10.08.2013 Views

Issue 4 May 2010 - LTA Academy

Issue 4 May 2010 - LTA Academy

Issue 4 May 2010 - LTA Academy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Issue</strong> 4 <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong>


JOURNEYS<br />

Publisher<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong><br />

Land Transport Authority<br />

1 Hampshire Road<br />

Singapore 219428<br />

Editorial Team<br />

Naleeza Ebrahim<br />

Alison Tan<br />

George Sun<br />

Mageret Ely<br />

Foo Jong Ai<br />

All feedback, suggestions and contribution of papers for future issues are welcome.<br />

Please address all correspondence to:<br />

JOURNEYS<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong><br />

Land Transport Authority<br />

1 Hampshire Road<br />

Singapore 219428<br />

Fax: 65 6396 1890<br />

Email: JOURNEYS@lta.gov.sg<br />

JOURNEYS is also available online at www.<strong>LTA</strong>academy.gov.sg<br />

© <strong>2010</strong> <strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong>, Land Transport Authority, Singapore<br />

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by<br />

any means without the prior written permission of the <strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong>, Land Transport Authority, Singapore.<br />

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect<br />

the views of the <strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> or the Land Transport Authority, Singapore.<br />

ISSN: 1793-494X


Contents<br />

07. Proactive National Transport Strategy<br />

for Low Carbon and Green Growth<br />

in Korea<br />

HWANG Kee Yeon<br />

PARK Jin Young<br />

16. Urban Leaders Find Transportation<br />

Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

Michael REPLOGLE<br />

Michael KODRANSKY<br />

26. Practices and Policies of Green Urban<br />

Transport in China<br />

JIANG Yulin<br />

LI Zhenyu<br />

36. GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

Rosina HOWE<br />

42. Urban Transportation Planning for a<br />

Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

Michael QUAH<br />

Dickson YEO<br />

52. Household Interview Survey<br />

from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of<br />

Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

CHOI Chik Cheong<br />

Raymond TOH


Naleeza Ebrahim<br />

When we open our minds, the<br />

possibilities are great. As<br />

any philosopher would say,<br />

everything begins with a thought. Today, the<br />

world is thinking in eco-friendly terms, and<br />

‘green’ initiatives will follow suit. In this fourth<br />

issue of JOURNEYS, we are transported<br />

around the world – in the greenest possible<br />

way, our armchairs – to learn of green<br />

transport development. At the heart of these<br />

measures are people-centric values because<br />

transportation systems are there to serve<br />

people, not the other way around.<br />

Hwang Kee Yeon and Park Jin Young from<br />

the Korea Transport Institute not only share<br />

Korea’s efforts to green the country’s<br />

transportation system, but also propose<br />

pushing the envelope to execute ideas,<br />

such as, bicycle highways, and photovoltaic<br />

transport infrastructure.<br />

Michael Replogle and Michael Kodransky,<br />

of the Institute for Transportation and<br />

Development Policy (USA), give a stimulating<br />

Editor’s Note<br />

overview of how urban transport policy<br />

makers around the world, from Colombia<br />

to China, India to Ecuador, USA to UK, are<br />

putting people-centric schemes forward.<br />

The moniker for Ahmedabad, India’s, Bus<br />

Rapid Transit system, ‘Janmarg’ or ‘people’s<br />

way’, says it in a nutshell.<br />

China, the fastest growing economy<br />

in the world, which could become the<br />

biggest greenhouse gas emitter, aims to be<br />

equally fast in getting its urban transport<br />

standards to eco-friendly levels. Jiang Yulin<br />

and Li Zhenyu, at the China <strong>Academy</strong> of<br />

Transportation Sciences, describe the slew<br />

of successful measures that China has<br />

been effecting.<br />

Making changes in the virtual world<br />

can have real impact. Singapore’s Land<br />

Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>) has developed a<br />

Geographic Information System (GIS), using<br />

digital maps to vastly improve land transport<br />

planning and public safety. This eco-friendly<br />

solution allows urban and transport plans<br />

and scenarios to be more extensively and<br />

rigorously tested on computers before they<br />

are finally executed, thus, saving precious<br />

physical resources.<br />

Michael Quah and Dickson Yeo from the<br />

National University of Singapore’s Energy<br />

Studies Institute give insights regarding<br />

current research and Singapore’s test<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 5


6<br />

bedding of vehicle electrification, touted as<br />

the green solution by its proponents.<br />

In the final article, the findings of Singapore’s<br />

regular Household Interview Surveys (HITS)<br />

on travel behaviour patterns underscore the<br />

people-centric philosophy that must prevail<br />

in any kind of transport development. To<br />

ensure that the system serves the people, we<br />

must first understand what the people need.<br />

I thank the authors for contributing to an<br />

absorbing issue. Before you turn the pages<br />

and lose yourself in the fascinating global<br />

arena they have so ably assembled with<br />

their wealth of knowledge, I’d like to thank<br />

the outgoing editor of JOURNEYS, Alison<br />

Tan, who has nurtured it from its launch to<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

become a key resource for the <strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong><br />

to share policies, thinking and solutions with<br />

transport professionals around the world.<br />

We wish her the very best as she undertakes<br />

other roles and responsibilities within the<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong>.


Proactive National Transport Strategy for<br />

Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

HWANG Kee Yeon and PARK Jin Young<br />

Abstract<br />

According to the IPCC, global warming is mostly attributable to greenhouse gas (GHG)<br />

emissions from fossil fuel combustion. The transportation sector accounts for about 20%<br />

of greenhouse gas emissions and is the second largest emitter in Korea, trailing only<br />

the industrial sector. Within the transportation sector, road transportation dominates<br />

with an emission share of over 80%. Therefore, reducing transportation’s impact on<br />

the environment should require transforming the current automobile-based transport<br />

system into a more energy efficient, low carbon and eco-friendly one.<br />

Greening of the current transportation system requires a long term vision and<br />

multifaceted approaches. Land use and urban design should reflect energy and<br />

environmental considerations. Technologies should also be promoted and economic<br />

incentive schemes should be provided not only for the technological developments<br />

but also for behavioural changes in transportation. Transforming our transportation<br />

system into an environmentally friendly one would provide many opportunities for<br />

green growth and also indispensable infrastructure for sustainable economic growth<br />

and prosperity.<br />

Introduction<br />

Green growth is defined as attaining<br />

economic growth while minimising the<br />

burden on the ecosystem. The concept of<br />

green growth is relatively recent but it has<br />

already received much attention. Traditional<br />

policies for sustainable transport include<br />

technological developments, economic<br />

incentives, environmental standards, and<br />

regulations. However, the implicit assumption<br />

is that there are trade-offs between attaining<br />

environmental sustainability and achieving<br />

higher economic growth. Green growth seeks<br />

Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

Green growth seeks the possibility of<br />

decoupling the inverse linkage<br />

between economic growth and<br />

environmental preservation.<br />

the possibility of decoupling the inverse linkage<br />

between economic growth and environmental<br />

preservation. President Lee Myung Bak<br />

proposed a national development strategy of<br />

‘Low Carbon and Green Growth’ in August<br />

2008, and as a result, sectoral strategies<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 7


Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

have been pursued in order to develop green<br />

industries as an ‘engine for growth’ for the<br />

future. As for the institutional framework for<br />

promoting green growth, the National Green<br />

Growth Committee was created in February<br />

2009 and the Green Growth Law is being<br />

deliberated in the National Assembly.<br />

Major developed countries have also<br />

established ambitious national low carbon<br />

green growth strategies. Germany is aiming<br />

at reducing carbon emission by 40% in 2020<br />

compared with 1990 emissions. The U.K.’s<br />

plan is also ambitious: 60% reduction by 2050.<br />

Japan also announced their ‘Thirty Thirty Plan’,<br />

which means 30% GHG reduction by 2030.<br />

Through cutting year 2000’s GHG emissions<br />

by 4.2% in 2006, Japan has already reduced 11<br />

million tons of transport-related GHG. In their<br />

2008 White Paper, the Japanese government<br />

revealed their policy directive involving vehicle<br />

technology and alternative fuel developments,<br />

traffic flow improvement and means to induce<br />

behavioural change in transport users. These<br />

efforts are reflected in Japan’s ultra-efficient<br />

urban transport system and the dominance<br />

of Japanese car manufacturers in the<br />

world markets.<br />

Low carbon green growth is the most urgent<br />

and proactive policy direction for Korea to<br />

maintain its global competitive edge and to<br />

ensure sustainable economic growth. More<br />

specifically, low carbon green growth requires<br />

diminishing GHG emissions and environmental<br />

burdens in the course of economic growth and<br />

simultaneously developing and utilising green<br />

industries for further economic developments.<br />

8<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

New industries are expected to be developed<br />

and subsequently, new markets will also be<br />

created in many energy and environment related<br />

fields as stricter environmental and energy<br />

related regulations are introduced. Korea’s<br />

economy is still centred on manufacturing<br />

and IT, so Korea can leverage its competitive<br />

advantage in these fields to develop GHGreducing<br />

technologies. More attention and<br />

investment should be directed to developing<br />

low carbon green industries in order to drive<br />

momentum for a sustainable future.<br />

Transport in Korea in the Energy-<br />

Climate Era<br />

Mobility has tremendously increased during<br />

the last century. One of the most salient<br />

characteristics of the previous century is<br />

rapid motorisation and expansion of related<br />

infrastructure and industries. Increased vehicle<br />

use has enabled us to enjoy fast and convenient<br />

travel as well as rapid economic development<br />

and economic prosperity. Transport policy in<br />

many countries has centred on the car rather<br />

than on the person. And our lifestyle has been<br />

more and more dependent on automobiles for<br />

our socio-economic activities.<br />

Transport policy in many countries<br />

has centred on the car rather than<br />

on the person. And our lifestyle has<br />

been more and more dependent on<br />

automobiles for our socio-economic<br />

activities.<br />

However, increased automobile use can<br />

cause serious negative repercussions, such<br />

as, air pollution, noise pollution, congestion,


and even climate change, resulting from<br />

combustion of fossil fuels. The sustainability of<br />

an automobile-based transport system is now<br />

being seriously questioned, especially due<br />

to major global issues such as the possibility<br />

of climate change. The Intergovernmental<br />

Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is<br />

a UN subsidiary, predicts that the average<br />

temperature will increase by 1.8 to 4 degrees<br />

Celsius over the next 100 years and the sea<br />

level will also rise by 58 centimetres. Rising<br />

sea levels could threaten to inundate lowlying<br />

areas and islands, threaten dense coastal<br />

populations, erode shorelines, damage<br />

property, and destroy ecosystems. The rising<br />

temperature could also cause dangerous<br />

consequences, such as, stronger storms and<br />

more heat related illnesses and deaths. Korea<br />

has experienced a 0.6 degree Celsius increase<br />

in average temperature in just the last decade<br />

and also a 10% increase in precipitation<br />

compared with 30 years ago. This suggests<br />

that Korea is not immune to global climate<br />

change impacts.<br />

According to the IPCC, global warming is<br />

mostly attributable to greenhouse gas (GHG)<br />

Table 1: GHG emissions in the transport sector in Korea<br />

Road<br />

Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

emissions from fossil fuel combustion (OECD/<br />

ITF 2008). The transport sector accounts for<br />

about 20% of greenhouse gas emissions<br />

and is the second largest emitter in Korea,<br />

trailing only the industrial sector. Within the<br />

transport sector, road transport dominates<br />

with an emission share of over 80% (Table 1).<br />

Thus, reducing transport’s impact on the<br />

environment should require transforming the<br />

current automobile-based transport system<br />

into a more energy efficient, low carbon and<br />

eco-friendly one.<br />

Figure 1: Energy consumption in transport sector<br />

by mode in Korea (2006)<br />

Air<br />

Maritime<br />

Rail<br />

Road<br />

79%<br />

Sustainable development in transport has<br />

also been a major concern for Korea. Both<br />

vehicle ownership and transport demand have<br />

increased tremendously during the past two<br />

Modes GHG (Million CO 2 eq) Share (%)<br />

Private 61.07 57.67<br />

Commercial 24.64 23.27<br />

Road Subtotal 85.71 80.94<br />

Rail<br />

Regional 1.43 1.35<br />

Urban (Subway) 0.52 0.49<br />

Rail Subtotal 1.95 1.84<br />

Water 11.61 10.97<br />

Aviation 6.62 6.25<br />

Transport Total 105.89 100.00<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 9<br />

8%<br />

12%<br />

1%


Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

Table 2: International comparison of energy consumption in transport sector<br />

decades and as a result, energy consumption<br />

(Figure 1) has increased very rapidly, and<br />

vehicles have become the major source of urban<br />

air and noise pollution in many Korean cities.<br />

The growth shows no sign of subsiding, and<br />

both passenger and freight transport demands<br />

are forecasted to increase 1.5 and 2.1 times<br />

by 2019, respectively. Already, many Korean<br />

cities suffer from chronic traffic congestion,<br />

costing an estimated U.S. $24 billion dollars<br />

per annum in Korea, which is about 3% of the<br />

national GDP.<br />

In terms of per capita energy consumption in<br />

the transport sector, Korea is already on par<br />

with many European countries and Japan<br />

(Table 2). But while rail is regarded in these<br />

countries as the most environmentally friendly<br />

mode due to its high energy efficiency and<br />

the high possibility of fuel substitution in the<br />

sector, its potential has not been fully exploited<br />

in Korea yet.<br />

10<br />

Country Aviation Road Rail Total Per Capita Energy Consumption<br />

Unit M TOE* M TOE M TOE M TOE TOE/Person<br />

Canada 5.7 42.3 1.7 55.6 1.72<br />

U.S. 82.0 527.9 11.6 639.2 2.16<br />

Japan 10.8 77.5 1.8 94.1 0.74<br />

Korea 3.5 26.3 0.5 34.2 0.71<br />

Australia 4.4 23.6 0.7 29.3 1.44<br />

France 7.1 43.3 1.0 51.9 0.85<br />

Germany 8.0 54.2 1.9 64.5 0.78<br />

Italy 3.8 39.9 0.5 44.9 0.77<br />

Spain 5.2 31.2 1.0 39.1 0.90<br />

U.K. 12.7 40.2 0.9 54.8 0.91<br />

Source : OECD Environmental Data Compendium 2006/2007<br />

*M TOE: Million Ton of Oil Equivalent<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Proactive National Transport<br />

Policy for Low Carbon and<br />

Green Growth<br />

Environmental sustainability has been one of<br />

the main concerns among transport planners<br />

as well as policy makers. However, transport<br />

is the most difficult area for environmental<br />

sustainability due to ever-increasing demand<br />

and its extremely heavy reliance on nonrenewable<br />

fossil fuels. A new paradigm of<br />

low carbon and green growth strategies<br />

are required. These include low carbon<br />

infrastructure, new land use framework,<br />

development of green logistics and<br />

technologies, modal shift to low carbon and<br />

non-motorised transport, and improvements<br />

in energy efficiency.<br />

Undersea high speed rail and<br />

waterway logistics infrastructure<br />

for the environment<br />

Since Korea is a very densely populated,<br />

urbanised country, mass transit and


ailways have very high potential for<br />

environmental sustainability.<br />

Currently, eight subway lines amounting to<br />

492 km are in operation in Seoul and five<br />

other major cities in Korea. Nine subway lines<br />

totalling 226.5 km are under construction in<br />

six cities with populations of one million or<br />

more. Additional subway lines totalling 159 km<br />

are planned through 2019. The total subway<br />

network will be expanded from 492 km to<br />

651 km by 2019, and especially in Seoul, the<br />

subway modal share is projected to increase<br />

from the current 35% to over 50%.<br />

For interurban railways, 1,418 km of new<br />

railway lines are planned to be added by<br />

2020 to the existing stock of 3,374 km. Rail<br />

electrification will also be increased from 47%<br />

to 78%.<br />

Compact development based on rail or mass<br />

transit would induce people to use more<br />

energy efficient means of transport (Figure 2).<br />

Figure 2: Plan for Eurasian railways<br />

The proposed undersea high speed railway<br />

linking Jeju Island and Honam Province (Figure 3)<br />

can provide a secure alternative to land<br />

Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

transport for travellers and can also help create<br />

an ultra metropolitan economic bloc in the<br />

southwestern part of the Korean Peninsula. It<br />

can also provide green growth opportunities,<br />

as well as, an economic stimulus in the current<br />

economically depressed times.<br />

Figure 3: Concept of Honam-Jeju Undersea Railway<br />

Waterborne transport offers another possibility<br />

for low carbon green transport in Korea, where<br />

coastal areas are developed for industries and<br />

logistics. Inland ports need to be developed to<br />

fully exploit this potential. The Kyung-In Canal<br />

(Figure 4) connecting Seoul and Incheon, and<br />

the four major river regeneration projects,<br />

would revitalise economically depressed<br />

hinterland areas and would also provide<br />

employment opportunities.<br />

Figure 4: Rendering of Kyung-In Canal<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 11


Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

A waterway connecting Seoul and North<br />

Korea’s Wonsan (Korea Peace Waterway,<br />

Figure 5) is proposed in order to secure<br />

water resources and also to ease the tension<br />

between the South and the North. It will<br />

be approximately 200 km long and will<br />

contribute to the promotion of tourism along<br />

the waterway.<br />

Figure 5: Proposed route of Korea Peace Waterway<br />

Green transport cities<br />

A new land use framework is required in order<br />

to reduce travel demand and to fully utilise the<br />

public transport’s potential. Development of<br />

high density cities around the KTX high speed<br />

rail stations would serve as energy efficient<br />

regional hub cities. It would also facilitate<br />

balanced regional growth and help reduce<br />

regional auto travel. High density development<br />

around public transit should be promoted in<br />

order to encourage public transit patronage.<br />

Pedestrian travel should also be encouraged<br />

by constructing more pedestrian friendly<br />

facilities. For example, Daegu city transformed<br />

its busiest downtown street into a transit mall,<br />

allowing access to urban buses only during<br />

the day. The Ministry of Land, Transport and<br />

Maritime also plans and develops pedestrian<br />

priority zones to improve walking conditions<br />

(Figure 6).<br />

12<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 6: Pedestrian priority area in Seoul downtown<br />

