Vol. XVI Issue 2 April - June 2012 2012 Documentation ... - Nipccd
Vol. XVI Issue 2 April - June 2012 2012 Documentation ... - Nipccd
Vol. XVI Issue 2 April - June 2012 2012 Documentation ... - Nipccd
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the magnitude of child labour was slightly lower in Maharashtra, except in<br />
tomato farms; children under the age of 14 years accounted for 16 per cent of<br />
the total work force; the number of child labourers was higher in sweet pepper<br />
farms 17.7 per cent and lower in brinjal farms 13.6 per cent; of the total 220<br />
persons found working during field visits to 20 sample farms of sweet pepper,<br />
39 were children under 14 years old; children in the age group of 15-18<br />
accounted for 30.9 per cent of the total work force; girls accounted for more<br />
than 60 per cent of the total of children in all the crops; in Gujarat children under<br />
the age of 14 years accounted for 17.3 per cent of the total work force which<br />
was similar to Maharashtra; children under the age of 15 to 18 years accounted<br />
for 29.6 per cent the average number of children below 14 years per acre was<br />
3.4 persons and on average 58 persons per acre were workers in the 15-18<br />
years age group; the gender composition of working children indicated that girls<br />
out numbered boys, girls accounted for 61.8 per cent of children below 14<br />
years and 67.2 per cent among the 15-18 years age group; a total of 152, 369<br />
children, out of which 59, 417 (39%) were below 14 years and 61 per cent were<br />
in the 15-18 years age group, were employed in tomato, hot and sweet pepper,<br />
brinjal and okra seed plots in Karnataka, Maharashtra and Gujarat states which<br />
account for nearly 95 per cent of the total production area in the country; the<br />
existing employment practices in vegetable seed farms result in denial of right to<br />
education, health and safety by employing them on the farms on long-term<br />
contract basis, making them to work long hours and exposing them to<br />
poisonous pesticides that are applied in higher quantities on the plants.<br />
Conclusion: The current initiatives undertaken by the companies were largely<br />
confined to organizing awareness and motivational meetings for seed<br />
organizers and farmers against the practices of employing children; such<br />
measures are in some ways very significant as a beginning step to address the<br />
problem of child labour but certainly not sufficient to completely tackle the<br />
problem; several companies were not paying any serious attention to the issue.<br />
Unless all the major seed companies come forward and make serious<br />
interventions it is difficult to address the problem of child labour at an industry<br />
level.<br />
Key Words : 1.CHILD LABOUR 2.EXPLOITATION 3.VIOLATION OF CHILD<br />
RIGHTS 4.CHILD PROTECTION 5.NATIONAL CHILD LABOUR PROJECT<br />
6.EDUCATION 7.ELIMINATION OF CHILD LABOUR 8.ADOLESCENTS<br />
9.VEGETABLE SEED PRODUCTION 10.MAGNITUDE OF CHILD LABOUR<br />
11.WORKING CONDITIONS OF CHILDREN 12.KARNATAKA<br />
13.MAHARASHTRA 14.GUJARAT.<br />
34<br />
__________________________________________________________________________________<br />
DCWC Research Bulletin <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>XVI</strong> <strong>April</strong> - <strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong>