07.08.2013 Views

Tax Advisers - Deloitte

Tax Advisers - Deloitte

Tax Advisers - Deloitte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

United States<br />

Richard C Stark<br />

McKee Nelson LLP<br />

1919 M Street, NW<br />

Suite 200<br />

Washington, DC 20036<br />

US<br />

Tel: (1) 202 775 8673<br />

Fax: (1) 202 775 8586<br />

Email: rstark@mckeenelson.com<br />

Website: www.mckeenelson.com<br />

Mr Stark focuses on federal income tax matters. He has extensive experience in tax<br />

controversy matters, including audits, appeals, and litigation.<br />

Mr Stark began his career in private practice in Dallas, Texas in 1976, where he practised<br />

for 10 years. From 1986 to 1989, he served as assistant to the commissioner of the<br />

Internal Revenue Service. Before joining McKee Nelson, he was a partner in the<br />

Washington DC office of Miller & Chevalier.<br />

Mr Stark is a past chair of the <strong>Tax</strong>ation Section of the District of Columbia Bar<br />

Association, and of the ABA Section of <strong>Tax</strong>ation’s Administrative Practice Committee.<br />

He is a Fellow of the American College of <strong>Tax</strong> Counsel.<br />

Mr Stark received a JD, with first honours, from the Vanderbilt University School of<br />

Law in 1976, where he served as special projects editor for the Vanderbilt Law Review. He<br />

is a member of the Order of the Coif and Phi Beta Kappa.<br />

Representative cases in which Mr Stark was either counsel of record or a principal<br />

participant include:<br />

• The Dow Chemical Company v United States, 250 F Supp 2d 748, modified by 278 F<br />

Supp 2d 844 (ED Mich 2003) (on appeal);<br />

• GlaxoSmithKline Holdings Inc v Commissioner, 117 TC 1 (2001) (perpetuation of<br />

testimony in transfer-pricing dispute);<br />

• American States Insurance Co v Bower, Dkt 01-L-50940 (Ill App, appeal pending)<br />

(characterization of § 338 (h) (10) gain as non-business income);<br />

• Peerless Industries v United States, 94-1 USTC 50,043 (ED Pa), aff’d per curiam, 37<br />

F3d 1488 (3d Cir 1994) (business purpose doctrine);<br />

• Mobil Exploration & Producing North America, Inc v United States, 27 Fed Cl 463 (1993)<br />

(windfall profit tax); and<br />

• Woods Investment Co v Commissioner, 85 TC 274 (1985), acq 1986-2 CB 1 (consolidated<br />

returns).<br />

310 Guide to the World’s Leading <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Advisers</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!