Migration in the Russian Federation: A Country Profile 2008 - EU ...
Migration in the Russian Federation: A Country Profile 2008 - EU ...
Migration in the Russian Federation: A Country Profile 2008 - EU ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>:<br />
A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
Russia
The op<strong>in</strong>ions expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> report are those of <strong>the</strong> authors and do not necessarily reflect<br />
<strong>the</strong> views of <strong>the</strong> International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong> (IOM). The designations employed<br />
and <strong>the</strong> presentation of material throughout <strong>the</strong> report do not imply <strong>the</strong> expression of any<br />
op<strong>in</strong>ion whatsoever on <strong>the</strong> part of IOM concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legal status of any country, territory,<br />
city or area, or of its authorities, or concern<strong>in</strong>g its frontiers or boundaries.<br />
IOM is committed to <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants<br />
and society. As an <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental organization, IOM acts with its partners <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational community to: assist <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> operational challenges of migration;<br />
advance understand<strong>in</strong>g of migration issues; encourage social and economic development<br />
through migration; and uphold <strong>the</strong> human dignity and well-be<strong>in</strong>g of migrants.<br />
Prepared by:<br />
Al<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>dea<br />
Magdalena Majkowska-Tomk<strong>in</strong><br />
Heikki Mattila<br />
Isabel Pastor<br />
Edited by:<br />
Sheila Siar<br />
Publisher: International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong><br />
17 route des Morillons<br />
1211 Geneva 19<br />
Switzerland<br />
Tel: +41.22.717 91 11<br />
Fax: +41.22.798 61 50<br />
E-mail: hq@iom.<strong>in</strong>t<br />
Internet: http://www.iom.<strong>in</strong>t<br />
_____________________________________________________<br />
ISBN 978-92-9068-483-1<br />
ISBN 978-92-9068-517-3 (<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black Sea Region: Regional Overview,<br />
<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s and Policy Recommendations)<br />
© <strong>2008</strong> International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong> (IOM)<br />
_____________________________________________________<br />
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored <strong>in</strong> a retrieval<br />
system, or transmitted <strong>in</strong> any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
record<strong>in</strong>g, or o<strong>the</strong>rwise without <strong>the</strong> prior written permission of <strong>the</strong> publisher.<br />
94_08
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>:<br />
A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong><br />
October <strong>2008</strong>
Contents<br />
List of tables and figures......................................................................... 7<br />
Acronym list............................................................................................. 7<br />
Foreword.................................................................................................. 9<br />
Executive Summary: General Assessment of <strong>Migration</strong> Issues........ 13<br />
1. Immigrants......................................................................................... 17<br />
1.1. Number of immigrants .............................................................................17<br />
1.2. Status of immigrants .................................................................................19<br />
1.3. Ma<strong>in</strong> countries of orig<strong>in</strong> of immigrants ....................................................28<br />
2. Emigrants........................................................................................... 33<br />
2.1. Total number of emigrants ........................................................................33<br />
2.2. Status of emigrants ....................................................................................34<br />
2.3. Ma<strong>in</strong> countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation ..................................................................38<br />
3. Remittances ....................................................................................... 41<br />
3.1. Quantitative aspects of remittances ..........................................................41<br />
3.2. Qualitative aspects of remittances ............................................................46<br />
4. Migrant communities/diasporas...................................................... 47<br />
4.1. Description of relationship between diasporas and country of orig<strong>in</strong> ......47<br />
4.2. Migrant communities/diasporas’ organizations by country<br />
of dest<strong>in</strong>ation ..............................................................................................53<br />
5. Irregular migration .......................................................................... 55<br />
5.1. Numbers/estimates of irregular movements .............................................55<br />
5.2. Figures and <strong>in</strong>formation on return migration flows ..................................57<br />
5.3. Figures and <strong>in</strong>formation on traffick<strong>in</strong>g ....................................................58<br />
6. Assessment and analysis of migration issues................................... 65<br />
6.1. Government <strong>in</strong>stitutions responsible for migration policy ......................65<br />
6.2. International legal framework <strong>in</strong> place relevant to migration ..................67<br />
6.3. <strong>Migration</strong> policies <strong>in</strong> place ......................................................................72<br />
6.4. Labour migration issues ............................................................................75<br />
6.5. Policies to address irregular migration .....................................................81<br />
6.6. Policies to address traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs ........................................83<br />
6.7. Refugees, asylum seekers and <strong>in</strong>ternally displaced persons,<br />
and relevant policies <strong>in</strong> place ....................................................................88<br />
6.8. O<strong>the</strong>r important migration actors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country ......................................89<br />
7. Annex: Some Additional <strong>Migration</strong> Statistics ................................ 95<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
list of tables<br />
Table 1. Population born outside of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
(<strong>in</strong> thousands; as of 9 October 2002) .................................................18<br />
Table 2. Foreign citizens and stateless persons (as of 9 October 2002) ..........19<br />
Table 3. Asylum applications <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007 ..............19<br />
Table 4. Residence permits issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007 ......21<br />
Table 5. Temporary residence permits issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
2004-2007 ..........................................................................................21<br />
Table 6. Persons who received <strong>the</strong> forced resettlement or refugee status,<br />
1992-2006 ...........................................................................................22<br />
Table 7. Refugees and forced resettlers (persons) ............................................23<br />
Table 8. Forced resettlers (by place of former residence) ................................24<br />
Table 9. Distribution of foreign workers (by types of economic activity) .......25<br />
Table 10. Foreign workers <strong>in</strong> Russia (by ma<strong>in</strong> countries of orig<strong>in</strong>) ................26<br />
Table 11. Distribution of foreign workers <strong>in</strong> Russia<br />
(by duration of work period) ............................................................27<br />
Table 12. Distribution of foreign workers (by gender) ....................................27<br />
Table 13. Immigration flows to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> by country of<br />
departure, 1997-2006 .......................................................................29<br />
Table 14. Immigrants <strong>in</strong> Russia by ethnic orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2002-2006 .......................31<br />
Table 15. Distribution of immigrants age 14 and older, by educational<br />
status ...............................................................................................32<br />
Table 16. Emigration from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1997 and 2000-2007<br />
by year and country of dest<strong>in</strong>ation ..................................................33<br />
Table 17. Distribution of refugees and asylum seekers from Russia by<br />
country of asylum ............................................................................34<br />
Table 18. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad<br />
(by gender) .......................................................................................35<br />
Table 19. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad<br />
(by educational status) .....................................................................35<br />
Table 20. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad<br />
(by duration of employment period) ................................................35<br />
Table 21. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad <strong>in</strong> 2006<br />
(by type of economic activity) .........................................................36<br />
Table 22. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad <strong>in</strong><br />
2005-2007, by dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries ................................................36<br />
Table 23. Occupation of <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment<br />
abroad ...............................................................................................37<br />
Table 24. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad,<br />
by category of occupation ................................................................38<br />
Table 25: Selected countries of residence of <strong>Russian</strong> emigrants .....................38<br />
Table 26. <strong>Russian</strong> emigration by countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation and by year,<br />
2000-2006 ........................................................................................39<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 27. Educational status of emigrants 14 years and older, 2002-2006 ......40<br />
Table 28..Amount of <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g migrant remittances to Russia .......................41<br />
Table 29. Remittances to and from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2000-2006 .........42<br />
Table 30. Remittances sent via money transfer systems <strong>in</strong> 2006 .....................43<br />
Table 31. Violations of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Migration</strong> Law of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> ............57<br />
Table 32. IOM assisted voluntary returns to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
2005-2006 .........................................................................................57<br />
Table 33. Differences <strong>in</strong> GDP and standards of liv<strong>in</strong>g among <strong>the</strong><br />
CIS countries ....................................................................................75<br />
Table 34. Economically active population ......................................................78<br />
Table 35. Average annual employment by type of economic activities ...........79<br />
Table 36. Number of unemployed persons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
1992, 1995, and 2000-2006 .............................................................80<br />
Table 37. Unemployment by age and educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> 2006<br />
(as of end of November; percentage of <strong>the</strong> total) ............................81<br />
Table 38. Statistics on crimes related to traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> people, 2004-2007 ......86<br />
Table 39. Asylum applications <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007 ............89<br />
list of figures<br />
Figure 1. Net migration to Russia, by ethnic group, 1992-2003 (<strong>in</strong> %) ..........28<br />
Figure 2. Changes <strong>in</strong> average commission<br />
(for transactions from Russia via payment systems) ........................45<br />
Figure 3. Traffick<strong>in</strong>g routes used <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g people out and <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> ...........................................................................63<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
aCronYM list<br />
BSEC Organization of <strong>the</strong> Black Sea Economic Cooperation<br />
CBR Central Bank of Russia<br />
CIS Commonwealth of Independent States<br />
FMS Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
ILO International Labour Organization<br />
IOM International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong><br />
MIA M<strong>in</strong>istry of Internal Affairs<br />
MTO Money transfer operators<br />
NGO Non-governmental organization<br />
RCP Regional Consultative Process<br />
UN United Nations<br />
UNDP United Nations Development Programme<br />
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund<br />
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees<br />
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund<br />
UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime<br />
USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics<br />
WGCC Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Combat<strong>in</strong>g Crime<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
foreWorD<br />
International migration is a prom<strong>in</strong>ent feature of globalization and one of<br />
<strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g issues of this century. Increas<strong>in</strong>gly, migration entails economic, social,<br />
demographic, cultural, security and environmental effects on both send<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and receiv<strong>in</strong>g societies. The task of formulat<strong>in</strong>g effective and coherent approaches<br />
for <strong>the</strong> management of <strong>in</strong>ternational migration poses formidable challenges<br />
and frequently has led to regional <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as Regional Consultative Processes<br />
(RCPs). 1 These <strong>in</strong>itiatives – which address a wide range of migration issues<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g migration and development, <strong>in</strong>tegration of migrants, smuggl<strong>in</strong>g of and<br />
traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons, irregular migration and so on – often reflect <strong>the</strong> different<br />
migration agendas of governments even though <strong>the</strong> challenges <strong>the</strong>y face may be<br />
similar <strong>in</strong> nature.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> this context and consider<strong>in</strong>g its proactive role <strong>in</strong> various RCPs, <strong>the</strong><br />
International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong> (IOM) signed a Memorandum of Understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with <strong>the</strong> Organization of <strong>the</strong> Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC)<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2006. One of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> aims of this agreement is to enhance cooperation <strong>in</strong><br />
address<strong>in</strong>g irregular migration and combat<strong>in</strong>g traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Black<br />
Sea region, an area that experiences significant migration challenges as a transit,<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>, and dest<strong>in</strong>ation hub for migrants. Consequently, <strong>in</strong> 2007, IOM launched<br />
<strong>the</strong> “Black Sea Consultative Process on <strong>Migration</strong> Management”, a jo<strong>in</strong>t project<br />
with <strong>the</strong> BSEC’s Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Combat<strong>in</strong>g Crime (WGCC) (Particularly its<br />
Organized Forms).<br />
The project aimed to contribute to effective migration management <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Black Sea region as well as combat<strong>in</strong>g irregular migration through streng<strong>the</strong>ned<br />
regional cooperation and capacity build<strong>in</strong>g of relevant authorities <strong>in</strong> all twelve<br />
member states of <strong>the</strong> BSEC. 2 Specifically, IOM has drafted national <strong>Migration</strong><br />
<strong>Profile</strong>s for those countries where such documents did not exist, and has reviewed<br />
and updated exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Profile</strong>s. 3<br />
Why country <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s? A concept and tool promoted by <strong>the</strong> European<br />
Commission, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s are an evidence-based approach to assess <strong>the</strong><br />
migration situation <strong>in</strong> a country. IOM has adopted and fur<strong>the</strong>r developed this<br />
1 Regional Consultative Processes br<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r representatives of states, <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations and, <strong>in</strong><br />
some cases, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for <strong>in</strong>formal and non-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g dialogue and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
exchange on migration-related issues of common <strong>in</strong>terest and concern.<br />
2 Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece, Moldova, Romania, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Serbia,<br />
Turkey and Ukra<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
3 With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework of <strong>the</strong> Slovenian presidency of <strong>the</strong> European Union, IOM prepared <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Western Balkan Countries <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g BSEC members Albania, Serbia and Turkey.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
concept and has s<strong>in</strong>ce implemented it <strong>in</strong> various regions such as <strong>the</strong> Balkans,<br />
Western and Central Africa, and Lat<strong>in</strong> America. The <strong>in</strong>tention is to contribute<br />
towards greater coherence of national migration policies and enhanced regional<br />
cooperation. This requires appropriate compilation of <strong>in</strong>ternationally comparable<br />
data among o<strong>the</strong>r features such as national coord<strong>in</strong>ation and cooperation among<br />
<strong>in</strong>volved authorities and pursuit of an active <strong>in</strong>ternational cooperation at bilateral,<br />
regional and global levels. The <strong>Profile</strong>s, us<strong>in</strong>g a common template, allow for<br />
comparability despite data limitations 4 and different national contexts.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, to ensure <strong>the</strong> legitimacy and recognized value of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s,<br />
<strong>the</strong> BSEC member states and <strong>the</strong> BSEC WGCC provided substantial feedback<br />
on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s. Drafted <strong>in</strong> IOM’s office <strong>in</strong> Budapest and coord<strong>in</strong>ated with IOM’s<br />
Research Unit at IOM Headquarters <strong>in</strong> Geneva and <strong>the</strong> respective IOM office <strong>in</strong><br />
each of <strong>the</strong> BSEC countries – to ensure high-quality – <strong>the</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s also offer a<br />
set of policy recommendations for effective migration management <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region.<br />
These were thoroughly discussed dur<strong>in</strong>g an expert meet<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> BSEC’s WGCC<br />
<strong>in</strong> Istanbul on 10 September <strong>2008</strong>. Subsequently, <strong>the</strong> recommendations were approved<br />
by <strong>the</strong> BSEC’s Council of M<strong>in</strong>isters of Foreign Affairs that convened <strong>in</strong><br />
Tirana on 23 October <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
This set of <strong>Profile</strong>s is <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>in</strong>tensive cooperation between many<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals with<strong>in</strong> IOM and among IOM and o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders. The <strong>in</strong>put of <strong>the</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g people is highly appreciated: Christ<strong>in</strong>e Aghazarm and Verónica Escudero,<br />
Research Unit <strong>in</strong> IOM Geneva, as authors of <strong>the</strong> regional overview and for<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir extensive review of all <strong>the</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s, Frank Laczko, head of <strong>the</strong> Research and<br />
Publications <strong>in</strong> IOM Geneva, for his supervision throughout <strong>the</strong> project, IOM<br />
staff <strong>in</strong> IOM offices <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> BSEC countries, and <strong>the</strong> dedicated f<strong>in</strong>ance and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />
colleagues <strong>in</strong> IOM Budapest. Special thanks to IOM’s 1035 Facility<br />
who funded this project. Moreover, particular gratitude is warmly given to <strong>the</strong><br />
Organization of <strong>the</strong> Black Sea Economic Organization as <strong>the</strong> associate organization<br />
<strong>in</strong> this project, especially <strong>the</strong> Permanent International Secretariat who k<strong>in</strong>dly<br />
arranged <strong>the</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs related to <strong>the</strong> implementation of <strong>the</strong> project. Not least,<br />
IOM gratefully acknowledges <strong>the</strong> support of <strong>the</strong> BSEC Member States <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
production of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>s, above all for <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>put to <strong>the</strong>ir specific country profile<br />
and <strong>the</strong> endorsement of <strong>the</strong> regional migration policy recommendations.<br />
Argent<strong>in</strong>a Szabados, Regional Representative<br />
Al<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>dea, Project Coord<strong>in</strong>ator<br />
International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong><br />
Mission with Regional Functions for Central and South-Eastern Europe<br />
4 For a discussion on <strong>the</strong> quality and limitations migration data, see <strong>the</strong> regional overview.<br />
10 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
ussia – basic facts<br />
Population (July 2007) 141,377,752 (estimate)<br />
Total Area 16,995,800 sq. km<br />
GDP per Capita PPP USD 12,200<br />
Human Development Index (HDI) Rank 67 of 177<br />
Net <strong>Migration</strong> Rate 0.28 migrant(s)/1,000 population<br />
Sources: CIA World Factbook; United Nations Development Programme Human Development<br />
Report, 2006.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
11
exeCutive suMMarY: general<br />
assessMent of <strong>Migration</strong> issues<br />
From <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 20 th century until <strong>the</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>the</strong> Soviet<br />
Union, migration flows concern<strong>in</strong>g Russia took place ma<strong>in</strong>ly with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> borders of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Exceptions to this were dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> two World Wars and <strong>the</strong> civil war (1917-1922), which accompanied movements<br />
of refugees and displaced persons, repatriations, and mass deportations.<br />
After <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> 1990s was characterized<br />
by <strong>the</strong> so-called forced migration or forced resettlement towards <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong>, basically from countries of <strong>the</strong> Commonwealth of Independent States<br />
(CIS) and Baltic States, <strong>the</strong> sharp reduction of emigration streams to <strong>the</strong>se states,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> boom<strong>in</strong>g emigration to “far abroad” or outside of <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Union.<br />
This far-abroad emigration was mostly ethnic <strong>in</strong> character: Germans, Jews<br />
and Greeks, and <strong>Russian</strong>s liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> large cities were mostly <strong>the</strong> ones to leave.<br />
