Epidemiological principles for EMF and EMR studies - Lincoln ...
Epidemiological principles for EMF and EMR studies - Lincoln ...
Epidemiological principles for EMF and EMR studies - Lincoln ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10<br />
Figure 2: The basic design of a cohort study, Beaglehole, Bonita <strong>and</strong> Kjellström<br />
(1993).<br />
By then investigating the rate of disease in the exposed group compared with the<br />
rate of disease in the remainder of the group who were not exposed, the effect of<br />
exposure can be evaluated. Initially it appears from Figure 1 that because both the<br />
case- <strong>and</strong> control- groups are compared between exposed <strong>and</strong> not exposed groups<br />
that the effect of exposure on the assumed not exposed group, could be being<br />
dealt with. However, because there is a wide range of residential <strong>and</strong> urban levels<br />
of exposures to the ELF & <strong>EMR</strong> fields, this can vary greatly from individuals <strong>and</strong><br />
groups. This produces significant confounders in these <strong>studies</strong>.<br />
As it has demonstrated above, the failure to adequately deal with a ubiquitous<br />
agent will place a proportion of the exposed group in the not exposed group <strong>and</strong><br />
grossly underestimate the effects of a disease agent. Hence a more appropriate<br />
exposure assessment is vital.<br />
When dealing with a ubiquitous agent such as electromagnetic fields <strong>and</strong> radiation,<br />
adequate exposure assessment requires extensive underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> the<br />
development of careful methods. Otherwise, results will be very misleading through<br />
underestimating the impact of the exposure <strong>and</strong> ignoring the exposure factors<br />
within the control groups. An important factor in cohort <strong>studies</strong> is matching the<br />
characteristics of the not exposed group as much as possible to those of the<br />
exposed group so that the only difference is exposure, not age, sex, ethnicity nor<br />
income <strong>for</strong> example.<br />
Statistical Methods:<br />
Even though Sir Austin said that significant statistics are not required <strong>for</strong> deciding a<br />
causal relationship he agreed that they showed the play of chance <strong>and</strong> show the<br />
magnitude of the RRs. Hence an appropriate use of statistical methods is helpful.<br />
One-tailed <strong>and</strong> two-tailed distributions:<br />
The normal statistical method uses a one-tailed distribution test <strong>for</strong> a one direction<br />
effect <strong>and</strong> a two tailed test <strong>for</strong> a two directional effect. If you are seeking to<br />
determine whether a disease agent is going to increase an incidence of the disease<br />
then a one-tailed test is appropriate. If the influence of the agent is unknown then a