Download (1227Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT
Download (1227Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT
Download (1227Kb) - OAR@ICRISAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Benefit/cost ratio was calculated by comparison of<br />
the cost of protective sprays and net gain over the control<br />
treatments.<br />
The data (Table 1) show that field application of 3<br />
sprays of endosulfan against H. armigera in chickpea<br />
resulted in significant reduction in pod damage at maturity<br />
and increased grain yield in both years. The application<br />
of endosulfan, 0.07%, gave maximum protection with<br />
minimum pod damage 40.2% and 29.3% and highest<br />
grain yield 2.12 and 2.27 t ha -1 respectively. Pod damage<br />
at maturity varied from 44% to 65% with grain yield 0.29<br />
to 1.29 t ha 1 in treated plots in 1992-1993 as compared<br />
to 81.7% and 0.2 t ha -1 in untreated control plots. Similar<br />
trend was observed in 1993-94 with varied pod damage<br />
51-70% and grain yield 1.34-1.65 t ha -1 as compared to<br />
70% damage and 0.83 t ha -1 yield in untreated control<br />
plots. The treatment of crop with karanj oil during<br />
1992-93 resulted in minimum pod damage, 44% with<br />
maximum grain yield, percent increase in grain yield<br />
over control and percent avoidable yield loss, i.e., 1.29 t<br />
ha -1 , 54.5% and 84.5% respectively among various<br />
bioproducts tested. In 1993-94, the plots treated with nicotine<br />
sulphate gave lowest pod damage, 51% but treatment<br />
with neem oil gave maximum grain yield, percent<br />
increase in grain yield over control and avoidable yield<br />
loss, i.e., 1.65 t ha -1 , 99% and 50% respectively followed<br />
by karanj oil and green mark.<br />
The data on the economics of different treatments<br />
show that endosulfan gave the maximum benefit/cost<br />
ratio, 14.8 in 1992-93 and 14.1 in 1993-94. Among the<br />
botanicals tested, green mark gave highest ratio, 6.3<br />
followed by karanj oil, 5.1 in 1992-93 and NSKWE, 9.2<br />
followed by green mark, 5.8 in 1993-94.<br />
Neem, karanj, and tobacco formulations, when tested<br />
under heavy pest pressure at Pantnagar as in these studies<br />
and even in the All India Pulse Project data cited by Lal<br />
et al. (1986) were less effective than endosulfan. Similarly,<br />
Rao et al. (1990) had reported that neem oil was not<br />
effective against H. armigera and resulted in less yield<br />
of cotton seed. Gupta et al. 1990 had reported that application<br />
of karanj oil 3% and 5% reduced the pod damage<br />
of H. armigera to