There were many scientists and representatives of art among emigrants <strong>in</strong> that<br />
period. 1<br />
However, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> 1990s, <strong>the</strong>re was a reduction <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> streams of refugees and forced immigrants from <strong>the</strong> countries of <strong>the</strong> former<br />
Soviet Union. Immigration lost its forced nature, and more and more migrants<br />
started to move <strong>in</strong>to Russia for social and economic reasons. The diversity of<br />
emigration (by countries, by regions of orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Russia, and by ethnic composition)<br />
decreased as well.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> 2000s, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g migration <strong>in</strong> Russia have been its<br />
more favorable economic development compared to most of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r CIS countries<br />
and <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g problems of demographic development <strong>in</strong> Russia.<br />
Nowadays, Russia is fac<strong>in</strong>g similar migration challenges to most o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
European countries. These challenges <strong>in</strong>clude: how best to use immigration (today<br />
and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future) to compensate for <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population, labour force<br />
shortages, and emigration of work<strong>in</strong>g age citizens; how to fight aga<strong>in</strong>st irregular<br />
forms of migration and traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs; and how to overcome antiimmigrant<br />
sentiment, xenophobia, and ethnic conflict, problems closely l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />
with migratory movements.<br />
1 Vladimir , Mukomel and Nikita Mkrtchyan (<strong>2008</strong>) Expert memorandum drafted for this <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>; Commissioned<br />
by IOM Office <strong>in</strong> Moscow; January <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
The vast territory of <strong>the</strong> country, its numerous adm<strong>in</strong>istrative sub-regions,<br />
and ethnically diverse population also create special problems, such as keep<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sparsely populated areas <strong>in</strong>habited. The long land borders of nearly 20,000 km<br />
pose special challenges for controll<strong>in</strong>g migration flows.<br />
Also, <strong>the</strong> common past of <strong>the</strong> CIS as former Soviet Republics, where <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> language is generally spoken and a visa-free regime prevails, gives a<br />
special characteristic to <strong>the</strong> nature of migration to and from Russia.<br />
Ivakhniouk (2006) 2 lists <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g features that characterize much of<br />
<strong>the</strong> “migration system” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS area:<br />
• historical ties<br />
• geographical proximity, ‘transparent’ borders (visa-free movements)<br />
• common transport <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
• psychological eas<strong>in</strong>ess to move (language, former common territory)<br />
• demographic complementarity<br />
• mutual <strong>in</strong>terest towards common labour market<br />
• large-scale irregular migration<br />
• regional cooperation aimed at coord<strong>in</strong>ated migration management.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s, about<br />
25 million ethnic <strong>Russian</strong>s found <strong>the</strong>mselves liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r CIS countries and<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three Baltic Republics. 3<br />
Meanwhile, between 1989 and 2002, Russia received 10.9 million migrants<br />
from <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Republics (<strong>the</strong> current CIS and <strong>the</strong> Baltic States). 4 A large<br />
part of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>Russian</strong>s had to move under some degree of pressure, with many<br />
of <strong>the</strong>m even flee<strong>in</strong>g conflicts <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those <strong>in</strong> South Ossetia, Abkhasia, and<br />
Tajikistan. In Russia, <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong>refore called “refugees”’ or “forced migrants”<br />
(also “forced resettlers”).<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same period, 4.1 million persons moved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> opposite direction,<br />
5 that is, from Russia to <strong>the</strong> newly <strong>in</strong>dependent former Soviet Republics.<br />
Thus, Russia’s net immigration figure with <strong>the</strong> Former Soviet Union (FSU) Re-<br />
2 Ivakhnyuk, Ir<strong>in</strong>a (2006) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Region: Common Problems and Mutual Benefits”, An expert<br />
paper presented at <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on International <strong>Migration</strong> and Development, United Nations<br />
Population Division, 28-30 June 2006, Tur<strong>in</strong>, Italy.<br />
3 Tishkov, Valery, Zhanna Zay<strong>in</strong>chkovskaya and Gal<strong>in</strong>a Vitkovskaya (2005) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Countries of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Former Soviet Union”, A paper prepared for <strong>the</strong> Policy Analysis and Research Programme of <strong>the</strong> Global<br />
Commission on International <strong>Migration</strong>.<br />
4 Ibid.<br />
5 Ibid.<br />
1 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
publics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same period was 6.8 million. These people resettled <strong>in</strong> numerous<br />
communities all around <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>ir resettlement was for<br />
many years <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> priority of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> migration authorities, most notably<br />
<strong>the</strong> Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service (FMS) created <strong>in</strong> June 1992. 6<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Tishkov et al. (2005), s<strong>in</strong>ce mid-1990s, such forced migration<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS region has gradually decreased, while at <strong>the</strong> same time economically<br />
motivated migration has grown. Ivakhniouk (2006) confirms 7 that dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last<br />
15 years, <strong>the</strong> nature of migration flows <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS region shifted “from primarily<br />
forced migrations to voluntary economic migrations”. The strongly vary<strong>in</strong>g economic,<br />
social and political development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS countries has generated large,<br />
mostly economic migration flows primarily towards Russia (see more on this <strong>in</strong><br />
Section 6.4 on labour migration).<br />
The <strong>in</strong>creased mobility of various ethnic groups of <strong>the</strong> Central Asian countries<br />
of <strong>the</strong> CIS, and <strong>the</strong>ir employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, has led to an<br />
expansion of migrant ethnic communities and <strong>in</strong>tensive formation of “new diasporas”<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g ethnic confrontations of a socio-cultural variety.<br />
Partly l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong> recent large labour migration, Russia and <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
CIS region have become transit and residence areas for large numbers of irregular<br />
migrants, thus new and more effective methods are be<strong>in</strong>g sought to deal with <strong>the</strong><br />
situation.<br />
The need for active migration policy has been acknowledged at <strong>the</strong> highest<br />
level. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>Russian</strong> President, Vladimir Put<strong>in</strong>, announced <strong>in</strong><br />
March 2005 <strong>the</strong> need for adjust<strong>in</strong>g Russia’s migration policy as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s population. 8 The President was quoted as say<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that <strong>the</strong> state’s migration policy needs to be adjusted and be closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to<br />
important tasks of socio-economic development, with <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> task at present to<br />
create additional conditions for attract<strong>in</strong>g skilled labour. The President also stated<br />
that those migrants fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> shadow economy largely have done so due to<br />
<strong>the</strong> cumbersome procedures <strong>in</strong> place for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g legal employment <strong>in</strong> Russia.<br />
In recent years, <strong>Russian</strong> authorities have launched numerous proactive migration<br />
policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir attempts to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> recruitment of highly<br />
skilled professionals from abroad, as well as to encourage <strong>Russian</strong> expatriates<br />
6 Voron<strong>in</strong>a (2006).<br />
7 Ivakhnyuk, Ir<strong>in</strong>a (2006) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Region: Common Problems and Mutual Benefits”, An expert<br />
paper presented at <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on International <strong>Migration</strong> and Development, United Nations<br />
Population Division, 28-30 June 2006, Tur<strong>in</strong>, Italy.<br />
8 Interfax New Report, 17 March 2005.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
to return and to dim<strong>in</strong>ish irregular migration, through facilitation of immigration<br />
procedures and imposition of sanctions to employers hir<strong>in</strong>g undocumented<br />
labour, improved migration databases and new passports with electronic and biometric<br />
features, and <strong>in</strong>creased cooperation among CIS countries <strong>in</strong> migration issues.<br />
New migration legislation has also been <strong>in</strong> force s<strong>in</strong>ce January 2007.<br />
16 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
1. iMMigrants<br />
1.1. Number of immigrants<br />
Stock ............................................................................. 12,080,000 (2006) 9<br />
As percentage of total population .........................................8.4% (2006 ) 10<br />
Gender ratio .............................................................57.8% female (2005) 11<br />
The United Nations Population Division (UNPD) ranks Russia second to<br />
<strong>the</strong> United States <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> list of countries with <strong>the</strong> largest numbers of immigrants:<br />
United States – 38.9 million immigrants<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> – 12.1 million<br />
Germany – 10.1 million<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e – 6.8 million<br />
Many of <strong>the</strong> foreign-born resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> current <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> were<br />
born <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r states of <strong>the</strong> former USSR (Table 1). Therefore, for a large share<br />
of <strong>the</strong> foreign-born <strong>in</strong> Russia, <strong>the</strong> figure reflects <strong>the</strong> changed geopolitical status<br />
of <strong>the</strong>ir country of birth, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>ternational migration to Russia. The total<br />
number of citizens from o<strong>the</strong>r states and of stateless persons is much lower<br />
(Table 2).<br />
9 United Nations Secretariat, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (October 2006)<br />
International <strong>Migration</strong>. The number of <strong>in</strong>ternational migrants generally represents <strong>the</strong> number of persons born<br />
<strong>in</strong> a country o<strong>the</strong>r than that <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y live.<br />
10 Ibid.<br />
11 World Bank, Development Prospects Group (2005) <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
Table 1. Population born outside of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
(<strong>in</strong> thousands; as of 9 October 2002) 12<br />
<strong>Country</strong> no.<br />
Azerbaijan 846<br />
Armenia 481<br />
Byelorussia 936<br />
Georgia 629<br />
Kazakhstan 2,585<br />
Kirghizia 464<br />
Latvia 103<br />
Lithuania 86<br />
Moldova 278<br />
Tadzhikistan 383<br />
Turkmenia 175<br />
Uzbekistan 918<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 3,560<br />
Estonia 67<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries 466<br />
Total 11,977<br />
Source: The 2002 Census <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> as presented by Rosstat <strong>in</strong> 2005<br />
12 Rosstat of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Moscow (2005) Results of <strong>the</strong> 2002 Census <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Vol.<br />
14, Total F<strong>in</strong>al Figures of <strong>the</strong> 2002 Census <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
18 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 2. Foreign citizens and stateless persons (as of 9 October 2002) 13<br />
no. (<strong>in</strong> thousands)<br />
as percentage of <strong>the</strong><br />
russian population<br />
Total no. of foreign citizens 1,025.4 0.7<br />
Their country of citizenship:<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r than CIS 119.1 0.1<br />
Azerbaijan 154.9 0.1<br />
Armenia 136.8 0.1<br />
Byelorussia 40.3 0.0<br />
Georgia 52.9 0.0<br />
Kazakhstan 69.5 0.1<br />
Kyrgyzstan 28.8 0.0<br />
Moldavia 51.0 0.0<br />
Tadzhikistan 64.2 0.0<br />
Turkmenia 6.4 0.0<br />
Uzbekistan 70.9 0.1<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 230.6 0.2<br />
Stateless people 429.9 0.3<br />
Source: The 2002 Census <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> as presented by Rosstat <strong>in</strong> 2005<br />
1.2. Status of immigrants<br />
Refugees/asylum seekers<br />
Situation at <strong>the</strong> end of 2006:<br />
Refugees ...........................................................................................1,425 14<br />
Asylum seekers (pend<strong>in</strong>g cases)............................................................291<br />
Table 3. Asylum applications <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007 (June)<br />
315 292 1,170 291<br />
Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), 2007.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Law on <strong>the</strong> Legal Status of Foreign Citizens <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> of July 25, 2002, No. 115-FZ, foreign citizens may temporarily<br />
13 Ibid.<br />
14 UNHCR (2007) Statistical Yearbook 2006, Trends <strong>in</strong> Displacement, Protection and Solutions, Geneva December<br />
2007. The first figure refers to “Persons recognized as refugees under <strong>the</strong> 1951 UN Convention/1967<br />
Protocol, <strong>the</strong> 1969 OAU Convention, <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> UNHCR Statute, persons granted a complementary<br />
form of protection and those granted temporary protection”.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
stay, 15 temporarily reside, and permanently reside <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. The<br />
number of temporary residence permissions (for a period of three years) is allocated<br />
by quota. 16 Residence permits are issued for a five-year period with possible<br />
extension. Prior to <strong>the</strong> receipt of a residence permit, a foreign citizen is obliged<br />
to live <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> for at least one year on <strong>the</strong> basis of a temporary<br />
residence permit.<br />
Forced migrants may seek, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Law of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
temporary refuge, refugee status, or displaced person status. 17<br />
Simplified procedure sfor <strong>the</strong> acquisition of nationality is <strong>in</strong> force between<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Republics of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan.<br />
18 In addition, separate categories of immigrants may also obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
citizenship through a simplified procedure. 19<br />
Permanent residence status<br />
The number of people issued residence permits <strong>in</strong> 2006 totaled 16,699. As<br />
of October 2007 this figure was 12,217.<br />
15 The period of a foreigner’s temporary stay <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> is def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> validity period of his/her<br />
visa. Temporary stay that does not require a visa but <strong>the</strong> duration of stay should not be longer than 90 days.<br />
16 Quotas are distributed among subjects (regions) of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. Quotas are not extended to <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
categories of foreign citizens. A quota of 140,790 for part-time residence has been approved for <strong>the</strong><br />
year <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
17 The status of forced migrants can be given to <strong>in</strong>ternal migrants as well as to <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who are forced<br />
to leave <strong>the</strong> place of <strong>the</strong>ir residence outside of Russia.<br />
18 Federal Law of 2 January 2000, No. 18-FL.<br />
19 These <strong>in</strong>clude foreign citizens and stateless persons who have at least one parent with <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
citizenship and liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>; who had <strong>the</strong> citizenship of <strong>the</strong> USSR; who had<br />
resided or is resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> former republics of <strong>the</strong> USSR and did not receive <strong>the</strong> citizenship of <strong>the</strong>se republics<br />
and thus rema<strong>in</strong> stateless persons; who are citizens of <strong>the</strong> former republics of <strong>the</strong> USSR; who had received<br />
professional or higher education <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> after 1 July 2002;<br />
who were born <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and had citizenship of <strong>the</strong><br />
former USSR; who are married to <strong>the</strong> citizen of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> for at least three years; and who are<br />
not capable of work<strong>in</strong>g and have a legally capable son or daughter over <strong>the</strong> age of 18 who are citizens of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. (The Federal Law on Amendments to <strong>the</strong> Federal Law on <strong>the</strong> Citizenship of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong>, 11 November 2003, No. 151-FL).<br />
20 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 4. Residence permits issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007<br />
Temporary residence status<br />
Year no.<br />
2004 43,828<br />
2005 18,862<br />
2006 16,699<br />
2007 (as of October) 12,217<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service.<br />
The number of people issued temporary residence permits <strong>in</strong> 2006 totaled<br />
150,716. As of October 2007, <strong>the</strong> figure reached 167,347.<br />
Table 5. Temporary residence permits issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007<br />
Refugees/asylum seekers<br />
Year no.<br />
2004 120,756<br />
2005 170,267<br />
2006 150,716<br />
2007 (as of October) 167,347<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service.<br />
Refugees – 445 persons (as of November 2007)<br />
Applied for refugee status – 1,872 persons (January-October 2007)<br />
Recognized as refugees – 113 (January-October 2007)<br />
Applied for temporary asylum – 1,042 persons (January-October 2007)<br />
Received temporary asylum – 359 persons (January-October 2007)<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
21
Table 6. Persons who received <strong>the</strong> forced resettlement or refugee status, 1992-2006 20<br />
total of forced<br />
migrants<br />
1992 160,341<br />
1993 323,244<br />
refugees<br />
22 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
forced<br />
re-settlers<br />
1994 254,518 85,811 168,707<br />
1995 271,950 46,409 225,541<br />
1996 172,672 19,824 152,848<br />
1997 131,130 5,751 125,379<br />
1998 118,227 510 117,717<br />
1999 79,126 381 78,745<br />
2000 59,196 277 58,919<br />
2001 41,958 134 41,824<br />
2002 20,504 51 20,453<br />
2003 4,726 58 4,668<br />
2004 4,291 42 4,249<br />
2005 8,939 25 8,914<br />
2006 7,177 42 7,135<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service.<br />
20 FMS press release. Moscow, 1993-1999; Information and Statistics Collected Book No. 1, <strong>the</strong> FMS. Moscow,<br />
2002; Population and migration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. Moscow, <strong>the</strong> Goskomstat of Russia, 1994-2006.
Table 7. Refugees and forced resettlers 1 (persons)<br />
of which<br />
refugees (s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
20 March 1993)<br />
resettlers (s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
1 July 1992)<br />
total s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> start<br />
of registra-tion as of<br />
1 January 20072 1995 2000 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total 271,977 59,196 4,726 4,291 8,914 7,177 118,116 117,711 405<br />
Out of <strong>the</strong>m, former<br />
permanent residents of<br />
Azerbaijan 12,963 619 82 41 20 18 2,486 2,468 18<br />
Armenia 1,653 58 - 2 5 3 215 215 -<br />
Belarus 188 - - - - - 7 7 -<br />
Georgia 10,778 4,297 2,537 1,889 60 16 17,302 17,202 100<br />
Kazakhstan 88,689 29,026 828 348 224 110 42,971 42,971 -<br />
Kyrgyzstan 17,769 1,115 85 35 14 10 2,879 2,879 -<br />
Latvia 5,427 106 10 6 2 4 472 472 -<br />
Lithuania 719 22 6 1 1 8 82 82 -<br />
Moldova 2,688 509 12 8 5 3 944 943 1<br />
Russia 3 34,871 9,712 414 1,522 8,380 6,876 23,827 23,827 -<br />
Tajikistan 26,982 3,387 256 161 58 27 9,179 9,169 10<br />
Turkmenistan 4,574 279 29 33 17 6 1,133 1,133 -<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
Uzbekistan 59,212 9,352 410 201 94 54 15,582 15,575 7<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 2,262 392 8 2 5 8 519 517 2<br />
Estonia 3,171 127 15 2 6 - 244 244 -<br />
31 195 34 40 23 34 274 7 267 4<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r territories or those<br />
not specified<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service, http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/2007/b07_12/05-10.ht<br />
1 Data from <strong>the</strong> FMS on <strong>the</strong> number of citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and foreign citizens given correspond<strong>in</strong>g official status <strong>in</strong> its territorial bodies.<br />
2 Exclud<strong>in</strong>g those taken off <strong>the</strong> records.<br />
3 Exclud<strong>in</strong>g data on forced re-settlers from <strong>the</strong> Republic of North Ossetia-Alania to <strong>the</strong> Republic of Ingushetia and on those who applied to <strong>the</strong> FMS <strong>in</strong> connection with<br />
events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chechen Republic <strong>in</strong> 1994-1996 and 1999-2001.<br />
4 Includ<strong>in</strong>g 240 persons who were formerly permanent residents of Afghanistan; Rwanda, 7; Israel, 5; Iraq, 5; Vietnam, 3; Serbia, 3; and one person each from Iran,<br />
Pakistan, Uganda, and Ethiopia.<br />
23
Table 8. Forced resettlers (by place of former residence)<br />
1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Total 956,874 880,394 782,215 625,639 491,898 352,796 237,998 168,253 117,711<br />
Belarus 304 253 174 102 65 28 12 7 7<br />
Kazakhstan 234,205 309,155 290,698 259,827 216,891 150,423 99,500 66,020 42,971<br />
Moldoa 14,015 10,614 9,458 6,989 5,483 3,950 2,128 1,404 943<br />
Russia* 194,332 157,425 140,657 112,367 82,289 61,382 46,706 36,375 23,827<br />
Kyrgyzstan 63,606 44,433 35,498 23,907 16,197 10,999 6,092 4,265 2,879<br />
24 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
Tadzhikistan 126,625 96,056 83,040 59,190 44,342 31,563 17,683 12,158 9,169<br />
Turkmenistan 14,564 14,552 12,709 9,588 6,084 3,332 1,917 1,376 1,133<br />
Uzbekistan 135,579 122,369 100,606 80,306 64,907 48,319 33,015 22,257 15,575<br />
Azerbaijan 68,383 45,275 36,698 20,740 14,003 9,161 5,025 3,322 2,468<br />
Armenia 4,621 3,283 2,579 1,616 1,183 601 390 295 215<br />
Georgia 60,884 41,915 40,507 30,361 27,488 25,199 22,278 18,868 17,202<br />
Latvia 18,680 14,861 11,888 7,679 4,392 2,305 1,029 614 472<br />
Lithuania 2,771 2,279 1,881 1,093 754 485 196 109 82<br />
Estonia 11,636 10,519 9,023 6,320 3,753 1,993 659 339 244<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r territories<br />
or those<br />
70 167 186 189 167 103 69 23 7<br />
not specified<br />
Source: Population and <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. Moscow, <strong>the</strong> Goskomstat of Russia, 1997-200.<br />
* <strong>the</strong> Chechen Republic, <strong>the</strong> Republic of Ingushetia, and <strong>the</strong> Republic of North Ossetia-Alania.