Green technology development<br />

in transport<br />

Non-motorised forms of transport lead to zero<br />

carbon emissions. Bicycles are extensively used<br />

in many European and Asian cities but their<br />

modal share in Korean cities is minimal due to<br />

limited infrastructure and low public reception.<br />

Bicycles should be promoted for short<br />

distance commuting by providing adequate<br />

infrastructure and increased safety. Figure 7 is a<br />

conceptual illustration of a Bicycle expressway,<br />

which is dedicated to bicycles, quite similar to<br />

light rail transit infrastructure.<br />

Figure 7: Illustrations of bicycle expressway


The concept of transport power plant is an<br />

electricity generating initiative by installing<br />

photovoltaic facilities along transport<br />

infrastructure, such as, highways, railways<br />

and waterways. The electricity generated in<br />

such transport power plants can be used for<br />

the transport facility itself or it could be used<br />

ultimately for charging future electric vehicles.<br />

Green car development<br />

Current dependence on heavy fossil fuel for<br />

transport should be reduced by diversifying<br />

energy sources. Neighbourhood Electric<br />

Vehicles (NEV) offer a promising alternative<br />

to conventional vehicles for short distance<br />

trips in urban areas. Wireless electricity<br />

technology could facilitate the introduction<br />

of electric vehicles by solving their current<br />

battery limitations. Fuel cell technology could<br />

be a long term option in future alternative<br />

fuel vehicle developments. Legal support and<br />

economic incentives should be provided for the<br />

development of these types of green vehicles.<br />

Wireless power supply technology is another<br />

promising technological option that could<br />

ultimately eliminate the challenging requirement<br />

for powerful and efficient batteries for electric<br />

vehicles. Vehicles travelling in downtown areas<br />

or highways can be charged or supplied with<br />

electricity continuously (Figure 8).<br />

Wireless electricity technology could<br />

facilitate the introduction of electric<br />

vehicles by solving their current<br />

battery limitations.<br />

Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

Figure 8: Concept of wireless power supply city<br />

Travel demand management<br />

Another important pillar in policies for<br />

environmental sustainability is travel demand<br />

management (TDM). Measures to increase<br />

transport supply are often expensive or<br />

difficult to implement, and gains from these<br />

and other improvements are offset by further<br />

increases in travel demand. Lower-cost TDM<br />

strategies are intended to reduce demand,<br />

particularly single-occupant vehicle demand,<br />

and optimise system performance, reduce peak<br />

period congestion, save energy, and improve<br />

the environment. Various policy measures<br />

have been employed in order to discourage<br />

passenger car use in Korea. The Sustainable<br />

Transport & Logistics Act, in force from this<br />

year, allows local government to restrain total<br />

traffic volume in certain areas and adjust travel<br />

fares to promote public transportation.<br />

Another good example of TDM is congestion<br />

pricing. An experimental congestion pricing<br />

scheme was introduced in two major tunnels<br />

which connect the downtown area and<br />

the southern part of Seoul in November<br />

1996. The charge was set at 2,000 won per<br />

crossing and it was applied during the peak<br />

hours in weekdays to private passenger cars.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 13


Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

The charge has reduced 12,000 vehicles per<br />

day at Seoul downtown, which is 13.3 %<br />

of total downtown traffic volume. More<br />

elaborate congestion pricing schemes should<br />

be developed, based on emission produced by<br />

each vehicle type and travel speed, in order<br />

to reduce congestion-related externalities and<br />

environmental burdens.<br />

Parking policy<br />

Previously, the core of Korea’s parking policy<br />

was to provide adequate parking for every<br />

building and facility. This thinking is about to<br />

be reversed and decreased parking spaces in<br />

the CBD is being considered so as to reduce<br />

the influx of private passenger cars into Korea’s<br />

cities. On the other hand, park-and-ride<br />

facilities have been continuously constructed.<br />

Parking-related charges should be employed<br />

in order to better reflect the cost of providing<br />

and maintaining parking spaces, as well as<br />

the externalities caused by the use of private<br />

passenger cars.<br />

Modal shift in freight transport<br />

and green logistics<br />

The freight transport sector accounts for<br />

31% of the total transport CO emissions and<br />

2<br />

it is also regarded as the most inefficient of<br />

Korea’s transport sectors. In particular, less<br />

efficient private freight vehicles dominate the<br />

sector. The government is now establishing<br />

a plan to reduce freight’s dependency on<br />

the road sector and to increase the capacity<br />

of the freight rail, a more energy efficient<br />

and environmentally friendly way to move<br />

the nation’s goods. This sector can also be<br />

made more efficient through policies such as<br />

14<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

green logistics certification, which provides<br />

incentives to logistics firms to reduce energy<br />

consumption and GHG emissions.<br />

Parking-related charges should be<br />

employed in order to better reflect<br />

the cost of providing and maintaining<br />

parking spaces, as well as the<br />

externalities caused by the use of<br />

private passenger cars.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Greening of the current transport system<br />

requires a long term vision and multifaceted<br />

approaches. Land use and urban design<br />

should reflect energy and environmental<br />

considerations. Technologies should also<br />

be promoted and economic incentive<br />

schemes should be provided not only for<br />

the technological developments but also for<br />

behavioural changes in transport demand<br />

and usage.<br />

Transforming our transport system into a low<br />

carbon and environmentally friendly one would<br />

provide many opportunities for green growth<br />

and also indispensable infrastructure for<br />

sustainable economic growth and prosperity.<br />

A legal framework is required in order to<br />

facilitate the transition to green transport<br />

systems. Investments on transport infrastructure<br />

should be guided by a revised assessment<br />

methodology which takes the environmental<br />

benefits and cost into full consideration.


References<br />

OECD. 2008. Environmental Data Compendium<br />

2006/2007<br />

Proactive National Transport Strategy for Low Carbon and Green Growth in Korea<br />

OECD/ITF. 2008. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies<br />

in the Transport Sector: Preliminary Report (2008)<br />

Hwang Kee Yeon is the President of The Korea Transport Institute. Dr.<br />

Hwang received his Ph.D. in urban and regional planning at the University<br />

of Southern California, USA. He has been a Professor of Urban Planning and<br />

Design Department in Hongik University from 2005 to 2008 and a member<br />

of the Presidential Committee on Green Growth, Korea. He was head of the<br />

research team for Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project, and as a member<br />

of Seoul Development Institute, has conducted many important projects for<br />

Seoul’s transport system, such as, the introduction of congestion charging in<br />

Seoul.He can be reached at keith@koti.re.kr<br />

Park Jin Young is a research fellow at the Centre for Transport and Climate<br />

Change in the Korea Transport Institute. Dr Park was one of the active members<br />

of the Seoul Bus Reform Project from 2003 to 2005. His main research area<br />

is Sustainable Urban Transport Systems. Currently he conducts research<br />

related to Sustainable Transport & Logistics Plan for Korea, He graduated<br />

from the Engineering Faculty of Seoul National University, and completed his<br />

PhD in Transport Engineering at the Department of Civil and Environmental<br />

Engineering, Imperial College London, UK.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 15


Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to<br />

Global Green Growth<br />

Michael REPLOGLE and Michael KODRANSKY<br />

Abstract<br />

A key driver of environmentally friendly transportation is visionary urban leadership<br />

that advances better ways to manage traffic and street space. Innovative leaders often<br />

get their inspiration by seeing what other cities are doing to advance best practices.<br />

Global challenges of rapid urbanisation, environmental degradation, and demands for<br />

economic vitality and livable communities are common themes driving global green<br />

growth initiatives. These are also key to reducing greenhouse gases. This paper provides<br />

an overview of the accomplishments, obstacles, experiences gained and directions taken<br />

by selected cities that have sought cost-effective transportation solutions and achieved<br />

measurable results, improving the environment and quality of urban life and economies.<br />

Introduction<br />

Today, most of the world’s cities suffer from<br />

sharply rising traffic congestion, healthimpairing<br />

air pollution, sprawling development,<br />

an inefficient transportation network, and<br />

energy insecurity. Without changes in policies<br />

and investments, transport related CO2 emissions are projected to increase worldwide<br />

by 57% between 2005 and 2030, with 80% of<br />

that growth to occur in developing countries,<br />

where population and incomes are growing<br />

most rapidly.<br />

But that projection does not take into account<br />

the potential transformation in many cities’<br />

transportation systems as new information,<br />

communications, and smart management and<br />

operations strategies come into wider use. By<br />

2030, people living in developing regions will<br />

16<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

comprise 80% of the world’s urban population<br />

and the share of people living in cities will rise,<br />

from 50% today to over 70% (Department<br />

of Economic and Social Affairs 2006). The first<br />

half of the 21st century will become known as<br />

the time of global urbanisation. Yet, only by<br />

smart urbanisation will humanity find a way to<br />

manage global climate change and a host of<br />

other problems. What are the transportation<br />

pathways that will deliver green global growth?<br />

Many find hope that those pathways are being<br />

created by innovative leaders in developing<br />

cities in Latin America, Asia and Africa, joined<br />

by others in Europe and North America.<br />

From Seoul to Ahmedabad, Capetown to<br />

Bogotá, from Paris to New York, mayors<br />

have demonstrated cutting-edge ways to<br />

reshape urban mobility and enhance livability,


combining new intelligent transportation<br />

systems with bricks-and-paving stone streetspace<br />

reallocation, and smart urban design.<br />

From Seoul to Ahmedabad, Capetown<br />

to Bogotá, from Paris to New York,<br />

mayors have demonstrated cuttingedge<br />

ways to reshape urban mobility<br />

and enhance livability,...<br />

Harnessing private sector involvement towards<br />

public-private partnerships and creative<br />

infrastructure management can be a key to<br />

success. Projects that advance global discourse<br />

often involve integrated transport and land use<br />

planning, such as the implementation of a well<br />

designed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system (Table 1)<br />

with good pedestrian and bicycle linkages<br />

(Table 2), and the demolition of an elevated<br />

highway to create a new public space. Let’s<br />

look at some of the cities from around the<br />

world that have used transportation reforms to<br />

reduce greenhouse gas emissions, bring new<br />

mobility options to the neediest communities,<br />

stimulate economic development and improve<br />

overall quality of life.<br />

Projects that advance global discourse<br />

often involve integrated transport<br />

and land use planning,...<br />

BRT Systems Moving Cities Ahead<br />

Bogotá, Colombia<br />

Former Bogotá <strong>May</strong>or, Enrique Peñalosa,<br />

oversaw the conception and opening of an<br />

extensive, cost-efficient, high quality and high<br />

capacity public transit system between 1998 –<br />

2001, even as expensive metro proposals in<br />

Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

other cities continued to languish for years<br />

without any progress. TransMilenio (Figure 1),<br />

as the BRT system in Bogotá is known, used<br />

lessons learned from Curitiba, Brazil, which<br />

debuted the first ever BRT system in the<br />

1970s, unveiling an even more ambitious<br />

system that quickly became a gold standard<br />

in BRT development. Bogota’s system consists<br />

of 9 lines that use exclusive busways with<br />

over 1,000 branded buses carrying 1.6 million<br />

passengers a day. Elevated stations, level<br />

passenger boarding and wide vehicle doors<br />

optimise getting on and off the buses. The<br />

capital construction costs for the system<br />

amount to $5.5 million per kilometre.<br />

Figure 1: TransMilenio buses in Bogotá are<br />

highway based and also enter the downtown area<br />

Before the introduction of TransMilenio,<br />

thousands of independent mini-bus drivers<br />

provided the only public transit system in the<br />

city. These drivers formed operating companies<br />

and participated in a competitive tendering<br />

process to run TransMilenio. The Bogotá<br />

system pays private operators to drive special<br />

red TransMilenio buses based on a set number<br />

of kilometres driven, so if a bus needs to be<br />

rerouted to another corridor, its income is not<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 17


Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

affected. With performance-based contracts,<br />

operators are penalised if they fail to provide<br />

other expected services, such as, keeping the<br />

vehicles clean and being on-time (Wright and<br />

Hook 2007).<br />

Approximately 400 feeder buses bring<br />

passengers from outskirt locations onto<br />

the system. Pedestrian and bicycle paths<br />

leading from low-income and impoverished<br />

neighbourhoods are integrated into the system<br />

design. TransMilenio is so successful that it is<br />

often overcrowded during non-peak hours – a<br />

major complaint by passengers.<br />

After the implementation of the widereaching<br />

system, a referendum was passed<br />

by overwhelmingly popular vote to hold a<br />

Car-Free Day every year, forbidding private<br />

vehicles from being driven in the city during<br />

one workday. Roads normally used for cars<br />

become boulevards for walking and cycling<br />

while TransMilenio continues to operate<br />

smoothly. This measure exists in conjunction<br />

with Ciclovía – Bogota’s world renowned<br />

Car-Free Sundays event.<br />

TransMilenio is so successful that it<br />

is often overcrowded during nonpeak<br />

hours – a major complaint by<br />

passengers.<br />

Guangzhou, China<br />

The world’s highest frequency and capacity<br />

BRT system opened in February <strong>2010</strong> in<br />

Guangzhou, China. The 22.5 km system is<br />

the first BRT to directly connect to a metro<br />

system and the first BRT system in China to<br />

18<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

include bicycle parking in its station design. It<br />

has the world’s highest number of passenger<br />

boardings at BRT stations and the world’s<br />

longest stations in the world. Already carrying<br />

750,000 passengers a day, it is expected to<br />

soon carry even more. Infrastructure costs to<br />

build the GBRT were 30 million yuan renminbi<br />

(US$ 4.4 million) per kilometre.<br />

More than 40 bus routes use Guangzhou’s<br />

“open” BRT system, which is designed to<br />

enable many more one-seat rides, as many<br />

routes originate or end in neighbourhoods<br />

beyond the BRT corridor itself. Real time<br />

passenger information systems and operational<br />

control systems boost convenience, help keep<br />

buses on time, and support performance<br />

contracting. The BRT was faster to implement<br />

than a new metro line would have been, with<br />

the conceptual plan, engineering design and<br />

construction each taking one year to complete.<br />

Building the Guangzhou BRT took five years<br />

from start to finish, including times when the<br />

project was placed on hold.<br />

The BRT was faster to implement than<br />

a new metro line would have been,<br />

with the conceptual plan, engineering<br />

design and construction each taking<br />

one year to complete.<br />

Ahmedabad, India<br />

India’s first world-class BRT system opened<br />

in 2009 in Ahmedabad, a city of 6 million<br />

residents. The system is called Janmarg, or<br />

the “people’s way”, reflecting a strategic<br />

transportation focus on moving people rather<br />

than vehicles. It is a “closed system”, with buses


Table 1: Some notable cities advancing BRT<br />

Location Notable Features<br />

Cali, Colombia<br />

Curitiba, Brazil<br />

Guadalajara, Mexico<br />

Guangzhou, China<br />

Guatemala City, Guatemala<br />

Hangzhou, China<br />

Istanbul, Turkey<br />

Jakarta, Indonesia<br />

Johannesburg, South Africa<br />

Mexico City, Mexico<br />

Pereira, Colombia<br />

Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

Cali’s MIO system launch is part of a national government<br />

initiative to build BRT systems in cities with more than 600,000<br />

inhabitants. MIO already meets 46% of the city’s public<br />

transport demand.<br />

The first BRT system in the world, inaugurated in the 1970s and<br />

used by over 75% of the population.<br />

The initial Macrobus line runs 16 km. When complete, it will take<br />

55,000 private vehicles off the road.<br />

The highest capacity BRT system in Asia, this 23 km system that<br />

opened in <strong>2010</strong> carries over 750,000 passengers daily.<br />

This first Central American BRT opened in 2007. The initial 11 km<br />

include dedicated median busways with on-level boarding<br />

stations. The system cut travel time by 20%.<br />

The second city in China after Beijing to unveil a BRT system,<br />

which includes bus prioritisation with facilities for cyclists<br />

and pedestrians.<br />

Metrobus BRT carries 450,000 passengers a day over 43 km of<br />

segregated busway, so travel speeds reach 40 km per hour –<br />

reducing travel time by 75%.<br />

TransJakarta uses mostly CNG buses in 10 corridors, carrying over<br />

300,000 daily riders.<br />

After violent protests from taxi drivers, the first true BRT system<br />

in Africa, Rea Vaya ("We Are Moving"), opened and is carrying<br />

18,000 daily passengers.<br />

The Metrobus system carries 320,000 passengers a day. Accidents<br />

dropped by 30%, and the corridor saw a 5% modal shift from<br />

private vehicles to public transport.<br />

The first city to emulate the success of TransMilenio in Colombia,<br />

it carries 155,000 passengers per day.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 19


Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

using dedicated lanes instead of mixing with<br />

traffic, spanning over 88 km and connecting<br />

the downtown commercial district of Kalupur<br />

with outlying neighbourhoods. Most of the<br />

network passes through low and middle<br />

income neighbourhoods. Janmarg is meant to<br />

improve the quality of commuting in the city<br />

through dedicated bus lanes, bicycle tracks,<br />

pedestrian facilities and parking management.<br />

Some of the infrastructure highlights of the<br />

system include segregated lanes, high floor<br />

buses, level passenger boarding, external<br />

ticketing and real-time bus arrival information.<br />

Completion of the network is expected in<br />

2011; half of the system is now in operation.<br />

Ridership is now about 32,000 passengers<br />

daily, with that number expected to grow<br />

greatly. Eventually, the city envisions an<br />

integrated fare scheme between normal bus<br />

service, Janmarg and parking. The capital cost<br />

of Janmarg was US$1.8 million per kilometre.<br />

Figure 2: Bicycle riders enjoy the first ever Summer<br />

Streets in NYC<br />

Improving Walking and<br />

Cycling Infrastructure<br />

New York City, USA<br />

More than 50 acres of road space in New York<br />

City (NYC) have been reclaimed from traffic<br />

lanes and car parking spaces to meet the goals<br />

20<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

of PlaNYC 2030, a comprehensive long-term<br />

sustainability vision announced on Earth Day<br />

in 2007 by <strong>May</strong>or Michael Bloomberg. A<br />

large component of the plan, after decades<br />

of car-oriented policies, is to create a more<br />

balanced transportation network in the<br />

city by the year 2030. NYC Department of<br />

Transportation Commissioner, Janette Sadik-<br />

Khan, succeeded in overseeing the creation<br />

of new public plazas and the installation of<br />

over 322 km of new bicycle lanes – 8 km of<br />

which are protected, installation of more than<br />

6,000 bicycle racks, more than two dozen<br />

bicycle parking shelters and a 45% increase<br />

in bicycle commuting (NYC Department of<br />

Transportation 2009).<br />

The city adopted a strategy that<br />

was championed by Copenhagen,<br />

Denmark – taking small nibbles of<br />

street space away from cars until<br />

reaching a groundswell of noticeable<br />

changes.<br />

The most iconic transformation occurred in<br />

Times Square with the pedestrianisation of<br />

Broadway after a century of accommodating<br />

car traffic. The city adopted a strategy that<br />

was championed by Copenhagen, Denmark –<br />

taking small nibbles of street space away from<br />

cars until reaching a groundswell of noticeable<br />

changes. Much of the street reclamations<br />

have been done initially using fast and costeffective<br />

coloured paint on asphalt, followed<br />

later by permanent reconstruction. As part of<br />

improving the street experience, over 98,000<br />

trees were planted and a Car-Free Sundays<br />

programme was launched, called Summer


Streets (Figure 2), inspired by Bogotá’s Ciclovía.<br />

The city also launched a Select Bus Service that<br />

incorporates partial elements of BRT, such as,<br />

advanced fare collection, dedicated lanes and<br />

signal prioritisation.<br />

Figure 3: Vélib stations are accessible everywhere<br />

within the city of Paris<br />

Paris, France<br />

The Paris Vélib, combines the French words for<br />

bicycle (vélo) and freedom (liberté), and has<br />

revolutionised bicycle sharing and showcases a<br />

new kind of individualised mass transit system.<br />

The design is already being mimicked in cities<br />

like Hangzhou, China. Vélib solves the problems<br />

of bicycle storage, maintenance and parking.<br />

<strong>May</strong>or Bertrand Delanoë and Deputy <strong>May</strong>or<br />

Denis Baupin saw an opportunity to offer<br />

advertising space to the company JCDecaux<br />

in exchange for management of the system.<br />

Approximately 4,000 car parking spaces were<br />

replaced with 1,451 Vélib stations that hold<br />

20,600 public bicycles for hire (Figure 3).<br />

Registered users pay a small fee to rent a<br />

bicycle and can return it to any station around<br />

the city, provided there is docking space.<br />

JCDecaux shuttles bicycles between stations<br />

to maintain a balance in the system and<br />

assures there are enough available bicycles<br />

Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

at every station. If a station is full, users are<br />

directed to the next available docking space. A<br />

survey of users found that 15% of Vélib trips<br />

had shifted from car travel. Vélib users can<br />

hire a bicycle at any time of the day or night,<br />

which is a good complement to the metro that<br />

closes around midnight. Approximately 30%<br />

of bicycle traffic consists of Vélib users (Le<br />

Mairie de Paris 2007). To support an increase<br />

in cycling, Paris built nearly 400 km of new<br />

bicycle lanes and also increased general bicycle<br />

parking facilities.<br />

A cornerstone of the mobility plan under<br />

Deputy <strong>May</strong>or Denis Baupin, Vélib is one of<br />

many Paris transportation innovations aimed<br />

at revitalising community life in public spaces.<br />

In addition to improving conditions for cyclists,<br />

Paris has prioritised pedestrians by renovating<br />

public squares and plazas, widening sidewalks,<br />

adding new landscaping and installing raised<br />

crosswalks. Slow speed 30-km zones have<br />

been introduced to increase pedestrian safety.<br />

Paris has prioritised pedestrians by<br />

renovating public squares and plazas,<br />

widening sidewalks, adding new<br />

landscaping and installing raised<br />

crosswalks.<br />

A national directive passed in 2008 mandates<br />

that these zones include contra-flow bicycle<br />

lanes, which will further increase cycling in<br />

the coming years. The city also closes down a<br />

major stretch of highway along the Seine River<br />

for one month in the summer to create 3 km<br />

of beach areas known as Paris Plages. Lastly,<br />

a new system called Mobilien, which uses<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 21


Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

elements of BRT, opened along three corridors<br />

in 2007. All these improvements led to a<br />

decrease in private vehicle traffic by 20% and<br />

a 9% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.<br />

Table 2: Other notable cities promoting walking<br />

and cycling.<br />

Managing the Demand of Vehicles<br />

Driving into the City<br />

London, UK<br />

In 2003, London adopted a groundbreaking<br />

congestion pricing plan in an effort to tackle<br />

traffic gridlock, improve air quality and<br />

generate funds for the city’s transport system.<br />

Drivers entering the congestion zone (Figure 4)<br />

during peak hours are required to pay a hefty<br />

fee. Enforcement is through automated license<br />

recognition, with multiple payment channels.<br />

The congestion pricing initiative was so<br />

successful in improving mobility conditions<br />

that neighbourhoods near the border<br />

requested that the zone be extended. In<br />

2007, the congestion zone was doubled and<br />

the price was increased. About 70,000 fewer<br />

vehicles enter the congestion zone on a daily<br />

basis. Congestion dropped by 21% that year<br />

and carbon dioxide emissions decreased by<br />

16%. More than £123 million (US$194 million)<br />

is generated annually from the congestion<br />

zone pricing and reinvested in public transport<br />

22<br />

Cape Town,<br />

South Africa<br />

Dakar,<br />

Senegal<br />

Santiago,<br />

Chile<br />

Continued government<br />

support for Car-Free days<br />

Organised West Africa’s first<br />

ever Car-Free day<br />

Implemented new bicycle<br />

lanes and Car-Free Sundays<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

improvements. Bus travel times significantly<br />

improved after implementation of the<br />

congestion zone and bus ridership increased<br />

by 45%. Older, dirtier trucks pay a special<br />

steep daily charge to enter the city.<br />

Figure 4: The congestion zone is indicated with<br />

signage and street stencils in central London<br />

Cities such as Shanghai and Shenzhen in<br />

China are looking to introduce a London-style<br />

congestion scheme in their commercial centres<br />

to address traffic problems. Most London<br />

boroughs also charge a steep curbside parking<br />

fee to dissuade driving. Some boroughs, such<br />

as Camden and Richmond upon Thames, have<br />

even introduced CO -based residential parking<br />

2<br />

permits with the most polluting vehicles<br />

paying a higher price. A percentage of the<br />

parking revenues from every borough helps<br />

to fund the Freedom Pass programme, which<br />

enables disabled and elderly residents to use<br />

public transit free of charge (London Councils).<br />

Beijing, China<br />

As the 2008 Olympics approached, Beijing<br />

faced crippling traffic jams, severely<br />

compromised air quality and soaring collision<br />

rates due to the rapid growth in private vehicle<br />

use. City officials undertook an ambitious


task, working on a variety of fronts, to make<br />

transportation better and cleaner in time<br />

for the Olympic Games. Beijing instituted<br />

vehicle restrictions on weekdays based on<br />

odd/even license plate numbers. The success<br />

of the measure led to an extension of the<br />

programme, which is enforced through<br />

automated license plate recognition systems.<br />

A percentage of the parking revenues<br />

from every borough helps to fund<br />

the Freedom Pass programme, which<br />

enables disabled and elderly residents<br />

to use public transit free of charge.<br />

Drivers must leave their automobiles at home<br />

one day each week, leading to 800,000<br />

vehicles staying off the streets every day. The<br />

city also expanded the metro and existing BRT<br />

systems in 2008 with new lines and additional<br />

hours of operation. Beijing increased the<br />

regular bus fleet, while decreasing the fleet<br />

of government vehicles by 30%. Additionally,<br />

one-third of the police fleet is now patrolling<br />

using bicycles and electric bicycles. Measures<br />

to restrict automobile use have been<br />

complemented with investments in public<br />

transit infrastructure and policies to promote<br />

alternative modes.<br />

Integrated Transport and Public<br />

Space Planning<br />

Seoul, South Korea<br />

Under the leadership of <strong>May</strong>or Lee Myung<br />

Bak, a 6.4 km elevated highway that once<br />

covered the Cheonggyecheon River in the<br />

center of Seoul was replaced in 2005 with<br />

a riverfront park, high quality walkways<br />

Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

and public squares (Figure 5). Removing the<br />

road has cut traffic congestion in the area<br />

and the popularity of the measure led to 84<br />

additional elevated roadways being shortlisted<br />

for demolition. The city government<br />

also retrofitted over 58 km along the former<br />

highway corridor with exclusive median bus<br />

lanes, and added more than 100 additional bus<br />

lanes as part of a broader initiative to improve<br />

all aspects of Seoul’s transportation system. In<br />

2007, Lee Myung Bak was elected President<br />

of South Korea largely due to his leadership<br />

in transforming the Cheonggyecheon area<br />

into a national public resource. President Lee<br />

had prioritised environmental stewardship<br />

as <strong>May</strong>or and improved the quality of life<br />

in Seoul.<br />

Figure 5: The highway that covered the<br />

Cheonggyecheon River was replaced with a<br />

riverfront park<br />

Guayaquil, Ecuador<br />

Improvements to deteriorating public spaces<br />

and other public works projects formed an<br />

important part of <strong>May</strong>or Jaime Nebot’s plan<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 23


Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

to revitalise the city of Guayaquil. His vision<br />

included enhancing pedestrian facilities that<br />

link to the city’s waterfront and hilly Santa<br />

Ana district. He also oversaw the opening of<br />

Metrovía in 2006, the city’s BRT system that<br />

stretches 45 km and serves nearly 500,000<br />

daily passengers. The private bus services<br />

in Guayaquil were included in the Metrovia<br />

operating consortium while over 500 of the<br />

fleet’s oldest and highest-polluting buses<br />

were removed from the road. In the same<br />

year, the city also launched its first Car-Free<br />

Sunday, closing streets to traffic and allowing<br />

thousands of residents to enjoy safe walking<br />

and cycling opportunities.<br />

References<br />

Le Mairie de Paris. 2007. Paris Transport and Travel<br />

Report. Paris Transport Monitoring Center<br />

London Councils, Freedom Pass. http://www.<br />

londoncouncils.gov.uk /freedompass/default.htm<br />

(accessed February 13, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

NYC Department of Transportation. 2009. DOT<br />

Completes Unprecedented Three-Year, 200-Mile<br />

Installation of Bike Lanes, Making City Streets Safer for<br />

All Users. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/<br />

pr09_030.pdf<br />

24<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Conclusion<br />

Any city can profoundly impact on sustainability<br />

and livability by employing some of the costeffective<br />

transportation best practices being<br />

advanced world wide and learning from the<br />

experience of neighbours. BRT, non-motorised<br />

transport, travel demand management,<br />

and integrated transportation and land use<br />

planning, implemented with intelligent traffic<br />

and transport management systems, can<br />

change the way residents experience a city in<br />

a positive way. The solutions also tackle larger<br />

issues: reducing emissions, saving commuters<br />

time, improving access to economic<br />

opportunities and decreasing air pollution.<br />

Population Division of the Department of Economic and<br />

Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. 2006.<br />

World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision and<br />

World Urbanization Prospects. http://esa.un.org/unup<br />

(accessed February 13, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Wright, Lloyd, and Walter Hook. 2007. Bus Rapid<br />

Transit Planning Guide. Institute for Transportation and<br />

Development Policy


Urban Leaders Find Transportation Paths to Global Green Growth<br />

Michael Replogle is the Global Policy Director and Founder of the Institute for<br />

Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP), USA. He has over 30 years of<br />

experience in transportation engineering and policy. He is a strategic advisor<br />

on transportation for the Environmental Defense Fund, where he served<br />

as Transportation Director from 1992 to 2009. He has been an advisor or<br />

consultant to the World Bank, Federal Highway Administration, and the United<br />

States Environmental Protection Agency. He has been an advisor to various<br />

government agencies, including Mexico City, Jakarta, Beijing, New York City,<br />

Washington, DC, and Singapore’s Land Transport Authority. He is currently consulting to the United<br />

Nations Environment Programme and Asian Development Bank regarding strategies to evaluate and<br />

mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from transportation.<br />

Michael Kodransky is an urban planner at the Institute for Transportation and<br />

Development Policy (ITDP), where he conducts and coordinates research on best<br />

practices in parking management, BRT and other ITDP global programme areas.<br />

He has also done research examining the impact of neighbourhood design<br />

on walking, road closures on traffic congestion and curbside management on<br />

street activity. The focus of Michael’s transportation related inquires always<br />

return to issues of equity and community health.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 25


Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

Practices and Policies of Green Urban<br />

Transport in China<br />

JIANG Yulin and LI Zhenyu<br />

Abstract<br />

China faces serious challenges as a result of rapid urbanisation and motorisation.<br />

Congestion and environmental impact have become major concerns. In this crucial<br />

setting, this paper looks at the practices of green urban transport in China and offers a<br />

possible interpretation of the green development of urban transport. Finally, it proposes<br />

the approach and some policy recommendations to steer urban transport towards<br />

green development.<br />

Introduction<br />

Over the past three decades, while urban<br />

transport has made great contributions for<br />

fast urban socio-economic development, it<br />

also poses challenges such as congestion, air<br />

pollution, energy security, as well as safety.<br />

Green transport is a category of<br />

sustainable transport which uses<br />

human power, animal power, public<br />

transportation, smart design, and<br />

renewable energy.<br />

According to evaluations, the cost of congestion<br />

is 250 billion RMB, equivalent to 2% of China’s<br />

GDP in 2003 (Qiu 2007). Worldwide, transport<br />

systems account for between 20% and 25%<br />

of carbon dioxide emission (World Energy<br />

Council 2007). Greenhouse gas emissions<br />

from transport have been increasing at a<br />

faster rate than any other energy consumption<br />

sector (IPCC 2007), but until now, less climate<br />

26<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

change mitigation gains have been made in<br />

the transport sector. In China, the statistics<br />

from the Ministry of Environment Protection<br />

show that at city level, in 2005, the national<br />

average proportion of vehicular emission in<br />

urban air pollution is more than 70%; the<br />

motorised vehicle has become the biggest<br />

emission source in Chinese cities. Therefore, it<br />

is urgent to implement green development of<br />

urban transport in China.<br />

Green transport is a category of sustainable<br />

transport which uses human power, animal<br />

power, public transportation, smart design,<br />

and renewable energy (Ecoseed 2008). Chris<br />

Bradshaw, who started the first pedestrian<br />

advocacy group in America, defined a Green<br />

Transport Hierarchy, in which he ranked<br />

the modes of passenger transport based on<br />

how environmentally friendly each mode is<br />

(Bradshaw 2009). In this hierarchy, walking<br />

was ranked the greenest, followed by cycling,


public transport, car sharing, and finally private<br />

car. This classification of green transport is also<br />

suitable for China.<br />

Practices of Green Urban Transport<br />

in China<br />

Compared with European cities, public<br />

transport lags far behind in China. With<br />

the economic development and increasing<br />

affluence, car ownership will continue to<br />

experience unprecedented growth, putting<br />

incredible pressures on the urban transport<br />

systems. Therefore, to achieve green<br />

development, comprehensive urban transport<br />

measures have been implemented in China.<br />

Transit Oriented Development (TOD)<br />

is the creation of compact, walkable<br />

communities centred around mass<br />

transit systems, making it possible<br />

to live a higher quality life without<br />

complete dependence on a car for<br />

mobility and survival.<br />

Urban planning<br />

The pattern of travel demand is affected by the<br />

way we use land. For a long time, Chinese cities<br />

have followed ring type (Figure 1), single centre<br />

development patterns, which are unfavourable<br />

to public transport development. Transit<br />

Oriented Development (TOD) is the creation<br />

of compact, walkable communities centred<br />

around mass transit systems (Wikipedia 2007),<br />

making it possible to live a higher quality life<br />

without complete dependence on a car for<br />

mobility and survival. Lately, TOD has been<br />

gradually accepted in the urban transport<br />

planning for cities such as Beijing, Shanghai,<br />

Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc. It has shown<br />

obvious effects on green development of<br />

urban transport.<br />

Figure 1: Chengdu: 2nd Ring Road Project<br />

Smooth Traffic Project<br />

Since 2000, the Smooth Traffic Project has<br />

been initiated among the 36 Central cities<br />

in China. Ten years later, other cities joined<br />

the project. Both the transport infrastructure<br />

and capacity have been greatly improved,<br />

the service quality has also been improved<br />

obviously, which laid a good foundation for<br />

the green development of urban transport<br />

today. To maintain the developments, the<br />

management concept should be updated,<br />

and the management efficiency should be<br />

improved continuously.<br />

Public transport<br />

priority development<br />

Under the central directive on Public Transport<br />

Priority Development, in combination with<br />

local actual circumstances, many cities issued<br />

local policies to promote public transport<br />

priority development. Thus, the capacity of<br />

public transport is increased obviously. For<br />

example, in 2006, Beijing issued Opinions<br />

on the Development of Public Transport<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 27


Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

Figure 2: BRT in Beijing<br />

Figure 3: LRT in Beijing<br />

Priority. The public transport system has been<br />

developed, with urban rail system as the<br />

backbone, bus as the body, other transport<br />

modes as the supplement. The public transport<br />

modal share increased from 28% in 2002 to<br />

37% in 2008; citizens enjoy quick, convenient<br />

and substantial public transport services. In<br />

addition, municipal governments of Shanghai,<br />

Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc., have formulated<br />

administrative provisions for giving priority<br />

to public transport and made great progress,<br />

such as with urban rail and bus rapid transit<br />

(BRT) systems (Figure 2 and Figure 3).<br />

Action plan for green<br />

urban transport<br />

Some city authorities have made action plans<br />

for green urban transport. After the Green<br />

Olympics, Beijing began to implement the<br />

28<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Action Plan for Green, People-oriented and<br />

High-tech Urban Transport (2009 – 2015).<br />

By 2015, the public transport modal share<br />

will be improved to 50% in the central<br />

area. The rail system will be up to 561 km.<br />

Beijing will pilot some electric vehicle<br />

demonstrations, and more than 5,000 new<br />

energy vehicles will be put into operation.<br />

Furthermore, to form a new green system,<br />

Beijing will develop cycling. Some measures<br />

will be taken, such as, planning nonmotorised<br />

transport (NMT) zones, free<br />

bicycle rental and convenient transfers to<br />

public transport by cycling, etc.<br />

Shanghai has launched a Green-Commuting<br />

Project and created the Green Transport<br />

Strategy to ensure smooth traffic flow and<br />

a greener environment during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

World Expo. The Strategy encourages both<br />

residents and visitors to choose greener<br />

modes of transport. They have also made a<br />

green commuting plan for some enterprise<br />

employees and developed a WebGIS-based<br />

transport carbon calculator for them.<br />

In addition, to impove urban public transport,<br />

more than one hundred cities join the Public<br />

Transport Week & Car-Free Days Action in<br />

September annually; the concept of Green<br />

Commuting has gradually penetrated into the<br />

lives of Chinese citizens.<br />

Non Motorised Transport (NMT)<br />

NMT includes cycling and walking and is the<br />

greenest transport mode. Bicycles not only<br />

could be a viable alternative to car journeys for<br />

many short trips, but also serve as collection


and distribution means for the public<br />

transport system.<br />

• Bicycle travel<br />

NMT is the most important component<br />

of urban transport in most Chinese cities.<br />

According to statistics, the bicycle modal<br />

share accounts for 36% to 50% of total<br />

travel volume in different cities, and<br />

walking modal share is about one-third, on<br />

average, far above that of public transport<br />

(Jiang and Jiang 2008). However, with<br />

rapid urbanisation and motorisation, both<br />

cycling and walking are becoming more<br />

difficult because of vehicle oriented road<br />

network planning. More driveways are<br />

broadened, while walkways are encroached<br />

by roadside parking or street vendors,<br />

which greatly dampen the enthusiasm of<br />

both cyclists and pedestrians. In Beijing,<br />

the bicycle modal share was up to 62.7%<br />

in 1986, but reduced sharply to 38.5% in<br />

2000, 30.3% in 2005, and 20% in 2008.<br />

Figure 4: Free bicycle rental in Beijing<br />

To ease the shrinking modal share,<br />

bicycle rental has entered the agenda<br />

of city government. Governments of<br />

Hangzhou, Beijing, Wuhan, etc., have<br />

initiated policies, including financial<br />

Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

investment, for bicycle travel by setting<br />

up free-of-charge bicycle rental nonlocal<br />

access systems, which create a new<br />

channel for improving cycling. Bicycle travel<br />

will even be included in the Beijing Overall<br />

Transport Plan in <strong>2010</strong>. Two free bicycle<br />

rental demonstrations are being piloted<br />

in Beijing (Figure 4). A few cities are also<br />

developing connections between bicycle<br />

networks and public transport.<br />

With rapid urbanisation and<br />

motorisation, both cycling and<br />

walking are becoming more<br />

difficult because of vehicle<br />

oriented road network planning.<br />

• Walking<br />

Walking shows its advantages for meeting<br />

the increasing travel demand from trade,<br />

shopping and leisure activities. Recently,<br />

pedestrianised streets were constructed<br />

all over China, fully embodying the people<br />

oriented concept. For example, in the<br />

Overall Planning of Shenzhen (2007 –<br />

2020), publicised at the end of 2008, in<br />

addition to implementing “Public Transport<br />

Priority”, NMT was also advocated, with<br />

“Walking Priority” written in the plan.<br />

This is a correction of transport planning<br />

concepts in Shenzhen and is a notable<br />

progress in China.<br />

Transport Demand<br />

Management (TDM)<br />

TDM can restrict motor vehicle use through<br />

effective guidance of transport demand, and<br />

is an important way for developed countries<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 29


Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

to realise green transportation. In recent<br />

years, China has tried some measures and<br />

accumulated certain experience in TDM.<br />

• License plate quota auction system<br />

The car license plate quota auction system<br />

is to restrict vehicle ownership growth. The<br />

main measures are to suppress the desire<br />

to purchase a vehicle by levying high tax.<br />

30<br />

Shanghai is the only city in China that<br />

carries out this system which effectively<br />

suppresses car ownership growth. In<br />

2007, average daily increment of motor<br />

vehicles in Shanghai was 380, about<br />

one-third of Beijing’s 1,050 daily average.<br />

At a news conference in January 2008,<br />

Wu Yi, the Deputy Director General of<br />

Shanghai Municipal Transport Bureau<br />

said, “in the past 13 years after the policy<br />

implementation, about 1.5 million motor<br />

vehicles have been reduced in Shanghai.”<br />

So we can say that the system implemented<br />

in Shanghai achieves notable effect on the<br />

green development of urban transport.<br />

Small charging differences among<br />

different parking places cannot<br />

relieve urban parking problems<br />

notably. Shenzhen’s case shows<br />

that synchronous implementation<br />

of relevant supporting policies is<br />

required to achieve better effect.<br />

• Parking charges<br />

Differentiated parking charges could shift<br />

some commuters from private vehicles to<br />

public transport. Existing parking charge<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

is cheap in the cities, and without certain<br />

area and time difference. A few cities,<br />

such as, Beijing and Shanghai, began<br />

to introduce charges according to area<br />

and time. But small charging differences<br />

among different parking places cannot<br />

relieve urban parking problems notably.<br />

Shenzhen has shown that synchronous<br />

implementation of relevant supporting<br />

policies is required to achieve better effect,<br />

for example, increased road parking prices,<br />

setting time limits for parking on the street,<br />

heavy penalties for exceeding the time<br />

limit, etc.<br />

• Travel restriction measures for cars<br />

After the 2008 Olympic Games, to relieve<br />

traffic jam and improve air quality, Beijing<br />

began to implement No Driving, One Day Per<br />

Week, and reduced about 800,000 motor<br />

vehicles per day in the whole city. The<br />

policy is that vehicles with certain licence<br />

plate tail numbers will not be driven on<br />

certain days. Thus, 30% of government<br />

vehicles stay off the roads. Statistics show<br />

that although the number of motor vehicles<br />

in February 2009 still increased greatly<br />

compared with November 2007, the traffic<br />

jam index decreased from ‘moderate’ to<br />

‘slight’; the duration of jams in work days<br />

also decreased from 7 hours 45 minutes<br />

to 2 hours 30 minutes. ‘Restriction’ has<br />

notably improved traffic status and air<br />

quality in Beijing.<br />

Based on its good effects, Beijing decided<br />

to continue the measure with a little<br />

change, after a half year trial.


Beijing began to implement No<br />

Driving, One Day Per Week, and<br />

reduced about 800,000 motor vehicles<br />

per day in the whole city.<br />

• Other economic instruments<br />

Since 2008, in order to expand domestic<br />

demand and promote reasonable<br />

consumption of automotives, China<br />

implemented some economic instruments,<br />

while concurrently introducing measures to<br />

reduce transport emissions.<br />

i Consumption tax adjustments<br />

From 1st September 2008, the Ministry<br />

of Finance adjusted vehicle consumption<br />

tax. The tax rate of large passenger cars,<br />

3.0 litres to 4.0 litres, was increased from<br />

15% to 25%, while tax for cars above<br />

4.0 litres was raised from 20% to 40%.<br />

On the other hand, the consumption<br />

tax rate of small passenger cars, those<br />

below 1.0 litre, was reduced from 3%<br />

to 1%. This seems to have achieved<br />

its primary effect. In 2008, passenger<br />

cars 1.6 litres and below accounted<br />

for 61.5% of annual vehicle sales, and<br />

sales increased up to 18%, far higher<br />

than the increment for the overall<br />

vehicle market.<br />

ii The Adjustment and Vitalisation Plan<br />

for Auto Industry<br />

This plan released by the State Council<br />

specified that, from January 20 to<br />

December 31 2009, the vehicle purchase<br />

tax for passenger cars 1.6 litres and<br />

Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

below would be reduced from 10% to<br />

5%, to encourage the consumption of<br />

smaller vehicles.<br />

iii Fuel tax<br />

The State Council implemented a fuel<br />

tax from 2009. Gasoline consumption<br />

tax increased RMB 0.8 per litre, diesel<br />

consumption tax increased RMB 0.7 per<br />

litre, and the unit tax amount of other<br />

fuels increased correspondingly. The<br />

fuel tax embodies the principle of more<br />

payment for more use, less payment<br />

for less use, thus promoting social<br />

equity and enhancing the competitive<br />

power of small vehicles. It changes<br />

the consumption pattern in the<br />

domestic automotive market, promotes<br />

automotive enterprises to improve car<br />

technology, and drives the healthy<br />

development of industrial chains in the<br />

vehicle industry.<br />

Alternative Fuel Vehicle<br />

(AFV) Action<br />

Diversifying fuel supply for vehicles is necessary<br />

to save fossile fuels. So more cities in China are<br />

encouraged to choose AFV, including hybrid<br />

vehicles and electric vehicles.<br />

• Clean Vehicle Action<br />

Since 1999, the Clean Vehicle Programme<br />

has been initiated in 12 large cities in<br />

China. There were 153,000 LPG or CNG<br />

vehicles and 486 gas stations available in<br />

the 12 cities in 2002, and 250,000 LPG or<br />

CNG vehicles and 712 gas stations available<br />

in 19 cities by 2004 (Wang 2005). After ten<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 31


Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

32<br />

years of development, the quality of AFV<br />

has improved and now more AFV are used<br />

in over 100 cities, which also promotes the<br />

development of other relevant industries.<br />

• Electric Vehicle Action<br />

Since the Ninth Five-Year Plan (1996 – 2000),<br />

China has focused on the development of<br />

electric vehicles with fruitful results. The<br />

Safety Requirements for Hybrid Electric<br />

Vehicles states standards which began<br />

to be implemented from 2005, and is a<br />

turning point for electric vehicles, from<br />

research to industrialisation. In March<br />

2009, the State Council publicised the<br />

Adjustment and Vitalisation Plan for the<br />

Auto Industry, putting forward the goal<br />

that the sales volume of new energy<br />

vehicles from 2009 to 2011 should<br />

account for about 5% of the total<br />

sales volume of passenger cars. It also<br />

mentioned that China will allocate RMB<br />

10 billion to support the development<br />

of new energy vehicles, etc., (Jiang and<br />

Jiang 2008).<br />

In 2008, the Ministry of Science and<br />

Technology and the Ministry of Finance<br />

jointly initiated the electric vehicle<br />

demonstration project, Ten-Cities, Thousand<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Units. 13 cities, including Beijing, Wuhan<br />

and Shanghai, were preliminarily selected<br />

for using electric vehicles in public<br />

transport, taxis, etc. (Figure 5). It is planned<br />

to popularise 60,000 new energy vehicles<br />

all over China by 2012, of which hybrid<br />

vehicles account for above 95%. The<br />

project’s launch ceremony in Wuhan in<br />

January 2009 marked a fresh era of new<br />

energy vehicle industrialisation in China.<br />

The higher cost of new energy vehicles<br />

will be subsidised by the Central and<br />

local governments.<br />

Figure 5: Electric Bus in Beijing<br />

Table 1: Emission standard implementation in China, Beijing, Shanghai and EU<br />

EU<br />

Euro<br />

1<br />

Vehicular emission control<br />

In order to improve air quality, stricter emission<br />

standards for vehicles have been implemented.<br />

In 2007, China implemented GUO 3 emission<br />

standard for light vehicles, which is equivalent<br />

to Euro 3. GUO 4 emission standard will be<br />

Year 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

China GUO 1 GUO 2 GUO 3<br />

Beijing GUO 1 GUO 2 GUO 3 GUO 4<br />

Shanghai GUO 1 GUO 2 GUO 3 GUO 4<br />

Euro 2 Euro 3 Euro 4 Euro 5<br />

GUO<br />

4


Figure 6: Approach to achieving green<br />

urban transport<br />

Urban<br />

Planning<br />

Compact<br />

High Density<br />

Mixed<br />

Land use<br />

Green Urban<br />

Transport<br />

NMT<br />

Bicycle<br />

Rental<br />

Bicycle<br />

special lane<br />

Electric<br />

bicycle<br />

Public<br />

Transport<br />

Economic<br />

Awareness<br />

Technology<br />

implemented in <strong>2010</strong>, which is equivalent<br />

to Euro 4. Some cities, such as, Beijing and<br />

Shanghai, have begun to implement GUO 4<br />

(Table 1). The emission standard gap between<br />

China and European countries is becoming<br />

smaller. At the same time, the fuel quality is<br />

improved and the sulfur content in vehicular<br />

fuels is reduced. In Beijing, the environment<br />

tax for vehicles will be levied according to the<br />

different emission levels, which will promote<br />

the development of clean urban transport<br />

as well.<br />

The higher cost of new energy<br />

vehicles will be subsidised by the<br />

Central and local governments.<br />

TDM<br />

Information<br />

New Energy<br />

Emission<br />

Approach to Achieving Green<br />

Urban Transport<br />

With a large population and limited fossil fuel<br />

resources, China has to build a green transport<br />

system comprising “Urban public transport &<br />

NMT” (Figure 6). The figure shows the main<br />

factors and their interrelation that influence<br />

Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

green urban transport. Firstly, through urban<br />

planning, some travel by motorised modes<br />

can be reduced effectively. Secondly, some<br />

private car commuters must shift to more<br />

environmental friendly modes such as public<br />

transport and NMT. Thirdly, the energy<br />

efficiency of transport modes and vehicle<br />

technology should be continually improved.<br />

Policy recommendations<br />

Based on the approach, Chinese transport<br />

authorities should move away from the idea<br />

of “Vehicle-orientation” in urban transport<br />

planning, focus mainly on public transport<br />

improvement, manage urban road space<br />

better and guide the reasonable use of private<br />

cars, as the key elements in the green urban<br />

transport strategy. Policies that encourage<br />

people to take public transport or NMT can<br />

bring these benefits too, while enhancing<br />

the local environment and supporting<br />

healthier lifestyles.<br />

Firstly, China should optimise the urban<br />

transport layout by integrating urban and<br />

transport planning based on TOD, develop<br />

“compact” communities and cities in multifunctional<br />

areas, so as to reduce redundant<br />

transport trips from the source. Specifically,<br />

for new developments, we should construct<br />

compact, intensive small towns along Mass<br />

Transit stations of rail or BRT systems.<br />

Secondly, to improve urban public transport,<br />

the Legislation for Urban Public Transport<br />

should be unveiled as soon as possible. The<br />

transport authority should set up a special<br />

fund for urban public transport, regulate public<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 33


Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

fares and subsidy compensation mechanisms,<br />

strengthen planning integration, guarantee<br />

land use for public transport facilities and<br />

launch the action plan to improve the quality<br />

of public transport services.<br />

Thirdly, more TDM should be used in most big<br />

cities, to balance travel demand and supply<br />

well, especially in traffic congested cities.<br />

For urban taxis, a good information platform<br />

should be developed to improve the loading<br />

rate and reduce empty running. On the other<br />

hand, governments should take the lead to<br />

encourage the use of energy efficient and low<br />

emission vehicles, and raise the awareness of<br />

the public to choose green transport modes.<br />

Fourthly, city governments should encourage<br />

bicycle rental, develop scientific bicycle-renting<br />

businesses, make plans for urban bicycling<br />

lanes, extend the special lanes for bicycles and<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

The paper is funded by Volvo Research and Educational<br />

Foundations (VREF). The authors thank Ms. Liu Leilei<br />

for her contributions to this paper, and Professor Chen<br />

34<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

footpaths and set up high-speed pedestrian<br />

systems in downtowns to provide convenience<br />

for travellers.<br />

Last but not least, to improve overall<br />

transport efficiency, better coordination and<br />

integration of different transport services will<br />

improve the attractiveness and convenience<br />

of public transport. For example, we are<br />

keen to promote the use of smart ticketing<br />

which allows passengers to move seamlessly<br />

between different modes.<br />

By 2030, with the concept of people<br />

orientation, China will have a more advanced<br />

public transport system that gives a network<br />

of paths connecting people safely, and mainly<br />

by public transport and NMT, with the places<br />

they want to reach. And it will undeniably<br />

be a highly efficient and low carbon urban<br />

transport system.<br />

Suoxiang for providing invaluable comments on an earlier<br />

version of this paper.


