20.07.2013 Views

Gauge theory for embedded surfaces, II

Gauge theory for embedded surfaces, II

Gauge theory for embedded surfaces, II

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>embedded</strong> <strong>surfaces</strong>, <strong>II</strong> 45<br />

Lemma 7.6 with the metric g(s). Suppose that α(s) is less than both α1(s) and<br />

α0 <strong>for</strong> all s, and that α(s) remains in the interval I. Then the value of Γ is<br />

constant in the family.<br />

Proof. As usual, we can <strong>for</strong>m the parametrized moduli space and its compacti-<br />

fication. The map ¯ρ extends continuously to the parametrized moduli space, so<br />

even the fundamental class ¯ρ∗[ ¯ M α 0,l ] is unchanged in the family. ⊓⊔<br />

Remark. The point here is that, a priori, two metrics satisfying the conditions<br />

laid down need not be connected by any path of the sort asked <strong>for</strong> in the lemma.<br />

To tidy up the situation, it would be necessary to consider extending Γ to an<br />

invariant in the sense of [D2]. That is, one should consider the (α, t) plane to<br />

be divided into chambers by the walls given in 7.4, and one should hope to<br />

understand how Γ will change as a path (α(s),g(s)) crosses one of the walls.<br />

On the basis of this, one should seek to show that Γ was a function only of the<br />

chambers. As it is, we have considered only one chamber (the one with α small),<br />

andwehavenotshownthatΓ takes only one value here.<br />

(iii) Relating Γ to p0,l.<br />

Consider <strong>for</strong>ming the ruled surface X as the union of manifolds with cylindrical<br />

ends, X o and W o . The latter space W o is, as usual, a complex line bundle of<br />

degree n over Σ, while X o is a line bundle of degree −n over Σ ′ . The situation<br />

is not symmetrical between these two however, since as usual we have nontrivial<br />

holonomy and a cone-like metric along Σ ⊂ W o . Fix metrics with cylindrical<br />

ends on both pieces, and join them together as usual with a neck of length<br />

R. Note that the quantity α1 <strong>for</strong> the resulting metric gR can be taken to be<br />

independent of R, since the geometry near Σ ′ is determined by the metric on<br />

X o alone. Fix α less than both α1 and α0 as be<strong>for</strong>e, and take a suitably large ν.<br />

Using these values of α and ν and the metric gR, obtain an integer Γ as<br />

above. By Lemma 7.9 the result is independent of R. From the manifold W o<br />

with its cylindrical end metric, obtain also the invariant p0,l. Then we have the<br />

following counterpart to Theorem 5.10:<br />

Proposition 7.10. For the metrics as above, the integer Γ is given by<br />

Γ = p0,l × ∆,<br />

where ∆ is the degree of the moduli space of flat connections inside Bo Σ ′; that is,<br />

∆ = µ 3g−3 , [Mflat(Σ ′ )] .<br />

Proof. Choose 3g − 3 sections of the standard line bundle on Bo Σ ′ so that there<br />

common zero set V is transverse to Mflat and meets it in a finite number of points<br />

in the irreducible part of the moduli space. The number of these points, counted<br />

algebraically, will be ∆. We can also arrange that these points are regular values<br />

<strong>for</strong> the map<br />

rl : M α 0,l (W o ,Σ; R s + )→R+

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!