strategy plan that adheres to <strong>the</strong><br />

Balanced Scorecard methodology. Strategy maps depict objectives in multiple<br />

perspectives with corresponding cause and effect linkages.<br />

Strategy plan: A visual representation of an organization’s strategy and <strong>the</strong><br />

objectives that must be met to effectively reach its mission. A strategy plan<br />

can be used to communicate, motivate and align <strong>the</strong> organization to ensure<br />

successful execution.<br />

Supply Chain - The supply chain represents <strong>the</strong> flow of materials,<br />

information, and finances as <strong>the</strong>y move in a process from supplier to<br />

manufacturer to wholesaler to retailer to consumer. Many organizations are<br />

looking to supply chain optimization as a means of gaining significant<br />

competitive advantages. The Internal Process Perspective of <strong>the</strong> Balanced<br />

Scorecard often contains performance measures pertaining to supply chain<br />

performance.<br />

Target: A target is <strong>the</strong> defining standard of success, to be achieved over a<br />

specified time period, for <strong>the</strong> key performance indicators associated with a<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 72


Lifecycle Lifecycle <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> Professionals<br />

Professionals<br />

particular strategic objective. Providing context to make results meaningful,<br />

targets represent <strong>the</strong> organization’s “stretch goals.”<br />

Theme: Descriptive statement representing a major component of a strategy,<br />

as articulated at <strong>the</strong> highest level in <strong>the</strong> Vision. Most strategies can be<br />

represented in three to five <strong>the</strong>mes. Themes are most often drawn from an<br />

organization’s internal processes or <strong>the</strong> customer value proposition, but may<br />

also be drawn from key financial goals. The key is that <strong>the</strong>mes represent<br />

vertically linked groupings of objectives across several scorecard<br />

perspectives (at a minimum, Customer and Internal). Themes are often stated<br />

as catchy phrases or “buzz” words that are easy for <strong>the</strong> organization to<br />

remember and internalize. Example: “Top Innovator,” “Customer Intimate,”<br />

“Operationally Excellent” “Processes/Tools,” “Thinking,” “Content,” “Pipeline”<br />

(I/T Organization).<br />

Threshold: A means of describing and/or depicting <strong>the</strong> performance gap in<br />

easily understandable terms. Examples of threshold methods include “lettergrade”<br />

(A/B/C/D/F) and “traffic-light” (green/yellow/red).<br />

Values: Representing an organization’s deeply-held and enduring beliefs, an<br />

organization’s values openly declare how it expects everyone to behave and<br />

are often embedded in its vision.<br />

Value proposition or discipline: Describes how an organization intends to<br />

differentiate itself in <strong>the</strong> marketplace and what particular value it will deliver to<br />

customers. Many organizations choose one of three “value disciplines” ―<br />

operational excellence, product leadership, or customer intimacy ―<br />

articulated by Treacy and Wiersema in “The Discipline of Market Leaders.”<br />

Vision: A concise statement defining an organization’s long-term direction,<br />

<strong>the</strong> vision is a summary statement of what <strong>the</strong> organization ultimately intends<br />

to become five, 10 or even 15 years into <strong>the</strong> future. It is <strong>the</strong> organization’s<br />

long-term “dream,” what it constantly strives to achieve. A powerful vision<br />

provides everyone in <strong>the</strong> organization with a shared mental framework that<br />

helps give form to <strong>the</strong> often abstract future that lies ahead. Effective visions<br />

provide a word picture of what <strong>the</strong> organization intends ultimately to become -<br />

which may be five, ten, or fifteen years in <strong>the</strong> future. This statement should<br />

not be abstract - it should contain as concrete a picture of <strong>the</strong> desired state as<br />

possible, and also provide <strong>the</strong> basis for formulating strategies and objectives.<br />

“Wobble” test: A litmus test used to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r a given objective is<br />

truly necessary to achieving organizational mission; if an objective can be<br />

dropped from <strong>the</strong> strategy plan and <strong>the</strong> organization can still reach your<br />

mission, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> objective is not necessary and should be excluded.<br />

© 2009 Lifecycle-performance-pros.com All rights reserved 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!