01.08.2013 Views

smallpox vaccine and vaccination in the intensified ... - libdoc.who.int

smallpox vaccine and vaccination in the intensified ... - libdoc.who.int

smallpox vaccine and vaccination in the intensified ... - libdoc.who.int

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>and</strong> it was feared that serial passage of vacc<strong>in</strong>ia<br />

virus <strong>in</strong> tissue culture might lead to its<br />

attenuation. After 1967, when <strong>the</strong> Intensified<br />

Smallpox Eradication Programme was <strong>in</strong>itiated,<br />

WHO did not promote <strong>the</strong> production<br />

of <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> cultured cells because it was<br />

realized that <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> eradication<br />

campaign was heavily dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />

production of large amounts of <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

laboratories <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, which<br />

were unlikely at that time to be able successfully<br />

to produce tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> late 1960s, <strong>the</strong> WHO International<br />

Reference Centre for Smallpox Vacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

a development study with Lister <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

grown <strong>in</strong> primary rabbit kidney cells. At <strong>the</strong><br />

time this was <strong>the</strong> only tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

comparable with conventional calf lymph<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms of heat stabilitv. immuno-<br />

2,<br />

genicity <strong>and</strong> reactogenicity (Hekker et al.,<br />

1973a). The production method was simple<br />

<strong>and</strong> cheap, <strong>the</strong> <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> was sterile <strong>and</strong> free<br />

from mycoplasmas <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r adventitious<br />

agents, <strong>and</strong> it ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed its potency for up to<br />

8 weeks at 37 "C. The actual reductions <strong>in</strong><br />

titre, rang<strong>in</strong>g from loo.* to pockform<strong>in</strong>g<br />

units per m1 after 8 weeks at 37 "C,<br />

were smaller than those of <strong>the</strong> calf lymph<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> tested as a control. The immunogenicity<br />

of this <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> was tested by measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g antibody titres <strong>in</strong> subjects<br />

1 year after primary <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>, a control<br />

group hav<strong>in</strong>g been vacc<strong>in</strong>ated with conventional<br />

calf lymph <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>. All <strong>the</strong> subjects<br />

produced neutraliz<strong>in</strong>g antibody <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

no significant difference <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> results obta<strong>in</strong>ed,<br />

as between tissue culture <strong>and</strong> calf<br />

lymph <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>s. (Hekker et al., 1973b).<br />

Measurement of <strong>the</strong> antibodv titre 2 months<br />

after re<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> with <strong>the</strong> tissue culture<br />

11. VACCINATION IN THE INTENSIFIED PROGRAMME 589<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> showed an adequate booster effect<br />

compared with <strong>the</strong> calf lymph control group.<br />

Because of <strong>the</strong>se successful results. a field<br />

trial on a large scale <strong>in</strong> Lombok, Indonesia,<br />

was jo<strong>in</strong>tly organized <strong>in</strong> 1973 by <strong>the</strong> Smallpox<br />

Eradication unit, <strong>the</strong> WHO Regional Office<br />

for South-East Asia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> government of<br />

Indonesia. A total of 45 443 children under<br />

<strong>the</strong> age of 15 years were vacc<strong>in</strong>ated with tissue<br />

culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> results compared with<br />

those for 9061 children of a similar age <strong>and</strong><br />

sex distribution <strong>who</strong> had been vacc<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard Lister stra<strong>in</strong> calf lymph<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> (Hekker et al., 1976). The success rate<br />

with tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> reached 97%<br />

<strong>in</strong> primary <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>and</strong> 75% <strong>in</strong><br />

re<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> (Table 11.24), results comparable<br />

with those obta<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> calf<br />

lymph <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>.<br />

The children were carefully followed up for<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> complications. The only suspected<br />

complication was a fatal case of possible<br />

encephalitis <strong>in</strong> a 5-month-old girl <strong>who</strong> had<br />

been vacc<strong>in</strong>ated with tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>,<br />

but <strong>in</strong> Lombok <strong>the</strong>re were many o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

~ossible causes of this disease.<br />

Both this tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

LCl6m8 stra<strong>in</strong> of Hashizume, which was also<br />

produced <strong>in</strong> primary rabbit kidney cells, met<br />

<strong>the</strong> WHO requirements for safety, potency<br />

<strong>and</strong> stability, <strong>and</strong> were comparable to calf<br />

lymph <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>in</strong> effectiveness for both primarv<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>and</strong> re<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>. These<br />

2 stra<strong>in</strong>s are <strong>the</strong> only tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>s<br />

which have been thoroughly <strong>and</strong> systematically<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> laboratory <strong>and</strong> also to<br />

a limited extent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field. In <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lister tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> is kept<br />

as <strong>the</strong> <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> stock for emergency use, both<br />

locally <strong>and</strong> for supply to o<strong>the</strong>r countries; <strong>the</strong><br />

Table 1 1.24. Take rates follow<strong>in</strong>g primary <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>and</strong> re<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> with tissue culture <strong>and</strong> calf lymph<br />

<strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong>s (Lornbok, Indonesia, 1973)a<br />

Prlmary vacclnatlon Revacclnatlon<br />

Age group Tlssue culture vacclne Glf lymph <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Tissue culture <strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Calf lymph vacclne<br />

(yeam)<br />

Number Take rate Number Take rate Number Take rate Number Take rate<br />

(W (W (W (W<br />

Total 14 677 97.1 2 796 96.9 30 766 74.7 6 265 71.2<br />

a From Hekker et al. (1 976).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!