How to evaluate vulnerability in changing environmental conditions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

How to Evaluate Vulnerability in Changing Environmental Conditions? Edited by Roger A. Pielke, Sr. and Lelys Bravo de Guenni
Introduction Roger A. Pielke, Sr. The prevailing paradigm has been that climate varia- existing paradigm for predicting the future starts from bility and change can be projected decades or even a the global scale and then attempts to downscale to the century or more into the future (e.g. IPCC 1996, 2001). regional and local scales; it focuses on averages, is long- However, for several reasons -e.g. imperfect representerm, and depends on skilful prediction of the future. It tation of the full complexity of the Earth system, non- is therefore much less useful to policy-makers (Sarewitz linear spatial and temporal feedbacks, and imperfect et al. 2000). The in-depth discussion of why we need a foresight of human behaviour, it may not be possible to vulnerability approach that then follows will be illus- assess the range of potential future climate change actrated using water as an example. curately. Water is an essential component of life both in terms Therefore, a newer paradigm requires that our vul- of its quality and quantity; however, this resource is nerability to the entire spectrum of environmental threats threatened. For example, as reported in the Economist be assessed, including the ranking of their seriousness. (May 29, 1999, p. 102), while 90% of the world's popula- Once vulnerabilities have been so evaluated, whether or tion have enough water at present, it is estimated that not they can be quantitatively predicted for the future by 2050 more than 40% of the population will face some can then be tested. This part of the BAHC synthesis dis- water shortage (see also Sect. E.6.1). The lack of access cusses this perspective to assess risk associated with en- to safe water is even more serious. According to the same vironmental variability and change. In particular, we article in the Economist, developing countries often have should start the analysis by first assessing vulnerability, very limited access to safe water supplies. Only about instead of projecting possible climate change scenarios, 30% of the residents in rural Brazil, for example, cur- and then assessing vulnerabilities based on that subset rently have access to safe water. of possible future climates. There is increasing recognition that threats to future This is a broader definition of vulnerability than that water quality and quantity are influenced by a wide va- used by the impacts community. As discussed later, this riety of environmental concerns. These concerns involve approach involves first assessing all of the vulnerabilities effects both from natural and human origin. Stahle et al. of an environmental (or other) resource to environmen- (2000), for example, document a 16th century megatal variability and change. Once these vulnerabilities are drought in western North America that dwarfs any determined, estimates (with probabilities, if they can be drought since then. Wilhite (2000) presents a series of quantified) of what scenarios would cause a vulnerabil- articles that demonstrates the extensive effect of drought ity threshold to be exceeded are specified. Also, unlike on human society. Kunkel et al. (1999) describe the im- the more narrowly defined concept of vUlnerability, nonportance of vulnerability to weather and climate exlinear feedbacks between the resource being affected and tremes, and how this vulnerability changes in response the forcings are included. to increases in human exposure, even when extreme We will discuss first the relationship between pre- weather statistics remain unchanged. Non-weather rediction and vulnerability in Chapt. E.2 and E.3. The scelated influences include land-use change effects on runnario approach will be reviewed later in Chapt. E.4 and off and stream flow, and deliberate engineering of wa- its shortcomings illustrated. The reasons why a vulnerter flow whereas human activities change the distribuability approach as presented in Chapt. E.5 is more aption and availability of water through engineering works. propriate for environmental assessments is because it is Examples of this kind of human activity include rerout- regional and local in scale; it involves the evaluation of ing of rivers, creating artificial surfaces (reservoirs), thresholds and the threat associated with extreme con- changing surface water content through irrigation of ditions; it can include a spectrum of threats, and can drylands or drainage of wetlands, and through lifting consider the effect of abrupt changes. In contrast, the groundwater to the surface.
Page 5 and 6: Predictability and Uncertainty Roge
Page 7 and 8: "L"3"6!;j -eueldx3 lO}) UO!JJ!P3ld}
Page 9 and 10: formed as sensitivity experiments (
Page 11 and 12: Contrast between Predictive and Vul
Page 13 and 14: E.3.1 .Societal Needs 493 sion maki
Page 15 and 16: discuss below a procedure for handl
Page 17 and 18: 498 CHAPTER E.4 .The Scenario Appro
Page 19 and 20: 500 CHAPTER E.5 .The Vulnerability
Page 21 and 22: 502 CHAPTER E.5 .The Vulnerability
Page 23 and 24: 504 CHAPTER E,S" The Vulnerability
Page 25 and 26: sa6ul!lj) adl!JspUl!lll!Jn~I!N :saJ
Page 27 and 28: processes. A broad literature infor
Page 29 and 30: fnvasive (Stohlgren 1999a). Current
Page 31 and 32: ~sed M~tic (e.g. nitrogen fixers or
Page 33: Case Studies Roger A. Pielke, Sr. I
Page 36 and 37: 81S sa!pms as e) , 9'3 !l3.LdVH) "W
Page 38 and 39: 520 . CHAPTER E.6 .Case Studies Fig
Page 40 and 41: 522 CHAPTER E.6 .Case Studies with
Page 42 and 43: ~ 524 .. CHAPTER E.6 .Case Studies
Page 44 and 45: 526 CHAPTER E.6 .Case Studies Table
Page 46 and 47: Acknowlegement This 528 CHAPTER E.6
Page 48: of~ sa!pms as e) 0 903 ~3idVH) -!AU
Page 51 and 52: Fig. E.23. Ratios of "short" (1972-
Page 53 and 54:
Fig. E.26. Schematic illustration o
Page 55 and 56:
suo!snl:>uo) 'lS ';}lIl;}ld 'V l;}~
Page 57 and 58:
References Part E Adams RM, Crocker
Page 59 and 60:
Hoffman MT, Todd SW, Ntshona ZM, Tu
Page 61 and 62:
Schellnhuber H-J, Yohe G (1998) Com
show all

How to evaluate vulnerability in changing environmental conditions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?