Epidemiological principles for EMF and EMR studies - Lincoln ...
Epidemiological principles for EMF and EMR studies - Lincoln ...
Epidemiological principles for EMF and EMR studies - Lincoln ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
32<br />
0.155, or relative gains of 1.0, 0.00027 <strong>and</strong> 0.2 respectively. The side-lobes have<br />
elevation angles of 8, 15, 40, 57 <strong>and</strong> 72 degrees. For an antenna at 500m above<br />
ground level, the ground level side-lobe peaks occur at 160, 390, 600, 1870 <strong>and</strong><br />
3560m from the base of the tower, with troughs of significantly low exposure<br />
between them.<br />
The amplitudes of the peaks <strong>and</strong> troughs are very large because of the<br />
logarithmic nature of the dB units. It is common to tilt the antenna pattern slightly<br />
downwards so that the main beam is directed towards major population centres<br />
in the listening <strong>and</strong> viewing area rather than towards the far horizon.<br />
RF/MW antennas, including cell phone antennas have complex horizontal <strong>and</strong><br />
vertical radiation patters, <strong>for</strong> example Figure 17.<br />
Figure 17: The antenna pattern <strong>for</strong> a 900 MHz cell phone base station<br />
transmission, Bernardi et al. (2000).<br />
In Figure 17 note that the radial scale is in decibels (dB) which is a logarithmic<br />
scale. From the main beam peak at 90° to the minimum on either side at about 75°<br />
<strong>and</strong> 105°, the signal is 30 dB lower, i.e. 1000 times weaker. The other smaller<br />
peaks are called side-lobes. They are typically 12 to 16 dB smaller or 16 to 40<br />
times less intense than the main beam. All antennas have main beams <strong>and</strong> sidelobes<br />
producing a complex spatial pattern that needs to be understood when<br />
carrying out health effects <strong>studies</strong> around radio/TV broadcast or cell phone<br />
transmission stations.<br />
Figure 18 shows the dominant strength of the main beam, which is actually<br />
stronger because of the square of the relative field factor. The elevation angle of<br />
the antenna is usually slightly tilted downwards by 0.5° to point the main beam at<br />
the more remote listening or viewing audience.<br />
The Relative Field peaks in Figure 18 are at 0.5, 3.5, 5.7, 7.9, 10.1 <strong>and</strong> 12.3°. With<br />
the assumption of the mean height of the antennae at 460m, these peaks<br />
correspond to ground level positions at 52.7, 7.5, 4.6, 3.3, 2.6 <strong>and</strong> 2.1km from the