13.08.2013 Views

New York City Department of Environmental Protection ... - NYC.gov

New York City Department of Environmental Protection ... - NYC.gov

New York City Department of Environmental Protection ... - NYC.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

comments to the engineer on 3/24/11 regarding the concrete check dams. A progress meeting<br />

was held with the project representatives on 3/29/11. DEP performed a site visit on 3/29/11;<br />

there were no deficiencies, there was no discharge and the site was vacant. DEP performed a site<br />

visit on 4/7/11; there were no deficiencies, there was no discharge, the site was occupied. DEP<br />

received a sketch <strong>of</strong> where the walls will be installed from the engineer on 4/12/11. DEP<br />

received a copy <strong>of</strong> the outfall pipe finished grade elevations from the engineer on 4/13/11. DEP<br />

performed a site visit on 4/21/11; there were no deficiencies, there was no discharge, the site was<br />

occupied. DEP received the April 2011 meeting minutes from the engineer on 5/6/11. DEP<br />

performed a site visit on 5/10/11; there were deficiencies, there was no discharge, the site was<br />

occupied. DEP sent and received e-mails to and from the engineer on 5/11/11 regarding the<br />

erosion on the north side <strong>of</strong> Rt. 23. DEP received an e-mail from the engineer on 5/12/11 with a<br />

photo that was sent from the contractor. DEP performed a site visit on 5/17/11; there were no<br />

deficiencies, there was no discharge, the site was vacant. DEP sent an e-mail to the engineer on<br />

5/31/11 with photos that were taken at the 5/19/11 site visit. A meeting was held with the project<br />

engineer and contractor on 6/2/11. Structure elevation and spot elevations were taken. DEP<br />

received an e-mail from the engineer on 6/2/11 regarding the adjustments in elevations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bio-retention basin. DEP called the project inspector on 6/14/11 regarding the bio-retention<br />

basin drainage. Currently, the basis is supposed to drain out completely within 48 hours. It does<br />

not appear to be functioning properly during the standard site visits. Special attention to the<br />

weather forecasts and the basis's elevation needs to be considered. DEP received a call on<br />

6/16/11 from the project inspector regarding the bio-retention. He's going to the site to pull soil<br />

samples <strong>of</strong> the media and sending <strong>of</strong>f to a lab to check if it meets the spec in the approved plans.<br />

DEP called the project inspector on 6/21/11 regarding the bio-retention basin. The project<br />

inspector stated that he was on site yesterday and did not observe any water coming from the<br />

bio-retention basin's under drain. The engineer and the project inspector have looked into their<br />

records whether the media used was tested and when it was installed. After calling the<br />

contractor, the contractor stated that they used the topsoil on site; it supposedly passed their soil<br />

testing near the high limit for testing. Later this week, the contractor is meeting the project<br />

inspector and they will both will be taking soil samples and getting them tested. DEP sent an email<br />

to the engineer on 6/27/11 requesting the testing results regarding the bio-retention basin.<br />

DEP received the Certificate <strong>of</strong> Functional Completion from the engineer on 6/28/11. DEP sent<br />

an internal e-mail on 6/28/11 stating that the bio-retention basin will not hold up the functional<br />

completion for the WWTP. DEP received an e-mail from the engineer on 6/29/11 with the bioretention<br />

flow splitter. DEP received an e-mail from the engineer on 8/17/11 informing DEP that<br />

the soil tests passed the required specifications however the engineer requested the contractor to<br />

dig soil test pits to check the media’s homogeneousness. The contractor will also adjust the one<br />

concrete weir at that time. DEP performed a site visit on 10/3/11; there were deficiencies, there<br />

was no discharge and the site was occupied. A meeting was held with the project inspector on<br />

10/3/11. DEP performed a site visit on 10/11/11; there were deficiencies, there was no discharge<br />

and the site was occupied. DEP received the meeting minutes for construction startup on laterals<br />

and septic tank installation from the engineer on 10/14/11. DEP performed a site visit on<br />

10/17/11; there were deficiencies, there was no discharge and the site was occupied. DEP<br />

received an e-mail from the engineer on 10/18/11 with the WWTP flood damage repair update.<br />

DEP issued a letter to the engineer on 10/19/11 regarding the 10/17/11 site visit and the bioretention<br />

test holes. DEP received a call on 10/19/11 from the engineer regarding the<br />

Bioretention test holes. DEP called the inspector on 10/26/11 regarding the bio-retention basin.<br />

It appears that a portion <strong>of</strong> the Bio-retention basins under drain has been replaced. DEP called<br />

the inspector to confirm that the under drain will be exposed for inspection prior to the media<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!