GENERATIVE CHARACTERISTICS AS ANTECEDENTS OF ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fredrickson, B. L. 2003. Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & J. E. Dutton & R. A. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 163-175. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishing. Fredrickson, B. L. 2005. Positive emotions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez, (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford Press. Friedlander, F. 1983. Patterns of individual and organizational learning. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), The executive mind: 192-220. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc. Fry, R., Barrett, F., Seiling, J., & Whitney, D. 2002. Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkery, T. J. 2004. Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(2): 228-249. Gittell, J. H. 2003. A theory of relational coordination. In K. S. Cameron & J. E. Dutton & R. A. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline: 279-295. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. 2002. Primal leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Golembiewski, R. T. 2001. Three perspectives on appreciative inquiry. In D. Cooperrider, P. F. Sorensen, T. Yaeger & D. Whitney (Eds.), Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organizational development: 389-396. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing information across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82- 111. Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Lovas, B. 2005. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 776- 793. Harter, J. K., F.L. Schmidt, & Hayes, T. L.. 2002. Business-unit level relationships between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 268-279. 44
Head, T. C. 1997. Why does appreciative inquiry work?: Speculation and a call for empirical research. Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN. Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. 1999. The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U. S. and Japanese plants. Management Science, 45(5): 704-721. Kahn, W. A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724. Kahn, W. A. 1992. To be full there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45: 692-724. Kahn, W. A., Cross, R., & Parker, A. 2003. Layers of diagnosis for planned relational change in organizations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3): 259-280. Kotter, J. P. 1996. Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press. Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. 2005. Handbook of positive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Luechauer, D. L. 2000. Applying appreciative inquiry instead of problem-solving techniques to facilitate change. Management Development Forum, 2(1). Maister, D. H., Green, C. H., & Galford, R. M. 2000. The trusted advisor. New York, NY: The Free Press. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R.. 2006. Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 1031-1056. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organizational Science, 14(1), (January-February 2003): 91-103. Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., & Mohrman, A. M. 2003. The role of networks in fundamental organizational change: A grounded analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3): 301. Moorman, R. H. 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6): 845-855. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-256. 45
Page 1 and 2: GENERATIVE CHARACTERISTICS AS ANTEC
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.........
Page 5 and 6: & Hinings, 2002), and trust in peer
Page 7 and 8: subject knowledge and craft skill (
Page 9 and 10: Hypothesis 4. Peer trust has a dire
Page 11 and 12: part based on perceptions and obser
Page 13 and 14: esponses were received. Appendix A
Page 15 and 16: scales (refer to Appendix A). The c
Page 17 and 18: Adequacy of the model was establish
Page 19 and 20: Estimated Coefficients and Nomologi
Page 21 and 22: cutoff value (Fornell & Larcker, 19
Page 23 and 24: The re-specified model produced ove
Page 25 and 26: and H3 were not supported for the f
Page 27 and 28: asis for personal and organizationa
Page 29 and 30: espondents engage themselves in the
Page 31 and 32: accept. It is hoped and intended th
Page 33 and 34: 1.) Leadership in this organization
Page 35 and 36: C2 1 APPENDIX B: Item Correlations
Page 37 and 38: d2 1 d3 1 d4 d5 d6 1 d7 1 d9 1 1 d8
Page 39 and 40: -.09 APPENDIX F: Female Engagement
Page 41 and 42: REFERENCES Adams, M. G., Schiller,
Page 43: Cooperrider, D., & Sekerka, L. E. 2
Page 47: Thatchenkery, T. J. 2004. Paradox a

GENERATIVE CHARACTERISTICS AS ANTECEDENTS OF ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?