- Page 1: LICENTIATE THESIS Evaluation of Con
- Page 5: Preface This licentiate thesis pres
- Page 8 and 9: Evaluation of Concrete Structures I
- Page 10 and 11: Evaluation of Concrete Structures I
- Page 12 and 13: Evaluation of Concrete Structures 4
- Page 14 and 15: A. Simplified check A1. In-situ ins
- Page 17 and 18: Evaluation of Concrete Structures 2
- Page 19 and 20: Evaluation of Concrete Structures G
- Page 21 and 22: Lok-Strength & Capo-Strength F [kN]
- Page 23 and 24: Evaluation of Concrete Structures 3
- Page 25 and 26: Evaluation of Concrete Structures a
- Page 27 and 28: Evaluation of Concrete Structures 3
- Page 29 and 30: Evaluation of Concrete Structures 4
- Page 31 and 32: Evaluation of Concrete Structures t
- Page 33: Evaluation of Concrete Structures d
- Page 36 and 37: Evaluation of Concrete Structures T
- Page 38 and 39: Evaluation of Concrete Structures -
- Page 41: 6 Outlook Evaluation of Concrete St
- Page 44 and 45: Evaluation of Concrete Structures E
- Page 49 and 50: CONCRETE STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT IN SW
- Page 51 and 52: strength of all bridges along the r
- Page 53 and 54: USED METHODS The methods that have
- Page 55 and 56: underestimated. Rockström & Molin
- Page 57 and 58: Eight road underpasses In order to
- Page 59 and 60: Table 2 Concrete compression streng
- Page 61 and 62: Another correlation to determine th
- Page 63 and 64: Table 3 Concrete tensile strength f
- Page 65 and 66: The regression equation is: F = 0.5
- Page 67 and 68: cores were taken out later on they
- Page 69 and 70: German Petersen C. (1997). LOK-test
- Page 71: Paper B LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF C
- Page 74 and 75: INTRODUCTION Railway sleepers made
- Page 76 and 77: Figure 2 Picture showing how much o
- Page 78 and 79: Group 3 No cracks on the upper side
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 7 Forces acting on a mass m
- Page 82 and 83: Figure 10 The horizontal track forc
- Page 84 and 85: Figure 12 Failure of sleeper no. 2
- Page 86 and 87: Load [kN] 350 300 250 200 150 100 5
- Page 88 and 89: Horizontal force [kN] 140 120 100 8
- Page 90 and 91: The mean value for 18 tensile tests
- Page 92 and 93: Possible failure mechanisms are ill
- Page 94 and 95: the level of the applied load. The
- Page 96 and 97:
Sahlin, Sven and Sundqvist, Håkan.
- Page 99 and 100:
CONCRETE FATIGUE CAPACITY. A STUDY
- Page 101 and 102:
The fatigue tests in this paper can
- Page 103 and 104:
The concrete mixtures used for the
- Page 105 and 106:
Load [kN] 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 T
- Page 107 and 108:
Tensile strength [MPa] 5 4 3 2 1 0
- Page 109 and 110:
Strain [‰] 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Load
- Page 111 and 112:
specimens. For series A no indicati
- Page 113 and 114:
REFERENCES Albert, W A J, (1837):
- Page 115 and 116:
Strain [‰] 0.8 0.6 0.4 ε max 0.2
- Page 117 and 118:
C = dε / dN [× 10 −6 ] 100 10 1
- Page 119:
Test series B: S min = σ min / f c
- Page 123 and 124:
SHEAR FATIGUE CAPACITY - A COMPARIS
- Page 125 and 126:
φ16 s100 B=1000 - 3 - d=295 Figure
- Page 127 and 128:
P = 22.5 tons ⇒ V dim = 54.43 ·
- Page 129 and 130:
a) b) 1,0 0,5 1,0 0,5 UIC EC2, Aas-
- Page 131 and 132:
As0 ρ = b ⋅ d , not higher than
- Page 133 and 134:
No risk of fatigue failure is assum
- Page 135 and 136:
A sl b w σ cp N Sd = the area of t
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 5.2 Fatigue strength. Fatigue
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 5.3 Number of cycles to failu
- Page 141 and 142:
Vmin = V1 = 22.08 · 1.55 = 34.22 k
- Page 143 and 144:
If this method is applied also for
- Page 145 and 146:
For example: for the strength class
- Page 147:
BBK 94 (1994, 1996): Swedish Code f
- Page 151:
Excerpt from EC2-draft (1999) First
- Page 154 and 155:
- 32 -
- Page 156 and 157:
- 34 -
- Page 158 and 159:
- 36 -
- Page 160 and 161:
- 38 -
- Page 162 and 163:
- 40 -
- Page 165:
Excerpt from EC2-1 (1991) and EC2-2
- Page 168 and 169:
- 46 -
- Page 170 and 171:
- 48 -
- Page 172 and 173:
- 50 -
- Page 174 and 175:
- 52 -
- Page 176 and 177:
- 54 -
- Page 179:
Excerpt from MC90 (1990) CEB-FIP Mo
- Page 182 and 183:
- 60 -
- Page 184:
Licentiate Theses Lennart Fransson