Text, including the two scores - Columbia University Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

piece will not merely be a demonstration of its technology, but be judged on a blank canvas of aesthetic possibility outside of its technology. Must all electronic pieces inherently be ‘about’ their technical systems and boundaries? This seems unfair, given that instrumental music electronic/electroacoustic generally considered that way. At some point in a traditional instrument’s development, it ceased to be an object of novelty defined by its limitations and gained some sort of common practice and style on its own, after which it gained something like a Platonic status (even though those limitations remain, isn’t just fade from consciousness). Yet is that arrival to an ideal freed from particulars only possible after an instrumental technology has stopped they and calcified into a fixed form? One could argue that this change has begun to happen with electronic music, with digital software a common platform on which to model the historical hodgepodge of analog and digital hardware, and with computer developing and operating systems coalescing into a handful of dominant platforms. Yet of course there is always disorder and incompatibility, especially on brand new developments, before eventually becoming subsumed into the dominant high-powered workflows. If calcification is required for that Platonic softwares it seems that electronic music is such a completely different creature from traditional instruments in that not only will it continue to change form, status, its power and ability to change and customize itself will never yield it stable enough to be widely considered as a Platonic instrument. Yet perhaps the degree to which this is true is less about dominant usage, and more about an individual development and narrative. I still feel it true for my own work, but I but 67
new systems/methods for nearly every project, and so result always feels like exemplar of that system which I have just created. Once I make many pieces on a system, perhaps I will feel otherwise, that within a body of work, the embodiments and limitations, while still present and affecting the develop have begun to fade from self-critical view. outcome, 68
Page 1 and 2:
Design and Composition for Two Inte
Page 3 and 4:
Computational Design and Compositio
Page 5 and 6:
of Figures 1. User interfaces for t
Page 7 and 8:
video1 is a pair of methods for gen
Page 9 and 10:
Music Specification Language). JMSL
Page 11 and 12:
this point, the program is finished
Page 13 and 14:
holds single frame of analysis data
Page 15 and 16:
10 and finds the most spectrally si
Page 17 and 18:
esult. I dealt with this empiricall
Page 19 and 20:
to each other when far. This exactl
Page 21 and 22: ‘behind’ the screen. The more s
Page 23 and 24: portions of a shape are hidden behi
Page 25 and 26: 20 is done in the raster system. Th
Page 27 and 28: new technological development (and
Page 29 and 30: Incorporation into Concert Works 2.
Page 31 and 32: foolishly, an intermedia work can d
Page 33 and 34: 28 (though the recent flood of 3D H
Page 35 and 36: y retrieving detailed lists of dire
Page 37 and 38: 32 cases, relations between phrases
Page 39 and 40: exploits subjective conceptual mapp
Page 41 and 42: Ratio 3:4:5 rotation: 0 π/4 π/2 3
Page 43 and 44: and to more complex shifting betwee
Page 45 and 46: line of any length. The last one (2
Page 47 and 48: wave drone create a visual figure t
Page 49 and 50: Parameters affecting all three osci
Page 51 and 52: These are listed in order of the mo
Page 53 and 54: of the strings (from normal, to sul
Page 55 and 56: 50 in Cardinality Aleph Two (C.A.T.
Page 57 and 58: across various source samples is al
Page 59 and 60: eenter more placidly, with the entr
Page 61 and 62: Dots on the matrix control signify
Page 63 and 64: statement, thus intertwining the no
Page 65 and 66: language can (i.e. is equally power
Page 67 and 68: 62 of software separate from its en
Page 69 and 70: individual instead of the machine.
Page 71: of an outmoded technology, but to t
Page 75 and 76: Schwarz, Diemo. ‘Corpus-Based Con
Page 77 and 78: Percussion notes The electronic per
Page 79 and 80: &?ã&?ã 18œ. ˙ 18œ. ˙ 18ŒœÓ
Page 81 and 82: 43 ∑ &?ã&?ã ˙ # 43˙ œ. œ 43
Page 83 and 84: 55 3 Œ˙ b≈. j œ. œœ 55≈. j
Page 85 and 86: 69 69 69 848484848484 F &?ã&?ã
Page 87 and 88: &?ã&?ã F 91 ∑ 91w b 91œŒÓ 91
Page 89 and 90: &?ã&?ã √ √ 114‰œJœ œœ b
Page 91 and 92: 131‰œj œœ b 131Œ‰Jœ bŒŒ
Page 93 and 94: 147Œœ œœ bœ œœJœ. œœ œ b
Page 95 and 96: 163œ œœ b b. œœœ‰œJœ œœ
Page 97 and 98: q»¡¢º 180≈. œ. bœ b nœ≈.
Page 99 and 100: 192‰.Rœœ œ bœ. œ œ>œ ≈R
Page 101 and 102: 203œ 3 3 b‰œ b Œ 203‰.r œ b
Page 103 and 104: &?ã&?ã 216 ∑ 216œ #œ. œ b3
Page 105 and 106: 230 3 3 230 5 230Œ F3 bœ bœœœ
Page 107 and 108: ?ã&?ã 240œ b œœ bœ5 ‰. Jœ
Page 109 and 110: œ 252. 252 ∑ 252˙ bœ. œœœœ
Page 111 and 112: 273∑ &?ã&?ã273œŒÓ 273∑ 273
Page 113 and 114: 286 ∑ 286œ bœœœœœœœœœ 2
Page 115 and 116: &?ã&?ã 297. œ. œ bœ. œ #. œ
Page 117 and 118: &?ã&?ã 314w 314∑ 314∑ 314w 31
Page 119 and 120: American Engineer by Daniel Iglesia
Page 121 and 122: Flute Clarinet in Bb Violin Viola C
Page 123 and 124:
fl cl. vl. vla. v.c. prc. fl cl. vl
Page 125 and 126:
&V?ã fl cl. vl. vla. v.c. prc. 44
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
&ã fl cl. vl. vla. v.c. prc. (€)
Page 135 and 136:
&ã fl cl. vl. vla. v.c. prc. (€)
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
show all

Text, including the two scores - Columbia University Department of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?