References<br />

Bradshaw, Chris. 2009. Green Transportation Hierarchy:<br />

A Guide for Personal and Public Decision-making.<br />

Available via http://www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/articles/<br />

trips.asp<br />

EcoSeed. 2008. Green Transportation. Available via<br />

http://www.ecoseed.org/en/general-reference/greenreference/green-transportation.<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007.<br />

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Mitigation of Climate<br />

Change, Chapter 5, Transport and its Infrastructure. The<br />

full report can be viewed online at http://www.ipcc.ch/<br />

Jiang, Yulin, and Kejun Jiang. 2008. Policy for energy<br />

saving of urban transport in China. China: China<br />

Communications Press<br />

Practices and Policies of Green Urban Transport in China<br />

Qiu, Baoxing. 2007. Fulfilling bus transportation priority<br />

strategies, expediting the construction of socialist<br />

harmony. Urban Vehicles (in Chinese only), No.1 2007,<br />

pp27 – 33<br />

Transit-oriented development. From Wikipedia, the<br />

free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitoriented_development,<br />

2007,10<br />

Wang, Bingang. 2005. The achievement and prospect<br />

of Alternative Fuel Vehicles in China (in Chinese only).<br />

Automotive Engineering, Vol. 27 No. 6 2005, pp643 – 647.<br />

World Energy Council. 2007. Transport Technologies<br />

and Policy Scenarios. World Energy Council. http://www.<br />

worldenergy.org/publications/809.asp. (accessed <strong>May</strong><br />

26, 2009)<br />

Jiang Yulin is a Professor and Director of CUSTReC and Deputy Chief Engineer<br />

of China <strong>Academy</strong> of Transportation Sciences (CATS), Ministry Of Transport<br />

(MOT), P. R. China. She has led CUSTReC to international prominence by building<br />

strong partnerships with Chinese government agencies and international<br />

organisations, integrating interdisciplinary research and public outreach<br />

programmes. Her research interest spans the areas of transport, environment<br />

protection and energy policy. Over the years, she has carried out extensive<br />

field and analytic studies by working locally, nationally and internationally on a<br />

number of projects. She held positions on four National <strong>Academy</strong> Committees related to sustainable<br />

transport and environment. Professor Jiang is a member of the standing committee on Sustainability<br />

and Transportation of the TRB, USA. She has published ten books and more than sixty papers in recent<br />

years. She can be reached at jiangyulin@vip.sina.com<br />

Li Zhenyu is an Assistant Professor in CUSTReC, China <strong>Academy</strong> of<br />

Transportation Sciences (CATS), Ministry Of Transport (MOT), P.R.China. His<br />

research interests cover transport strategy and policies on energy saving and<br />

emission reduction, green transport, low carbon transport and climate change.<br />

Mr. Li has published 10 papers and 1 book in recent years. He can be reached at<br />

lizhenyu_sxcz@163.com<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 35


GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

Rosina HOWE<br />

Abstract<br />

The Land Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>) has brought Geographic Information System (GIS),<br />

a means to visualise and analyse intelligent information through digital maps, a step<br />

closer to the pulse of businesses and the community. Through the innovative use of GIS,<br />

maps have come alive in strategic land transport planning, in ensuring public safety, in<br />

becoming more pro-enterprise and in strategic information dissemination.<br />

Introduction<br />

The Land Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>) has brought<br />

Geographic Information System (GIS), a means<br />

to visualise and analyse intelligent information<br />

through digital maps, a step closer to the pulse<br />

of businesses and the community. Building<br />

on its extensive and comprehensive digital<br />

Figure 1: Land Transport GIS Hub<br />

36<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

knowledge of land transport infrastructure<br />

information, <strong>LTA</strong> has conceptualised and<br />

developed a Land Transport GIS Hub (Figure 1)<br />

for the enterprise, capable of meshing<br />

engineering drawings and geotechnical<br />

readings together with traffic management<br />

schemes and public transport planning, to<br />

aid improvements in construction safety,


oad safety, as well as, provide new services<br />

for commuters and motorists. Through the<br />

innovative use of GIS, maps have come alive<br />

and given new meaning to location-based<br />

services which cater to engineers, construction<br />

professionals, planning regulators and the<br />

man-in-the-street.<br />

Geography In Action<br />

Strategic land transport planning<br />

Singapore faces increasing population and<br />

travel demand, changing demographics and<br />

expectations, all against a backdrop of limited<br />

land space. This brings great challenges to <strong>LTA</strong><br />

in integrating land use and transport planning<br />

to guarantee quality of life for everyone and<br />

create sustainable communities.<br />

Decision-makers are able to visualise<br />

things as they really are, or will be,<br />

resulting in improved efficiency<br />

and accuracy when developing<br />

transport proposals for road and rail<br />

improvements and expansions.<br />

The Concept and Master Plans are 40-year<br />

and 15-year horizon plans, respectively, on<br />

land use and transport planning. <strong>LTA</strong> uses GIS<br />

technology to lay down medium to long-term<br />

transport plans, including the road and rapid<br />

transit networks, on these strategic plans.<br />

Multiple environmental criteria are “layered”<br />

on top of one another to identify areas that<br />

require facelifts, and to predict travel demand<br />

on our roads and rail network. Decisionmakers<br />

are able to visualise things as they really<br />

are, or will be, resulting in improved efficiency<br />

and accuracy when developing transport<br />

GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

proposals for road and rail improvements and<br />

expansions.<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> uses GIS extensively for strategic studies,<br />

transportation modelling and network travel<br />

demand projection. <strong>LTA</strong>’s geometry and<br />

business data are meticulously tagged and<br />

consolidated in enterprise databases, allowing<br />

the quick creation of GIS maps that integrate a<br />

medley of different parameters specific to each<br />

analysis. This facilitates the study of changes<br />

from current and future planning quantum for<br />

scenario comparison.<br />

Figure 2: RTS Catchment Areas<br />

GIS is also applied in studying the behaviour<br />

and characteristics of consumers living in<br />

various bus and rail catchment areas. It allows<br />

us to analyse the sensitivity of the consumers<br />

to different parameters. Each bus stop and<br />

Rapid Transit Station (RTS) along the corridor<br />

is mapped using GIS technology. By modifying<br />

the radius of the catchment area (Figure 2), GIS<br />

can easily show us patterns, relationships and<br />

trends that help us understand the attributes<br />

and underlying factors within the catchment<br />

areas, so that we can choose the best<br />

modal option for the population living in the<br />

catchment area. It helps us plan for changes<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 37


GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

in the transportation network design for the<br />

future. This will in turn yield considerable<br />

commuter satisfaction.<br />

<strong>LTA</strong>’s transport planners exploit the<br />

complementary strengths of transportation<br />

models and GIS systems to develop a<br />

comprehensive bus route network, fulfilling<br />

our role as the central bus planner. The<br />

graphical maps enable us to better understand<br />

the viability of various routes. By integrating<br />

data and layering with maps, we can easily see<br />

the demographics of the area being served<br />

by the bus network. It also helps us to better<br />

connect train and bus services, allowing train<br />

passengers to easily transfer to bus services<br />

and vice versa.<br />

With GIS, we can display ridership counts<br />

for different services and compare service<br />

ridership volumes. This comparative analysis<br />

can be used to check the coverage of the<br />

existing bus stop or RTS station. By combining<br />

historical ticketing data with a change of bus<br />

route, the model is able to highlight changes<br />

in ridership patterns and hence determine the<br />

feasibility of the proposed revised route.<br />

Public safety and road planning<br />

In the area of road safety, <strong>LTA</strong> leverages on<br />

GIS technology to significantly reduce the<br />

number of traffic accidents, fatal or otherwise,<br />

at accident-prone areas in Singapore to protect<br />

38<br />

GIS makes the visualisation of<br />

collision incidence distributions and<br />

patterns more intuitive than statistics,<br />

charts and tabular data.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

motorists and pedestrians. GIS makes the<br />

visualisation of collision incidence distributions<br />

and patterns more intuitive than statistics, charts<br />

and tabular data. Through collaboration with<br />

Singapore Traffic Police, traffic accident locations<br />

and collision patterns can be easily visualised<br />

and analysed geographically in a process<br />

known as “Black Spot Analysis” (Figure 3).<br />

Trouble spots can be pin-pointed for our road<br />

safety engineers to implement mitigating<br />

traffic improvement schemes. This has yielded<br />

significant reduction in accidents over a twoyear<br />

period in treated areas; specifically, 66% at<br />

traffic junctions and 90% at expressways. <strong>LTA</strong>’s<br />

approach to road safety improvement garnered<br />

the Prince Michael International Safety Award<br />

2007 for outstanding achievements in its<br />

collaborative efforts to promote road safety<br />

through innovations in engineering and active<br />

public education.<br />

Figure 3: Black Spot Analysis<br />

By harnessing GIS technology, our road<br />

safety engineers are able to validate the<br />

effectiveness of the implemented treatments<br />

over a two-year period and further refine<br />

improvements for proactive maintenance<br />

of road carriageways across Singapore.<br />

Through predictive forecasts of road


surface deterioration, road carriageways are<br />

maintained at an optimum level of roughness<br />

and skid resistance to prevent possible skidding<br />

during wet weather.<br />

At construction sites, GIS is used to enhance<br />

the safety of construction workers and the<br />

community in the environs. Specialised<br />

sensing instruments are enabled with GIS<br />

technology to monitor construction activities<br />

that may affect the integrity of structures and<br />

buildings in the vicinity. The United Kingdombased<br />

Royal Society for the Prevention of<br />

Accidents (RoSPA) has named <strong>LTA</strong> in its annual<br />

honour roll of organisations committed to<br />

occupational safety and health in 2008 for<br />

achieving a high level of safety performance<br />

underpinned by good management systems.<br />

Being pro-enterprise<br />

Business communities and industry partners<br />

also enjoy greater convenience and a more<br />

seamless experience when transacting with<br />

<strong>LTA</strong>. Leading an online inter-agency system<br />

that leverages on GIS to coordinate road<br />

construction works, <strong>LTA</strong> has reduced the<br />

processing time for approval of road works<br />

applications from 2 – 3 months to within 2<br />

weeks. The duration for approval of plans<br />

for civil and structural works is also reduced<br />

by 50%. Surveyors, real estate developers,<br />

lawyers, architects, and engineers can also<br />

obtain online road line plans instantaneously,<br />

whereas previously they had to wait up to<br />

10 days.<br />

Strategic information dissemination<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> shares data from our GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> initiative<br />

with various agencies in the government<br />

GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

sector. Our data is used by the government<br />

agencies in areas such as strategic planning,<br />

operations management, research studies,<br />

homeland security, crime prevention and<br />

risk management. <strong>LTA</strong> also supports the<br />

development of the National Spatial Data<br />

Infrastructure (SDI). This is the national strategy<br />

for information sharing.<br />

Strategic partnerships are formed with the<br />

likes of Google, Nokia and local start-ups,<br />

such as, Quantum Inventions, a company that<br />

processes <strong>LTA</strong>’s raw traffic data to provide<br />

real-time traffic information, dynamic routing<br />

and navigation solutions, to further exploit<br />

its enterprise geospatial data to benefit end<br />

users. These collaborations have brought<br />

about an array of innovative services that<br />

Figure 4: Interactive traffic and public transport<br />

maps on <strong>LTA</strong> portals<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 39


GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

directly benefit the public and transform the<br />

way Singaporeans use the land transport<br />

systems, as well as helped to fuel the growth<br />

of new commercially-viable services. Through<br />

these partnerships, <strong>LTA</strong> has sought to extend<br />

its reach through new media channels, such<br />

as, the mobile Internet to disseminate GIS@<br />

<strong>LTA</strong>’s data.<br />

By placing GIS-enabled transport<br />

information right at the fingertips<br />

of commuters and motorists, we<br />

empower them to effectively plan<br />

their journeys and reduce overall<br />

travel time and travel anxiety.<br />

Citizens can also freely access <strong>LTA</strong>’s GIS data<br />

at the One.Motoring (www.onemotoring.<br />

com.sg) and PublicTransport@SG (www.<br />

publictransport.sg) Portals. Motorists can be<br />

informed of road accidents and travel speeds<br />

of the routes they are planning to take, before<br />

they embark on their journeys. They may even<br />

query regarding the availability of car parking<br />

spaces at their destinations, so that they can<br />

make alternative arrangements to avoid long<br />

waits. Commuters can locate the nearest busstops<br />

using mobile telephones equipped with<br />

location based services (LBS), and even find<br />

out when their next bus will arrive. By placing<br />

GIS-enabled transport information right at<br />

the fingertips of commuters and motorists,<br />

we empower them to effectively plan their<br />

journeys and reduce overall travel time and<br />

travel anxiety.<br />

40<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

International Recognition<br />

ESRI Special Achievement in<br />

GIS 2008<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> received the Special Achievement in GIS<br />

(SAG) Award at the 28th Annual Environmental<br />

Systems Research Institute (ESRI) International<br />

User Conference 2008 in San Diego, California,<br />

from among 100,000 user organisations<br />

worldwide, for demonstrating vision and<br />

leadership in using GIS technology to better<br />

serve the world.<br />

CIO Asia Awards 2009<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> has won the annual CIO Asia Award<br />

three times in seven years, for its adoption<br />

of GIS technologies for decision-making<br />

and information dissemination within the<br />

organisation and across other government<br />

agencies. The Award recognises the top five<br />

Asian organisations that have made use of<br />

information and communications technology<br />

to obtain the greatest returns for their key<br />

operations and businesses.<br />

The next generation of GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> will<br />

support more LBS to benefit endusers,<br />

while planners will have access<br />

to a myriad of geospatial data at<br />

their fingertips to make effective and<br />

timely business decisions.<br />

IDC Enterprise Innovation<br />

Awards 2009<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> was among the top 10 institutions for its<br />

innovative approach in using emerging GIS<br />

technologies and IT processes to rejuvenate,<br />

sustain and empower business growth. The<br />

IDC Enterprise Innovation Award 2009 was


presented at IDC’s Asia Pacific CIO Summit on<br />

14 July 2009.<br />

Moving Forward<br />

With the Land Transport Masterplan setting<br />

the stage to double today’s 138 km Rapid<br />

Transit System (RTS) network to 278 km<br />

in the future, and expand road networks<br />

to serve new developments and support<br />

economic growth, GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> will play a pivotal<br />

role in supporting land transport planning and<br />

development efforts.<br />

GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> – Bringing Maps to Life<br />

<strong>LTA</strong>’s GIS framework needs to remain agile<br />

and nimble, yet be robust enough to respond<br />

to the fast changing business needs. The next<br />

generation of GIS@<strong>LTA</strong> will support more<br />

LBS to benefit end-users, while planners will<br />

have access to a myriad of geospatial data at<br />

their fingertips to make effective and timely<br />

business decisions.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

I would like to thank Lem Kiah Chen and Jonah Ong from<br />

the Application Services 1 Division, and Chan Bee Ling<br />

from the Development & Building Control Division for<br />

their efforts in gathering the information for this paper.<br />

Rosina Howe is the Group Director of the Innovation and InfoComm Technology<br />

Group in the Land Transport Authority, Singapore. She is also the Chief Innovation<br />

Officer at <strong>LTA</strong> where she plays a significant role in charting strategic directions<br />

through value innovation and technology breakthroughs to meet <strong>LTA</strong>’s vision of<br />

providing a people-centred land transport system. Mrs Howe spearheads the<br />

Innovation Steering Committee in formulating and implementing <strong>LTA</strong>’s Vision<br />

and Strategy for Innovation. She also chairs the Land Transport Innovation<br />

Fund Committee which catalyses <strong>LTA</strong>’s collaborative efforts with its local and<br />

overseas partners in land transport research and development to realise the Singapore Urban Transport<br />

Solution initiative.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 41


Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

Urban Transportation Planning for a<br />

Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

Michael QUAH and Dickson YEO<br />

Abstract<br />

Singapore’s Economic Strategies Committee in early <strong>2010</strong> issued a series of<br />

recommendations towards making Singapore a “vibrant and distinctive global city...<br />

open and diverse, the best place to grow and reach out to a rising Asia, and a home<br />

that provides an outstanding quality of life for our people.” This paper explores the<br />

role of urban transportation planning as one of many factors that could contribute to<br />

this vision.<br />

Singapore’s well-articulated plans to test-bed electric vehicles dovetail well with its<br />

vision for a “smart energy economy” – an example to Asia. We will focus primarily on<br />

the pros and cons of vehicle electrification; issues more complex than is often simplified<br />

by purveyors of new technologies.<br />

Introduction<br />

Singapore, with its Rapid Transit Systems<br />

(RTS), buses, taxis, its control of private<br />

vehicle ownership and usage through the<br />

Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) scheme, vehicle<br />

tax schemes and the annual quota for growth<br />

of the private vehicle fleet, is to be lauded<br />

for striking an appropriate balance between<br />

economic efficiency, satisfying demand<br />

for better transportation and managing<br />

traffic congestion.<br />

In fact, the ERP systems in place in Singapore,<br />

the signboards of the parking guidance system,<br />

the speed-trap cameras, the proliferation of<br />

GPSs, in totality, all provide the foundation for<br />

an Intelligent Transport System (ITS), which<br />

could in the future:<br />

42<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

• Reduce accidents, by enabling vehicle-tovehicle<br />

(V2V) communications<br />

• Allow for individual vehicles to communicate<br />

seamlessly with traffic signals, i.e., vehicleto-infrastructure<br />

(V2I) communications,<br />

enabling smoother traffic flows [these<br />

may be based on Dedicated Short Range<br />

Communications (DSRC) technologies]<br />

• Provide real-time relevant traffic and<br />

weather data to all vehicles (also V2I), and<br />

• Enable data capture for traffic management,<br />

over time, to assess and improve upon<br />

multi-modal transportation performance.<br />

Beyond the safety aspects, such systems provide<br />

environmental benefits in reducing tail-pipe<br />

emissions from idling vehicles and thus improve<br />

overall energy efficiency and fuel savings.


