22.07.2013 Views

Annual Report 2011 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy

Annual Report 2011 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy

Annual Report 2011 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 II. Highlights<br />

Credit: A. van der Wel<br />

I F814W – J F125W [mag]<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

–0.5<br />

E(B–V) = 0,3<br />

continuum<br />

emission line<br />

–1.5<br />

Even when adopting the starburst hypothesis, it is<br />

immediately clear that these objects are all but normal.<br />

The only way to get such large line-to-continuum<br />

Flux ratios is to have a stellar population with an age<br />

of about 10 Myr. Usually, galaxy ages are measured in<br />

Gyrs, not Myrs. Given this age constraint, the luminosities<br />

imply stellar masses of around 10 8 M . Although it<br />

is plausible that an older population of stars exists we<br />

can rule out that these starbursts occur in much large,<br />

say, Milky Way type, galaxies. Rather, these must be<br />

truly low-mass galaxies, such that this population constitutes<br />

the first systematic detection of dwarf galaxies<br />

at high redshift.<br />

Cosmological Context<br />

–1 –0.5<br />

JF125W – HF160W [mag]<br />

100 Myr<br />

continuum 1 Myr<br />

Let us now consider the broader implications of the<br />

presence of 69 starbursting dwarf galaxies at z 1.7<br />

in CaNdelS. To be somewhat more precise, assuming<br />

a redshift range of z 1.6 – 1.8, their volume density<br />

is 4 10 –4 Mpc –3 . This makes them about 100 times<br />

rarer than present-day dwarf galaxies and they constitute<br />

only 0.1 % of the 10 Myr young stellar populations<br />

at that redshift if we consider galaxies of all<br />

masses.<br />

While this may sound unimpressive it does not<br />

make these starbursts cosmologically irrelevant once<br />

we realize that they are very short-duration events: <strong>for</strong><br />

every objects we see, there must be numerous similarly<br />

massive objects that are not undergoing such an intense<br />

burst of star <strong>for</strong>mation at the time of observation but<br />

have had or will have one at some other time.<br />

Let us <strong>for</strong>malize this argument and make two reasonable<br />

assumptions. The first assumption is that the<br />

observed bursts do not only occur at at z 1.7 but at<br />

0<br />

Fig. II.4.2: I – J vs. J–H color-color diagram of objects in<br />

CaNdelS, highlighting with large red symbols with error bars<br />

those objects selected as extreme emission line galaxy candidates.<br />

They mainly differ from the main branch of galaxy<br />

colors by their blue J–H colors. The blue line indicates the<br />

colors of the continuum radiation produced by a young population<br />

of stars (the ages are labeled). The red line includes the<br />

effect of a strong emission line on the colors. The selected<br />

objects have colors indicative of strong emission line contributions<br />

in the J filter.<br />

all redshifts z 1 – 4, a period of roughly 4 Gyr. We<br />

know that similarly strong bursts are exceedingly rare<br />

at z 1 but there is no reason to think that they do not<br />

occur over a much broader redshift range. With upcoming<br />

spectroscopic data from HST this assumption can be<br />

tested easily.<br />

The second assumption is that between z 1.7 and<br />

the present day these galaxies will not grow by an order<br />

of magnitude or more. That is, we will rely on the<br />

prediction of ΛCDM-based galaxy <strong>for</strong>mation models<br />

that galaxies typically grow by a factor of several over<br />

that time span. That is, the descendants of the observed<br />

bursting galaxies at z 1.7 are dwarf galaxies with<br />

masses 10 9 M . This assumption is more difficult to test,<br />

and all we can do now is rely on this model prediction.<br />

By integrating the observed burst frequency at<br />

z 1.7 over 4 Gyr (z 1 – 4) we can derive the total<br />

number of bursts per unit cosmic volume as well as the<br />

total number of stars <strong>for</strong>med in this manner. By comparing<br />

the total number of bursts with the total number of<br />

dwarf galaxies in the present-day universe, it then follows<br />

that each present-day dwarf galaxy must have undergone<br />

two or three of such strong bursts over its life<br />

time, and, moreover, that the majority of the stars in<br />

present-day dwarf galaxies <strong>for</strong>med in these bursts. In<br />

other words, we propose that the star <strong>for</strong>mation history<br />

of dwarf galaxies has been strongly burst-like: long periods<br />

of relative inactivity are interspersed with a small<br />

number of very strong bursts, mostly occurring at early<br />

times (z 1).<br />

Unsolved Riddles and Future Directions<br />

The observations and our interpretation present a host<br />

of new questions, as well as speculation on the effect of<br />

such strong bursts on the galaxies and the dark matter<br />

halos that host them. First, hydrodynamical simulations<br />

cannot reproduce such strong bursts in such low-mass<br />

galaxies. It appears that something fundamental is lacking<br />

in our description of galaxy <strong>for</strong>mation. Their mere<br />

existence implies the presence of large reservoirs of gas,<br />

and it is entirely unclear how to prevent this gas reservoir<br />

from <strong>for</strong>ming stars be<strong>for</strong>e the burst commences, or,<br />

alternatively, how to assemble a large amount of gas on<br />

a very short time scale.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!