Paulo Santiago, OECD - CMI

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Country approaches to funding tertiary education EXTENT of COST-SHARING Important and uniform across students Non-uniform across students Minor and uniform across students Source: <strong>OECD</strong> (2008), Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society. BASIS for STUDENT SUPPORT Universal support systems Family-based funding Australia, Chile, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden China, Japan, Korea Croatia, Estonia, Poland, Russian Federation Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Greece, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland
Expansion of TE system and funding New tertiary female graduates as a share of the 20-29 female population and relative proportion of private expenditure on tertiary education institutions, 2004 % Female tertiary graduation ratios (proxy for ‘size’ of TE system) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 GRC DNK FIN AUT ISL BEL TUR SWE DEU CZE HUN Source: <strong>OECD</strong> (2008), Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society. IRL SLK NLD ESP ITA UKM MEX NZL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Relative proportion of private expenditure on tertiary education institutions AUS JAP USA KOR %
Page 1 and 2: Building Sustainable Funding Strate
Page 3 and 4: Part 1: Trends in funding tertiary
Page 5 and 6: Index of change (2007, with 1995 =
Page 7 and 8: % 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Chil
Page 9 and 10: … which is also the case in some
Page 11 and 12: Allocation of public subsidies for
Page 13 and 14: 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 % Chile A great
Page 15: Countries are developing student su
Page 19 and 20: Ensuring the long-term financial su
Page 21 and 22: Part 4: Policy directions
Page 23 and 24: The principle of cost-sharing Use c
Page 25 and 26: Institutional Funding Policy direct
Page 27 and 28: Student Support Back the overall fu
Page 29: Thank you for your attention Final

Paulo Santiago, OECD - CMI

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?