15.08.2013 Views

Ω-Theory: Mathematics with Infinite and Infinitesimal Numbers - SELP

Ω-Theory: Mathematics with Infinite and Infinitesimal Numbers - SELP

Ω-Theory: Mathematics with Infinite and Infinitesimal Numbers - SELP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 1. Ω-CALCULUS<br />

6. For all r ∈ R, Fr = {λ ∈ Pfin(Ω) : r ∈ λ} ∈ Q;<br />

7. ∅ ∈ Q <strong>and</strong> Pfin(Ω) ∈ Q.<br />

Proof. The first part of this Proposition follows from Proposition 1.4.4.<br />

To prove part 2, we will show that, if A = Qϕ,ψ <strong>and</strong> B = Qη,γ, then A∩B = Qδ,φ,<br />

<strong>and</strong> δ <strong>and</strong> φ have the same Ω-limit. If A ⊆ B or B ⊆ A, the thesis follows from<br />

part 1. Let’s suppose that this is not the case. Let’s call ξ = limλ↑Ω ϕ(λ) <strong>and</strong><br />

ζ = limλ↑Ω η(λ). If ξ = ζ, Axiom 1 ensures that there is a function ν such as<br />

limλ↑Ω ν(λ) = ξ −ζ. If we define η ′ = η +ν <strong>and</strong> γ ′ = γ +ν, we have that Qη ′ ,γ ′ = Qη,γ<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

lim η<br />

λ↑Ω ′ = lim γ<br />

λ↑Ω ′ = ζ + ξ − ζ = ξ<br />

We have shown that, <strong>with</strong>out loss of generality, we can suppose<br />

Now, it’s clear that<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

lim ϕ(λ) = lim ψ(λ) = lim η(λ) = lim γ(λ)<br />

λ↑Ω λ↑Ω λ↑Ω λ↑Ω<br />

Qϕ−η,ψ−γ = Qϕ,ψ ∩ Qη,γ<br />

lim(ϕ(λ)<br />

− η(λ)) = lim(ψ(λ)<br />

− γ(λ)) = 0<br />

λ↑Ω λ↑Ω<br />

<strong>and</strong> that’s what we wanted to prove.<br />

The proof of part 3 is by converse. Let’s suppose A ∈ Q <strong>and</strong> B ∈ Q. From<br />

the definition we have that, for all functions ϕ <strong>and</strong> ψ, the hypothesis Qϕ,ψ = A or<br />

Qϕ,ψ = B implies limλ↑Ω ϕ(λ) = limλ↑Ω ψ(λ). Since the implication holds if both the<br />

premises are true, we have that, if for ϕ <strong>and</strong> ψ the equality Qϕ,ψ = A ∪ B holds,<br />

then limλ↑Ω ϕ(λ) = limλ↑Ω ψ(λ), <strong>and</strong> so we conclude A ∪ B ∈ Q, as we wanted.<br />

To prove the first implication of part 4, let’s suppose A ∈ Q, so that there exist<br />

ϕ, ψ such as A = Qϕ,ψ <strong>and</strong> limλ↑Ω ϕ = limλ↑Ω ψ. Let’s define the functions:<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

η(λ) =<br />

γ(λ) =<br />

ϕ(λ) if λ ∈ A<br />

1 if λ ∈ A c<br />

ϕ + 1 if λ ∈ A<br />

1 if λ ∈ A c<br />

Clearly, Qη,γ = A c <strong>and</strong>, by part 3 of Proposition 1.4.4, limλ↑Ω η(λ) = limλ↑Ω ϕ(λ),<br />

while limλ↑Ω γ(λ) = limλ↑Ω ϕ(λ)+1. This shows that A c ∈ Q. Conversely, if A c ∈ Q,<br />

we can apply the same argument to show that A = (A c ) c ∈ Q.<br />

To prove part 5, we can consider the function c0 <strong>and</strong> the function<br />

<br />

c<br />

0 if λ ∈ F<br />

ϕ(λ) =<br />

1 if λ ∈ F<br />

By definition, we have Qc0,ϕ = F c , so ϕ is eventually constant (take λ0 = n<br />

i=1 λi)<br />

<strong>and</strong>, by Axiom 2, limλ↑Ω ϕ(λ) = 0. This implies F c ∈ Q <strong>and</strong>, by part 4, F ∈ Q.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!