21.07.2013 Views

Apartheid

Apartheid

Apartheid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38<br />

After being freed from slavery in the mid-19 th century, in both countries, they remained poor<br />

and oppressed. Their situation could only really be matched by that of the indigenous people.<br />

Coincidentally, in each of the countries the descendants of those slaves and imported<br />

indentured laborers now make up around twelve per cent of the total population.<br />

But here, in the crucial realm of demography, the similarity between the indigenous<br />

groups, between South African Blacks and Native Americans in the USA, breaks down<br />

completely. After over half a century of both absolute and relative growth, more than three<br />

quarters of South Africa’s population today is black, whereas Native Americans have by now<br />

been made to dwindle to one per cent of the US population. 34<br />

This important difference in the demographic development of the oppressed<br />

indigenous ethnic groups in South Africa and the USA thus highlights the most dramatic<br />

phenomenological difference between apartheid and genocide. South Africa under white rule<br />

was essentially apartheid, the USA under white rule was (and to some extent still is)<br />

essentially genocidal. Nonetheless, there are obviously overlapping zones between genocide<br />

and apartheid, as well. Millions of Southern African Blacks were murdered, on the one hand,<br />

and there are still some Native Americans alive and some Native Americans tongues spoken<br />

today, on the other.<br />

The book most similar to mine is perhaps ‘White Supremacy: A Comparative Study in<br />

American and South African History’, by George Fredrickson, who is well aware of those<br />

demographic discrepancies in his comparison, but does not consider them as important as I<br />

do. The difference between us, however, is not of a fundamental nature. I have nothing in<br />

principle against labeling some of the conditions imposed upon Black and Native Americans<br />

‘apartheid’, and I believe that Fredrickson’s work is both very good and important for the<br />

understanding of ethnicism, racism, war and oppression in general, on the one hand, and for<br />

the understanding of unique US and South African developments on the other. But I believe it<br />

can be argued convincingly that there are even closer structural parallels to white supremacy<br />

in South Africa, namely in Graeco-Roman Egypt and in modern Israel. Writing in 1981, when<br />

South African apartheid was still officially (but mostly inofficially) being defended and aided<br />

by the dominant US and UK elites, Fredrickson commendably took pre-1948 developments in<br />

South Africa into consideration, and referred to them well with his more unspecified title. His<br />

was also, however, a more diachronic perspective than the relatively synchronic perspective<br />

that I have chosen. His analysis is more about the process and the causal chains within it;<br />

mine is more about the structure or system and the interdependence and interactions between<br />

constituents of that system. 35 He writes history, and I write political science and political<br />

34 Fenton 1999: 41; Churchill: Suppression of Indigenous Sovereignty in 20 th Century United States, 1997. In<br />

Canada, a similarly genocidal society, the present combined population of indigenous people, American Indians<br />

and Inuit, is also less than two per cent of the present total of 26 million inhabitants. In Hawai’i, which was<br />

conquered by Whites much later but more overwhelmingly, the indigenous have only survived due to<br />

intermarriage with incoming groups, and there are still 18 per cent people with part Hawaiian ancestry left of the<br />

total population in the archipelago today. Ibid. The genocide of Native Americans was probably most<br />

destructive, however, during the first century after Columbus stumbled upon America. An estimated 70 to 90 per<br />

cent of all Native Americans had died, mostly from White-borne diseases, by the end of the sixteenth century.<br />

See Reilly 2003: 129. On the many parallels of internationally illegal land expropriation, creation of native<br />

reservations, official lies, broken promises, and ethnic cleansing of indigenous populations between the US white<br />

elites and the modern Israeli Jewish elites (with US elite support), see also McCabe: What Indians And<br />

Palestinians Share, 2005.<br />

35 Fredrickson 1981; Churchill: Perversions of Justice, 1993; Cox: Caste, Class and Race: A Study in Social<br />

Dynamics, 1970 (1948): 355ff; Hodge, Struckman & Dorland Trust: Cultural Bases of Racism and Group<br />

Oppression: An Examination of Traditional “Western” Concepts, Values and Institutional Structures Which<br />

Support Racism, Sexism and Elitism, 1975: 12ff; Indigenous Watch, no date. The systematic oppression and<br />

genocide of the cultures of Black slaves in the USA reached more extreme dimensions than that of Asian forced<br />

laborers in South Africa. Many of the descendants of the latter are still Muslims, whereas African religions,<br />

languages, and almost all other African cultural traditions, were systematically and successfully forbidden and<br />

eventually exterminated by Whites in the USA. White slaveowners and their employees in the Caribbean and in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!