Table 9. Distribution of foreign workers (by types of economic activity)<br />
2005 2006<br />
no. % no. %<br />
Total 702,500 100.0 1,014,013 100.0<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g 272,122 38.7 414,084 40.8<br />
Industry and m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g operations 48,725 6.9 72,245 7.1<br />
Agriculture, hunt<strong>in</strong>g 33,438 4.8 72,646 7.2<br />
transport, communication 32,972 4.7 46,990 4.7<br />
Trade and services 213,933 30.5 270,944 26.7<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r types of economic activity 101,310 14.4 137,104 13.5<br />
Source: <strong>the</strong> Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
25
Labour migrants<br />
Table 10. Foreign workers <strong>in</strong> Russia (by ma<strong>in</strong> countries of orig<strong>in</strong>)<br />
2004 2005 2006<br />
no. % no. % no. %<br />
total 460,364 100.00 702,500 100.00 1,014,013 100.00<br />
from Cis<br />
countries (total)<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Azerbaijan<br />
221,862 48.19 343,665 48.92 537,722 53.03<br />
9,844 2.14 17,302 2.46 28,319<br />
Armenia 17,000 3.69 26,169 3.73 39,760 3.92<br />
Georgia 3,789 0.82 4,314 0.61 4,928 0.49<br />
Kyrgyzstan 7,988 1.74 16,228 2.31 32,981 3.25<br />
Moldavia 22,689 4.93 30,613 4.36 50,958 5.03<br />
Tadzhikistan 23,282 5.06 52,602 7.49 98,736 9.74<br />
Turkmenistan 304 0.07 1,499 0.21 704 0.07<br />
Uzbekistan 24,101 5.24 49,043 6.98 105,061 10.36<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 108,615 23.59 141,777 20.18 171,292 16.89<br />
from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
countries (total)<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Afghanistan<br />
238,502 51.81 358,835 51.08 476,291 46.97<br />
2,521 0.55 2,874 0.41 3,840 0.38<br />
Bulgaria 2,268 0.49 1,815 0.26 1,547 0.15<br />
Bosnia and<br />
Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a<br />
1,583 0.34 2,084 0.3 3,667<br />
Vietnam 41,816 9.08 55,554 7.91 69,076 6.81<br />
Germany 1,506 0.33 2,132 0.3 3,094 0.31<br />
India 2,109 0.46 2,729 0.39 3,802 0.37<br />
Italy 758 0.16 909 0.13 1,097 0.11<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 94,064 20.43 160,569 22.86 210,784 20.79<br />
Korea (PDRK) 14,736 3.2 20,057 2.86 27,666 2.73<br />
Korea Republic 466 0.1 968 0.14 1,321 0.13<br />
Latvia 1,158 0.25 1,176 0.17 1,128 0.11<br />
Lithuania 4,429 0.96 3,894 0.55 3,428 0.34<br />
Poland 1,328 0.29 1,432 0.2 2,141 0.21<br />
Serbia and Montenegro<br />
7,504 1.63 9,777 1.39 13,661<br />
Great Brita<strong>in</strong> 1,449 0.31 2,168 0.31 3,193 0.31<br />
United States 1,943 0.42 2,859 0.41 3,724 0.37<br />
Turkey 48,007 10.43 73,695 10.49 101,407 10.00<br />
Philipp<strong>in</strong>es 112 0.02 692 0.1 2,559 0.25<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 1,259 0.27 1,290 0.18 1,264 0.12<br />
France 1,137 0.25 1,614 0.23 2,576 0.25<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
26 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
2.79<br />
0.36<br />
1.35
Table 11. Distribution of foreign workers <strong>in</strong> Russia (by duration of work period)<br />
2005 2006<br />
Up to 3 months 2,260 2,683<br />
3-6 months 34,764 5,590<br />
6-9 months 17,663 14,206<br />
9-12 months 391,477 547,633<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
Table 12. Distribution of foreign workers (by gender)<br />
2004 2005 2006<br />
No. % No. % No. %<br />
Male 379,186 82.4 591,235 84.2 858,506 84.7<br />
Female 81,178 17.6 111,265 15.8 155,507 15.3<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
1.3. Ma<strong>in</strong> countries of orig<strong>in</strong> of immigrants<br />
As <strong>in</strong>dicated earlier, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early to mid-1990s, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> migration flows<br />
to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> consisted of ethnic <strong>Russian</strong>s who moved from o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
former Soviet Republics, often flee<strong>in</strong>g discrim<strong>in</strong>ation or ethnic conflicts, and<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore were known as forced migrants or forced resettlers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 2000, <strong>the</strong> top 10 source countries have been Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Kazakhstan,<br />
Belarus, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and<br />
Moldova. 21<br />
21 World Bank, Development Prospects Group (<strong>2008</strong>) <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
27
10.00%<br />
6.00%<br />
Figure 1. Net migration to Russia, by ethnic group, 1992-2003 (<strong>in</strong> %)<br />
1.50%<br />
15.70%<br />
Source: Valery Tishkov , Zhanna Zay<strong>in</strong>chkovskaya and Gal<strong>in</strong>a Vitkovskaya (2005) <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries of <strong>the</strong> former<br />
Soviet Union, Global Commission on International <strong>Migration</strong>, p.13.<br />
28 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
66.80%
Table 13. Immigration flows to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> by country of departure, 1997-2006<br />
1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
597,651 359,330 193,450 184,612 129,144 119,157 177,230 186,380<br />
Arrivals to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Total<br />
of which from:<br />
CIS countries 571,903 346,774 183,650 175,068 119,661 110,374 168,598 177,657<br />
Azerbaijan 29,878 14,906 5,587 5,635 4,277 2,584 4,600 8,900<br />
Armenia 19,123 15,951 5,814 6,802 5,124 3,057 7,581 12,949<br />
Belarus 17,575 10,274 6,520 6,841 5,309 5,650 6,797 5,619<br />
Georgia 24,517 20,213 9,674 7,128 5,540 4,886 5,497 6,806<br />
Kazakhstan 235,903 124,903 65,226 55,706 29,552 40,150 51,945 38,606<br />
Kyrgyzstan 13,752 15,536 10,740 13,139 6,948 9,511 15,592 15,669<br />
Moldova 13,750 11,652 7,569 7,562 6,391 4,816 6,569 8,649<br />
Tajikistan 23,053 11,043 6,742 5,967 5,346 3,339 4,717 6,523<br />
Turkmenistan 16,501 6,738 4,402 4,531 6,299 3,734 4,104 4,089<br />
Uzbekistan 39,620 40,810 24,873 24,951 21,457 14,948 30,436 37,126<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 138,231 74,748 36,503 36,806 23,418 17,699 30,760 32,721<br />
from non-CIS countries 25,748 12,556 9,800 9,544 9,483 8,783 8,632 8,723<br />
Australia 57 27 25 22 30 42 30 28<br />
Afghanistan 208 288 171 107 82 55 60 86<br />
Bulgaria 750 245 255 238 212 125 118 109<br />
Germany 2,379 1,753 1,627 1,962 2,692 3,117 3,025 2,900<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
29
Greece 183 182 124 150 224 182 200 176<br />
Israel 1,626 1,508 1,373 1,670 1,808 1,486 1,004 1,053<br />
Canada 73 50 74 70 103 87 99 77<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 2,861 1,121 405 410 346 212 432 499<br />
Cuba 110 37 42 22 23 12 17 12<br />
Latvia 5,658 1,785 1,283 990 906 819 726 766<br />
30 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
Lithuania 1,785 945 758 722 535 339 360 371<br />
Poland 247 61 56 53 39 48 55 48<br />
Syria 483 358 260 144 101 56 68 67<br />
United States 668 439 432 455 484 518 396 411<br />
Turkey 176 164 184 144 112 77 86 172<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 140 83 97 136 125 141 129 137<br />
Sweden 32 14 28 19 22 16 23 32<br />
Estonia 3,483 786 535 534 445 446 432 347<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries 4,829 2,710 2,071 1,696 1,194 1,005 1,372 1,432<br />
Sources: Goskomstat (The Central Statistical Office of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>) website; Demographic Yearbook of Russia, Moscow, 2006; Population and<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2006, Moscow, 2006.
A significant part of migrants mov<strong>in</strong>g for permanent (primary) residence<br />
to Russia are <strong>Russian</strong>s (ethnic <strong>Russian</strong>s from o<strong>the</strong>r regions of <strong>the</strong> Former Soviet<br />
Republic who are entitled to <strong>Russian</strong> citizenship) arriv<strong>in</strong>g from o<strong>the</strong>r CIS countries<br />
or who belong to ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. The majority<br />
of <strong>the</strong>m have <strong>Russian</strong> citizenship. The follow<strong>in</strong>g table describes <strong>the</strong> ethnic orig<strong>in</strong><br />
of those immigrants.<br />
Table 14. Immigrants <strong>in</strong> Russia by ethnic orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2002-2006<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total 184,612 129,144 119,157 177,230 186,380<br />
<strong>Russian</strong>s 99,683 66,076 65,831 92,576 82,647<br />
Tatars 7,708 5,782 4,039 6,330 8,171<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r nations and<br />
ethnic groups of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
5,567 3,768 3,382 3,763 4,068<br />
Azerbaijanis 2,921 1,884 1,196 2,489 5,345<br />
Armenians 7,491 5,757 3,547 7,157 11,358<br />
Belarusians 2,819 1,833 1,820 2,544 2,028<br />
Georgians 1,451 968 609 811 1,055<br />
Kazakhs 1,946 1,304 1,452 2,022 1,862<br />
Kirghiz 428 276 403 1,332 2,394<br />
Moldovans 1,263 981 807 1,385 2,033<br />
Tadjiks 1,481 1,004 639 1,305 2,550<br />
Turkmen 218 311 219 231 285<br />
Uzbeks 2,020 1,597 1,130 2,069 3,880<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian 17,699 11,225 8,886 13,623 13,564<br />
Koreans 1,577 1,295 985 2,162 2,870<br />
Germans 2,523 1,913 2,342 2,974 2,438<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r nationalities,<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly outside of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Nationalities have not<br />
been specified<br />
4,077 2,986 2,148 3,565 3,546<br />
23,740 20,184 19,767 30,892 36,286<br />
Source: Population and migration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. Moscow, <strong>the</strong> Rosstat, 2004-2006<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
Table 15. Distribution of immigrants age 14 and older, by educational status<br />
educational status 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total 158,505 111,883 104,550 155,056 163,687<br />
Higher professional<br />
education<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g Doctors of Science<br />
(PhD specialists)<br />
Candidates of Sciences<br />
(PhD specialists)<br />
Incomplete higher education<br />
Secondary vocational<br />
education<br />
General secondary<br />
education<br />
Basic secondary education<br />
Primary education or no<br />
education<br />
Educational status not<br />
specified<br />
28,561 22,185 20,563 29,357 31,118<br />
40 29 35 38 54<br />
206 161 60 79 86<br />
4,254 3,193 3,210 4,973 5,083<br />
47,620 33,250 31,797 48,180 48,554<br />
53,084 37,210 32,713 48,561 50,608<br />
19,283 12,566 12,387 18,689 18,313<br />
5,703 3,479 3,880 5,296 3,958<br />
Source: Population and <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Moscow, <strong>the</strong> Rosstat, 2002-2006.<br />
32 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
6,053
2. eMigrants<br />
2.1. Total number of emigrants<br />
..................................................................................... 11,480,137 (2005) 22<br />
As percentage of total population .............................................8% (2005) 23<br />
Table 16. Emigration from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1997 and 2000-2007 by year and<br />
Departures<br />
from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
Total<br />
of which to:<br />
country of dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
1997 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
232,987 145,720 121,166 106,685 94,018 79,795 69,798 54,061<br />
CIS countries 146,961 82,312 61,570 52,099 46,081 37,017 36,109 35,262<br />
Azerbaijan 4,302 3,187 2,170 1,704 1,771 1,336 1,274 1,366<br />
Armenia 2,578 1,519 1,362 1,114 1,098 654 620 686<br />
Belarus’ 18,928 13,276 11,175 8,829 7,016 5,671 6,034 6,318<br />
Georgia 3,286 1,802 1,339 964 939 740 691 593<br />
Kazakhstan 25,364 17,913 15,186 13,939 14,017 12,504 12,437 11,948<br />
Kyrgyzstan 6,296 1,857 1,333 1,080 959 656 473 605<br />
Moldova 5,715 2,237 1,660 1,385 1,234 907 786 636<br />
Tajikistan 2,474 1,158 993 827 922 549 434 424<br />
Turkmenistan 1,532 676 352 272 251 168 125 112<br />
Uzbekistan 7,370 3,086 1,974 1,400 1,130 717 595 648<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 69,116 35,601 24,026 20,585 16,744 13,115 12,640 11,926<br />
to non- CIS<br />
countries<br />
86,026 63,408 59,596 54,586 47,937 42,778 33,689 18,799<br />
Australia 297 176 184 144 146 167 209 167<br />
Afghanistan 146 25 18 7 17 2 11 11<br />
Bulgaria 668 180 163 133 156 160 124 116<br />
Germany 48,363 40,443 43,682 42,231 36,928 31,876 21,458 8,229<br />
Greece 886 314 204 190 186 157 155 139<br />
Israel 12,873 9,407 4,835 2,764 2,048 1,733 1,745 1,408<br />
Canada 1,333 841 812 725 701 783 628 552<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 1,222 658 156 151 86 154 456 196<br />
22 World Bank Development Prospects Group (2005) <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.<br />
23 Ibid.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Cuba 89 27 15 6 8 8 2 3<br />
Latvia 636 365 311 256 259 226 211 223<br />
Lithuania 1,162 376 262 293 268 282 213 228<br />
Poland 376 135 84 80 72 57 76 84<br />
Syria 256 54 60 66 58 55 54 42<br />
United States 9,087 4,793 4,527 3,134 3,199 2,919 4,040 3,109<br />
Turkey 356 104 96 80 88 60 85 78<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 923 1,142 980 1,110 737 910 737 695<br />
Sweden 151 195 148 162 151 158 110 132<br />
Estonia 702 385 402 321 351 265 225 270<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />
Source: Goskomstat website<br />
6,500 3,788 2,657 2,733 2,478 2,806 3,150 3,117<br />
2.2. Status of emigrants<br />
Refugees ...........................................................................159,381 (2006) 24<br />
Asylum seekers...................................................................20,670 (2006) 25<br />
Table 17. Distribution of refugees and asylum seekers from Russia by country of asylum<br />
<strong>Country</strong> of asylum refugees<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
asylum seekers<br />
(pend<strong>in</strong>g cases)<br />
Total 159,381 20,670<br />
United States 86,914 680<br />
Germany 25,347 506<br />
Austria 8,723 6,977<br />
Poland 6,024 1,814<br />
France 5,945 1,914<br />
Belgium 5,425 730<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries 21,003 8,049<br />
Sources: UNHCR, 2006<br />
24 UNCHR (2006) Statistical Yearbook 2006. Global Trends: Refugees, Asylum-seekers, Returnees, Internally<br />
Displaced and Stateless Persons. Figures represent end-of-2006 statistics. Data are provisional and subject<br />
to change. Status as of 15 June 2007. The figure refers to “Persons recognized as refugees under <strong>the</strong> 1951<br />
UN Convention/1967 Protocol, <strong>the</strong> 1969 OAU Convention, <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> UNHCR Statute, persons<br />
granted a complementary form of protection and those granted temporary protection”.<br />
25 Ibid.
Labour migrants<br />
Suspended licenses - 1, cancelled licenses - 4 (as of January-October<br />
2007)<br />
Table 18. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad (by gender)<br />
2005 2006 2007 (as of June)<br />
Total 60,926 65,747 39,074<br />
Male 50,722 52,185 30,243<br />
Female 10,204 13,562 8,831<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
Table 19. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad (by educational status)<br />
2005 2006 2007 (as of June )<br />
Total 60,926 65,747 39,074<br />
Higher professional education 20,880 20,901 11,916<br />
Secondary vocational education 23,786 23,381 13,379<br />
General secondary education 15,821 20,857 13,705<br />
No general secondary education 439 608 74<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
Table 20. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad<br />
(by duration of employment period)<br />
2006 2007 (as of June)<br />
Total 65,747 39,074<br />
Up to 6 months 43,834 27,180<br />
6 months - 1 year 14,949 9,728<br />
1-2 years 1,651 258<br />
2-3 years 1,843 373<br />
3 years and more 3,470 835<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 21. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad <strong>in</strong> 2006 (by type of<br />
economic activities<br />
economic activity)<br />
6 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
employment<br />
before leav<strong>in</strong>g russia abroad<br />
no. % no. %<br />
Total 65,747 100.00 65,747 100.00<br />
I. Employment by economic activity 46,197 70.26 65,747 100.00<br />
Fish<strong>in</strong>g and fish farm<strong>in</strong>g 3,178 4.83 3,238 4.92<br />
Transport and communications 39,794 60.53 44,758 68.08<br />
- Of which transport 39,771 60.49 44,738 68.05<br />
Education 261 0.40 90 0.14<br />
Health care and social services 186 0.28 132 0.20<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r utility, social, and personal services 1,501 2.28 3,085 4.69<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r economic activities 535 0.81 13,723 20.87<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r economic activities 1,025 1.56 14,186 21.58<br />
II. Unemployed before leav<strong>in</strong>g abroad,<br />
except for never been employed before<br />
5,456 8.30 Х Х<br />
III. Never been employed before 14,094 21.44 Х Х<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
Table 22. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad <strong>in</strong> 2005-2007,<br />
by dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries<br />
2005 2006<br />
2007<br />
(as of June)<br />
Total 60,926 65,747 39,074<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g: CIS countries, total 478 1,697 907<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries, total 60,450 64,050 33,454<br />
Antigua and Barbuda 666 1,053 344<br />
Bahamas 815 1,877 1,119<br />
Belize 1,629 1,831 787<br />
Belgium 961 569 183<br />
Germany 3,272 3,419 1,738<br />
Greece 2,884 2,221 1,102<br />
Italy 544 586 178<br />
Cambodia 1,731 1,849 785<br />
Cyprus 10,492 8,875 4,156<br />
Korea, Republic 542 607 359<br />
Liberia 3,955 3,963 1,803<br />
Luxembourg 600 586 240<br />
Malta 4,424 4,416 2,157
Marshall Islands 897 1,121 632<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 2,428 2,386 1,421<br />
Norway 1,963 2,006 945<br />
Panama 1,090 1,590 552<br />
Sa<strong>in</strong>t V<strong>in</strong>cent and <strong>the</strong> Grenad<strong>in</strong>es<br />
1,854 1,307 645<br />
S<strong>in</strong>gapore 839 972 417<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom of Great Brita<strong>in</strong><br />
and Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland<br />
2,428 1,630 819<br />
United States of America 7,409 13,457 8,614<br />
Japan 2,619 1,603 965<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries 6,408 6,126 3,493<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
Table 23. Occupation of <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad<br />
before departure abroad abroad<br />
2005 2006<br />
2007<br />
(as of June)<br />
2005 2006<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
2007<br />
(as of June)<br />
Total 60,926 65,747 39,074 60,926 65,747 39,074<br />
Supervisors 10,711 11,056 6,836 10,890 11,040 6,818<br />
Specialists 16,768 16,999 9,499 17,715 16,898 9,305<br />
Office workers<br />
(technical personnel)<br />
101 496 248 134 475 243<br />
Workers 24,013 22,897 10,533 32,187 37,334 22,708<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs 9,333 14,299 11,958<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service
Table 24. <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who migrated for employment abroad,<br />
by category of occupation<br />
38 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
2005 2006 2007 (as of June)<br />
Total 60,926 65,747 39,074<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Those work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> foreign-flag vessels<br />
45,283 47,940 25,657<br />
Seasonal workers 198 157 37<br />
Students dur<strong>in</strong>g vacations 8,250 14,214 11,644<br />
Probationers 445 471 133<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs 6,750 2,965 1,603<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service<br />
2.3. Ma<strong>in</strong> countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Development Prospects Group 26 of <strong>the</strong> World Bank, <strong>the</strong><br />
top 10 dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries of migrants from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> are Ukra<strong>in</strong>e,<br />
Kazakhstan, Belarus, Israel, Uzbekistan, United States, Latvia, Germany, Moldova,<br />
and Estonia.<br />
Table 25: Selected countries of residence of <strong>Russian</strong> emigrants<br />
<strong>Country</strong> no. Year source<br />
United States 340,175 2003 US Census 1<br />
Germany 662,000 2006 Eurostat<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 3,613,240 2001 UKR Census 2<br />
Latvia 2,801 2006 Eurostat<br />
1 US Census Bureau (2003) Foreign-Born Population of <strong>the</strong> United States from <strong>the</strong> American Community Survey<br />
2003, http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/foreign/datatbls.html<br />
2 State Statistics Committee of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e (2001), http://www.ukrcensus.gov.ua<br />
26 World Bank, Development Prospects Group (2007) <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.
Table 26. <strong>Russian</strong> emigration by countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation and by year, 2000-2006<br />
Countries 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total 145,720 121,166 106,685 94,018 79,795 69,798 54,061<br />
CIS countries 82,312 61,570 52,099 46,081 37,017 36,109 35,262<br />
Azerbaijan 3,187 2,170 1,704 1,771 1,336 1,274 1,366<br />
Armenia 1,519 1,362 1,114 1,098 654 620 686<br />
Belarus 13,276 11,175 8,829 7,016 5,671 6,034 6,318<br />
Georgia 1,802 1,339 964 939 740 691 593<br />
Kazakhstan 17,913 15,186 13,939 14,017 12,504 12,437 11,948<br />
Kyrgyzstan 1,857 1,333 1,080 959 656 473 605<br />
Moldova 2,237 1,660 1,385 1,234 907 786 636<br />
Tadzhikistan 1,158 993 827 922 549 434 424<br />
Turkmenistan 676 352 272 251 168 125 112<br />
Uzbekistan 3,086 1,974 1,400 1,130 717 595 648<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 35,601 24,026 20,585 16,744 13,115 12,640 11,926<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r countries 63,408 59,596 54,586 47,937 42,778 33,689 18,799<br />
Australia 176 184 144 146 167 209 167<br />
Afghanistan 25 18 7 17 2 11 11<br />
Bulgaria 180 163 133 156 160 124 116<br />
Germany 40,443 43,682 42,231 36,928 31,876 21,458 8,229<br />
Greece 314 204 190 186 157 155 139<br />
Israel 9,407 4,835 2,764 2,048 1,733 1,745 1,408<br />
Canada 841 812 725 701 783 628 552<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 658 156 151 86 154 456 196<br />
Latvia 365 311 256 259 226 211 223<br />
Lithuania 376 262 293 268 282 213 228<br />
Poland 135 84 80 72 57 76 84<br />
United States 4,793 4,527 3,134 3,199 2,919 4,040 3,109<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 1,142 980 1,110 737 910 737 695<br />
Sweden 195 148 162 151 158 110 132<br />
Estonia 385 402 321 351 265 225 270<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs 3,973 2,828 2,885 2,632 2,929 3,291 3,240<br />
Sources: Demographic Yearbook of Russia, Moscow, 2006; Population and <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2006,<br />
Moscow.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 27. Educational status of emigrants 14 years and older, 2002-2006<br />
educational status 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total 89,589 79,380 66,759 59,228 46,398<br />
Higher professional education 16,479 14,463 12,675 12,215 10,798<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g doctors of sciences 22 14 23 19 23<br />
Candidates of sciences 83 59 53 52 42<br />
Incomplete higher education 2,666 2,633 2,187 1,889 1,611<br />
Secondary vocational education 24,658 22,009 18,624 16,250 12,598<br />
General secondary education 29,569 26,184 21,434 19,085 13,613<br />
Basic secondary education 12,236 10,690 9,046 7,609 5,488<br />
Primary education or no education 3,981 3,401 2,793 2,180 1,495<br />
Educational status not specified 795<br />
Source: Population and <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Moscow, <strong>the</strong> Rosstat, 2002-2006.<br />
40 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
3. reMittanCes<br />
3.1. Quantitative aspects of remittances<br />
The low proportion of remittances as a percentage of <strong>Russian</strong> GDP (0.3%<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2006) 27 demonstrates that this phenomenon is currently of m<strong>in</strong>or importance<br />
for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> economy. 28 However, <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous growth of remittances <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> past five years <strong>in</strong>dicates that it might <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> proportion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g<br />
decade. This trend can already be observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region of <strong>the</strong> CIS countries. 29<br />
But, as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 30, <strong>the</strong> outward remittance flows from Russia to migrants’<br />
countries of orig<strong>in</strong> has grown much steeper than <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ward flows sent by <strong>Russian</strong>s<br />
abroad.<br />
Table 28. Amount of <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g migrant remittances to Russia 30<br />
Year remittances (million usD)<br />
2003 1,453<br />
2004 2,495<br />
2005 2,918<br />
2006 3,091<br />
2007 (estimate) 4,000<br />
Source: World Bank<br />
27 Ibid.<br />
28 Central Bank of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (2005), Cross Border Remittances, <strong>Russian</strong> Experience, p. 8, http://<br />
www.adb.org/Documents/Events/2005/ADB-IADB-MIF-UNDP/cbr-<strong>the</strong>-russian-experience.pdf<br />
29 Quill<strong>in</strong>, Bryce, Carlo Segni, Sophie Sirta<strong>in</strong>e and Ilias Skamnelos (2007) Remittances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Countries: A<br />
Study of Selected Corridors, Chief Economist’s Regional Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper Series, F<strong>in</strong>ance and Private Sector<br />
Development Department, Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 5.<br />
30 World Bank, Development Prospects Group (2007) <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
Table 29. Remittances to and from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2000-2006 31<br />
remittances (million usD) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Inward remittance flows 1,275 1,403 1,359 1,453 2,668 3,117 3,308<br />
of which<br />
Workers’ remittances<br />
42 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
- 363 232 300 1,098 820 983<br />
Compensation of employees 500 624 704 814 1,206 1,714 1,647<br />
Migrants’ transfer 775 416 423 339 364 583 678<br />
Outward remittance flows 1,101 1,823 2,226 3,233 5,188 6,989 11,438<br />
of which<br />
Workers’ remittances<br />
- 421 788 1,306 2,672 3,051 4,587<br />
Compensation of employees 232 493 507 958 1,464 2,921 6,038<br />
Migrants’ transfers 867 908 931 969 1,052 1,017 813<br />
Sources: World Bank, Development Prospects Group.<br />
Tables 27 and 28 above report <strong>the</strong> officially recorded remittances. The<br />
true size of remittances, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g unrecorded flows through formal and <strong>in</strong>formal<br />
channels, is believed to be larger.<br />
For comparison, Table 29 below shows <strong>the</strong> amount of remittances as registered<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Central Bank of Russia (CBR). The CBR records <strong>the</strong> remittances<br />
of physical persons as performed by selected (most important) money transfer<br />
systems 32 and <strong>the</strong> Postal Service of Russia.<br />
31 World Bank, Development Prospects Group (2007) <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.<br />
32 Includ<strong>in</strong>g 16 <strong>in</strong>ternational payment systems (Western Union, MoneyGram, and o<strong>the</strong>rs).
Dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
country<br />
Table 30. Remittances sent via money transfer systems <strong>in</strong> 2006<br />
remittances<br />
from russia<br />
(million usD)<br />
share (%)<br />
source<br />
country<br />
remittances<br />
to russia<br />
(million usD)<br />
share (%)<br />
Total 6,005 100.0 Total 1,304 100.0<br />
Uzbekistan 1,000 16.7 United States 190 14.6<br />
Tadzhikistan 957 15.9 Kazakhstan 154 11.8<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 927 15.4 Uzbekistan 92 7.0<br />
Armenia 604 10.1 Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 88 6.8<br />
Moldova 525 8.7 Germany 62 4.8<br />
Kyrgyzstan 438 7.3 Italy 50 3.9<br />
Georgia 344 5.7<br />
United<br />
K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />
44 3.3<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a 278 4.6 Kyrgyzstan 44 3.3<br />
Kazakhstan 86 1.4 Spa<strong>in</strong> 42 3.2<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
countries<br />
Source: Central Bank of Russia.<br />
405 6.7<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
countries<br />
481 36.9<br />
Data from CBR shows an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> remittances from Russia <strong>in</strong> 2006 by<br />
64 per cent <strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> outward remittances <strong>in</strong> 2005, and by 120 per<br />
cent from <strong>the</strong> level <strong>in</strong> 2004. Remittances to Russia grew slower at a rate of 25 per<br />
cent from 2005 to 2006 <strong>in</strong> comparison to 68 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />
Compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> figures of <strong>the</strong> World Bank and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> Central Bank<br />
on <strong>the</strong> total amounts of registered remittances <strong>in</strong>to and out of Russia <strong>in</strong> 2006 (<strong>the</strong><br />
only year shown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CBR data), <strong>the</strong> World Bank totals are much larger, perhaps<br />
due to <strong>the</strong> different methodology used.<br />
As to <strong>the</strong> bilateral data on <strong>the</strong> total amounts of remittance flows between<br />
Russia and <strong>in</strong>dividual countries, <strong>the</strong> CBR figures from 2006 are, however, close<br />
to those presented by <strong>the</strong> World Bank. 33 The bilateral remittance figures of <strong>the</strong><br />
World Bank are actually estimates calculated by <strong>the</strong> World Bank and <strong>the</strong> University<br />
of Sussex Development Research Centre, us<strong>in</strong>g migrant stocks and <strong>in</strong>comes<br />
both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation and orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> migrants.<br />
Thus, accord<strong>in</strong>g to such calculations published by <strong>the</strong> Development Prospects<br />
Group of <strong>the</strong> World Bank,34 <strong>the</strong> most important remittance-send<strong>in</strong>g coun-<br />
33 These data are estimated us<strong>in</strong>g assumptions and arguments as expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Ratha and Shaw (2006), South-<br />
South <strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances, Development Prospects Group, World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/<br />
prospects/migrationandremittances.<br />
34 Ibid<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
tries or source countries of migrants’ remittances to Russia <strong>in</strong> 2005 were Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(USD 1,220 million), Kazakhstan (USD 461 million), Israel (USD 212 million),<br />
Belarus (USD 189 million), United States (USD 166 million), Uzbekistan (USD<br />
111 million), and Germany (USD 78 million).<br />
Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> key countries receiv<strong>in</strong>g remittances from Russia <strong>in</strong> 2005<br />
were Armenia (USD 484 million), Azerbaijan (USD 432 million), Moldova (USD<br />
340 million), Tadzhikistan (USD 268 million), Ukra<strong>in</strong>e (USD 309 million), Belarus<br />
(USD 168 million), Georgia (USD 201 million), Kyrgyzstan (USD 138 million),<br />
and Kazakhstan (USD 122 million). 35<br />
The World Bank figures do not <strong>in</strong>clude remittances from Russia to Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
and Uzbekistan. Citizens of <strong>the</strong>se two countries occupy <strong>the</strong> first and third places,<br />
respectively, by <strong>the</strong> number of persons officially engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy of Russia<br />
(see Table 29). In 2006, Uzbekistan was <strong>the</strong> foremost recipient of remittances<br />
from Russia, estimated at more than one billion US dollars, 36 and this is expected<br />
to <strong>in</strong>crease fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> 2007.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period January-September 2007, <strong>the</strong> remittances received by private<br />
persons <strong>in</strong> Russia were USD 1,193 billion based on CBR data. Remittances<br />
sent by physical persons from Russia amounted to USD 6,317 million (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
USD 5,733 million sent to <strong>the</strong> CIS countries). The ma<strong>in</strong> recipient countries were<br />
Uzbekistan (USD 1,100 million), Tadzhikistan (USD 1,080 million), Ukra<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(USD 925 million), Armenia (USD 629 million), Moldova (USD 536 million),<br />
Kyrgyzstan (USD 476 million), and Azerbaijan (USD 445 million).<br />
Individual transfers<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to CBR data, <strong>the</strong> average amount of remittance transfers from<br />
<strong>the</strong> CIS countries show a steady <strong>in</strong>crease dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last couple of years. In 2006,<br />
<strong>the</strong> average transfer rose to USD 511 from USD 457 <strong>in</strong> 2005, and fur<strong>the</strong>r to USD<br />
531 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> third quarter of 2007. The average amount of remittance transfer to<br />
Uzbekistan was USD 593; to Tadzhikistan, USD 541; to Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, USD 445; and<br />
to Moldova, USD 558. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to experts at <strong>the</strong> CBR, <strong>the</strong> reason for <strong>the</strong> higher<br />
average amount of remittance transfer to Uzbekistan and Tadzhikistan compared<br />
with that <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e is because <strong>the</strong> transfers to Uzbekistan and Tadzhikistan are<br />
consolidated transfers, mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> money resources of several people are given to<br />
one authorized representative who transfer <strong>the</strong> remittances as a s<strong>in</strong>gle amount. 37<br />
35 Ibid.<br />
36 Mukomel and Mkrtchyan (<strong>2008</strong>), Ibid.<br />
37 http://www.cbr.ru/search/pr<strong>in</strong>t.asp?File=/statistics/crossborder/cross-border_06.htm<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Several factors have contributed to <strong>the</strong> recent growth of <strong>in</strong>dividual amounts<br />
sent from Russia. First, <strong>the</strong> steady growth of wages <strong>in</strong> Russia (<strong>the</strong> average wage<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased from 5,500 rubles <strong>in</strong> 2003 to 14,406 rubles <strong>in</strong> November 2007) has<br />
made larger transfers possible. Second, <strong>the</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> ruble-dollar exchange<br />
rate (<strong>the</strong> ruble appreciated by 23% <strong>in</strong> 2003-2007) has made <strong>the</strong> dollar<br />
figure larger. Third, it is believed that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased trust and confidence to <strong>the</strong><br />
payment systems and <strong>the</strong> decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount of transfer commissions have<br />
contributed to <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual transfers. In 2006, <strong>the</strong> average commission<br />
charged to <strong>the</strong> client by <strong>the</strong> transfer systems for send<strong>in</strong>g remittances<br />
abroad was 3.7 per cent of <strong>the</strong> transferred amount. Given <strong>the</strong> average transferred<br />
amount of between USD 500 and USD 600, <strong>the</strong> average commission was about<br />
USD 20. As illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2, <strong>the</strong> commission has considerably decreased<br />
over <strong>the</strong> last few years. The greatest decrease was from USD 100 to USD 200.<br />
On average, <strong>the</strong> amount of commission decreased by 7 and 13 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2006,<br />
compared to 2005 and 2004, respectively.<br />
8%<br />
7%<br />
6%<br />
5%<br />
4%<br />
3%<br />
Figure 2. Changes <strong>in</strong> average commission<br />
(for transactions from Russia via payment systems)<br />
2%<br />
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Source: http://www.cbr.ru/search/pr<strong>in</strong>t.asp?File=/statistics/crossborder/cross-border_06.htm named Transboundary operations<br />
of natural persons accord<strong>in</strong>g to RF Central Bank<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
3.2. Qualitative aspects of remittances<br />
Formal transfers are made through money transfer systems and through <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> Postal Service. Money transfer operators (MTOs) represent a grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
market given <strong>the</strong> improvements <strong>in</strong> macroeconomic conditions, <strong>the</strong> proliferation<br />
of advanced technologies, and <strong>the</strong> liberalization of such markets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country<br />
and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region. 38 Never<strong>the</strong>less, many transfers occur through o<strong>the</strong>r channels,<br />
such as f<strong>in</strong>ancial and credit <strong>in</strong>stitutions with l<strong>in</strong>ks to organized crime organizations,<br />
or us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> services of <strong>Russian</strong> nationals <strong>in</strong> order to escape <strong>the</strong> widespread<br />
phenomenon of migrant workers fall<strong>in</strong>g prey to sw<strong>in</strong>dlers. 39<br />
As previously mentioned, <strong>the</strong> amount of remittances be<strong>in</strong>g sent to Russia<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2006 was 0.3 per cent of <strong>the</strong> GDP. 40 In-k<strong>in</strong>d remittances were also sent. These<br />
remittances were of greatest importance to vulnerable groups such as pensioners,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle persons, and one-parent families, among o<strong>the</strong>rs. Generally, remittances<br />
were important sources of <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 1990s, when <strong>the</strong> standard<br />
of liv<strong>in</strong>g sharply decreased immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fall of Communism<br />
and emigration from Russia was about ten times higher than today.<br />
As to <strong>the</strong> specific use of <strong>the</strong> received money transfers, no data were found<br />
as to <strong>the</strong>ir use for <strong>in</strong>vestment vis-à-vis consumption.<br />
Aside from <strong>the</strong> transfer payment system (MTOs, <strong>Russian</strong> Postal Service)<br />
and bank<strong>in</strong>g system, traditional transfer channels (for example, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
money by hand) are used. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to CBR estimates, <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> money<br />
personally brought through <strong>the</strong> border <strong>in</strong> 2005 did not exceed 20 per cent of <strong>the</strong><br />
officially registered transfers.<br />
In Russia , remittances that are directed outside <strong>the</strong> country have received<br />
much more public attention than <strong>the</strong> flows from abroad <strong>in</strong>to Russia. As <strong>the</strong> remittance<br />
flows out of <strong>the</strong> country have grown much larger than <strong>the</strong> money known to<br />
have been sent to Russia, this has made <strong>the</strong> mass media, politicians, and officials<br />
critical of remittances given <strong>the</strong> seem<strong>in</strong>g imbalance between <strong>the</strong> amount received<br />
by and sent from Russia. Experts, however, po<strong>in</strong>t out that remittances only play a<br />
marg<strong>in</strong>al role <strong>in</strong> weaken<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> external balance of payments.<br />
38 Quill<strong>in</strong>, Bryce, Carlo Segni, Sophie Sirta<strong>in</strong>e and Ilias Skamnelos ( 2007) op. cit., p. 5<br />
39 Tishkov, Valery, Zhanna Zay<strong>in</strong>chkovskaya and Gal<strong>in</strong>a Vitkovskaya (2005) <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Countries of <strong>the</strong><br />
Former Soviet Union, op. cit., p.29.<br />
40 World Bank, Development Prospects Group (2006)<br />
6 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
4. Migrant CoMMunities/Diasporas<br />
With approximatively 20-25 million people, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> diaspora is one of<br />
<strong>the</strong> largest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. The <strong>Russian</strong> population and o<strong>the</strong>r ethnic groups based<br />
for <strong>the</strong> most part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of Russia is believed to reach up to 23 million, 20<br />
million of whom to live <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> states of <strong>the</strong> former USSR 41 and about 3 million <strong>in</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r countries, mostly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States and Canada. 42<br />
4.1. Description of relationship between diasporas and country<br />
of orig<strong>in</strong><br />
The relationship between <strong>Russian</strong> authorities and <strong>Russian</strong>s liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad<br />
has evolved through structures of f<strong>in</strong>ancial support and social organizations provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
support. 43 So far, no elaborate network structures have been created, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> only official l<strong>in</strong>ks that exist between <strong>the</strong> diaspora and <strong>the</strong> country of orig<strong>in</strong><br />
appear to be through <strong>the</strong> support of veterans, pensioners, and socially vulnerable<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> groups liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad. Fur<strong>the</strong>r evidence to <strong>the</strong> weakness of this official<br />
relationship can be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important role played by American<br />
and European foundations deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> young <strong>Russian</strong>-speak<strong>in</strong>g elite, 44 as<br />
well as by o<strong>the</strong>r organizations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation that are <strong>in</strong>volved<br />
with <strong>Russian</strong> communities at <strong>the</strong> economic, cultural and scientific levels.<br />
Russia’s severe demographic decl<strong>in</strong>e 45 has led <strong>the</strong> authorities to make efforts<br />
<strong>in</strong> attract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Russian</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> diaspora to return to <strong>the</strong>ir homeland, focus<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir attention on <strong>the</strong> emigrant elite. 46 However, <strong>the</strong> appeals from compatriots to<br />
<strong>the</strong> diaspora to return have met only limited success. 47<br />
The state policy concern<strong>in</strong>g compatriots abroad goes as a separate item <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> federal budget. The expenditure related to implementation of <strong>the</strong> State pro-<br />
41 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> census <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS countries and Baltic republics, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> population is about 18.2 million<br />
and about 2.1 million are o<strong>the</strong>r ethnic <strong>Russian</strong>s.<br />
42 Kabuzan, V. (1996) <strong>Russian</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> World, <strong>Russian</strong> Baltic Information Center “BLITZ”, St. Petersburg, p.21.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to o<strong>the</strong>r estimates, <strong>the</strong>ir number may be 10-12 million people.<br />
43 Yatsenko, Elena (2007) Russia’s Diaspora Capital: Key Actors and Conditions for Accumulation, Eurasia<br />
Heritage Foundation, http://www.eurasianhome.org/xml/t/expert.xml?lang=en&nic=expert&pid=1361<br />
44 Ibid.<br />
45 From 148 million <strong>in</strong> 1992 to 142 million <strong>in</strong> 2006. See World Bank, Development Prospects Group (2007)<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> and Remittances Factbook.<br />
46 Heleniak, Timothy (2002) Russia Beckons, but Diaspora Wary, <strong>Migration</strong> Policy Institute, http://www.migration<strong>in</strong>formation.org/Feature/pr<strong>in</strong>t.cfm?ID=56<br />
47 Ibid.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
gramme for render<strong>in</strong>g assistance with regards to willful compatriot migration to<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> is f<strong>in</strong>anced by ano<strong>the</strong>r item <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget.<br />
Government and o<strong>the</strong>r agencies deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> diaspora<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
The M<strong>in</strong>istry promotes development of relations and contacts with compatriots<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad. It carries out protection of legitimate rights and <strong>in</strong>terests of<br />
compatriots liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> norms of <strong>in</strong>ternational law.<br />
32/34, Smolenskaya-Sennaya ploshad<br />
Moscow, 119200, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7 (495) 244-16-06<br />
http://www.mid.ru<br />
Correspondence and private issues department (MFA reception desk)<br />
Tel.: +7 (495) 244-22-83, fax: +7 (495) 244-34-48<br />
E-mail: m<strong>in</strong>istry@mid.ru<br />
• Governmental Commissions for Affairs of Compatriots Abroad<br />
The Commission is a coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g body of <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g coord<strong>in</strong>ation support for <strong>the</strong> activities of federal executive<br />
authorities and executive authorities of <strong>the</strong> constituent entities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong>. The adm<strong>in</strong>istrative responsibility for <strong>the</strong> commission lies with <strong>the</strong><br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs of Russia.<br />
• Interdepartmental Commission for Implementation of <strong>the</strong> State Programme<br />
on Assist<strong>in</strong>g Willful <strong>Migration</strong> to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> of <strong>the</strong><br />
Compatriots Liv<strong>in</strong>g Abroad<br />
This is a collegial body that controls <strong>the</strong> State programme on assist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
willful migration to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> of compatriots liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad, and also<br />
monitors its implementation.<br />
The Commission’s organizational support is carried out by divisions of <strong>the</strong><br />
Adm<strong>in</strong>istration of <strong>the</strong> President of Russia while system support is provided by<br />
<strong>the</strong> FMS of Russia.<br />
48 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
• <strong>Russian</strong> Center of <strong>the</strong> International Scientific and Cultural Cooperation<br />
under <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs of Russia (Roszarubezhcenter)<br />
The Roszarubezhcenter’s pr<strong>in</strong>cipal activities are:<br />
o provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation support for <strong>the</strong> external and <strong>in</strong>ternal policy of Russia<br />
and assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation of positive perception of <strong>the</strong> image of modern<br />
Russia <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> global community<br />
o assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of comprehensive connections of compatriots<br />
with <strong>the</strong> historical mo<strong>the</strong>rland and <strong>in</strong>teraction with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong>-speak<strong>in</strong>g diasporas<br />
abroad<br />
o streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of positions of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> language <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world<br />
o preserv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> high reputation abroad of <strong>the</strong> national system of higher education<br />
o conduct<strong>in</strong>g cultural and educational activities abroad and assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development<br />
of bus<strong>in</strong>ess and cultural relations of Russia with o<strong>the</strong>r countries<br />
o assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of scientific, technical and bus<strong>in</strong>ess cooperation<br />
of Russia with foreign countries.<br />
14, Vozdvizhenka Street, Moscow<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 290-12-45<br />
http://www.rus<strong>in</strong>tercenter.ru/<br />
http://www.rus<strong>in</strong>tercenter.ru/?lang=ru&menu=70 (for <strong>the</strong> Roszarubezhcenter’s<br />
foreign representations and <strong>Russian</strong> centers of science and culture).<br />
• Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service (FMS) of Russia<br />
The FMS participates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> implementation of <strong>the</strong> state policy of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> concern<strong>in</strong>g compatriots abroad.<br />
16, Zhitnaya Street, Moscow, 117049, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 923-89-45<br />
http://www.fms.gov.ru<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>istry of Regional Development (M<strong>in</strong>region) of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong><br />
The M<strong>in</strong>istry arranges <strong>the</strong> implementation of regional programmes for assist<strong>in</strong>g<br />
willful migration to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> of compatriots liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
10/23, Sadovaya-Samotechnaya Street<br />
Bdg 1, Moscow, 127994, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 980-25-47<br />
Fax: +7 (495) 699-38-41<br />
http://www.m<strong>in</strong>region.ru/<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>istry of Education and Science (M<strong>in</strong>obrnauki ) of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
11, Tverskaya Street, 125993, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 629-70-62<br />
Fax +7(495) 921-70-48<br />
http://www.mon.gov.ru<br />
• Federal Education Agency (Rosobrazovanie)<br />
The Agency organizes selection of youth from among <strong>the</strong> compatriots liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
abroad for study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> higher and vocational educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. It also arranges <strong>Russian</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> countries of residence.<br />
51, Lyus<strong>in</strong>ovskaya Street, 113833, Moscow, Russia<br />
Telephone: +7(495) 237-97-63<br />
http://www.ed.gov.ru<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>istry of Culture and Mass Communications (M<strong>in</strong>kultury) of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
7, Kitaygorodskiy proezd, 193693, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 925-11-95<br />
http://www.mkmk.ru<br />
• Federal Agency for Press and Mass Communications (Rospechat)<br />
5, Strastnoy Boulevard, 127994, Moscow, Russia<br />
• Committee for <strong>the</strong> Affairs of <strong>the</strong> Community of Independent States of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Council of <strong>Federation</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Federal Assembly of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
50 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
26, Bolshaya Dmitrovka Street, 103426, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel. : +7(495) 692-07-18 ; Fax: +7(495) 692-59-36<br />
http://www.council.gov.ru/committee/item540.html<br />
• Committee for <strong>the</strong> Affairs of <strong>the</strong> Community of Independent States and<br />
Relations with Compatriots of <strong>the</strong> State Duma of <strong>the</strong> Federal Assembly<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
1, Okhotniy Ryad Street, 103265, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 692-59-95, 692-22-35, 692-53-18<br />
http://www.duma.gov.ru<br />
• Human Rights Commissioner (Ombudsman) of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
47, Myasnitskaya Street, 107084, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 207-34-12 факс: +7(495) 207-39-77;<br />
+7(495) 207-53-37 (press service); +7(495) 207-42-90 (<strong>in</strong>ternational department)<br />
E-mail: press-sl@ropnet.ru<br />
http://wwwombudsman.gov.ru,<br />
• Moscow Government<br />
13, Tverskaya Street, 125032, Moscow, Russia<br />
36/9, Noviy Arbat Street, 121205, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: + 7 (495) 777-77-77<br />
http://www.mos.ru<br />
Department of <strong>the</strong> International Relations<br />
Tel. : +7(495) 725-04-82<br />
