LICENTIATE THESIS - Luleå tekniska universitet
LICENTIATE THESIS - Luleå tekniska universitet
LICENTIATE THESIS - Luleå tekniska universitet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Evaluation of Concrete Structures<br />
The trough consists of a slab connected to and carried by two longitudinal beams. The<br />
bridges of this standard type were usually built between 1950 and 1980 with a concrete<br />
compression strength of about 40 MPa (tested on 150 mm cubes). The older bridges<br />
were designed according to principles where the shear capacity of the concrete was<br />
somewhat overestimated. This leads to problems when the bridges are recalculated with<br />
the design strength for the higher axle loads.<br />
The load case that has been used for the calculation is shown in Figure 5.1, Figure 5.2<br />
and Figure 5.3.<br />
~750 1700 1500 1700<br />
- 24 -<br />
~750<br />
Figure 5.1 Load case with two bogies from two iron ore wagons, Nilsson et al.<br />
(1999).<br />
~1540<br />
3100<br />
Figure 5.2 Cross-section of the Lautajokki Bridge, Nilsson et al. (1999).<br />
φ16 s100<br />
B=1000<br />
600<br />
320<br />
d=295<br />
Figure 5.3 Reinforcement in the longitudinal direction in the slab in the<br />
Lautajokki Bridge.<br />
The comparison can also be found in the report Thun et al. (2000).<br />
5.2 Results and Discussion<br />
First of all it must be said once again that it is very difficult to make a comparison of<br />
this kind between the codes. Though, this comparison nevertheless gives an idea how<br />
the two codes are designed.<br />
One general difference between the codes is how you check the fatigue capacity. In<br />
Eurocode you have three different “levels”. The first check is very easy to perform<br />
since the calculations are very basic. If your structure passes this level you do not have<br />
to go any further. The following level needs more calculations and more information