13.08.2013 Views

History and genealogy of Peter Montague, of Nansemond and ...

History and genealogy of Peter Montague, of Nansemond and ...

History and genealogy of Peter Montague, of Nansemond and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DESCENDANTS OF PETER MONTAGUE. 55<br />

erable l<strong>and</strong> along the river in Lancaster as early as 165 1 or 2 can<br />

scarcely admit <strong>of</strong> a doubt, though the records that are preserved at<br />

Lancaster do not show it. Jan'y 16, 1658, he was granted 200 acres<br />

on the Rappahannock river [Va. L<strong>and</strong> Office Book 4, p. 340] <strong>and</strong><br />

this is the last recorded purchase he ever made. He had now<br />

become a large l<strong>and</strong> owner <strong>and</strong> a leading citizen <strong>of</strong> the Colony, a<br />

man <strong>of</strong> intelligence, <strong>of</strong> moral worth <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> influence. He represented<br />

the County <strong>of</strong> Lancaster in the Assembly [House <strong>of</strong> Burgesses] from<br />

165 1 to 1658. [See Hist, <strong>of</strong> Va. by R. R. Howson, p. 309-310.]<br />

"In 1657-58, he represented the County <strong>of</strong> Lancaster in the House<br />

<strong>of</strong> Burgesses at James City."—See Hen. Stat., Vol. 1, p. 431.<br />

Failing health at this time no doubt was the cause <strong>of</strong> his resigning his<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial duties in that capacity. In his will, dated March, 1659, he<br />

says he is " weak <strong>of</strong> body but <strong>of</strong> perfect memory." He was a member<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Established Church, <strong>and</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> church records will<br />

not prevent the fact being recorded here—that he was a leading-<br />

member, prominent in all good works, one <strong>of</strong> the founders <strong>of</strong> the<br />

church in Virginia.<br />

" There were two parishes in Lancaster on the<br />

north side <strong>of</strong> the river, St. Marys <strong>and</strong> Christ Church. The White<br />

Chapel Church was in the parish <strong>of</strong> St. Marys. These two parishes<br />

were afterward united into that <strong>of</strong> Christ Church, Lancaster. The<br />

first vestry book known was dated 1654. The church was completed<br />

in 1670 under the direction <strong>of</strong> Mr. John Carter, the great ancestor <strong>of</strong><br />

many bearing that name in Va. The present church, built upon the<br />

same spot by Mr. Robert Carter [known as King Carter] son <strong>of</strong> John<br />

<strong>and</strong> was completed in 1732. In 1654 Rev. Samuel Cole was the<br />

minister <strong>of</strong> this church, [the same who was minister in Middlesex in<br />

1664] he was at that time the minister for the whole Co. both sides<br />

<strong>of</strong> the river. After him the Rev. Andrew Jackson was minister, <strong>and</strong><br />

he was succeeded by Rev. John Bell, who was minister from 17 13 to<br />

1743. Rev. David Currie succeeded him until his death in 179 1,<br />

nearly fifty years. From 1796 to 1805 Rev. Daniel McNaughton<br />

was minister <strong>and</strong> James Ball, William <strong>Montague</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Martin Shearman<br />

were lay delegates. In 1732 a new church was built upon the<br />

site <strong>of</strong> the old one <strong>and</strong> was st<strong>and</strong>ing in 1857 in good state <strong>of</strong> preser-<br />

vation, being very solidly built, the walls three feet thick. The first<br />

White Chapel church was torn down, the present one was built in<br />

1740. In 1724, Mr. Bell, who had been their minister for twelve<br />

years, informs the Bishop <strong>of</strong> London that there were three hundred

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!