http://www.moskvaimir.mos.ru/dms/activity/support<br />
Department of <strong>the</strong> Relations with <strong>the</strong> CIS countries and Baltic Republics,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Compatriots Abroad Division<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 957-01-50<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
• St. Petersburg Government<br />
The Sa<strong>in</strong>t Petersburg Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, Smolniy, 191060<br />
Fax: +7 (812) 576-78-27<br />
E-mail : gov@gov.spb.ru<br />
http://www.gov.spb.ru<br />
External Relations and Tourism Committee: http://www.kvs.spb.ru/ru<br />
Relations with national associations of Sa<strong>in</strong>t Petersburg<br />
and compatriots abroad:<br />
Tel.: +7(812) 576-71-59, 70-85<br />
Fax: +7(812) 576-45-84<br />
• “The <strong>Russian</strong> World” Foundation<br />
The Foundation (http://www.russkiymir.ru/) was formed accord<strong>in</strong>g to Decree<br />
No. 796 (21 June 2007) of <strong>the</strong> President of Russia. Its founders on behalf of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> are <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs and <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />
of Education and Science.<br />
• “The Rod<strong>in</strong>a” (Mo<strong>the</strong>rland) Association (http://www.association-rod<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
ru/site/)<br />
• “The Russia and Compatriots” Foundation (http://www.russiane.org)<br />
Information support and communication<br />
• “The <strong>Russian</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e” Information Agency (http://www.rusk.ru)<br />
• Network Center for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong>s Abroad (http://www.russkie.org/) of <strong>the</strong><br />
Institute for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong>s Abroad<br />
• Compatriot Information Portal (http://compatriot.su/) of <strong>the</strong> Institute of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Eurasian Research Development Foundation<br />
• Compatriot Portal (http://www.russed<strong>in</strong>a.ru)<br />
52 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
4.2. Migrant communities/diasporas’ organizations by country<br />
of.dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
(Please note <strong>the</strong> lists below do not purport to be exhaustive or representative.<br />
IOM does not take responsibility for <strong>the</strong> accuracy of <strong>the</strong> contact details.)<br />
Worldwide<br />
• USSR <strong>Russian</strong> Net Community (http://www.saumita.com/ussr/c<strong>in</strong>dex.html)<br />
• American RU (http://www.americaru.com/)<br />
Diaspora organizations abroad<br />
• International Council of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> Compatriots (http://www.msrs.ru)<br />
• For a list of organizations of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> compatriot abroad, 48 see.:<br />
o <strong>the</strong> website of <strong>the</strong> Moscow House of <strong>the</strong> Compatriot (http://www.mosds.<br />
ru/Soot/soot_org1.shtml)<br />
o <strong>the</strong> Materik Portal (http://www.materik.ru/<strong>in</strong>dex.php?section=diaspora)<br />
Migrant community/diaspora organizations <strong>in</strong> Russia<br />
For a list of migrant organizations, see <strong>the</strong> website of <strong>the</strong> Forum of Resettled<br />
Organizations (http://db.ngo.ru/fair.nsf/MigrantByTitle?OpenView&count<br />
=1000).<br />
Migrant communities, as a rule, are organized accord<strong>in</strong>g to ethnicity. Many<br />
migrants take part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> work of national cultural autonomies (NCA) and national<br />
cultural centers. A total of 17 federal NCAs and over 350 regional NCAs have<br />
been created accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Federal Law on <strong>the</strong> National Cultural Autonomy<br />
No. 74-FL of 17 June 1996, and many national cultural centers also function<br />
today.<br />
For a list of NCAs, see <strong>the</strong> website of <strong>the</strong> Center of Interethnic Cooperation.(http://www.<strong>in</strong>terethnic.org/CNO.htm).<br />
48 The compatriots abroad, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> law, are understood as follows: <strong>the</strong> citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> permanently liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad; <strong>the</strong> persons hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> citizenship of <strong>the</strong> USSR and liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent states; natives (emigrants) of Russia and <strong>the</strong> USSR; and descendants of <strong>the</strong> persons belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to <strong>the</strong> abovementioned groups, except for <strong>the</strong> descendants of persons of <strong>the</strong> eponymous ethnic groups of <strong>the</strong><br />
foreign states (The Federal Law About <strong>the</strong> State Policy of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> Concern<strong>in</strong>g Compatriots<br />
Abroad, 24 May 1999, No. 99-FZ, Article 1, Part 2).<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
5. irregular <strong>Migration</strong><br />
5.1. Numbers/estimates of irregular movements<br />
Irregular immigration <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Russia is primarily a dest<strong>in</strong>ation country for irregular migrants; secondly,<br />
a transit state for those on <strong>the</strong>ir way to Western and Central Europe; and thirdly,<br />
a country of exit for <strong>Russian</strong> citizens who <strong>in</strong>tend to live or work irregularly <strong>in</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />
The major route of irregular migrants arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Russia is through <strong>the</strong><br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn borders—<strong>the</strong> states of Central Asia and Trans-Caucasus, of which Russia<br />
has agreements for cross<strong>in</strong>g t on visa-free terms.<br />
The CIS countries are estimated to be <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> sources of irregular migration<br />
to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. As for o<strong>the</strong>r source areas abroad, Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia<br />
is said to be prom<strong>in</strong>ent. Along <strong>the</strong> nearly 20,000 km land border of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong>, <strong>the</strong> borders with Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan are said to be<br />
among <strong>the</strong> most preferred sections for illegal cross<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to Russia. As transit<br />
migrants from <strong>the</strong> CIS and from elsewhere try to make <strong>the</strong>ir way through Russia<br />
to Central and Western Europe, <strong>the</strong> illegal cross<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Western borders are<br />
often much more difficult. This “asymmetry of <strong>the</strong> borders” is one of <strong>the</strong> reasons<br />
why many irregular migrants plann<strong>in</strong>g to transit through Russia get “stuck” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
country. 49<br />
In 2007, <strong>the</strong> number of irregular migrants reportedly decreased due to <strong>the</strong><br />
new migration law which came <strong>in</strong>to force and <strong>the</strong> modification of procedures of<br />
reception of temporary stays and labour permits. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> FMS, irregular<br />
migrants <strong>in</strong> 2006 totaled 10 to 15 million, but this was said to have gone down to<br />
5-7 million <strong>in</strong> 2007. 50 However, some experts considered <strong>the</strong>se figures for 2006<br />
and 2007 overestimated.<br />
Indeed, World Bank researchers cite estimations that vary between 3 and<br />
3.5 million of irregular migrants currently liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Russia. 51 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to pre-<br />
49 ICMPD (2005)<br />
50 FMS Director K. Romodanovskiy, 18 December 2007.<br />
51 Quill<strong>in</strong>, Bryce, Carlo Segni, Sophie Sirta<strong>in</strong>e and Ilias Skamnelos (2007) Remittances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS countries: A<br />
Study of Selected Corridors, op. cit., p. 7.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
vious estimates of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Labour, 52 about 3-5 million irregular<br />
labour migrants were resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> or nearly eight per cent<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g-age population. Additionally, estimates of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
Federal Border Service <strong>in</strong>dicate some 1.5 million irregular migrants from Sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
and Central Asia, and Africa resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> territory. 53 Also, based<br />
on <strong>the</strong> figures of <strong>the</strong> FMS, over 93,000 employers were us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> services of<br />
irregular foreign workers <strong>in</strong> 2004, and about 713,000 foreign citizens fall <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
category of irregular workers. 54<br />
Ivakhnouk (2006) 55 presents a larger estimate of 5–15 million irregular<br />
migrants (<strong>in</strong> general terms, not only irregular labour migrants) <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> CIS<br />
with “<strong>the</strong> most part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>”. Ivakhniouk po<strong>in</strong>ts out that <strong>the</strong><br />
development of <strong>the</strong> private sector <strong>in</strong> Russia <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s and its grow<strong>in</strong>g need<br />
for labour, as well as <strong>the</strong> migration flows from CIS countries given <strong>the</strong>ir high unemployment<br />
rate and lower salaries (such as Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan,<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, and Moldova), have propelled irregular migration <strong>in</strong>to Russia spontaneously.<br />
Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong>re has been no full documentation of its extent.<br />
With <strong>in</strong>sufficient channels for regular labour migration and lack of official<br />
migration <strong>in</strong>frastructure and legislation, a large irregular regional labour market<br />
has developed. This situation has also been taken advantage of by <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
networks of crim<strong>in</strong>al organizations specializ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human traffick<strong>in</strong>g. Human<br />
traffickers are said to be benefit<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> gaps <strong>in</strong> national legislation on migration,<br />
<strong>the</strong> lack of official migration <strong>in</strong>frastructure, and <strong>the</strong> highly bureaucratic<br />
procedures for gett<strong>in</strong>g job permits, amidst <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g demand for migrant labour<br />
<strong>in</strong> Russia.<br />
As to <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> sources of irregular foreign labour, <strong>the</strong> Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />
Labour reports <strong>the</strong> Caucasus countries, Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Vietnam, and <strong>the</strong> Central Asian<br />
countries. 56<br />
52 Cited <strong>in</strong> ICMPD (2005): Overview of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Migration</strong> Systems <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Countries.<br />
53 Ibid.<br />
54 Ibid.<br />
55 Ivakhnyuk, Ir<strong>in</strong>a (2006) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Region: Common Problems and Mutual Benefits”, An expert<br />
paper presented at <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on International <strong>Migration</strong> and Development, United Nations<br />
Population Division, 28-30 June 2006, Tur<strong>in</strong>, Italy.<br />
56 Cited <strong>in</strong> ICMPD (2005), Ibid.<br />
6 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 31. Violations of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Migration</strong> Law of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Violations to stay (residence)<br />
regulation<br />
2005 2007 2007 (as of June)<br />
1,514,759 1,403,261 282,074<br />
Illegal labour activity 49,938 54,280 3,008<br />
Violations to immigration<br />
regulation<br />
Source: Information Analysis Center, MIA of Russia.<br />
1,103 649 218<br />
5.2. Figures and <strong>in</strong>formation on return migration flows<br />
Inflows<br />
Table 32. IOM assisted voluntary returns to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2005-2006<br />
return from: 2005 2006 total<br />
Austria 26 72 98<br />
Belgium 210 159 369<br />
Czech Republic 20 41 61<br />
F<strong>in</strong>land 2 2<br />
Germany 399 407 806<br />
Hungary 7 3 10<br />
Ireland 3 6 9<br />
Italy 13 3 16<br />
Lithuania 16 16<br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands 98 104 202<br />
Norway 66 65 131<br />
Poland 25 402 427<br />
Portugal 19 8 27<br />
Serbia and Montenegro 3 3<br />
Slovakia 21 12 33<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong> 5 5<br />
Switzerland 10 4 14<br />
United K<strong>in</strong>gdom 39 64 103<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 1 1<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r 3 1 4<br />
Total 977 1 360 2 337<br />
Source: Provisional statistics from IOM’s AVR Service Area, IOM Headquarters, Geneva, January <strong>2008</strong><br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Outflows<br />
Based on <strong>the</strong> records of <strong>the</strong> FMS, <strong>the</strong> number of foreign citizens deported<br />
from Russia (<strong>in</strong> thousands of persons) is 80.3 for 2005, 55.8 for 2007, and 24.0<br />
for 2007 (January to October).<br />
5.3. Figures and <strong>in</strong>formation on traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> former Interior M<strong>in</strong>ister of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> Anatoly<br />
Kulikov, Russia is a provider, “transiter”, and consumer of human merchandise.<br />
For migrants from CIS countries, Russia is a consumer, and for those who<br />
are <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to seek<strong>in</strong>g sexual services abroad, it is a provider. More than 500,000<br />
<strong>Russian</strong>-speak<strong>in</strong>g women are said to have been trafficked for sexual exploitation.<br />
57 Estimates of <strong>the</strong> yearly number of trafficked <strong>Russian</strong> women vary from<br />
35,000 to 57,750. 58<br />
Numerous reasons have been given to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> Russia, such as:<br />
• <strong>the</strong> practically transparent state borders between Russia and <strong>the</strong> CIS countries<br />
• <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> migration flows outside and <strong>in</strong>side of Russia<br />
• <strong>the</strong> developed <strong>in</strong>ternal human traffick<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> Russia as one of <strong>the</strong><br />
spheres of crim<strong>in</strong>al bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> use of forced labour<br />
• <strong>the</strong> globalization of organized crime due <strong>the</strong> existence of stable channels of<br />
“deliveries”.<br />
Similarly, migration reports note that Russia is both a country of orig<strong>in</strong> and<br />
of dest<strong>in</strong>ation for human traffick<strong>in</strong>g. Tishkov et al. (2005) 59 estimate that some<br />
50,000 women from Russia are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> illegal sex trade <strong>in</strong> Western countries,<br />
and an equal number from Ch<strong>in</strong>a and Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia is also reportedly <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />
Additionally, Ivakhniouk (2006) 60 claims that men, women, and children from<br />
57 1. http://gzt.ru/society/<strong>2008</strong>/02/12/220004.html<br />
2. The Coord<strong>in</strong>ator of <strong>the</strong> Inter-Agency Work<strong>in</strong>g Group is E. Mizul<strong>in</strong>a, Permanent Representative of <strong>the</strong> State<br />
Duma <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitutional Court of Russia.<br />
3. From 2004 <strong>the</strong> Legislative Committee of <strong>the</strong> State Duma was renamed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> Committee of civil, crim<strong>in</strong>al,<br />
constitutional and procedural legislation.<br />
58 United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) (2004) Transport of Women and Children from Russia with <strong>the</strong><br />
Goal of Sexual Exploitation, Moscow.<br />
59 Tishkov, Valery, Zhanna Zay<strong>in</strong>chkovskaya and Gal<strong>in</strong>a Vitkovskaya (2005) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Countries of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Former Soviet Union”, A paper prepared for <strong>the</strong> Policy Analysis and Research Programme of <strong>the</strong> Global<br />
Commission on International <strong>Migration</strong>.<br />
60 Ivakhnyuk, Ir<strong>in</strong>a (2006) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Region: Common Problems and Mutual Benefits”, An expert<br />
paper presented at <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on International <strong>Migration</strong> and Development, United Nations<br />
Population Division, 28-30 June 2006, Tur<strong>in</strong>, Italy.<br />
58 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
poorer CIS countries are trafficked to Russia for labour exploitation. The author<br />
adds that “hundreds of thousands” of Tajik, Kyrgyz, Moldovan, and Uzbek migrants<br />
are taken to Russia for seasonal employment <strong>in</strong> construction and agriculture.<br />
Their seasonal earn<strong>in</strong>gs provide sustenance to <strong>the</strong> families <strong>the</strong>y left beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />
while <strong>the</strong>y endure hardships and suffer<strong>in</strong>gs such as <strong>the</strong> violation of <strong>the</strong>ir human<br />
rights and exposure to serious health risks.<br />
Tishkov et al. confirm that <strong>in</strong> Central Asia, traffick<strong>in</strong>g also occurs frequently<br />
among men, who are sold for slave labour <strong>in</strong> Russia. The problem of traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Russia of young girls and women, <strong>in</strong> particular those from Moldova and<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, is also said to have <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 1999, IOM has been collect<strong>in</strong>g statistical <strong>in</strong>formation on victims of<br />
traffick<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> organization has assisted <strong>in</strong> its return and rehabilitation programmes.<br />
Although not all IOM-assisted victims have been entered <strong>in</strong>to IOM’s<br />
database, figures at <strong>the</strong> end of 2007 po<strong>in</strong>t to nearly 12,800 victims assisted. As <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>formation is collected only from victims who have benefited from IOM’s programmes,<br />
<strong>the</strong> sample can be regarded as <strong>in</strong>complete and not representative of <strong>the</strong><br />
total number of traffick<strong>in</strong>g victims. Still, <strong>the</strong> IOM data can give relevant <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
particularly on <strong>the</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong> potential victims to be targeted <strong>in</strong> prevention<br />
activities. The data can likewise reveal <strong>in</strong>formation that can support law enforcement<br />
officials <strong>in</strong> apprehend<strong>in</strong>g and prosecut<strong>in</strong>g crim<strong>in</strong>al organizations.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> end of 2007, <strong>the</strong> IOM database conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>formation on 233 victims<br />
of <strong>Russian</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>. A total of 222 were female and only 11 were male. These<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> victims had ended up <strong>in</strong> 23 different countries of dest<strong>in</strong>ation, which were<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regions IOM has a good coverage of counter-traffick<strong>in</strong>g programmes and<br />
where <strong>the</strong> data on <strong>the</strong> victims were ga<strong>the</strong>red. These regions and dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegov<strong>in</strong>a, Serbia and Kosovo, FYRoM,<br />
and Albania), East and South Eastern Europe (Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus,<br />
Greece, Moldova), <strong>the</strong> Middle East (Turkey, United Arab Emirates), and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Caucasus and Central Asia (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazahstan, and<br />
Kyrgyzstan). In Western Europe, Italy, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Sweden, and Switzerland figured<br />
among <strong>the</strong> dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries. The victims who ended up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Balkans had<br />
arrived through many different routes, with Hungary, Romania, Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, Croatia,<br />
Bulgaria, and even Sweden and Argent<strong>in</strong>a be<strong>in</strong>g used as transit countries.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> 233 <strong>Russian</strong> victims <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> database, Turkey was by far <strong>the</strong> most<br />
important country of dest<strong>in</strong>ation, with almost half of <strong>the</strong> victims (111 persons)<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g ended up <strong>the</strong>re. The o<strong>the</strong>r dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries had much lower figures,<br />
with Belarus (22), <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (19 victims of <strong>in</strong>ternal traffick<strong>in</strong>g), and<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
<strong>the</strong> former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (18 <strong>Russian</strong> victims) follow<strong>in</strong>g after<br />
Turkey.<br />
Recruitment<br />
In <strong>the</strong> sample (233 <strong>Russian</strong> victims), 62 per cent were recruited through<br />
personal contact, n<strong>in</strong>e per cent through newspaper advertisement, one per cent<br />
(two victims) through <strong>in</strong>ternet advertisement, and four per cent through o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
methods. For <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 25 per cent, <strong>the</strong> recruitment method was not <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation and <strong>the</strong>refore was unknown. In 18 per cent of <strong>the</strong> 233 cases, <strong>the</strong><br />
sex of <strong>the</strong> recruiter was not registered, but <strong>in</strong> 51 per cent of <strong>the</strong> 191 known cases,<br />
<strong>the</strong> recruiter was female, and <strong>in</strong> 45 per cent, male, while both men and women did<br />
<strong>the</strong> recruitment <strong>in</strong> four per cent of <strong>the</strong> cases (eight victims).<br />
Giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> applicants false promises of an overseas job was <strong>the</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
method used by recruiters. In 66 per cent of <strong>the</strong> sample for whom <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation of <strong>the</strong> promised jobs, <strong>the</strong> jobs mentioned <strong>in</strong>cluded waitress<strong>in</strong>g, danc<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
sell<strong>in</strong>g, child care, agricultural work, and begg<strong>in</strong>g. Prostitution was signified<br />
to 23 victims (10%) and sweatshop labour to 7 victims. However, as many as<br />
205 or 88 per cent of <strong>the</strong> sample ended <strong>in</strong> sexual exploitation, 18 (nearly 8%) <strong>in</strong><br />
forced labour, while 3 victims faced both types of exploitation. Ano<strong>the</strong>r 7 victims<br />
suffered yet o<strong>the</strong>r types of exploitation.<br />
<strong>Profile</strong> of victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
For <strong>the</strong> profile of <strong>the</strong> 233 <strong>Russian</strong> victims, <strong>the</strong> database revealed that 17<br />
(7.3%) were m<strong>in</strong>ors, 134 (58%) fell <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> age bracket 18-24, 51 (22%) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> age<br />
bracket 25-30, and only 31 (13%) were over 30 years.<br />
In 189 victims (81%), <strong>the</strong> educational level was known. Twelve (5%) had<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ished only primary or elementary school, 76 (33%) reached middle school, 57<br />
(24.5%) had a high school diploma, 176 (93%) had f<strong>in</strong>ished technical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and 26 (11%) had university studies.<br />
The marital status was known <strong>in</strong> 204 cases and unknown for <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
29. A total of 143 victims (61%) <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong>y were s<strong>in</strong>gle, 36 were divorced,<br />
4 were separated, and 5 were widows. Only 14 were married and 2 were<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> common law relationships. No less that 74 or almost 32 per cent of <strong>the</strong><br />
233 victims had <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong>y had children, and 12 of <strong>the</strong>m had more than<br />
one child.<br />