Exploring vehicle electrification<br />

The Energy Studies Institute (ESI), Singapore is<br />

committed to researching all forms of energy<br />

usage in the regional landscape. The recent<br />

interest in electric vehicles (EVs) (Figure 1)<br />

has been analysed by Wong Yuk Sam. He<br />

has offered a series of observations on the<br />

EV phenomenon and how it would impact<br />

our energy environment. Here are some<br />

conclusions from his studies (Wong 2009).<br />

Figure 1: Electric Vehicle on sale (Mitsubishi iMiEV)<br />

Energy consumption and CO 2 emission<br />

reductions are achieved by (1) reducing energy<br />

demand and (2) improving system efficiency.<br />

Among land vehicles in Singapore, Hybrid<br />

Electric Vehicles (HEVs), Plug-in Hybrid Electric<br />

Vehicles (PHEVs) and EVs are viable to replace<br />

gasoline Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles<br />

(ICEVs) to reduce total energy consumption<br />

and CO emissions from land vehicles. While<br />

2<br />

electricity harnessed from solar and wind in<br />

Singapore would theoretically be zero-carbon,<br />

it would not be sufficient to feed PHEVs and<br />

HEVs, given the small land area in Singapore.<br />

However, given that most of Singapore’s<br />

electricity is generated from Natural Gas<br />

Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

(NG) in Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT)<br />

power plants, switching some fraction of<br />

the automotive fuel diet from petrol and<br />

diesel to electricity (hence natural gas) would<br />

effectively reduce carbon emissions, as<br />

natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel. More<br />

importantly, it moves the various fugitive<br />

point source emissions to those at the power<br />

plants, allowing for easier carbon capture by<br />

CO smoke stack scrubbers, thus effectively<br />

2<br />

reducing the amount of emissions.<br />

In 2008, the total energy consumption from<br />

gasoline cars is 327 million gge (gallon gasoline<br />

equivalent) and the CO emissions total 3.24<br />

2<br />

million US tonnes. HEVs can reduce the energy<br />

consumption by up to 39% and reduce the<br />

CO emission by up to 39%. PHEVs can reduce<br />

2<br />

the energy consumption by up to 46% and<br />

reduce the CO emission by up to 54%.<br />

2<br />

The graphic (Figure 2) taken from Wong’s<br />

(2009) study represents our continuing studies<br />

at ESI to further analyse all types of energy<br />

sources for propulsion systems, including the<br />

future role of nuclear electricity in providing<br />

zero-carbon electricity for power generation<br />

Figure 2: The energy supply chain for vehicle<br />

electrification<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 43


Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

and for the EVs (Figure 3) of the future. In a<br />

separate study by Michael Quah (2009), biomass<br />

sources for the production of bio-diesel<br />

and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are further<br />

considered (Quah 2009). The key lessons from<br />

that study are the following:<br />

Figure 3: Renault Fluence Z.E. Concept, an<br />

electric vehicle<br />

• in the quest for energy security, energy<br />

diversity is key, and in the future, all<br />

possible sources of energy must be taken<br />

into consideration<br />

• for urban populations, there may be no<br />

need to move to fuel cell vehicles (as in<br />

the case of large countries, such as the<br />

US) because such power sources are more<br />

suited to long-range driving to minimise<br />

time between fuelling up<br />

• for urban populations with short-distance<br />

driving patterns as in Singapore, EVs (from<br />

PHEVs to HEVs to full EVs) may be the<br />

best options for private vehicles, although<br />

further improvements in energy storage<br />

systems, such as batteries and capacitors,<br />

and charging stations need to explored.<br />

Hence, the many test-bedding programmes<br />

being currently conducted in Singapore<br />

44<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

will help contribute to our holistic “systems<br />

of systems” approaches to meeting the<br />

challenges of the future. For example, the<br />

Experimental Power Grid Centre (previously<br />

known as SINERGY Centre) at A*STAR,<br />

focusing on intelligent grids, micro-grids<br />

and Distributed Energy Resources (DER),<br />

will provide plug-and-play capabilities and<br />

core research competencies in analysis and<br />

modelling, interconnection technologies, and<br />

advanced system control and management.<br />

These disciplines are critical to supporting<br />

the EV programmes as well as the vehicle-togrid<br />

(V2G) and V2I interactions of the future.<br />

Similarly, the Energy Market Authority (EMA)<br />

Pulau Ubin project on micro-grids will assist<br />

in understanding system interactions vital for<br />

a future “smart energy system” in Singapore.<br />

And so will the Energy Research Institute at<br />

NTU (ERI@N), with its work on energy storage,<br />

modelling, advanced metreing, and command<br />

and control systems.<br />

In the quest for energy security,<br />

energy diversity is key, and in the<br />

future, all possible sources of energy<br />

must be taken into consideration.<br />

What is impressive is that the variety of<br />

science and technology programmes (both<br />

fundamental and applied, as in test-bedding<br />

programmes) taken as a whole provides<br />

Singapore the tools to further advance<br />

urban transportation innovations and<br />

implementations; but, as in all “systems of<br />

systems” approaches, we must consider the<br />

pros and cons of policy implementation.


Vehicle Electrification:<br />

Potential pitfalls versus<br />

technology advantages<br />

With the underlying assumption that Singapore<br />

is beginning to test-bed the use of EVs, as<br />

being jointly driven by the EMA and the Land<br />

Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>), we will examine<br />

the pros and cons of the transformation in<br />

the vehicle powertrain. We assert that this<br />

transition would be no simple task given the<br />

complex interactions among:<br />

• consumer preference and choice<br />

• public transportation policy<br />

• corporate and industrial pressures for<br />

governmental subsidies for new technologies<br />

(as is evident in the West) and<br />

• advocacy from renewable energy sector<br />

private investors interested in public<br />

funding.<br />

Singapore could become the<br />

region’s first successful example of<br />

a truly distributed energy network<br />

with a flourishing private power<br />

generation market.<br />

The potential rewards are understandably<br />

satisfying:<br />

• a partial divorce between road<br />

transportation and dependence on the<br />

“liquid” fossil fuel diets (and hence the<br />

oil markets)<br />

• a decrease in Singapore’s net emissions<br />

(because of Singapore’s primarily natural<br />

gas sources for power generation) and<br />

• new technologies and new business sectors<br />

for economic growth.<br />

Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

With increasing electrification and the ITS<br />

innovations described earlier, centralised<br />

control of traffic flow and more efficient urban<br />

policies can all stem from success in electrifying<br />

the vehicle fleet. Equally importantly,<br />

mass increase in EVs provides a tantalising<br />

test-bed for a series of innovative energy<br />

generation and storage options: Singapore<br />

could become the region’s first successful<br />

example of a truly distributed energy network<br />

with a flourishing private power generation<br />

market which accommodates both legacy<br />

power plants and private individuals. Such a<br />

“systems of systems” integration could not<br />

be achieved without government establishing<br />

a framework for market interactions. But a<br />

whole-of-government approach is essential<br />

for leadership in establishing new industrial<br />

policies, balancing sophisticated technology<br />

investments without the government picking<br />

the winners in a complex network of vendors.<br />

Behavioural economics will have to come into<br />

play, where consumers may begin to consider<br />

that all types of EVs are safe, user-friendly and<br />

superior to the internal combustion engine<br />

(ICE): a formidable challenge for public -private<br />

sector collaboration.<br />

Behavioural Economics:<br />

Do people really prefer electrons<br />

over petrol or diesel?<br />

The lessons learned from the adoption of<br />

electric two-wheelers (E2W) in China and<br />

Taiwan might be crucial. A number of factors<br />

contributed to the demand in metropolitan<br />

China: the rapid increase in per capita income,<br />

rising concern of the pollution levels from<br />

ICEs, traffic congestion and the official ban<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 45


Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

on fossil-fuelled two-wheelers in metropolitan<br />

zones within China (Wienert 2008). The last<br />

factor is widely understood to be crucial to<br />

the rapid increase in demand for electrical<br />

replacements; consumers are simply turning<br />

to the most viable alternatives. This is a<br />

tough lesson for other countries seeking to<br />

adopt EV fleets: is the law as a stick the best<br />

encouragement for change?<br />

How would Singapore do? The China and<br />

Taiwan approach is likely to be unpalatable to<br />

proponents of market-based solutions who<br />

prefer to see consumers switching to EVs on<br />

their own accord (Wienert 2008). A legal ban on<br />

ICEVs on segments of Singapore roads would<br />

raise many questions (and many possibilities.)<br />

But a multi-government agency with a wholeof-government<br />

approach would have to be<br />

first established to provide options, e.g., rapidly<br />

engineer the electrical-charging infrastructure<br />

necessary to keep the EVs and electric bicycles<br />

on those segments of road. While the EV<br />

test-bedding programme is a good start, the<br />

entire car re-sale market would have to be<br />

actively tweaked by the government in order<br />

for existing car owners to gradually phase out<br />

their current vehicles; an ample adjustment<br />

period to alleviate any economic woes caused<br />

by the new policies is needed. Major cardealers<br />

and parallel importers would have to<br />

be persuaded to market EVs (Figure 4). And<br />

how is this to be achieved? We suggest that a<br />

study of the politics of subsidies and incentives<br />

and economic policy be expedited to ensure<br />

mass consumer confidence in new products,<br />

new systems, new technologies, given that<br />

there remains many rate-limiting steps, such<br />

46<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

as improvements needed in energy storage<br />

systems and systems for better monitoring<br />

and control of power flows within the vehicle<br />

and from grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and from V2G<br />

(Anderson 2009). Singapore could emerge as<br />

an international leader in the implementation<br />

(test-bedding) of EV technology with its<br />

attendant corporate consulting benefits and<br />

R&D leadership. However, the social-economic<br />

costs in doing so must be well-considered.<br />

Figure 4: Electric Vehicle on sale (Nissan Leaf)<br />

In Singapore, the current view is that through a<br />

system of government-sponsored and private<br />

sector-driven corporate incentives, the sticker<br />

price of any EV (HEVs, PHEVs, or EVs) would<br />

decline to levels palatable to the average<br />

motorist. The Chinese experience with E2Ws<br />

indicates that short of an outright ban on<br />

ICEVs, the public was unprepared to accept<br />

EVs as a general rule; one author has termed it<br />

“a policy accident, rather than success” (Yang<br />

<strong>2010</strong>). In Taiwan, motorists were not prepared<br />

to accept EVs even when prices were on par<br />

or below that of conventional cars, motorbikes<br />

and scooters (Yang <strong>2010</strong>). The PHEV combines<br />

the positive attributes of EVs and the ICE,<br />

but in the event where the driver forgets to<br />

charge the vehicle over-night, the efficiency<br />

factor of a PHEV plummets as the battery


on board simply becomes a dead weight<br />

to the conventional engine and consumes<br />

unnecessary fuel (Yang <strong>2010</strong>). Even the most<br />

efficient lithium-ion batteries used in today’s<br />

cutting edge car models like the GM Chevrolet<br />

Volt have much less energy storage capacity<br />

compared to traditional ICE cars. Although<br />

urban transportation patterns seem to indicate<br />

that most people would drive much less than<br />

the total energy requirement for EVs, breaking<br />

established patterns on car-refuelling might<br />

prove to be the Achilles heel for road vehicle<br />

electrification. Consumer behaviour related to<br />

driving habits, re-fuelling and the willingness<br />

of drivers to re-charge their cars regularly,<br />

all have to be examined much more closely<br />

in the Singapore context before policies can<br />

be implemented (Yang <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

The PHEV combines the positive<br />

attributes of EVs and the ICE, but in<br />

the event where the driver forgets<br />

to charge the vehicle over-night, the<br />

efficiency factor of a PHEV plummets<br />

as the battery on board simply<br />

becomes a dead weight.<br />

Perhaps the most difficult component would<br />

be the paying of subsidies for the EV roll out<br />

in Singapore. There is much international<br />

chatter with regards to governments offering<br />

partial financial assistance to car companies,<br />

infrastructure providers, electrical utilities<br />

companies and, ultimately, consumers, to<br />

commercialize EV technology on a mass<br />

scale (Anderson 2009). Once again, in the<br />

Singapore context, this approach runs counter<br />

to current policy on curbing private vehicle<br />

Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

usage and establishing an unfettered market<br />

on energy. In addition, there has to be a<br />

sustained political will to withstand the costs<br />

of doing so; an entire bevy of international<br />

consultants, financiers, researchers, policy<br />

makers and scientists will stand to gain a<br />

financial windfall from any local government<br />

largesse. The political endorsement for<br />

such a move has to be sustained for an<br />

indefinite period before we see the results.<br />

Consumer behaviour related to<br />

driving habits, re-fuelling and the<br />

willingness of drivers to re-charge<br />

their cars regularly, all have to be<br />

examined much more closely…<br />

But Singapore is well-recognised for its<br />

commitment to industrial policy and growth<br />

development. EVs are now fashionably touted<br />

in the international arena and in the US, the<br />

lobbyists for vested interests in this arena are<br />

plentiful. We contend that a holistic “systems<br />

of systems” technological and economic<br />

study be conducted to make the public fully<br />

aware of the social and economic cost of<br />

implementing such policies as well as the<br />

potential economic benefits of new industrial<br />

innovation in Singapore.<br />

Carbon pricing, by rewarding Singapore<br />

for the offset of CO emissions from road<br />

2<br />

vehicles, coupled with any additional tax<br />

revenues from road pricing, could help to pay<br />

for the current added costs of EVs (Anderson<br />

2009). As mentioned earlier, there has to be<br />

a large degree of flexibility and strong publicprivate<br />

sector co-operation in order for this<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 47


Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

project to come to fruition. Singaporeans<br />

have to actively “buy-in” to the rewards of<br />

EVs and their attendant benefits. One of the<br />

low hanging fruits would be the creation of<br />

the first consumer-oriented market place for<br />

carbon emissions in the world; it is possible<br />

that private equity, whether from Singapore<br />

or other financial centres, can be used to<br />

lubricate the transition process and help<br />

to pay for the government investments in<br />

the transition to EVs. The potential job and<br />

revenue spin-offs from participating in the<br />

carbon markets have been addressed by Tilak<br />

Doshi (2009). But once again, there has to<br />

be a concerted political effort to analyse the<br />

macro-economic impact of implementing a<br />

carbon marketplace/taxation effort. But as<br />

we work the carbon tax or cap-n-trade issues,<br />

consider its impact (negative?) on Singapore’s<br />

petro-chemical and international logistics<br />

sector which generate a majority of the<br />

carbon emissions in operations and bunkering<br />

while contributing tremendously to the islandstate’s<br />

economy.<br />

Changing the industrial<br />

architecture of road vehicle<br />

electrification<br />

The much touted association between EVs<br />

and renewable energy sources, such as, wind<br />

and solar lies in the usage of the electricity<br />

storage capacity of these vehicles when they<br />

are at rest, known as V2G (Anderson 2009).<br />

Essentially, the vehicles absorb the electricity<br />

generated by renewable sources and redistribute<br />

it through the national grid; this<br />

helps to offset the peaks and troughs for<br />

renewable energy generation at all hours of<br />

the day.<br />

48<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

EVs are now fashionably touted in<br />

the international arena... We contend<br />

that a holistic “systems of systems”<br />

technological and economic study be<br />

conducted to make the public fully<br />

aware of the social and economic cost<br />

of implementing such policies.<br />

Figure 5 illustrates the uneven nature of<br />

energy generation of the wind energy sector<br />

in Denmark, which theoretically could be<br />

offset by V2G technology.<br />

The complication lies in the implementation<br />

of this technique in Singapore. The amount<br />

of electricity generated by renewable energy<br />

remains negligible in the domestic Singapore<br />

electricity market, as mentioned earlier; natural<br />

gas powered turbines which are much more<br />

regular in energy generation remain the status<br />

quo. Hence, implementing a V2G solution<br />

would have much more different implications<br />

for the supply and demand structure of the<br />

power grid locally.<br />

Singapore is accustomed to separating the<br />

energy demand for transportation and<br />

electrical power. Combining these two areas<br />

means that an entirely new perspective on<br />

energy has to be formed; we will be witnessing<br />

a rapid increase in demand for electricity at all<br />

hours. The market case for renewable energy<br />

sources remains to be proven in the Singapore<br />

context and further investigation into its<br />

reliability in providing concentrated power<br />

for distributed, private transportation remains<br />

to be seen. <strong>LTA</strong> could collaborate with public


infrastructure providers or with customers with<br />

large roof areas to encourage the re-sale of<br />

excess electricity from vehicle owners, thereby<br />

creating a new market for small scale private<br />

holders in the domestic scene. However,<br />

ensuring that there is sufficient power for<br />

vehicles at all hours of the day would involve<br />

complex software and hardware co-ordination<br />

along with centrally allocated electricity blocs<br />

throughout the island. From a common sense<br />

perspective, motorists might not be able<br />

to use their vehicles at all hours of the day,<br />

given such an arrangement. Hence, consumer<br />

behaviour has to be changed, either through<br />

market persuasion or government regulation.<br />

Figure 5: Wind energy and electricity consumption<br />

in Western Denmark power grid<br />

Excerpted from Paul H. Anderson (2009) p.2484<br />

These are basic hurdles which have to be<br />

examined more thoroughly. A first step to<br />

solving this conundrum would be to electrify<br />

the road vehicle fleet of the 2 major public<br />

transportation providers; the fixed schedules<br />

of the various buses would be a much more<br />

predictable format for initial field tests of V2G.<br />

Financing the public transportation companies<br />

to make the switch from diesel and petroleum<br />

would be another attendant issue.<br />

Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

This focus on vehicle electrification serves to<br />

illustrate four major points of our paper:<br />

• such transitions would provide major<br />

economic benefits to Singapore in its<br />

re-engineering to participate in new<br />

technology innovations and hence new<br />

business and economic developments<br />

• however, the socio-economic costs nearterm<br />

and the remaining technological and<br />

system infrastructural challenges must not<br />

be underestimated,<br />

• hence, a holistic “systems of systems”<br />

analysis/study is paramount, because<br />

• in meeting the above challenges, Singapore<br />

could take the lead in vehicle electrification<br />

business developments, while striking the<br />

balance between private vehicles and the<br />

importance of public transit.<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> has shown that meeting urban<br />

transportation challenges today with<br />

a grand vision for tomorrow will<br />

indeed catalyse economic growth, and<br />

technological innovation with minimal<br />

environmental impact.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Given the above programmes in Singapore (the<br />

balance of promoting public transit versus the<br />

“control” of the growth of private vehicles, the<br />

decision to gradually electrify the automobile<br />

to reduce emissions, and the advancement<br />

of “smart energy systems” leading to future<br />

intelligent transportation systems), we contend<br />

that this nation has begun the journey towards<br />

emerging as a leading test-bed for innovative<br />

energy solutions for the transportation<br />

industry. Keeping in mind Singapore’s physical<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 49


Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

constraints and the imperative for innovation<br />

and continuous improvement, there emerges<br />

one important conclusion: a holistic “system<br />

of systems” integration across multiple<br />

disciplines (and thus agencies) must be further<br />

strengthened to achieve success. <strong>LTA</strong> has<br />

shown that meeting urban transportation<br />

challenges today with a grand vision for<br />

tomorrow will indeed catalyse economic<br />

growth, and technological innovation with<br />

References<br />

Andersen, Poul H. John A. Matthews, Morten Rask,<br />

2009. “Integrating private transport into renewable<br />

energy policy: The strategy of creating intelligent<br />

recharging grids for electric vehicles” Energy Policy 37<br />

(2009) pp 2483<br />

Doshi, Tilak 2009. “Singapore can be a carbon trading<br />

hub for ships” Straits Times 15 December 2009<br />

Friedman, Thomas L. 2008 “Hot, Flat, and Crowded”,<br />

Farrer, Strauss and Giroux, New York, 2008<br />

Quah Cheng-Guan, Michael, 2009, “Crafting a<br />

Technology Roadmap Towards Energy Security and<br />

Environmental Sustainability in Singapore: Beginning the<br />

Journey”, ESI Project Report, August 2009<br />

50<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

minimal environmental impact. As such, we<br />

are on our way to becoming a “vibrant and<br />

distinctive global city.” Indeed, if our urban<br />

environment could evolve to the standards set<br />

by Changi airport, then Thomas Friedman’s<br />

quotation, when he described his trip from<br />

New York’s JFK airport to Changi as “like we<br />

had just flown from the Flintstones to the<br />

Jetsons,” (Friedman 2008) may also apply to<br />

Singapore’s urban transportation system.<br />

Wienert, Jonathan, Joan Ogden, Dan Sperling, Andrew<br />

Burke, 2008. “The future of electric two-wheelers<br />

and electric vehicles in China” Energy Policy 36 (2008)<br />

pp 2544<br />

Wong Yuk Sum, 2009. “Energy and Carbon Dioxide<br />

Benefits of Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid and Battery Electric<br />

Vehicles to Singapore” 1st July 2009 ESI Project Report<br />

Yang, Chi-Jen <strong>2010</strong> “Launching strategy for electric<br />

vehicles: Lessons from China and Taiwan” Technological<br />

Forecasting & Social Change (<strong>2010</strong>), doi:10.1016/j.<br />

techfore.<strong>2010</strong>.01.010 P 2,3


Urban Transportation Planning for a Vibrant and Distinctive Singapore<br />

Michael Quah joined the National University of Singapore’s (NUS) Energy<br />

Studies Institute (ESI) as Principal Fellow and Chief Scientist, Energy Systems<br />

and Technology in October, 2009. He is also a Visiting Fellow at the Institute<br />

of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), and Executive Advisor at NUS Enterprise.<br />

He has worked for the DuPont Company for about 20 years, and also served as<br />

Adjunct Professor, Chemical Engineering, at North Carolina State University,<br />

USA. He was also an independent consultant and served in the US Army<br />

Research, Development, and Engineering Command, Communications and<br />

Electronics Directorate. Dr. Quah holds the following degrees from Yale University: Ph.D. (1980), M.<br />

Phil. (1978), M.Sc. (1975), Chemical Engineering and has a B.A. [magna cum laude] (1974), Chemistry<br />

and Physics, from Harvard University, USA.<br />

Dickson Yeo has a BA in Mass Communications from the Oklahoma City<br />

University and is attending the graduate programme in South East Asian<br />

Studies in National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore. He has cowritten<br />

and edited a number of energy related works on energy security,<br />

regional politics and administration. These include “A Regional Review of the<br />

Economics of Climate Change in Southeast Asia (RRECCS) – Country Report<br />

for Singapore” in December 2008.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 51


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

Household Interview Surveys from<br />

1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing<br />

Travel Behaviours<br />

CHOI Chik Cheong and Raymond TOH<br />

Abstract<br />

The Land Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>) conducts the Household Interview Travel Survey<br />

(HITS) every four to five years to give transport planners and policy makers insights into<br />

residents’ travelling behaviours. About one percent of all the households in Singapore are<br />

surveyed each time, with household members answering detailed questions about their<br />

trips. A decade of such travel surveys has provided vital insights about the commuting<br />

behaviours of Singapore’s residents and their evolving travelling patterns. The analyses<br />

from 1997 and 2004 HITS (which was subsequently confirmed by the 2008 HITS results)<br />

were helpful in understanding some of the challenges and policy issues that Singapore’s<br />

transport landscape faces going forward. An ambitious Land Transport Masterplan<br />

(LTMP) was consequently unveiled in 2008 to address these challenges.<br />

Introduction<br />

Travel is an integral part of life. People<br />

choose to travel for various reasons – work,<br />

education, recreation, leisure and other<br />

social activities. However, travel behaviour is<br />

strongly influenced by a country’s social and<br />

economic development, and understanding<br />

the way people travel and their reasons for<br />

travelling is vital for transport professionals<br />

to formulate transport strategies and policies.<br />

Thus, the Household Interview Travel Survey<br />

(HITS) is an important information-gathering<br />

tool of the Land Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>) to<br />

acquire feedback on the travel behaviour of<br />

Singapore residents.<br />

HITS is an intensive process of studying the<br />

travel behaviour of every member above the<br />

52<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

age of four in the households surveyed. It is<br />

conducted regularly, once every four to five<br />

years1 , with about one percent of Singapore<br />

households distributed across the island<br />

surveyed each time. 2 Detailed questions about<br />

the characteristics of trips made in a typical<br />

day are asked and these include questions<br />

on transport mode, frequency of trips, travel<br />

purpose and time of travel, along with other<br />

questions pertaining to the respondents’<br />

socio-economic characteristics.<br />

Though the HITS is a time consuming exercise,<br />

it provides essential information for the<br />

transport planners and policy makers in their<br />

ongoing work. The information gathered<br />

from the surveys gives feedback about<br />

residents’ travel needs and the adequacy of


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

the existing infrastructure, and helps transport<br />

professionals understand travel behaviour.<br />

Analysis of the results gives insights as to how<br />

the travel behaviours evolve and allows planners<br />

and policy makers to develop strategies and<br />

policies to meet these challenges.<br />

HITS is an intensive process of<br />

studying the travel behaviour of every<br />

member above the age of four in the<br />

households surveyed.<br />

This paper presents a decade of travel survey<br />

results from the HITS and highlights some<br />

of the changes in Singapore residents’ travel<br />

behaviour that have been observed. We will<br />

conclude with a review of the Land Transport<br />

Masterplan which was unveiled by <strong>LTA</strong> in 2008<br />

and highlight how the earlier survey results<br />

influence the development of the master plan<br />

and how it addresses some of the challenges<br />

arising from the changing travel behaviours.<br />

Singapore Residents’ Travel<br />

Behaviours<br />

Trip generation<br />

With an expanding economy and increasing<br />

population in Singapore, it is not surprising<br />

to see that travel demand had increased<br />

tremendously over the past decade (Figure 1).<br />

In 2008, an average of 9.9 million trips were<br />

generated daily – a growth of 32 percent from<br />

1997, which saw only 7.5 million daily trips.<br />

Between 1997 and 2004, the growth rate was<br />

only 10 percent (1.3% per annum), while 2004<br />

and 2008 saw a growth rate of 20 percent<br />

(4.8% per annum), suggesting accelerated<br />

growth in travel demand.<br />

In the same figure, the growth rates of<br />

different transport modes were given. Private<br />

transport (PV) trips grew steadily; from 2.7<br />

million daily trips in 1997 to 3.4 million in<br />

2004, and 4.3 million in 2008 – an average<br />

growth rate of 25 percent between survey<br />

years. In the same period, public transport<br />

(PT) trips did not as grow much; PT trips grew<br />

marginally between 1997 and 2004, and grew<br />

by 16 percent between 2004 and 2008. The<br />

overall impact of the different growth rates is<br />

that PT mode share has actually declined over<br />

the past decade.<br />

Figure 1: Daily Trips Generated<br />

No. No. of of Daily Trips (‘000)<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

Total<br />

Trips:<br />

7,500<br />

PV<br />

2,700<br />

HITS 1997<br />

Total: +10%<br />

PV: +26%<br />

PT: +1%<br />

PT<br />

4,800<br />

Total<br />

Trips:<br />

8,200<br />

PV<br />

3,400<br />

PT<br />

4,800<br />

Total: +20%<br />

PV: +25%<br />

PT: +16%<br />

Total<br />

Trips:<br />

9,900<br />

PV<br />

4,300<br />

PT<br />

5,600<br />

HITS 2004 HITS 2008<br />

(Note: Numbers are rounded off)<br />

The number of trips grew rapidly over the decade with private<br />

transport trips growing faster than public transport<br />

There are many reasons for the rapid<br />

growth in trips. Key factors affecting trip<br />

generation are the pace of Singapore’s<br />

economic development and the growth in<br />

population. According to Table 1, Singapore’s<br />

population had grown from 3.8 million to<br />

4.8 million between 1997 and 2008, a 26<br />

percent increase. Economic activity also grew<br />

tremendously during the period, as seen from<br />

the second and third columns of Table 1. More<br />

significantly, Singapore’s real GDP per capita<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 53


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

Table 1: Singapore Population, GDP per Capita, Economic Activities and Daily Trips Made<br />

grew by 33 percent between 1997 and 2008,<br />

matching the growth rates in trips, suggesting<br />

that there is a close relationship between<br />

economic development and travel demand.<br />

However, the increase in trips generated<br />

cannot be attributed to economic activities<br />

alone. It is found that in 2008, each person<br />

made an average of 2.18 trips on a typical<br />

day (Table 1), an increase from previous<br />

survey years when the trip rates were 1.98<br />

and 1.97 trips per person in 1997 and 2004,<br />

respectively. Taking into account Singapore’s<br />

unemployment rates during the survey years,<br />

trip rates below 2.0 are to be expected. This<br />

explains why the trip rate dropped slightly in<br />

2004 as unemployment rose. However, as<br />

the employment situation improved in 2008,<br />

54<br />

Year Population<br />

(mil)<br />

GDP per Capita<br />

($’000 at 2000 prices)^<br />

Resident<br />

Unemployment Rate*<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Daily Trips<br />

(mil)<br />

Daily Trips<br />

Per Capita<br />

1997 3.8 36.2 3.5% + 7.5 1.98<br />

2004 4.2 (11%) 44.2 (22%) 4.4% 8.2 1.97<br />

2008 4.8 (14%) 48.3 (9%) 3.2% 9.9 2.18<br />

(Note: Numbers are rounded off; figures in brackets refer to the change from the previous period.)<br />

^ From Singapore Department of Statistics’ website (http://www.singstat.gov.sg/)<br />

* From Ministry of Manpower’s website (www.mom.gov.sg)<br />

+ This is 1998’s unemployment rate as the 1997 figure is not available.<br />

Table 2: Purpose for Travelling (Forward Trips Only)<br />

the trip rate overshot the 2.0 benchmark,<br />

suggesting that individuals were making more<br />

discretionary trips that were driven by social<br />

and leisure activities.<br />

Based on the questions on trip purpose, it is<br />

possible to better understand the reasons for<br />

travelling. As seen from Table 2, most of the<br />

journeys generated are to and from homes<br />

and workplaces and for personal business<br />

and educational purposes – together they<br />

accounted for close to 80 percent of all<br />

the daily trips. This result had not changed<br />

drastically for the decade. However, a trend<br />

observed is that more private vehicle trips<br />

were made in servicing passengers3 (pick up<br />

or drop off) as the proportion of such trips had<br />

increased from 6 – 7 percent (about 500,000<br />

Purpose HITS 1997 HITS 2004 HITS 2008<br />

Go home 43% 45% 45%<br />

Go to workplace 25% 23% 21%<br />

Part of work (Travelling on business) 4% 3% 2%<br />

Go to school 8% 8% 10%<br />

Home/Work/School Sub Total 79% 79% 78%<br />

Personal business 4% 5% 3%<br />

Recreation/Social, Shopping and Eating 10% 10% 10%<br />

Other Reasons Sub Total 14% 15% 14%<br />

Serve Passenger (eg: pick up/drop off) 7% 6% 8%<br />

(Note: Numbers are rounded off.)<br />

The proportion of work/education related trips remained stable while there is a growing trend of more trips servicing passengers


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

daily trips) to 8 percent (775,000 daily trips)<br />

(Table 2).<br />

The growing number of passenger servicing<br />

trips should raise a red flag to transport<br />

planners as they are usually first-and-last<br />

mile trips that could have been completed<br />

on the PT network and thus avoided entirely.<br />

Growing demand for passenger servicing will<br />

put additional pressure on the road network.<br />

Already, Singapore cars are clocking very high<br />

mileage annually4 because car-owners tend<br />

to use their cars even for very short journeys.<br />

If such short journeys could be avoided, the<br />

demand on road space would lessen and there<br />

would be less pressure to expand existing<br />

road infrastructure, especially in the residential<br />

developments and key transport facilities.<br />

As the economy develops, we can expect<br />

more social or leisure (discretionary) trips,<br />

thus, there is a need to alter the current<br />

trend of making these trips by private<br />

transport. Commuters need to be persuaded<br />

to use alternative modes of transport, such<br />

as, PT or cycling or walking, for short trips,<br />

so that there can be better utilisation of PT<br />

resources and less demand on the limited<br />

road space. In land-scare Singapore, such<br />

outcomes are desirable.<br />

Mode share<br />

We have seen earlier that the daily PV trips had<br />

grown much faster than PT trips. This resulted in<br />

the daily PT mode share dropping consistently<br />

for the past decade, from 63 percent in 1997<br />

to 58 percent in 2004, and even lower to 56<br />

percent in the 2008 survey (Figure 2). Though<br />

the rate of decrease has fallen, the trend, if<br />

it continues, is not a sustainable one because<br />

of the corresponding increasing reliance on<br />

private vehicles.<br />

Figure 2: PT Mode Share<br />

Mode Share (%)<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

55%<br />

67%<br />

AM PT mode share:<br />

-4% (-0.9% p.a.)<br />

63% 63%<br />

58%<br />

AM PT mode share:<br />

-4% (-1.5% p.a.)<br />

59%<br />

56%<br />

AM Peak<br />

Daily<br />

50%<br />

HITS 1997 HITS 2004 HITS 2008<br />

The daily mode share for PT has dropped from 63% in 1997 to 56% in<br />

2008. The same trend is observed for AM peak mode share<br />

One of the reasons for the fall in PT mode<br />

share is the increase in car population per<br />

capita. Figure 3 shows that the car population<br />

had grown significantly by 47 percent between<br />

19985 and 2008, faster than the population<br />

growth rate of 26 percent. As a result, more<br />

people are owning cars now and the ratio for<br />

the number of persons per car has changed<br />

from 10 persons per car in both 1997 and 2004<br />

to 8.8 in 2008. As discussed earlier, Singapore<br />

car owners used their cars rather intensively,<br />

Figure 3: Car Population<br />

Car Population (‘000)<br />

600 Growth in car population:<br />

11%, 1.2%p.a.<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

377 385 395<br />

408 407 408<br />

Steep growth in car<br />

population: 32%, 7%p.a.<br />

0<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

The car population has been increasing steadily from 1998<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 55<br />

419<br />

441<br />

475<br />

517<br />

553


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

thus, a rapid increase in car population would<br />

dampen the growth in PT trips.<br />

Figure 4: Market Share Within the PT Sector<br />

Cumulative Mode Share (%)<br />

The demand for MRT is growing much faster than buses, resulting in a<br />

higher mode share for MRT<br />

Within the PT sector, the mode share is currently<br />

dominated by buses. However, from Figure 5,<br />

we observe that most of the increase in PT trips<br />

is from the increase in demand for mass rapid<br />

transit (MRT). Figure 4 shows that 0.93 million<br />

daily MRT trips (0.24 trips per capita) were<br />

generated in 1997, growing to 1.3 million (0.31<br />

trips per capita) in 2004, and 1.7 million (0.35<br />

trips per capita) in 2008 – almost doubling in<br />

ten years. The market share of MRT within the<br />

PT industry has risen by 12 percentage points<br />

to stand at 31 percent, with the bulk of the<br />

increase arising due to decanting from bus<br />

ridership, which consequently saw a gradual<br />

drop in market share.<br />

Factors affecting PT demand<br />

To better appreciate the factors affecting<br />

demand for each mode of transport, Figure 5<br />

gives the share breakdown of various transport<br />

modes against income levels.<br />

56<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

20% 0.24 taxi<br />

0.93 mil trips per<br />

capita<br />

61%<br />

2.91 mil<br />

19%<br />

0.92 mil<br />

0.77 bus<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

0.24 rail<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

18%<br />

0.87 mil<br />

55%<br />

2.65 mil<br />

27%<br />

1.3 mil<br />

0.21 taxi<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

0.63 bus<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

0.31 rail<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

55%<br />

3.09 mil<br />

31%<br />

1.7 mil<br />

HITS 1997 HITS 2004 HITS 2008<br />

MRT/LRT Buses Taxi<br />

14%<br />

0.78 mil<br />

0.16 taxi<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

0.64 bus<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

0.35 rail<br />

trips per<br />

capita<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Figure 5: PT mode breakdown by income levels<br />

