October 27, 1962: Transcripts of the Meetings of the ExComm
October 27, 1962: Transcripts of the Meetings of the ExComm
October 27, 1962: Transcripts of the Meetings of the ExComm
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
VOICE: Stop it.<br />
International Security 12:3 | 64<br />
and <strong>the</strong>y're attacked, we must attack back, ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> SAMs and/or<br />
MiG aircraft that come against <strong>the</strong>m, or <strong>the</strong> ground fire that comes up.<br />
We have ano<strong>the</strong>r problem tomorrow-<strong>the</strong> Graznyy approaching <strong>the</strong><br />
zone-we sent out a message today outlining <strong>the</strong> interception zone<br />
which was publicly released.... Well, we sent it to U Thant and it's<br />
released publicly. The Graznyy will be coming into <strong>the</strong> zone. Khrushchev<br />
has said he is ordering his ships to stay out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zone. If a<br />
Russian ship moves into <strong>the</strong> zone after he's said that publicly, we have<br />
two choices: stop it and board it, or don't. Now when you- -<br />
MCNAMARA: When you put <strong>the</strong> two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se toge<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong>-you know<br />
stopping surveillance and not stopping <strong>the</strong> ship-it seems to me we're<br />
too weak- -<br />
VOICE: Yeah, yeah.<br />
TAYLOR: I'd say we must continue surveillance. That's far more important than<br />
<strong>the</strong> ship.<br />
MCNAMARA: Well-uh-my main point is I don't think at this particular point we<br />
should-uh-show a weakness to Khrushchev, and I think we would<br />
show a weakness if we-if we failed on both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se actions.<br />
TAYLOR: And we must not fail on surveillance. We can't give up twenty-four<br />
hours at this stage.<br />
MCNAMARA: All right, I fully agree, Max. I was just trying to lay out <strong>the</strong> problem.<br />
Therefore I would recommend that tomorrow we carry on surveillance,<br />
but that we defer <strong>the</strong> decision as late as possible in <strong>the</strong> day to give a<br />
little more time because if we go in with surveillance, we have to put<br />
a cover on, and if we start shooting back, we've escalated substantially.<br />
JFK: When would you shoot- -<br />
DILLON: [Put a] cover on? I don't understand.<br />
MCNAMARA: Well, we can't send <strong>the</strong>se low-we can't send <strong>the</strong>se low-altitude aircraft<br />
in....<br />
JFK: If you're going to take a reprisal-<strong>the</strong> cover isn't much good because<br />
you've got anti-aircraft guns. You've got somebody up <strong>the</strong>re at 10,000<br />
feet and actually <strong>the</strong>y can't give much more cover-what you'd really-<br />
seems to me-have is a justification for a more elaborate action,<br />
wouldn't you? Do we want to worry about whe<strong>the</strong>r we're going to<br />
shoot up that one gun, or do we want to-just-uh-use this as a<br />
reason for doing a lot <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r- -