05.08.2013 Views

FERC vs NERC: A grid control showdown over cyber security

FERC vs NERC: A grid control showdown over cyber security

FERC vs NERC: A grid control showdown over cyber security

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GRID(UN)LOCK<br />

WWW.INTELLIGENTUTILITY.COM /// JULY/AUGUST 2011<br />

36<br />

“<br />

and/or demand charges reflecting their peak use, but that’s too expensive for this<br />

municipal, distribution-only utility with about 360,000 customers. (Although<br />

modest on paper, that profile makes Nashville one of the nation’s top dozen<br />

municipal utilities, by size.)<br />

Shoestring solution<br />

Instead, NES will implement a voltage conservation program on a systemwide<br />

basis to reduce peak demand and, therefore, mitigate the impact of demandbased<br />

wholesale rates on residential customers. The American National<br />

Standards Institute (ANSI) standard calls<br />

for 114 to 126 volts per residential end-user.<br />

We need consistency<br />

During peak load, NES will narrow that range<br />

to about 116-120 volts. It will use smart meters<br />

and predictability of<br />

as “continuous voltage sensors” at key sample<br />

points on every circuit.<br />

revenue and profit<br />

In this manner, NES can reduce its cost for<br />

peak-time energy use without the need to<br />

so we can bill our<br />

install a smart meter at every home in its entire<br />

service territory. Ultimately, the utility would<br />

customers equitably. ”<br />

like to install smart meters on every home<br />

to ensure that every customer’s voltage stays<br />

within the ANSI standard and to achieve the many other benefits that smart<br />

meters provide. TVA and NES are cooperatively involved in this solution, which<br />

should be fully operational by this time next year.<br />

“Over the past 20 years, our retail rates have been what they call ‘end-use rates,’<br />

which means that we paid TVA for wholesale power<br />

in the same way we billed for retail power,” Hatridge<br />

told me. “For example, retail customers paid a flat<br />

rate per kilowatt hour, so we reported to TVA how<br />

many kilowatt hours we sold to retail customers and<br />

paid TVA a flat charge per kilowatt hour for that<br />

power. For those large commercial and industrial<br />

customers that we billed for a demand charge, we<br />

reported that customer’s demand to TVA and paid<br />

TVA for that demand.”<br />

For residential customers, because NES only collected<br />

and passed through costs for energy consumed<br />

in kilowatt hours, NES received a guaranteed margin.<br />

Changing the face of the Tennessee Valley<br />

“What happened to us, as of April 1, is changing the<br />

face of the Tennessee Valley,” Hatridge said. “TVA<br />

is now going back to an old system of charging us<br />

demand charges for the energy we sell to residential customers.<br />

“This puts us at risk because we are billing residential customers at a flat rate<br />

per kilowatt hour but our wholesale cost for that power will vary. If we happen<br />

to have a really hot day near the end of the month, like we did in May 2011, our<br />

wholesale power bill from TVA shoots up much more than what we bill to our<br />

residential customers. We are concerned about how such an unpredictable profit<br />

margin will affect our financial stability.”<br />

In effect, NES will use a smart <strong>grid</strong> technique—in general, distribution optimization,<br />

in particular, voltage conservation—to manage retail rates to reflect<br />

wholesale rates from TVA.<br />

“We need consistency and predictability<br />

of revenue and profit so we can<br />

bill our customers equitably for what<br />

they use,” Hatridge said.<br />

Cost-effective<br />

win-win solution<br />

These changes may mean that NES<br />

sells less electricity <strong>over</strong>all, though<br />

ideally it would like to maintain the<br />

amount it sells, just shifting consumption<br />

to off-peak hours.<br />

“On a hot summer day when we’re<br />

trying to conserve power, we can actually<br />

turn down your voltage to, say,<br />

116 volts,” Hatridge said. “This won’t<br />

affect the performance of a customer’s<br />

electrical equipment, but it will reduce<br />

peak load. It will maintain a more<br />

consistent margin for NES and it will<br />

save the customer money because<br />

they will consume slightly less energy.<br />

We’ve prevented a brownout by making<br />

a slight adjustment in voltage that’s<br />

within the acceptable range.<br />

“We think this is a very cost-effective<br />

solution,” Hatridge concluded.<br />

“We can achieve some very significant<br />

reductions in peak energy demand at a<br />

reasonable cost and without requiring<br />

customers to change their energy<br />

usage habits.”<br />

This article first appeared in Intelligent<br />

Utility Daily.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!