20.07.2013 Views

December 2004 - Materials Science Institute - University of Oregon

December 2004 - Materials Science Institute - University of Oregon

December 2004 - Materials Science Institute - University of Oregon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVIEWS<br />

Orangutan Technology<br />

HOW DID THE GREAT APES GET TO BE SO SMART? BY BARBARA SMUTS<br />

AMONG ORANGUTANS:<br />

RED APES AND THE<br />

RISE OF HUMAN<br />

CULTURE<br />

by Carel van Schaik<br />

Photographs by Perry<br />

van Duijnhoven<br />

Harvard <strong>University</strong><br />

Press, <strong>2004</strong> ($29.95)<br />

In this book, Carel van Schaik, a highly<br />

regarded Dutch primatologist now at<br />

Duke <strong>University</strong>, concludes that “intelligence<br />

is ... socially constructed during<br />

development.” This won’t surprise you—<br />

until you realize that he is referring not to<br />

humans but to orangutans, the large red<br />

apes <strong>of</strong> south Asia. Van Schaik proposes<br />

that the discovery <strong>of</strong> orangutan culture<br />

can provide a resolution to a long-standing<br />

puzzle: Why are apes so smart? Perhaps<br />

the complexities <strong>of</strong> great ape social<br />

relationships selected for large brains. But<br />

orangutans challenge this “social intelligence”<br />

hypothesis: in the wild, they mostly<br />

travel about by themselves, yet they are<br />

at least as smart as chimpanzees.<br />

Van Schaik thinks that social factors<br />

are indeed pivotal in explaining orangutan<br />

intelligence, but not in the way proposed<br />

by the social intelligence hypothesis.<br />

In a beautifully written, compelling<br />

narrative that reads like a detective<br />

story, he weaves together several threads<br />

<strong>of</strong> evidence to argue that orangutan intelligence<br />

is intimately related to technological<br />

innovations that are passed down<br />

through social learning.<br />

Before hearing about the details <strong>of</strong><br />

orangutan culture, we accompany van<br />

Schaik into the fetid, mosquito-ridden<br />

swamp forests <strong>of</strong> western Sumatra (succinctly<br />

described as human hell—but<br />

orangutan heaven). Through the large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> outstanding color photographs,<br />

we meet many <strong>of</strong> the 100 orangutans<br />

his team recognized individually.<br />

They are handsome creatures with long<br />

red hair, expressive faces and round eyes<br />

that gaze out <strong>of</strong> the photographs with<br />

keen awareness.<br />

Orangutans do something clever that<br />

other great apes don’t do: they use leaves<br />

to make rain hats and leakpro<strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>s<br />

over their sleeping nests. But until recently,<br />

there was scant evidence <strong>of</strong> other<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> toolmaking. At van Schaik’s site,<br />

tools were common, and he documents in<br />

detail how the orangutans fashion tools<br />

out <strong>of</strong> twigs. They use some tools to fi sh<br />

for ants or termites, while they skillfully<br />

manipulate others to get at scrumptious<br />

seeds protected by razor-sharp hairs. At<br />

fi rst glance, these tools do not seem to<br />

refl ect advanced cognitive skills, but on<br />

closer inspection van Schaik found that<br />

each tool is carefully crafted to match the<br />

precise needs <strong>of</strong> a given situation. And<br />

like chimpanzees, orangutans sometimes<br />

make tools for later use, an apparent example<br />

<strong>of</strong> conscious planning.<br />

How do we know that such feats<br />

represent culture? The argument is<br />

complex, but in brief, orangutans’ use<br />

<strong>of</strong> tools on the islands <strong>of</strong> Sumatra and<br />

Borneo varies geographically in ways<br />

that cannot be explained by ecological<br />

or genetic differences between populations.<br />

Instead these differences are best<br />

explained by variation in sociability, as<br />

well as by the locations <strong>of</strong> geographic<br />

barriers preventing cultural diffusion<br />

between populations.<br />

In most places, intense feeding competition<br />

prevents orangutans from forming<br />

groups, and in these situations, tool<br />

use is rudimentary or absent. But swamp<br />

forests are highly productive, allowing<br />

van Schaik’s orangutans to associate a<br />

lot. As a result, youngsters spend many<br />

hours closely watching tolerant elders<br />

make and use tools. After about seven<br />

years <strong>of</strong> learning and practice, they, too,<br />

become skillful tool users.<br />

Because we already knew that material<br />

cultures vary among chimpanzee<br />

populations, why is the discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

orangutan culture so important? Van<br />

Schaik provides three reasons: First, the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> culture in orangutans can<br />

explain why they are so smart—something<br />

the social intelligence hypothesis<br />

ORANGUTAN mother-and-child union is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the longest and most intense among mammals.<br />

Many foods eaten by these animals require<br />

some form <strong>of</strong> processing; youngsters must<br />

learn by observing and copying their elders.<br />

112 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN DECEMBER <strong>2004</strong><br />

COPYRIGHT <strong>2004</strong> SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC.<br />

COURTESY OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!