05.08.2013 Views

FERC vs NERC: A grid control showdown over cyber security

FERC vs NERC: A grid control showdown over cyber security

FERC vs NERC: A grid control showdown over cyber security

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRANSMISSIONS<br />

WWW.INTELLIGENTUTILITY.COM /// JULY/AUGUST 2011<br />

6<br />

Vol 3, issue 3 » mAy/June 2011<br />

Letters from readers<br />

smARt sm smARt t gRiD gR gRiD iD<br />

2020<br />

©<br />

Industry experts weigh<br />

in on critical trends<br />

tRAnsmission<br />

inteRconnection<br />

two new developments<br />

putting the brakes on buildout<br />

eneRgy eFFiciency impAct<br />

How DR + ee is more than<br />

the sum of their parts<br />

where smart <strong>grid</strong> meets business—and reality.<br />

cis/mDm<br />

utility barriers still exist<br />

» www.intelligentutility.com<br />

Grid modernization<br />

monetization<br />

March/April 2011<br />

Thank you for the interesting article<br />

on ROCs. I had not previously heard<br />

of this sort of financial instrument,<br />

although it sounds a lot like a municipal<br />

revenue bond. Those instruments<br />

are tax-free and are low risk because<br />

of the dedication of project revenues<br />

to repay the debt. I like the long-term,<br />

stable source of capital that an ROC<br />

represents so that the payment stream<br />

can be more stable.<br />

I am curious about a few things.<br />

Firstly, long-term finance and amortization<br />

is common in the utility sector,<br />

but with smart <strong>grid</strong> assets the steep<br />

technology curve dictates much shorter<br />

amortization periods like 10 years instead<br />

of the typical 30. If the underlying<br />

assets become no longer useful before<br />

the debt is repaid, how is the remaining<br />

balance paid? In utility ratemaking,<br />

utilities can only have assets that are<br />

used and useful in rate base.<br />

I understand from a credit standpoint<br />

why the instrument’s marketability<br />

and lower interest rate is tied to<br />

the dedicated charge on consumers’<br />

bills along with a true-up mechanism<br />

and assurance from regulators that<br />

the deal will be honored <strong>over</strong> the term<br />

of the loan. However, this very issue<br />

of providing assured cost rec<strong>over</strong>y, or<br />

prudence, is a major issue for regulators<br />

as evidenced best in the initial<br />

order last June from the Maryland<br />

Commission re: denying BG&E cost<br />

rec<strong>over</strong>y for its AMI project.<br />

I am intrigued by the ROC, but<br />

wonder what thought has been given<br />

to satisfying or assuring regulators<br />

relative to performance, ratepayer<br />

benefit that would convince a PUC to<br />

provide the sort of iron-clad support<br />

contemplated in an ROC? Have any<br />

ROCs been placed at this point that<br />

would be instructive along these lines?<br />

David O’Brien<br />

Director Regulatory Strategy<br />

Bridge Energy Group<br />

Changing the<br />

dispatch equation<br />

March/April 2011<br />

We continue to look at our mounting<br />

problems through the lens that we<br />

have used since the <strong>grid</strong> was created.<br />

“We need to bring more data into<br />

the equation and find a way for<br />

dispatchers to manage it,” the gist of<br />

this article, is based on a top-down,<br />

center-based <strong>control</strong> paradigm. We<br />

need much more data, that is certainly<br />

true, but more data will <strong>over</strong>whelm<br />

our current system. Consider how<br />

the Internet manages complexity and<br />

massive amounts of data. The communication<br />

protocols of the Internet<br />

(TCP/IP, etc.) enable massive amounts<br />

of data to self-route. They provide<br />

an appropriate network architecture<br />

to manage complexity and, in so<br />

doing, unleash tremendous potential<br />

for innovation and, importantly for<br />

www.intelligentutility.com<br />

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Kate Rowland<br />

krowland@energycentral.com 720.331.3555<br />

SENIOR CONTRIBUTORS<br />

Phil Carson<br />

Editor-in-chief, Intelligent Utility Daily<br />

pcarson@energycentral.com 303.228.4757<br />

Christopher Perdue<br />

Vice President, Sierra Energy Group<br />

cperdue@energycentral.com 310.471.7396<br />

FEATURE WRITERS<br />

Mike Breslin, John Johnson, Phil Johnson, Laurel Lundstrom,<br />

Elizabeth McGowan, Cate Meredith<br />

COPY EDITORS: Martha Collins, J. Ian Tennant<br />

VICE PRESIDENT, SALES/MARKETING SERVICES: Jennifer LaFlam<br />

jlaflam@energycentral.com 800.459.2233<br />

ACCOUNT EXECUTIVES<br />

Jean Micketti, Ken Maness, Todd Hagen<br />

sales@energycentral.com 800.459.2233<br />

ADVERTISING COORDINATORS<br />

Eric Swanson, Stephanie Wilson, Patricia Davis<br />

CUSTOMER SERVICE<br />

Cindy Witwer, 800.459.2233<br />

ENERGY CENTRAL<br />

www.EnergyCentral.com<br />

PRESIDENT/CEO Steve Drazga<br />

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Steven D. Solove<br />

CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER Joe Haddock<br />

VICE PRESIDENT, INTELLIGENT UTILITY Mark Johnson<br />

VICE PRESIDENT, DATA & ANALYSIS Randy Rischard<br />

VICE PRESIDENT, MARKETING PRACTICES Mike Smith<br />

DIRECTOR OF MARKETING Sarah W. Frazier<br />

DIRECTOR OF SALES, EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Kyle Schnurbusch<br />

2821 S. PARKER RD., SUITE 1105<br />

AURORA, CO 80014<br />

PHONE 303.782.5510<br />

ADVERTISING AND REPRINT REQUESTS<br />

Please call 800.459.2233 or email sales@energycentral.com<br />

Intelligent Utility is available free to a limited number<br />

of qualified subscribers. Basic subscription rates are<br />

$99/year within the US and $129/year outside the US.<br />

Single copies are $10 plus S/H.<br />

Subscribe online at www.IntelligentUtility.com/SUBSCRIBE<br />

GEOSPATIAL PARTNER<br />

Official Association Partners<br />

UTILITY ICT PARTNER<br />

ADVANCED METERING PARTNER ENERGY EFFICIENCY PARTNER

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!