28.07.2013 Views

October 27, 1962: Transcripts of the Meetings of the ExComm

October 27, 1962: Transcripts of the Meetings of the ExComm

October 27, 1962: Transcripts of the Meetings of the ExComm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VOICE: Stop it.<br />

International Security 12:3 | 64<br />

and <strong>the</strong>y're attacked, we must attack back, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> SAMs and/or<br />

MiG aircraft that come against <strong>the</strong>m, or <strong>the</strong> ground fire that comes up.<br />

We have ano<strong>the</strong>r problem tomorrow-<strong>the</strong> Graznyy approaching <strong>the</strong><br />

zone-we sent out a message today outlining <strong>the</strong> interception zone<br />

which was publicly released.... Well, we sent it to U Thant and it's<br />

released publicly. The Graznyy will be coming into <strong>the</strong> zone. Khrushchev<br />

has said he is ordering his ships to stay out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zone. If a<br />

Russian ship moves into <strong>the</strong> zone after he's said that publicly, we have<br />

two choices: stop it and board it, or don't. Now when you- -<br />

MCNAMARA: When you put <strong>the</strong> two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se toge<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong>-you know<br />

stopping surveillance and not stopping <strong>the</strong> ship-it seems to me we're<br />

too weak- -<br />

VOICE: Yeah, yeah.<br />

TAYLOR: I'd say we must continue surveillance. That's far more important than<br />

<strong>the</strong> ship.<br />

MCNAMARA: Well-uh-my main point is I don't think at this particular point we<br />

should-uh-show a weakness to Khrushchev, and I think we would<br />

show a weakness if we-if we failed on both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se actions.<br />

TAYLOR: And we must not fail on surveillance. We can't give up twenty-four<br />

hours at this stage.<br />

MCNAMARA: All right, I fully agree, Max. I was just trying to lay out <strong>the</strong> problem.<br />

Therefore I would recommend that tomorrow we carry on surveillance,<br />

but that we defer <strong>the</strong> decision as late as possible in <strong>the</strong> day to give a<br />

little more time because if we go in with surveillance, we have to put<br />

a cover on, and if we start shooting back, we've escalated substantially.<br />

JFK: When would you shoot- -<br />

DILLON: [Put a] cover on? I don't understand.<br />

MCNAMARA: Well, we can't send <strong>the</strong>se low-we can't send <strong>the</strong>se low-altitude aircraft<br />

in....<br />

JFK: If you're going to take a reprisal-<strong>the</strong> cover isn't much good because<br />

you've got anti-aircraft guns. You've got somebody up <strong>the</strong>re at 10,000<br />

feet and actually <strong>the</strong>y can't give much more cover-what you'd really-<br />

seems to me-have is a justification for a more elaborate action,<br />

wouldn't you? Do we want to worry about whe<strong>the</strong>r we're going to<br />

shoot up that one gun, or do we want to-just-uh-use this as a<br />

reason for doing a lot <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r- -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!