60 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Out of 233, 133 said that <strong>the</strong>y worked <strong>in</strong> Russia at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> recruitment<br />
while 13 did not. For 87, <strong>the</strong>re was no <strong>in</strong>formation given. For <strong>the</strong> 133 who<br />
worked, 77 were office employees (ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> private or public sector), 9 worked <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector, and <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>in</strong> agriculture, domestic work, and sex <strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />
A total of 179 answered to <strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> economic situation of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
families. Only one of <strong>the</strong>m characterized it as well-off while 44 (25%) described<br />
it as standard, 106 (59%) as poor, and 28 (16%) as very poor.<br />
Traffick<strong>in</strong>g routes<br />
Experts identified several basic routes used by “transporters” <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
people out of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>:<br />
The Baltic route through Lithuania, as well as <strong>the</strong> Central European route<br />
through Warsaw and Prague are regarded as <strong>the</strong> easiest methods to transport illegal<br />
migrants to Germany, Scand<strong>in</strong>avia and o<strong>the</strong>r European countries, and <strong>the</strong><br />
United States. Recently, <strong>the</strong>se countries have substantially tightened <strong>the</strong>ir crossborder<br />
travel rules. None<strong>the</strong>less, European countries and <strong>the</strong> United States rema<strong>in</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong> dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries for human traffick<strong>in</strong>g out of Russia.<br />
The Caucasus (or Georgian) transit route is made easier by <strong>the</strong> weak borders<br />
with Turkey.<br />
Experts note that <strong>the</strong> majority of irregular migrants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g women and<br />
children, have beentransported via Georgia <strong>in</strong>to Turkey, Greece, and <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean<br />
countries for sexual and labour exploitation.<br />
Large resorts <strong>in</strong> Europe and Asia and armed conflict zones or regions where<br />
military and peacekeep<strong>in</strong>g forces are stationed (<strong>in</strong> this case primarily those <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Balkans) are regarded as notable traffick<strong>in</strong>g hubs for sexual exploitation of<br />
women. Routes through Egypt and <strong>in</strong>to Israel as well as o<strong>the</strong>r Middle Eastern<br />
countries are also common. In particular, many women and children are taken<br />
from <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn regions of Russia to <strong>the</strong> United Arab Emirates for sexual exploitation.<br />
Evidence of traffick<strong>in</strong>g for labour exploitation has been found <strong>in</strong> countries<br />
with large <strong>Russian</strong> diasporas such as <strong>in</strong> Germany, Turkey, Portugal, and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn European countries to which labourers are primarily transported for <strong>the</strong><br />
harvest of citrus fruit and o<strong>the</strong>r agricultural work.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
61
Ch<strong>in</strong>a-bound human traffick<strong>in</strong>g is divided <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a-Siberia and <strong>the</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a-Primorsky Region routes. Russia’s policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s, to attract<br />
greater Ch<strong>in</strong>ese tourists and to harbour good neighbour<strong>in</strong>g country relations, resulted<br />
<strong>in</strong> a large <strong>in</strong>flux of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese citizens settl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Russia’s far-east region.<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese crim<strong>in</strong>al groups have become a large problem for <strong>the</strong> law enforcement<br />
authorities of <strong>the</strong> Primorsky and Khabarovsk Regions and neighbor<strong>in</strong>g areas. The<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese traffick<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess has enormous potential. It is extremely stable, is<br />
geared to long-term activity, and is organized more like a bus<strong>in</strong>ess activity than<br />
a traditional crim<strong>in</strong>al group activity. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> human traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess is not marked by stability and is oriented more towards immediate profit,<br />
with its work<strong>in</strong>g slogan often be<strong>in</strong>g “grab a buck and lay low”. For this reason,<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> organized crim<strong>in</strong>al gangs engaged <strong>in</strong> human traffick<strong>in</strong>g adopt particularly<br />
harsh manners and methods of control.<br />
Russia is also a dest<strong>in</strong>ation country for human traffick<strong>in</strong>g routes from CIS<br />
countries and poor Asian regions. Almost all CIS states are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of people <strong>in</strong>to Russia as orig<strong>in</strong> countries. The most vulnerable populations<br />
are those from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, Armenia, Moldova,<br />
and Ukra<strong>in</strong>e. For all <strong>the</strong>se countries, Russia is one of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> dest<strong>in</strong>ation countries<br />
for human traffick<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> purpose of labour and sexual exploitation. 61<br />
61 E.V. Tiurukanova and <strong>the</strong> Institute for Urban Economics (2006) Human Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
Inventory and Analysis of <strong>the</strong> Current Situation and Responses. Report conducted for <strong>the</strong> UN/IOM Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Group on Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs, Moscow, pp.23-25.<br />
62 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Figure 3. Traffick<strong>in</strong>g routes used <strong>in</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g people out and <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Source: http://www.undp.ru/<strong>in</strong>dex.phtml?iso=RU&lid=1&cmd=publications1&id=54 Human Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. Inventory and Analysis<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Current Situation and Responses/Report conducted by E.V. Turukanova and <strong>the</strong> Institute for Urban Economics for<br />
UN/IOM Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs, Moscow 2006. p. 25<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
6
6. assessMent anD analYsis of<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> issues<br />
6.1. Government <strong>in</strong>stitutions responsible for migration policy<br />
Agencies responsible for migration policy and contacts with expatriate<br />
community<br />
The Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service (FMS) is <strong>the</strong> key agency responsible for<br />
<strong>the</strong> migration policy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. It functions under <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />
Internal Affairs (MIA). The jurisdiction of <strong>the</strong> FMS covers <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
• general strategy of <strong>the</strong> state migration policy<br />
• registration of citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir place of stay and<br />
residence with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> border of <strong>the</strong> country and control of citizens’ and officials’<br />
compliance with <strong>the</strong> rules of registration<br />
• registration and issuance to foreign citizens and stateless persons of entry<br />
and residence documents<br />
• control of compliance by foreign citizens and stateless persons with <strong>the</strong> residence<br />
and temporary stay regulations of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
• prevention of illegal migration<br />
• execution of <strong>the</strong> law of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> with regard to refugees and<br />
forced immigrants, and grant<strong>in</strong>g of political asylum to foreign citizens and<br />
stateless persons<br />
• control and supervision of external labour migration, engagement of foreign<br />
workers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, and employment of citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> abroad.<br />
The FMS is located <strong>in</strong> Moscow. Each of <strong>the</strong> constituent entities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> has a territorial branch of <strong>the</strong> Service.<br />
16, Zhitnay Street, 117049, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 923-89-45<br />
http://www.fms.gov.ru<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
6
The M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health and Social Development develops state policy<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of labour migration and prepares reports on <strong>the</strong> practicability of engagement<br />
and use of foreign labour.<br />
3, Rakhmanosvkiy pereulok, GSP-4, 127994, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: (495) 628 4453<br />
http://www.mzsrrf.ru<br />
The Federal Labor and Employment Service (Rostrud) has control and<br />
supervision functions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of labour, employment, and alternative civil<br />
service, render<strong>in</strong>g of state services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field of assistance of employment of<br />
<strong>the</strong> population and protection aga<strong>in</strong>st unemployment, and labour migration and<br />
settlement of collective labour disputes. Its work is coord<strong>in</strong>ated by <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />
of Health and Social Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
1/2, Birzhevaya ploshad, 109012, Moscow, Russia<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 298-84-36<br />
http://www.rostrud.<strong>in</strong>fo<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r key offices <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> migration policy<br />
• Office of <strong>the</strong> President of <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
103132, Moscow,<br />
Il<strong>in</strong>ka Str, 23<br />
• State Duma of <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
103265, Moscow, Mokhovaya, 7<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 692-80-00<br />
Fax:+7(495) 203-42-58<br />
E-mail: stateduma@duma.gov.ru<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs<br />
119200 Moscow, Smolenskaya-Sennaya, 32/34<br />
Tel.: +7 (495) 244-16-06<br />
Fax: +7 (495) 244-34-48<br />
E-mail: m<strong>in</strong>istry@mid.ru<br />
• Federal Security Service<br />
101000, Moscow, Kuznetskiy most,22<br />
Tel.: +7 (495) 924-31-58<br />
E-mail : fsb@fsb.ru<br />
http://www.fsb.ru<br />
66 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
• M<strong>in</strong>istry of Interior<br />
119049, Moscow, Zhitnaya St., 16<br />
Tel: + 7 (495) 622-66-69<br />
http://www.mvd.ru/contacts/10000005/<br />
• Office of Prosecutor General<br />
125993, ГСП-3, Moscow<br />
Bolshaya Dmitrovka, 15а<br />
Tel.: +7 (495) 692-26-82<br />
6.2. International legal framework <strong>in</strong> place relevant to migration.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Voron<strong>in</strong>a(2006), 62 as of 2006, <strong>the</strong>re were more that 10 federal<br />
acts, over 100 presidential decrees, parliamentary resolutions, and m<strong>in</strong>isterial<br />
acts, and dozens of <strong>in</strong>ternational and <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental agreements that toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
form <strong>the</strong> migration legislation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> laws regulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational migration <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> Scheme of Exit from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
and Entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (dated 15 August 1996, No. 114-FL, with<br />
amendments effective 18 July 1998, No. 110-FL), <strong>the</strong> Law on <strong>the</strong> Legal Status<br />
of Foreigners <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (dated 25 July 2002, No. 115-FL, with<br />
amendments effective 18 July 2006, No. 110-FL), <strong>the</strong> Law on <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Citizenship (with amendments effective 11 November 2003, No. 151-FL),<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Law on <strong>Migration</strong> Registration of Foreigners and Stateless Persons <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (dated 18 July 2006, No. 109-FL). The migration policy<br />
of Russia is also reflected <strong>in</strong> decrees of <strong>the</strong> President such as: On Involvement<br />
and Application of Foreigners’ Labor Force <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (dated 16<br />
December 1993, No. 2146) and On Measures for Assistance <strong>in</strong> Voluntary Resettlement<br />
to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> of Compatriots Resid<strong>in</strong>g Abroad (dated 22<br />
June 2006, No. 637). Most issues of <strong>the</strong> migration policy are also addressed <strong>in</strong><br />
regulative acts of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> government.<br />
Russia ratified <strong>the</strong> UN Convention on <strong>the</strong> Status of Refugees and its 1967<br />
Protocol <strong>in</strong> 1993. It is also a party to a number of <strong>in</strong>ternational treaties and agreements<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sphere of migration management.<br />
62 Voron<strong>in</strong>a, Natalia (2006) “Outlook on <strong>Migration</strong> Policy Reform <strong>in</strong> Russia: Contemporary Challenges and<br />
Political Paradoxes”, <strong>in</strong> Roger Rodriguez Rios (ed.) <strong>Migration</strong> Perspectives – Eastern Europe and Central<br />
Asia, IOM Technical Cooperation Centre for Europe and Central Asia, Vienna.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
6
International agreements on resistance to illegal migration<br />
• Agreement on cooperation of members of CIS <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st migration<br />
(Moscow, 6 March 1998)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Uzbekistan on cooperation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
illegal migration (Tashkent, 4 July 2007)<br />
• Protocol between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Latvia on establishment of a work<strong>in</strong>g group on<br />
issues of illegal migration (Moscow, 28 June 2006).<br />
International readmission agreements<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Lithuania on admission and return of persons resid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
illegally <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Lithuania ((Vilnius, 12 May 2003).<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> European Association<br />
on readmission (Sochi, 25 May 2006)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />
Government of <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom of Norway on readmission (Moscow, 8 June<br />
2007)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Uzbekistan on readmission (Tashkent, 4 July<br />
2007)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Cab<strong>in</strong>et<br />
of M<strong>in</strong>isters of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e on readmission (Kiev, 22 December 2006)<br />
International agreements on citizenship problems:<br />
• Agreement among <strong>the</strong> Republic of Belarus’, <strong>the</strong> Republic of Kazakhstan,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kyrgyz Republic, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> on simplified procedure of<br />
obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g citizenship, effective 26 February 1999<br />
68 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Republic of Kazakhstan on simplified procedure of<br />
obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g citizenship by citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Republic of Kazakhstan for permanent residency and by citizens of <strong>the</strong> Republic<br />
of Kazakhstan arriv<strong>in</strong>g for permanent residency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
effective 20 January 1995<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Kyrgyzstan Republic on<br />
simplified procedure of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g citizenship by <strong>the</strong> citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kyrgyzstan Republic for permanent residency, and<br />
by <strong>the</strong> citizens of <strong>the</strong> Kyrgyzstan Republic arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
for permanent residency, and on abatement of previous citizenships, effective<br />
28 March 1996<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and Turkmenistan on adjustment<br />
of dual citizenship, effective 23 December 1993<br />
International agreements on <strong>in</strong>ternational citizens’ reciproсal travels<br />
• Agreement among <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Belarus, Government of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Kazakhstan,<br />
Government of <strong>the</strong> Kyrgyz Republic, and Government of <strong>the</strong> Republic of<br />
Tajikistan on citizens’ reciprocal free-of-visa- travel, effective 30 November<br />
2000<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />
Government of <strong>the</strong> Azerbaijan Republic on citizens’ reciprocal free-of-visa<br />
travel, effective 3 July 1997<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of Armenia on citizens’ reciprocal free-of-visa travel, effective 25<br />
September 2000<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Ch<strong>in</strong>a on citizens’ reciprocal free-of-visa travel,<br />
effective 29 February 2000<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />
Government of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Moldova on citizens’ reciprocal free-of-visa<br />
travel, effective 30 November 2000<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
6
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e on citizens’ reciprocal free-of-visa travel, effective 16<br />
January 1997<br />
International agreements on labour force migration<br />
• Agreement on cooperation <strong>in</strong> labour force migration and social ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
of migrant workers, effective 15 April 1994 (signed under CIS), ratified on<br />
24 April 1995, No. 47-FL. The Protocol on <strong>in</strong>sertion of amendments and additions<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Agreement was signed on 25 November 2005 and came <strong>in</strong>to<br />
force on 15 December 2006<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Armenia on labour activity and social ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> citizens work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> Republic<br />
of Armenia, and of citizens of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Armenia work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
territory of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, effective 19 July 1994<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Belarus on labour activity and social ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
of citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong><br />
Republic of Belarus, and of citizens of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Belarus work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, effective 24 September 1993<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Federal Republic of Germany on employment of persons<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g for hire, targeted at improvement of <strong>the</strong>ir professional and language<br />
knowledge (The Agreement on Employment of Guest Workers of 17 May<br />
1992)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Kyrgyztan on labour activity and social protection of work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
migrants, dated 28 March 1996 (came <strong>in</strong>to effect on 15 January 1998, ratified<br />
on 14 November 1997, No. 139-FL, with amendments, Protocol of 22<br />
September 2003, ratified on 3 January 2006, No. 3-FL)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> People’s<br />
Republic of Ch<strong>in</strong>a on temporary labour activity of citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a and <strong>the</strong> citizens of <strong>the</strong> People’s Republic of Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, dated 3 November 2000<br />
70 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> People’s<br />
Republic of Ch<strong>in</strong>a on cooperation <strong>in</strong> mutual development of forest resources,<br />
dated 3 November 2000.<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> Republic<br />
of Lithuania on temporary labour activity of citizens, dated 29 June<br />
1999<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> Republic<br />
of Moldova on labour activity and social ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of citizens of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Republic of Moldova, work<strong>in</strong>g outside <strong>the</strong><br />
boundaries of <strong>the</strong>ir states, dated 27 May 1993 (with amendments, Protocol<br />
No. 105, dated 12 February 1994)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Poland on pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of labour activity of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> citizens <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of Poland and Polish citizens <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, dated 15 March 1994<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Slovak Republic on organization of citizens’ employment under<br />
contractual agreements and on employment assistance to citizens, dated<br />
13 February 1995 (came <strong>in</strong>to effect on 27 March 1995)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e on labour activity and social ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of <strong>the</strong> citizens<br />
of Russia and Ukra<strong>in</strong>e work<strong>in</strong>g outside <strong>the</strong> borders of <strong>the</strong>ir countries, dated<br />
14 January 1993<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of Switzerland Confederation on exchange of probationers, dated 2<br />
September 1993<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Tajikistan on labour activity of citizens of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Republic of Tajikistan and citizens of Tajikistan <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, dated 16 October 2004 (ratified on 3 January 2006,<br />
No. 2-FL)<br />
• Agreement between <strong>the</strong> Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Uzbekistan on labour activity and protection of<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
ights of labour migrants who are citizens of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Republic of Uzbekistan and <strong>the</strong> rights of labour migrants who are citizens<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Republic of Uzbekistan <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, signed on 3 July<br />
2007<br />
6.3. <strong>Migration</strong> policies <strong>in</strong> place<br />
Voron<strong>in</strong>a (2006) 63 divides <strong>the</strong> post-Soviet period of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> migration<br />
policy <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g stages:<br />
• 1992 – 1994 Formation<br />
• 1995 – 1999 Expand<strong>in</strong>g spheres under regulation and development<br />
of migration legislation<br />
• 1999 – 2002 Period considered by many as negative progress (<strong>the</strong><br />
FMS was dissolved)<br />
• 2002 – 2004 Focus on combat<strong>in</strong>g irregular migration and restrictive<br />
policies<br />
• 2005 Reform of migration policy<br />
In <strong>the</strong> early years after <strong>the</strong> dissolution of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, <strong>the</strong> first priority<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> migration authorities was to address <strong>the</strong> consequences of <strong>the</strong> large<br />
“return” migration of <strong>Russian</strong>s from <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Republics.<br />
In May 1992, <strong>the</strong> Council of M<strong>in</strong>istries of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> approved<br />
<strong>the</strong> first National Long-Term <strong>Migration</strong> Programme. The ma<strong>in</strong> goal of <strong>the</strong> Programme<br />
was to provide assistance to refugees and <strong>in</strong>voluntary migrants (<strong>Russian</strong>s<br />
who came from <strong>the</strong> former Soviet Republics). The ma<strong>in</strong> components of <strong>the</strong><br />
Programme <strong>in</strong>cluded support for resettlement, hous<strong>in</strong>g, employment, and health<br />
care. The Programme was approved and its implementation started before <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> created its own migration legislation. 64<br />
Over <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> 1990s, various components of migration legislation<br />
were created, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g presidential decrees <strong>in</strong> 1993-94, namely, On Recruitment<br />
and Employment of Foreign Labour Force <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and its<br />
complementary decree <strong>in</strong> 1994. The first Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Programme, created<br />
likewise by a presidential decree <strong>in</strong> August 1994, was <strong>the</strong> first attempt to comprehensively<br />