Mode Share (%)<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

No<br />

Income<br />

$1 –<br />

$1,000<br />

Taxi<br />

Bus<br />

MRT/LRT<br />

$1,001 – $1,500 – $2,000 – $2,500 – $3,000 – $4,000 – $5,000 – $6,000 – $7,000 – $8,000<br />

$1,499 $1,999 $2,499 $2,999 $3,999 $4,999 $5,999 $6,999 $7,999 and<br />

above<br />

Income Level<br />

Mode share for MRT remains stable across all income levels<br />

It shows that MRT mode share remained<br />

constant over the various income levels. At<br />

each income level, the MRT mode share was<br />

above 10 percent and rose to as high as 20<br />

percent for the middle-income group ($2,001 –<br />

$3,999). The mode share for buses was<br />

highest for the low-income group but quickly<br />

tapered off for those with incomes higher<br />

than $2,000. Taxis played an important mode<br />

of travel across all income bands because of<br />

Singapore’s relatively low car ownership levels.<br />

Figure 6: Mode share vs distance from MRT Station<br />

Mode Share (%)<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

the MRT station the lower the mode share. The<br />

PT mode share drops by a rate of 1.6 percent<br />

per 100m distance from the MRT station, and<br />

reaches a low of about 40 percent for people<br />

living 2 km from the station.<br />

The observation bodes well for transport<br />

planners. With the opening of the entire<br />

Circle Line (CCL) in 2011 and Downtown Line<br />

(DTL), Singapore residents will have greater<br />

accessibility to the rapid transit system (RTS) 6<br />

network. The LTMP also indicates a strong<br />

commitment to double the RTS network which<br />

implies that the likelihood of the population<br />

taking the PT will be higher for more people.<br />

Time of travel (Trip distribution)<br />

Time of travel (trip distribution) is of interest<br />

to the transport planners because it provides<br />

vital information for the planning of future<br />

transport infrastructure.The method employed<br />

to analyse the time of travel is based on the<br />

mid-trip time (the average of start and finish<br />

time of the trip). It gives a better indication<br />

of the distribution of travel demand on the<br />

transport network because at the mid-trip<br />

time, the trip makers are more likely to be<br />

actually present on the transport network<br />

than at the time of departure (Chandrasekar<br />

et. al. 1994).<br />

Over the ten years, it is observed that the<br />

peak of the morning peak had shifted earlier<br />

by an hour, and correspondingly the morning<br />

peak period had lengthened (Figure 7). The<br />

change could be due to the twin effects of the<br />

electronic road pricing (ERP) system and the<br />

introduction of flexible work times.<br />

Figure 7: Trip distribution in a typical day<br />

Distribution (%)<br />

9%<br />

8%<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

0<br />

0.00<br />

1.00<br />

2.00<br />

3.00<br />

4.00<br />

5.00<br />

6.00<br />

7.00<br />

Hour Beginning HITS 1997 HITS 2004 HITS 2008<br />

The trip distribution in a typical day shows that the morning peak<br />

has shifted earlier and spread across a longer period<br />

The ERP was introduced in 1998 to price<br />

congested expressways and arterial roads. 7<br />

Its primary objective is to make road users<br />

more aware of the true cost of driving and<br />

the impact to traffic conditions if they choose<br />

to drive. With road pricing, road users are<br />

more likely to make conscious decisions about<br />

the need to drive, the time to make the trip<br />

and the route to take. One of the behaviour<br />

changes implied by the shift in the peak hour<br />

is that some drivers had begun to leave home<br />

earlier to avoid paying the ERP charges.<br />

Fundamental changes in work<br />

practices, such as, widespread<br />

telecommuting, that could eliminate<br />

work trips will likely reduce the peak<br />

period demand.<br />

Similarly, flexible work arrangement for<br />

employees meant that workers could reach<br />

their office within a stipulated time belt<br />

instead of precisely on the hour8 . This relieves<br />

the pressure on the transport infrastructure<br />

as employees stagger their arrival times at<br />

work. The scheme was introduced by the Civil<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 57<br />

8.00<br />

9.00<br />

10.00<br />

11.00<br />

12.00<br />

13.00<br />

14.00<br />

15.00<br />

16.00<br />

17.00<br />

18.00<br />

19.00<br />

20.00<br />

21.00<br />

22.00<br />

23.00


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

Service in the 1970s, but it only took off in<br />

the late 1990s/early 2000s when there was<br />

greater emphasis on work-life balance. The<br />

impact we observed is a wider morning peak.<br />

It should be noted that even with the shift<br />

in PT trips during the morning peak, traffic<br />

conditions have not improved significantly.<br />

Fundamental changes in work practices, such<br />

as, widespread telecommuting, that could<br />

eliminate work trips will likely reduce the peak<br />

period demand.<br />

Addressing the Evolving<br />

Travel Behaviours<br />

In 2008, the Land Transport Authority came<br />

up with a bold and ambitious transport master<br />

plan that sets out the vision for the land<br />

transport system in 2020. The Land Transport<br />

Masterplan (LTMP) contains many policies and<br />

initiatives and some of them resulted from<br />

a better understanding of travel behaviours<br />

from past HITS. The 2008 HITS which came<br />

out after the review further confirmed some of<br />

the trends and highlighted the pressing need<br />

for timely implementation of the initiatives in<br />

the LTMP. In this section, we briefly review<br />

a few of these initiatives, namely, increasing<br />

the use of ERP to manage travel demand,<br />

reducing the population of cars and making<br />

PT a choice mode.<br />

Managing travel demand<br />

through ERP<br />

From the HITS results, we can see the<br />

effectiveness of the ERP. Firstly, city-bound<br />

traffic (private vehicles going into the restricted<br />

zones) grew only 15 percent compared to<br />

58<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

the island-wide vehicular journeys which<br />

grew 25 percent between 2004 and 2008.<br />

This suggests that traffic demand had been<br />

suppressed for areas that were priced by the<br />

ERP. Secondly, the trip distribution had also<br />

started to widen in the morning peak hours<br />

because of the imposition of the ERP and<br />

other policy changes. Therefore, the ERP has<br />

been effective in managing travel demand and<br />

ensuring better use of limited road resources.<br />

Table 3: Growth Rates of Traffic Volumes<br />

City-bound<br />

Traffic<br />

Island-wide<br />

Traffice<br />

Growth in Traffic Volumes<br />

15% 25%<br />

(Between 2004 and 2008)<br />

City-bound traffic going into the restricted zones grew less than the<br />

island-wide traffic<br />

Though ERP has been useful, the growing<br />

affluence of Singapore residents has led to a<br />

greater propensity to drive, which in turn has<br />

caused a significant increase in traffic volumes.<br />

With more cars on the road, congestion is<br />

now more prevalent, particularly during the<br />

peak periods. In the LTMP, <strong>LTA</strong> is committed<br />

to ensuring that the ERP remains effective in<br />

managing congestion. This includes refining<br />

the method of measuring traffic speeds to<br />

trigger ERP rate changes, changing the pricing<br />

structure and introducing more ERPs around<br />

the island to manage congestion in the<br />

city area.<br />

An important change is the restructuring of the<br />

ERP pricing mechanism. Instead of having many<br />

small adjustments, <strong>LTA</strong> will make larger rate<br />

increments so that the ERP charges can remain<br />

effective in influencing motorists’ behaviour.<br />

Instead of raising the incremental ERP charge


y $0.50, <strong>LTA</strong> will raise the incremental charge<br />

to $1.00. In addition, the starting charge for<br />

a new ERP gantry point will be increased from<br />

$1.00 to $2.00. These changes will improve<br />

the effectiveness of the ERP system, such that<br />

each time the ERP rates are adjusted, motorists<br />

who still choose to drive on priced roads will<br />

enjoy tangible improvements in traffic flows.<br />

Instead of having many small<br />

adjustments, <strong>LTA</strong> will make larger rate<br />

increments so that the ERP charges<br />

can remain effective in influencing<br />

motorists’ behaviour.<br />

Reducing car population<br />

Land in Singapore is scarce and building more<br />

roads is not a sustainable approach to managing<br />

traffic congestion. Therefore, <strong>LTA</strong> has to<br />

manage the growth in the car population. The<br />

Vehicle Quota System (VQS) was introduced<br />

in 1990 to restrict vehicle population growth,<br />

and the vehicle population growth was set at<br />

3 percent per annum. Over the past 15 years,<br />

the rate of total vehicle population growth<br />

has outstripped road development (Figure 8).<br />

Figure 8: Growth of Roads and Vehicle<br />

Population Index<br />

INDEX<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

Vehicle Population<br />

The growth in vehicle population has outstripped the pace of<br />

road development<br />

Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

Road Development<br />

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006<br />

Year<br />

The road growth rate has been only 1 percent<br />

per annum in the last 15 years and will drop to<br />

about half a percent per annum over the next<br />

15 years. Therefore, it is necessary to further<br />

limit the growth of the car population.<br />

HITS revealed the behavioural tendency of car<br />

owners to drive than use the PT even for short,<br />

discretionary trips. This trend has resulted in<br />

the rapid growth of PV trips. Therefore, in<br />

managing travel demand, <strong>LTA</strong> has to further<br />

restrict the growth of private vehicles to<br />

complement the ERP measures, so that the<br />

increasing demand for private trips may be<br />

arrested. In light of this, the vehicle quota<br />

growth has been reduced to 1.5% per annum<br />

from 2009 onwards, subject to further review<br />

in 2011.<br />

Making public transport a<br />

choice mode<br />

The initiatives with regards to private transport<br />

are only effective in suppressing the choice<br />

for PV mode. Overall demand for transport is<br />

still a derived demand, which means that as<br />

population grows and the economy develops,<br />

trip generation will not slow down. Thus, more<br />

needs to be done to avoid a choked transport<br />

system. Hence, the most important strategy is<br />

to make the public transport a choice mode<br />

for most of the population’s commute.<br />

As seen from Figure 5, the MRT is increasingly<br />

becoming a popular mode of transport. It is<br />

fast, efficient and good for long-distance<br />

commute. Even people in the high-income<br />

groups do not mind commuting on the MRT<br />

because of the comfort and speed. Therefore,<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 59


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

expanding the RTS is the right strategy<br />

going forward to attract more people to use<br />

public transport.<br />

In the LTMP, the Government announced that<br />

it will commit over $20 billion to double the<br />

existing 138 km of rail network to 278 km.<br />

This will increase the RTS density from 31 km<br />

per million population today to 51 km per<br />

million population, comparable to cities like<br />

New York and London, and surpasses RTS<br />

densities in Hong Kong and Tokyo today.<br />

Within the city centre, commuters will be able<br />

to access an RTS station within a 400 metre<br />

radius, or a five-minute walk. As seen earlier in<br />

Figure 6, this improvement in the accessibility<br />

to the MRT will have positive impact on the<br />

mode share and create better utilisation of the<br />

PT facilities.<br />

To complement the RTS network, <strong>LTA</strong> will also<br />

spend resources to improve the bus system for<br />

better integration between the PT modes and<br />

ensure the success of Singapore’s ‘hub-and-<br />

60<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> will also spend resources to<br />

improve the bus system for better<br />

integration between the PT modes<br />

and ensure the success of Singapore’s<br />

‘hub-and-spoke’ public transport<br />

network.<br />

Notes<br />

1. There is a longer gap between 1997 and 2004<br />

surveys because the HITS was conducted only after<br />

Northeast Line (NEL) was opened in 2003.<br />

2. The sampling rate is kept constant so to be<br />

comparable across surveys. It is also consistent with<br />

the recommended home interview sampling rate<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

spoke’ public transport network. Initiatives,<br />

such as, building integrated transport hubs<br />

and creating integrated fare structures, will<br />

enhance seamless bus-rail transfers. In addition,<br />

more bus priority schemes and premium bus<br />

services will greatly enhance the experience<br />

of bus passengers, thus improving the overall<br />

attractiveness of the PT system. In a nutshell,<br />

<strong>LTA</strong> is adopting a holistic approach to make<br />

the PT a choice mode for Singapore residents.<br />

Conclusion<br />

A decade of HITS has provided Singapore<br />

transport professionals with vital feedback<br />

about the travel behaviours of Singapore<br />

residents. The results have helped in making<br />

decisions about the types of transport<br />

infrastructure to be provided and the policies<br />

needed to make Singapore a liveable city.<br />

However, the observations on behaviour<br />

also presented many challenges in building a<br />

sustainable transport system. The solutions to<br />

some of the challenging transport issues have<br />

been provided in the Land Transport Master<br />

Plan. By adopting both pull and push measures,<br />

such as the expansion of the MRT network,<br />

reducing the car population and refining the<br />

ERP system, <strong>LTA</strong> aims to address the falling PT<br />

mode share and create a sustainable transport<br />

system for future generations of Singaporeans.<br />

of 1.5% to 0.5% for a population above 1 million.<br />

For HITS 2008, about 10,500 households were<br />

interviewed.<br />

3. Passenger servicing trips refer to trips made by<br />

motorists in picking-up or dropping-off passengers<br />

who are on their first/last mile. These motorists will


Household Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2008 – A Decade of Changing Travel Behaviours<br />

usually return to their place of origin and are not enroute<br />

to work/home.<br />

4. On average, cars in Singapore clock 20,000 km per<br />

year, comparable to cars in Chicago City. However,<br />

Singapore’s physical land mass is only 25 km long and<br />

48 km wide, so the statistics suggest that Singapore<br />

cars are driven excessively.<br />

5. The data for car population growth starts from 1998<br />

because a new road tax structure was implemented<br />

on 1 September 1998.<br />

6. The Rapid Transit System (RTS) refers to the<br />

Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and Light Rail Transit<br />

(LRT) systems.<br />

7. ERP was introduced in September 1998 to replace<br />

the manual Area Licensing Scheme (ALS) for the<br />

restricted zones (mainly in the Central Business<br />

District). At the same time, the road pricing scheme<br />

was also expanded to price major expressways when<br />

they are congested. In September 1999, the ERP was<br />

extended to some of the key arterial roads beyond<br />

the restricted zones.<br />

8. The Civil Service Flexi-hour is between 7.30 am and<br />

9.30 am.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

We would like to acknowledge Lim Wee Liang for his<br />

contribution and assistance for this paper.<br />

References<br />

Chandrasekar, Piotr Olszewski, Wong Yiik Diew,<br />

John Polak, and Peter Jones. 1994. Analysis of Travel<br />

Behaviour in Singapore. Report prepared for Public<br />

Works Department.<br />

Land Transport Authority. 2008. Land Transport<br />

Master Plan.<br />

Choi Chik Cheong is Deputy Director, Content Development and<br />

Documentation with Land Transport Authority, Singapore. He has over<br />

15 years experience in overall integrated land-use and transport planning,<br />

covering road and rail studies on alignment and scheme appraisal, including<br />

economic and financial assessments for highway and public transport<br />

projects. He also conducted studies on evaluation of public transport fare<br />

structures, and traffic and commuter surveys. He has directed studies on bus<br />

planning, road pricing, car-parking standards and multi-criteria evaluation of<br />

transport schemes. He worked with urban planners to integrate LRTs into both old developments and<br />

new towns, and has over ten years experience in building and MRT construction. He has an MSc in<br />

Transport from Imperial College London, UK.<br />

Raymond Toh is currently an Economist in the Land Transport Authority,<br />

Singapore. He graduated from the National University of Singapore, majoring<br />

in Economics, and has previously worked in Singapore’s Ministry of Transport<br />

under strategic and corporate planning where he had a global overview of the<br />

issues facing Singapore’s transportation. He is currently involved in economic<br />

research in areas of commuters’ travel behavior and people’s perception of<br />

public transport. His research interest is in winning people over to make public<br />

transport their choice mode and to give up their cars for a better Singapore.<br />

JOURNEYS <strong>May</strong> <strong>2010</strong> 61


The <strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> was launched in September 2006 by the Singapore Land Transport Authority.<br />

The <strong>Academy</strong> aims to be a global knowledge hub in urban transport. It serves as a one-stop focal<br />

point for government officials and professionals around the world to tap on Singapore’s knowhow<br />

and exchange international best practices in urban transport management and development.<br />

The <strong>LTA</strong> <strong>Academy</strong>’s Advisory Board provides high-level advice on strategic directions and major<br />

initiatives for the <strong>Academy</strong> to establish itself as a leading land transport institution in the world.<br />

The Advisory Board comprises the following international ensemble of distinguished members:<br />

Professor Cham Tao Soon (Chair)<br />

Chancellor and Chairman, SIM University, Singapore<br />

Yam Ah Mee (Vice Chair)<br />

Chief Executive, Land Transport Authority (<strong>LTA</strong>), Singapore<br />

Professor Henry Fan,<br />

Professor, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore<br />

Professor Fwa Tien Fang<br />

Director, Centre for Transportation Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore<br />

Professor Phang Sock Yong<br />

Professor of Economics, Singapore Management University, Singapore<br />

O P Agarwal<br />

Vice President, Institute of Urban Transport, India, and Senior Transport Specialist, World Bank<br />

Professor Lu Hua Pu<br />

Director, Institute of Transportation Engineering, Tsinghua University, China<br />

Professor Tony <strong>May</strong><br />

Research Professor in Transport Engineering, University of Leeds, UK<br />

Michael Replogle<br />

Global Policy Director, President Emeritus and Founder,<br />

Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP), USA<br />

JOURNEYS is a biannual publication of the <strong>Academy</strong>. It provides a platform for the <strong>Academy</strong><br />

to showcase and share urban transport trends, policies, technologies and challenges in different<br />

cities. It is also one of the key resources to complement and enhance the learning experience of<br />

participants at the <strong>Academy</strong>’s programmes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!