address <strong>the</strong> whole variety of migration issues.<br />
63 Voron<strong>in</strong>a, Natalia (2006) “Outlook on <strong>Migration</strong> Policy Reform <strong>in</strong> Russia: Contemporary Challenges and<br />
Political Paradoxes”, <strong>in</strong> Roger Rodriguez Rios (ed.) <strong>Migration</strong> Perspectives – Eastern Europe and Central<br />
Asia, IOM Technical Cooperation Centre for Europe and Central Asia, Vienna.<br />
64 Voron<strong>in</strong>a, Natalia (2006), Ibid.<br />
72 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
The Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service, first created <strong>in</strong> 1992, was <strong>in</strong> existence until<br />
its dissolution <strong>in</strong> 2000, to be restored aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2002 under <strong>the</strong> MIA. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Voron<strong>in</strong>a (2006), this new adm<strong>in</strong>istrative affiliation demonstrated <strong>the</strong> focus<br />
towards combat<strong>in</strong>g irregular migration.<br />
In recent years, Russia’s migration policy has <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly addressed <strong>the</strong><br />
need for labour immigration to Russia, such as by search<strong>in</strong>g for measures that<br />
would ease <strong>the</strong> geographical constra<strong>in</strong>ts and <strong>the</strong> skills shortages (see Section 6.4)<br />
and mismatch <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour markets, facilitat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legalization of undocumented<br />
workers through smooth and non-bureaucratic procedures, attract<strong>in</strong>g economic<br />
migrants, facilitat<strong>in</strong>g permanent immigration and resettlement, and assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration of immigrants.<br />
The Action Plan for <strong>the</strong> Implementation of <strong>the</strong> Programme on Socio-economic<br />
Development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> for 2006-<strong>2008</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> development<br />
of a Concept for National <strong>Migration</strong> Policy, which was enacted by <strong>the</strong><br />
State Duma <strong>in</strong> 2006 and has been implemented s<strong>in</strong>ce 2007. This co<strong>in</strong>cided with<br />
<strong>the</strong> entry <strong>in</strong>to force of <strong>the</strong> new migration legislation <strong>in</strong> 15 January.<br />
This new migration policy concerns three categories of migrants: temporary<br />
labour migrants from <strong>the</strong> CIS countries, for whom access to labour markets<br />
and registration of <strong>the</strong>ir residence has been made easier; immigrants, for whom<br />
<strong>the</strong> procedures for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g permits for residence have been liberalized; and<br />
compatriots, for whom benefits are be<strong>in</strong>g provided while repatriat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account public op<strong>in</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> negative attitude towards migrants,<br />
and especially demographic and labour market concerns, one key priority<br />
is <strong>the</strong> promotion of <strong>the</strong> return of compatriots. In 2007, <strong>the</strong> 12 pilot regions under<br />
<strong>the</strong> Federal Programme on render<strong>in</strong>g assistance to voluntary return to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> of compatriots liv<strong>in</strong>g abroad started to take part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> programme.<br />
The regions of Eastern Russia that are suffer<strong>in</strong>g from labour force deficit<br />
are considered to be <strong>the</strong> regions of first priority. As of 1 December 2007, 4,800<br />
<strong>Russian</strong>s abroad (altoge<strong>the</strong>r 12,000 persons when family members <strong>in</strong>cluded) were<br />
accepted to participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Federal Programme, however only about 400 persons<br />
did actually return. The <strong>Russian</strong> authorities expect <strong>the</strong>se figures to rise. 65<br />
Lately, <strong>the</strong> improvement of migration policy is be<strong>in</strong>g realized <strong>in</strong> Russia,<br />
which is aimed at enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> responsibility of employers <strong>in</strong> resist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> irregular<br />
employment of foreign workers, who, along with measures for simplify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
65 Initially, <strong>the</strong> plan was to resettle up to 50,000 people (Mukomel and Mkrtchyan <strong>2008</strong>).<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
procedures of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g work permits and registration for work<strong>in</strong>g migrants, are<br />
urged to help reduce <strong>the</strong> quantities of irregular migration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
Measures are be<strong>in</strong>g simultaneously taken for improv<strong>in</strong>g practical methods<br />
of sett<strong>in</strong>g quotas for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>take of labourers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector. In 2007, <strong>the</strong><br />
Government of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> approved a quota of 6,000 persons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
issuance of <strong>in</strong>vitations to foreign citizens for entry <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
for <strong>the</strong> purpose of labour activity from states with which Russia has established<br />
a visa-free regime. With o<strong>the</strong>r states that do not fall under Russia’s visa-free regime,<br />
<strong>the</strong> quota is set at 308,800 persons. The approved quotas are distributed<br />
among subjects of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. 66<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> law, <strong>Russian</strong> citizens should be given priority for local<br />
employment while a cap on <strong>the</strong> permitted share of employment exists for foreign<br />
citizens to work <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> fields. In 2006, <strong>the</strong> Government put limitations to a<br />
foreigners’ access to certa<strong>in</strong> established trade fields. 67<br />
The Concept of <strong>Migration</strong> Processes Regulation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
68 has set <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g goals:<br />
• provision of steady development of national economy and demographic policy<br />
• national security <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
• meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> demands of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> economy <strong>in</strong> human resources<br />
• rational distribution of population over <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> country<br />
• use of <strong>in</strong>tellectual and labour potential of migrants for prosperity of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple directions of activity for migration processes<br />
regulation as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Concept are:<br />
• ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g control over immigration processes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
• build<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>the</strong> conditions for <strong>in</strong>tegration of forced migrants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong><br />
• recruitment of immigrants to work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> to provide <strong>the</strong><br />
national economy with labour resources<br />
• enter<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational labour market and<br />
<strong>the</strong> process of regulation of economic migration<br />
66 Mukomel and Mkrtchyan (<strong>2008</strong>).<br />
67 Resolution of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> Government No. 683 dated 15 November 2006.<br />
68 Approved by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> Government Decree No. 256-r dated 1 March 2003.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
• build<strong>in</strong>g up of conditions for voluntary return to <strong>the</strong>ir former residential<br />
places of <strong>Russian</strong> nationals, who left <strong>the</strong>ir places of permanent residence <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> by force and are now liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r territories of <strong>the</strong><br />
country<br />
• keep<strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g relationships with compatriots abroad<br />
• optimization of <strong>in</strong>ternal migratory processes and promotion of effective usage<br />
of labour resources<br />
• creation of conditions for <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and fur<strong>the</strong>r formation of populations<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn, eastern, and cross-border regions of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
• render<strong>in</strong>g of assistance for <strong>the</strong> voluntary migration of compatriots from <strong>the</strong><br />
CIS member countries and <strong>the</strong> Baltic countries.<br />
6.4. Labour migration issues<br />
Russia’s economic development has <strong>in</strong> recent years outperformed <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
CIS countries (see Table 32) and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly made Russia a dest<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>in</strong>tra-<br />
CIS labour migration flows.<br />
Table 33. Differences <strong>in</strong> GDP and standards of liv<strong>in</strong>g among <strong>the</strong> CIS countries<br />
Cis country<br />
gDp per capita<br />
(usD)<br />
percetage of population liv<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
less than usD 2 per day<br />
Armenia 1234.0 49<br />
Azerbaijan 2585.9 9<br />
Belarus 3316.2 2<br />
Georgia 1765.8 16<br />
Kazakhstan 4386.1 25<br />
Kyrgyzstan 507.7 25<br />
Moldova 917.4 64<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> 6330.8 8<br />
Tajikistan 411.5 43<br />
Turkmenistan 3888.6 44<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 2020.6 46<br />
Uzbekistan 498.6 72<br />
Sources: IMF. World Economic Outlook Database, April 2006; UN Population Reference Bureau, World<br />
Population Data Sheet, 2005, presented by Ivankniouk (2006)69<br />
69 Ivakhnyuk, Ir<strong>in</strong>a (2006) “<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CIS Region: Common Problems and Mutual Benefits”, An expert<br />
paper presented at <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on International <strong>Migration</strong> and Developmen, United Nations<br />
Population Division, 28-30 June 2006, Tur<strong>in</strong>, Italy.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Thanks to <strong>the</strong> generally favourable economic development <strong>in</strong> Russia, <strong>the</strong><br />
employment situation has steadily improved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last years, as <strong>the</strong> succeed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tables on <strong>the</strong> economically active population and on unemployment show.<br />
The size of <strong>the</strong> economically active population has steadily risen as well as <strong>the</strong><br />
demand for immigrant labour due to <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population. Registered unemployment<br />
has clearly dropped <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last years—by 29 per cent, from over seven<br />
million <strong>in</strong> 2000 to less than five million <strong>in</strong> 2006 (see Table 36).<br />
Although <strong>the</strong> tables below do not reflect any dramatic changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> division<br />
of <strong>the</strong> labour force between <strong>the</strong> different sectors of economic activity, Russia<br />
seems to face <strong>the</strong> lack of professionals needed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> modern services-oriented<br />
economy.<br />
With its grow<strong>in</strong>g dependence on an immigrant labour force, Russia is fac<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> same situation as many o<strong>the</strong>r European countries: <strong>the</strong>re is a generous<br />
supply of an unskilled undocumented immigrant labour force, most of which is<br />
quite ill-matched to <strong>the</strong> labour force demands. The domestic labour force also<br />
cannot satisfy <strong>the</strong> current needs for professionals of modern bus<strong>in</strong>ess, production,<br />
and related bus<strong>in</strong>ess and personnel adm<strong>in</strong>istration, market<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
technology (IT). In Russia, <strong>the</strong> situation is typical as <strong>in</strong> many countries: <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is a shortage of eng<strong>in</strong>eers, IT specialists, <strong>in</strong>dustrial, technical and managerial<br />
staff, commercial and market<strong>in</strong>g professionals, and related adm<strong>in</strong>istrative support<br />
staff: This is illustrated <strong>in</strong> a list published by a <strong>Russian</strong> labour market news<br />
website (http://www.rhr.ru) that presents Russia’s most <strong>in</strong>-demand professionals<br />
at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2007:<br />
1. Human resources manager<br />
2. Market<strong>in</strong>g manager<br />
3. Director of production<br />
4. Personnel director<br />
5. Manager of production<br />
6. Internet project manager<br />
7. Client relations manager<br />
8. Senior secretary<br />
9. Bookkeeper<br />
10. Programmer<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce January 2007, <strong>the</strong> new legislation regulat<strong>in</strong>g access of foreign citizens<br />
to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> labour markets has become effective. The procedure for <strong>the</strong><br />
issuance of labour permits to foreign citizens arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
has been considerably simplified. The notice procedure covers employers as well,<br />
6 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
where<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>y are given <strong>the</strong> right to hire foreigners even without a foreign labour<br />
engagement permit.<br />
In 2007, <strong>the</strong> number of foreign citizens who are legally carry<strong>in</strong>g out labour<br />
activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> rose from 1,014,000 <strong>in</strong> 2006 to<br />
2,150,000 as of January-September 2007. The number of foreign citizens registered<br />
by migration 70 authorities has been much higher—over six million people<br />
as of January-September 2007. This may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> fact that even if<br />
a significant part of foreign citizens arrive <strong>in</strong> Russia primarily not for labour<br />
activity, many of <strong>the</strong>m most probably end up be<strong>in</strong>g engaged <strong>in</strong> irregular labour<br />
activity. 71<br />
Toge<strong>the</strong>r with measures for <strong>the</strong> liberalization of engagement and application<br />
of foreign labour, efforts aimed at streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative responsibility<br />
for combat<strong>in</strong>g irregular engagement and use of foreign labour and work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
without a labour permit were executed. The adm<strong>in</strong>istrative penalties for violation<br />
of regulations of stay and residence of foreign citizens and stateless persons,<br />
and for regulation of engagement and use of foreign labour <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> were significantly <strong>in</strong>creased to up to 800,000 rubles or<br />
about 22,000 euros per worker. This resulted <strong>in</strong> a significant decrease <strong>in</strong> offences<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> irregular engagement of foreign workers and hir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m without labour<br />
permits, 72 from 67,108 <strong>in</strong> 2005 and 68,703 <strong>in</strong> 2006 to 9,632 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />
2007. 73<br />
70 Mukomel, Vladimir and Nikita Mkrtchyan (<strong>2008</strong>): Expert memorandum drafted for this <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>,<br />
Moscow, January <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
71 Ibid.<br />
72 Articles 18.10 and 18.15 (before 2007, Parts 1 and 2 of Article 18.10) of <strong>the</strong> Code of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
on Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Offences.<br />
73 Source: Information Analysis Center of <strong>the</strong> MIA of Russia.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Economically<br />
active<br />
population, total<br />
of which:<br />
Table 34. Economically active population*<br />
1992 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006**<br />
Thousand persons<br />
75,060 70,740 72,332 71,411 72,421 72,835 72,909 73,811 74,187<br />
employed 71,171 64,055 65,273 65,124 66,266 67,152 67,134 68,603 69,189<br />
unemployed 3,889 6,684 7,059 6,288 6,155 5,683 5,775 5,208 4,999<br />
Men 39,197 37,338 37,499 36,905 36,997 37,206 37,079 37,511 37,643<br />
of which:<br />
employed 37,161 33,726 33,754 33,527 33,709 34,199 34,177 34,710 35,012<br />
unemployed 2,036 3,613 3,745 3,378 3,288 3,007 2,902 2,801 2,631<br />
Women 35,863 33,401 34,833 34,506 35,423 35,629 35,831 36,300 36,544<br />
of which:<br />
employed 34,010 30,330 31,519 31,596 32,557 32,953 32,958 33,893 34,176<br />
unemployed 1,853 3,072 3,314 2,910 2,866 2,676 2,873 2,407 2,368<br />
Economically<br />
active<br />
population, total<br />
of which:<br />
As percentage of <strong>the</strong> total of economically active population<br />
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
employed 94.8 90.5 90.2 91.2 91.5 92.2 92.1 92.9 93.3<br />
unemployed 5.2 9.5 9.8 8.8 8.5 7.8 7.9 7.1 6.7<br />
Men 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
of which:<br />
employed 94.8 90.3 89.8 90.8 91.1 91.9 92.2 92.5 93.0<br />
unemployed 5.2 9.7 10.2 9.2 8.9 8.1 7.8 7.5 7.0<br />
Women 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />
of which:<br />
employed 94.8 90.8 90.5 91.5 91.9 92.5 92.0 93.4 93.5<br />
unemployed 5.2 9.2 9.5 8.5 8.1 7.5 8.0 6.6 6.5<br />
Source: Goscomstat www.gks.ru<br />
* Data for 1992 and 1995 are as of <strong>the</strong> end of October; for 2000 to 2006, as of <strong>the</strong> end of November.<br />
**Data s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006 <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> Chechen Republic.<br />
78 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 35. Average annual employment by type of economic activities<br />
<strong>in</strong> thousand persons as percentage to <strong>the</strong> total<br />
2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006<br />
Total employment 66,407 66,792 67,017 100 100 100<br />
by type of economic activities:<br />
Agriculture, hunt<strong>in</strong>g and forestry 7,430 7,381 7106 11.2 11.1 10.6<br />
Fish<strong>in</strong>g, fish farms 113 138 133 0.2 0.2 0.2<br />
M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and quarry<strong>in</strong>g 1,088 1,051 1036 1.6 1.6 1.5<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 11,787 11,506 11,255 17.7 17.2 16.8<br />
Electricity, gas and water supply 1,900 1,912 1,917 2.9 2.9 2.9<br />
Construction 4,743 4,916 5,075 7.1 7.4 7.6<br />
Wholesale trade and commission<br />
trade; repair of motor<br />
vehicles, motorcycles; personal<br />
and household goods<br />
10,843 11,088 11,315 16.3 16.6 16.9<br />
Hotels and restaurants 1,152 1,163 1,183 1.7 1.7 1.8<br />
Transport and communication 5,293 5,369 5,423 8.0 8.0 8.1<br />
of which communication ... 940 951 ... 1.4 1.4<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation 835 858 928 1.3 1.3 1.4<br />
Real estate, rent<strong>in</strong>g and bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
activities<br />
Public adm<strong>in</strong>istration and defence;<br />
compulsory social security<br />
4,825 4,879 4,936 7.3 7.3 7.4<br />
3,447 3,458 3,579 5.2 5.2 5.3<br />
Education 6,125 6,039 6,014 9.2 9.0 9.0<br />
Health and social work 4,488 4,548 4,603 6.8 6.8 6.9<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r community, social and<br />
personal service activities<br />
Source: Goskomstat www.gks.ru<br />
2,330 2,460 2,492 3.5 3.7 3.7<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 36. Number of unemployed persons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 1992, 1995, and<br />
Total number of<br />
unemployed, <strong>in</strong><br />
thousand Persons<br />
Out of <strong>the</strong>m:<br />
Students,<br />
pensioners<br />
2000-2006<br />
1992 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> Sample survey on employment*<br />
3,888.6 6,684.3 7,059.1 6,287.9 6,154.7 5,683.3 5,775.2 5,208.3 4,998.7<br />
In thousand persons 717.5 520.3 686.5 726.9 633.1 645.6 777.3 610.5 517.1<br />
In per cent 18.5 7.8 9.7 11.6 10.3 11.4 13.5 11.7 10.3<br />
Women<br />
In thousand Persons 1,852.9 3,071.7 3,314.2 2,910.2 2,866.3 2,675.9 2,873.2 2,406.9 2,367.8<br />
In per cent 47.6 46.0 46.9 41.5 46.6 47.1 49.8 46.2 47.4<br />
Rural residents<br />
In thousand Persons 639.2 1,396.2 1,894.7 1,834.6 1,939.8 1,870.9 1,876.6 1,956.6 2,097.5<br />
In per cent 16.4 20.9 26.8 29.2 31.5 32.9 32.5 37.6 42.0<br />
Number of<br />
unemployed<br />
registered by<br />
government employment<br />
offices, **<br />
<strong>in</strong> thousand Persons<br />
Out of <strong>the</strong>m:<br />
Women<br />
In accordance with <strong>the</strong> data of <strong>the</strong> Federal Labour and Employment Service<br />
(end of year)<br />
577.7 2,327.0 1,037.0 1,122.7 1,499.7 1,638.9 1,920.3 1,830.1 1,742.0<br />
In thousand Persons 417.0 1,454.7 714.8 763.2 1,012.6 1,106.2 1,272.6 1,199.5 1,132.5<br />
In per cent 72.2 62.5 68.9 68.0 67.5 67.5 66.3 65.5 65.0<br />
Rural residents<br />
In thousand Persons 101.7 671.7 325.3 388.1 603.0 732.8 890.8 891.2 890.0<br />
In per cent 17.6 28.9 31.4 34.6 40.2 44.7 46.4 48.7 51.1<br />
Ratio of number of<br />
unemployed registered<br />
by government<br />
employment offices<br />
to total number of<br />
unemployed, <strong>in</strong> per<br />
cent<br />
14.9 34.7 14.8 17.8 24.4 28.7 33.3 35.1 34.8<br />
Source: Goskomstat www.gks.ru<br />
* Data for 1992 and 1995 are given as of <strong>the</strong> end of October; for 2000 to 2006, as of <strong>the</strong> end of November.<br />
**Data s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006 <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> Chechen Republic.<br />
80 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Table 37. Unemployment by age and educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> 2006*<br />
(as of end of November; percentage of <strong>the</strong> total)<br />
total Men Women<br />
Unemployed – total 100 100 100<br />
By age, <strong>in</strong> years:<br />
Under 20 9.5 8.8 10.4<br />
20 – 24 21.6 21.9 21.3<br />
25 – 29 13.9 14.4 13.3<br />
30 – 34 9.3 9.1 9.6<br />
35 – 39 10.0 10.7 9.2<br />
40 – 44 10.0 9.3 10.7<br />
45 – 49 12.2 12.5 11.9<br />
50 – 54 8.4 7.9 9.0<br />
55 - 59 3.8 4.1 3.6<br />
60 - 72 1.3 1.4 1.1<br />
Mean age of unemployed,<br />
<strong>in</strong> years<br />
34.1 34.2 34.1<br />
Unemployed – total 100 100 100<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those with<br />
education:<br />
higher professional 10.7 8.7 13.0<br />
<strong>in</strong>complete higher professional<br />
2.1 1.9 2.3<br />
secondary professional 17.3 13.0 22.1<br />
primary professional 17.6 20.0 14.9<br />
secondary (complete)<br />
general<br />
37.0 39.8 33.8<br />
basic general 13.5 14.8 12.1<br />
primary general, without<br />
primary general<br />
1.8 1.9 1.8<br />
Source : Goskomstat, see www.gks.ru<br />
* Data accord<strong>in</strong>g to returns of <strong>the</strong> sample survey on employment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g data on Chechen Republic.<br />
6.5. Policies to address irregular migration<br />
The combat irregular migration through <strong>in</strong>ternational cooperation is considered<br />
to be one of <strong>the</strong> priority areas of <strong>the</strong> MIA.<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> last years, some policy documents on <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental cooperation<br />
for combat<strong>in</strong>g irregular migration were elaborated. Such documents<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
81
<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> Concept of Cooperation between <strong>the</strong> CIS member countries aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
illegal migration approved by <strong>the</strong> Resolution of <strong>the</strong> Council of Heads of CIS<br />
member countries on 16 September 2004 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> city of Astana, and <strong>the</strong> Programme<br />
of Cooperation for 2006-<strong>2008</strong> between CIS member countries aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
illegal migration approved by <strong>the</strong> Council of Heads of CIS member countries on<br />
26 August 2005 at <strong>the</strong> city of Kazan.<br />
Close cooperation between foreign partners <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fight aga<strong>in</strong>st irregular<br />
migration is as before be<strong>in</strong>g practiced by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal security services of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework of <strong>the</strong> Agreement on Cooperation between <strong>the</strong><br />
CIS member countries aga<strong>in</strong>st illegal migration signed on 6 March 1998, and of<br />
succeed<strong>in</strong>g documents adopted as <strong>the</strong> Agreement’s cont<strong>in</strong>uation.<br />
Recent measures to facilitate <strong>the</strong> issuance of work permits especially for<br />
citizens of o<strong>the</strong>r CIS states, and <strong>the</strong> simplification of procedures to obta<strong>in</strong> foreign<br />
workers, have contributed to <strong>the</strong> strong <strong>in</strong>crease of legally employed foreigners,<br />
while <strong>the</strong> estimated numbers of undocumented foreign workers have decreased.<br />
These measures to simplify <strong>the</strong> bureaucracy have been l<strong>in</strong>ked with tougher employer<br />
sanctions. In 2007, more than 166,000 employers were found violat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
regulations <strong>in</strong> hir<strong>in</strong>g foreign citizens and were sanctioned by f<strong>in</strong>es or even by<br />
temporary suspension of <strong>the</strong>ir bus<strong>in</strong>ess up to 90 days. 74<br />
Cooperation with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r CIS states has been <strong>in</strong>tensified. In January <strong>2008</strong>,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Council of Heads of <strong>Migration</strong> Services of <strong>the</strong> CIS Member States was created.<br />
The Council has an ambitious agenda to promote more favourable attitudes<br />
on migration <strong>in</strong> CIS countries by promot<strong>in</strong>g and facilitat<strong>in</strong>g legal migration and<br />
cooperation aga<strong>in</strong>st irregular migration. The director of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> FMS is <strong>the</strong><br />
first Chairman of <strong>the</strong> Council. 75<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> authorities have launched a new database <strong>in</strong> December<br />
2007 to improve migration <strong>in</strong>formation, and are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Government Information System on <strong>Migration</strong> Records. 76 New<br />
passports have been developed with electronic components that allow better management<br />
and control of migration flows. Fur<strong>the</strong>r development work is underway<br />
to <strong>in</strong>clude biometric data <strong>in</strong>to travel documents.<br />
The <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> has signed or ratified a number of <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
<strong>in</strong>struments related to irregular migration. As previously mentioned, <strong>in</strong> March<br />
74 From FMS, reported <strong>in</strong> Mukomel and Mkrtchyan (<strong>2008</strong>).<br />
75 Idem.<br />
76 IOM Moscow and FMS of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
82 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
1998, <strong>the</strong> Agreement on cooperation between <strong>the</strong> CIS member-countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st illegal migration (Federal Law of 12 July 2000, No. 97-FL) was<br />
ratified.<br />
Also, on 12 December 2000, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> signed <strong>the</strong> UN Convention<br />
Aga<strong>in</strong>st Transnational Organized Crime, adopted on 15 November 2000,<br />
and <strong>the</strong> complementary Protocol aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> smuggl<strong>in</strong>g of migrants by land, sea<br />
and air.<br />
In Article 6 of this Protocol to <strong>the</strong> Convention, each member state shall<br />
take legal and o<strong>the</strong>r measures aga<strong>in</strong>st three specified variants of smuggl<strong>in</strong>g or<br />
related facilitation of illegal entry or stay. At present, only one offence is mentioned<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> as corpus delicti <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
“Organization of Illegal <strong>Migration</strong>” (Article 322.2).<br />
6.6. Policies to address traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
In 2000, Russia signed <strong>the</strong> UN Convention aga<strong>in</strong>st Transnational Organized<br />
Crime and its supplement<strong>in</strong>g Protocol on Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Persons, which was<br />
ratified <strong>in</strong> March 2004. Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, Russia also legally def<strong>in</strong>ed traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> its crim<strong>in</strong>al code and has <strong>in</strong>itiated steps toward respond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to traffick<strong>in</strong>g issues. Fora such as government <strong>in</strong>teragency meet<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />
anti-traffick<strong>in</strong>g conferences like <strong>the</strong> All-<strong>Russian</strong> Assemblies of Anti-Traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
NGOs have fostered dialogue among decision makers and practitioners <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
establishment of strategies to better combat traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
In order to create a special legal basis for <strong>the</strong> prevention of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, an Inter-Agency Work<strong>in</strong>g Group (WG) was<br />
established under <strong>the</strong> auspices of <strong>the</strong> Legislative Committee of <strong>the</strong> State Duma <strong>in</strong><br />
2002. 77 Members of Work<strong>in</strong>g Group (<strong>the</strong> State Duma deputies, representatives of<br />
various m<strong>in</strong>istries and departments, and non-government organizations) <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />
and developed <strong>the</strong> draft Federal Law on Prevention of Human Traffick<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> legal and organizational regulations for <strong>the</strong> prevention of human<br />
traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> and <strong>the</strong> means of coord<strong>in</strong>ation of activities<br />
of executive federal agencies, public <strong>in</strong>stitutions, and unions. The draft Law also<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> legal status and state guarantees for <strong>the</strong> victims of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The provisions of <strong>the</strong> draft Law were discussed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> parliamentary<br />
hear<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> February 2003 and March 2006. At present. <strong>the</strong> Work<strong>in</strong>g Group is<br />
77 Mukomel, Vladimir and Nikita Mkrtchyan (<strong>2008</strong>): Expert memorandum drafted for this <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong>,<br />
Moscow, January <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
83
carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> revision and upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g draft Law based on <strong>the</strong><br />
comments and amendments proposed by participat<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>istries, state departments,<br />
and political parties.<br />
In 2003, Federal Law No. 162-ФЗ on Introduc<strong>in</strong>g Changes and Additions<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> was adopted <strong>in</strong> Russia. With<br />
<strong>the</strong> adoption of this Law, <strong>Russian</strong> law enforcement authorities received a legal<br />
basis for <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>alization and prosecution of traffick<strong>in</strong>g-related offences. The<br />
Law envisages crim<strong>in</strong>al liability for traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons (Article 127-1), use<br />
of slave labour (Article 127-2), <strong>in</strong>volvement of m<strong>in</strong>ors <strong>in</strong> prostitution (Article<br />
240, part 3), <strong>the</strong> organization of prostitution (Article 241), and <strong>the</strong> manufacture<br />
and distribution of materials or objects with pornographic depictions of m<strong>in</strong>ors<br />
(Article 242-1). The Law def<strong>in</strong>es traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons as “<strong>the</strong> buy<strong>in</strong>g and sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of a person or o<strong>the</strong>r actions committed for <strong>the</strong> purpose of his exploitation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
form of recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbour<strong>in</strong>g, or receipt”. The Law<br />
differentiates aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al liability for traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons. Depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on <strong>the</strong> gravity of <strong>the</strong> crime (committed with regard to two or more persons, with<br />
<strong>the</strong> use or threat of force, etc.), <strong>the</strong> punishment might be up to 15 years of imprisonment.<br />
The Law def<strong>in</strong>es slave labour as “<strong>the</strong> use of person’s labour with regard to<br />
whom power characterized by <strong>the</strong> right of ownership is exercised, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> event<br />
when a person, for reasons beyond his control, cannot refuse do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> work<br />
(provid<strong>in</strong>g services)”. The maximum punishment of imprisonment is up to 15<br />
years.<br />
The crim<strong>in</strong>al liability for <strong>in</strong>volvement of m<strong>in</strong>ors <strong>in</strong> prostitution was <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
to up to eight years of imprisonment, and <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al liability of organization<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> engagement of o<strong>the</strong>r persons <strong>in</strong> prostitution was broadened. Aggravat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
circumstances <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> use or threat of force, <strong>the</strong> use of authority of<br />
an official position, and <strong>the</strong> deliberate use of m<strong>in</strong>ors for engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> prostitution,<br />
among o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />
The Federal Law of 20 August 2004 No. 119-ФЗ on State Protection of<br />
Victims, Witnesses and O<strong>the</strong>r Parties to Crim<strong>in</strong>al Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs which entered <strong>in</strong>to<br />
force on 1 January 2005 plays an important role <strong>in</strong> combat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g. It enacts a set of state-guaranteed security measures<br />
for <strong>the</strong> protected persons. In accordance to <strong>the</strong> Law, claimants, witnesses, and<br />
victims shall be eligible for government protection.<br />
84 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
The Law creates normative and legal bases for <strong>the</strong> protection of victims<br />
of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g and members of <strong>the</strong>ir families through relocation to a different<br />
permanent place of residence, issuance of new documents, change of appearance,<br />
personal protection and protection of home and property, provision of<br />
special <strong>in</strong>dividual protection, communication and security alarm devices, protection<br />
of confidential <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> protected person, transfer to a new job or<br />
educational <strong>in</strong>stitution, and temporary relocation to a secured shelter (Article 6,<br />
Chapter 2).<br />
To enhance <strong>the</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ation of anti-traffick<strong>in</strong>g activities, a programme of<br />
cooperation of CIS member states <strong>in</strong> combat<strong>in</strong>g traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons for 2007-<br />
2010 78 was adopted on 28 November 2006 <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>sk <strong>in</strong> which.specialized units<br />
have been created with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Interior 79 and regional departments<br />
with <strong>the</strong> purpose of prevent<strong>in</strong>g, detect<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g crim<strong>in</strong>al cases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
sphere of irregular migration, traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons, and use of slave labour. The<br />
methods used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation of traffick<strong>in</strong>g-related crimes were worked out.<br />
The methods conta<strong>in</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al qualification of traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> humans, <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />
procedures of traffick<strong>in</strong>g-related cases, ways of cooperation, tactical characteristics<br />
of some <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>vestigative actions, and subsequent and f<strong>in</strong>al stages of<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> authorities are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir efforts towards streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g antitraffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
response and improv<strong>in</strong>g correspond<strong>in</strong>g legislation. In particular, <strong>the</strong><br />
State Duma Committee for Civil, Crim<strong>in</strong>al, Arbitral and Remedial Legislation is<br />
draft<strong>in</strong>g three alternative bills for enrich<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human<br />
be<strong>in</strong>gs..It is also proposed that a new article on Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>ors be added<br />
as well as <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> length of imprisonment for traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ors. The<br />
Committee <strong>in</strong>tends to give <strong>the</strong> bills <strong>the</strong>ir first read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> early <strong>2008</strong>. 80<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> leaders of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs and<br />
<strong>the</strong> Interior M<strong>in</strong>istry are call<strong>in</strong>g for better <strong>in</strong>ternational cooperation and exchange<br />
of <strong>in</strong>formation, experiences and best practices on combat<strong>in</strong>g human traffick<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
with emphasis on <strong>the</strong> key role of <strong>the</strong> UN <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevention of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
worldwide. 81<br />
78 http://cis.m<strong>in</strong>sk.by/ma<strong>in</strong>.aspx?uid=8046<br />
79 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Article 151 (Investigative Jurisdiction) of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Procedural Code of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al cases for crimes, envisaged by Articles 127.1 and 127.2, a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>vestigation shall<br />
be conducted by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigators of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal affairs bodies of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>.<br />
80 http://www.rosbalt.ru/<strong>2008</strong>/02/12/455755.html<br />
81 http://www.rian.ru/world/<strong>2008</strong>0213/99134102.html, http://gzt.ru/world/<strong>2008</strong>/02/15/200652.html<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
85
Table 38. Statistics on crimes related to traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> people, 2004-2007 82<br />
(The table below conta<strong>in</strong>s data on traffick<strong>in</strong>g violations with reference to relevant laws or<br />
articles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicated below as CC RF.)<br />
article CC rf<br />
2004<br />
number of<br />
registered crimes<br />
86 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
number of persons<br />
called to account<br />
127-1 1 17 4<br />
127-2 2 8 5<br />
240 3 276 100<br />
241 4 976 656<br />
2005<br />
127-1 60 24<br />
127-2 20 10<br />
240 390 100<br />
241 1,030 741<br />
2006<br />
127-1 106 45<br />
127-2 19 15<br />
240 548 262<br />
241 1,376 967<br />
2007<br />
127-1 104 55<br />
127-2 35 22<br />
240 575 273<br />
241 1,570 1,049<br />
1 Article 127.1 of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code – Traffick<strong>in</strong>g of Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
2 Article 127.2 of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code – Use of Slave Labour<br />
3 Article 240 of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code – Attraction to Prostitution<br />
4 Article 241 of <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code – Organization of Prostitution<br />
82 Statistics from <strong>the</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong> Center for Information and Analysis of <strong>the</strong> Interior M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> Federa-<br />
tion.
The law enforcement authorities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> actively cooperate<br />
with law enforcement agencies <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries, with <strong>Russian</strong> and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
NGOs, and with <strong>the</strong> UN and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>ternational organizations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> IOM (see ma<strong>in</strong> actors <strong>in</strong> Section 6.9). 83<br />
Examples of counter-traffick<strong>in</strong>g projects<br />
Many anti-traffick<strong>in</strong>g projects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> are carried out by<br />
local NGOs. However such project-based activities have certa<strong>in</strong> weakness. Typically,<br />
<strong>the</strong> length of such projects is no more than one year. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />
little coord<strong>in</strong>ation between <strong>the</strong> different projects, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some overlap of<br />
activities as well as existence of serious gaps. S<strong>in</strong>ce anti-traffick<strong>in</strong>g activities and<br />
support to victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> majority of NGOs are based on <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
donor support, <strong>the</strong> lack of stability, cont<strong>in</strong>uity, and susta<strong>in</strong>ability will be a<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> concern until government agencies and public entities start support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se<br />
projects with f<strong>in</strong>ancial, <strong>in</strong>formation, and o<strong>the</strong>r types of assistance.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>in</strong> order to streng<strong>the</strong>n understand<strong>in</strong>g, coord<strong>in</strong>ation, and<br />
collaboration <strong>in</strong> counter-traffick<strong>in</strong>g , a UN and IOM work<strong>in</strong>g group was established<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2004, with UN agency membership <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ILO, UNFPA, UN-<br />
ODC, UNDP, UNICEF and <strong>the</strong> UN Resident Coord<strong>in</strong>ator’s Office <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong>. Thus, to support efforts of both government and non-government<br />
structures to combat traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> as a<br />
country of orig<strong>in</strong>, transit, and dest<strong>in</strong>ation, IOM spearheaded three anti-traffick<strong>in</strong>g<br />
projects:<br />
1. Prevention of human traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (funded by <strong>the</strong><br />
European Commission and <strong>the</strong> United States and Swiss governments). The<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> components of <strong>the</strong> project are:<br />
• Policy Advice: improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legislative framework and <strong>the</strong> state policies<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g human traffick<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> national capacity to<br />
assess and measure this phenomenon <strong>in</strong> Russia<br />
• Prevention: streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> capacity of <strong>the</strong> relevant law enforcement<br />
agencies to combat human traffick<strong>in</strong>g; rais<strong>in</strong>g awareness among<br />
<strong>the</strong> risk groups, general public and relevant <strong>Russian</strong> authorities, NGOs<br />
and diplomatic missions of foreign states<br />
83 E.V. Tiurukanova and <strong>the</strong> Institute for Urban Economics (2006) Human Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
Inventory and Analysis of <strong>the</strong> Current Situation and Responses. Report conducted for <strong>the</strong> UN/IOM Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Group on Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs, Moscow, http://www.undp.ru/<strong>in</strong>dex.phtml?iso=RU&lid=1&cmd=p<br />
ublications1&id=54<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
87
• Re<strong>in</strong>tegration: build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> capacity of <strong>the</strong> national authorities and local<br />
NGO networks to protect and re<strong>in</strong>tegrate victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
2. Combat<strong>in</strong>g Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> (funded<br />
by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> components of <strong>the</strong> project are:<br />
• Provision of equipment to Federal Counter-Traffick<strong>in</strong>g Department/<br />
Unit/Focal-po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
• Counter-traffick<strong>in</strong>g educational programme<br />
• Network<strong>in</strong>g visits to countries of orig<strong>in</strong><br />
• Law Enforcement Conference <strong>in</strong> Moscow/Sa<strong>in</strong>t Petersburg<br />
<strong>2008</strong>/2009<br />
• Youth group capacity build<strong>in</strong>g and engagement.<br />
3. Re<strong>in</strong>tegration assistance to victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
(funded by <strong>the</strong> Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation or<br />
SDC). The ma<strong>in</strong> components of <strong>the</strong> project are:<br />
• establishment of a safe house facilitat<strong>in</strong>g long-term assistance and<br />
support to up to 20 victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g (women victims of sexual<br />
exploitation)<br />
• launch<strong>in</strong>g of a project development contest for NGOs focus<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
counter-traffick<strong>in</strong>g services with as many as four NGOs receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fund<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> selected projects<br />
• creation of a re<strong>in</strong>tegration fund provid<strong>in</strong>g assistance to up to 75 former<br />
victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
6.7. Refugees, asylum seekers and <strong>in</strong>ternally displaced persons,<br />
and relevant policies <strong>in</strong> place<br />
Shortly after <strong>the</strong> dissolution of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>,<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> UN Convention on Refugees of 1951 and <strong>the</strong> Protocol of 1967,<br />
could not completely fulfill its obligations to <strong>the</strong> UN Convention due to f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts. Refugee status was granted ma<strong>in</strong>ly to citizens of CIS and Baltic<br />
countries; applicants from foreign countries were granted refugee status only <strong>in</strong><br />
exceptional cases. Russia adopted <strong>the</strong> Law on Refugees (of February 1993, No.<br />
4528-1) and on Asylum Seekers (19 February 1993, No. 4530-1). 84<br />
84 In 1995, <strong>the</strong> new version of <strong>the</strong> resolution “On asylum seekers” was adopted (by Federal Law of 20 December<br />
1995, No. 202-FL). Follow<strong>in</strong>g this, <strong>in</strong> 1997, <strong>the</strong> new version of <strong>the</strong> resolution “On refugees” (Federal Law<br />
of 28 June 1997, No. 95-FL), was adopted, putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> national legislation <strong>in</strong> better alignment with <strong>the</strong> UN<br />
Refugee Convention.<br />
88 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
S<strong>in</strong>ce July 1992, more than 1,623,000 people have been granted refugee<br />
and asylum seeker status. On 1 January 2001, 445 people were provided with<br />
refugee status and 117,711 with asylum seeker status, out of whom 23,827 persons<br />
were considered <strong>in</strong>ternally displaced persons. 85<br />
The FMS of Russia projects that <strong>in</strong> <strong>2008</strong>-2010, <strong>the</strong> number of applicants<br />
for refugee status and who will obta<strong>in</strong> this status will <strong>in</strong>crease. This projection<br />
goes as well to <strong>the</strong> number of persons who will be given temporary asylum.<br />
Russia has unfulfilled f<strong>in</strong>ancial obligations to persons who have received<br />
<strong>the</strong> status of asylum seekers. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>in</strong> 2007, 1,287 families of asylum<br />
seekers were provided with hous<strong>in</strong>g; <strong>in</strong> 2006, 306 families received this type of<br />
support. For <strong>2008</strong>, <strong>the</strong> federal budget envisages to allocate RUR 1129.2 million<br />
(about USD 46 million) for <strong>the</strong> purchase of hous<strong>in</strong>g for asylum seekers.<br />
In 2007, <strong>the</strong> government rendered support to citizens who suffered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Ossetian-Chechen conflict—a total of 655 families and 68,661 persons who were<br />
returned to <strong>the</strong> places of <strong>the</strong>ir former residence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> Chechen<br />
Republic. A total of 309 families received reimbursement for <strong>the</strong> lost of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
hous<strong>in</strong>g and/or property.<br />
Table 39. Asylum applications <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>, 2004-2007<br />
2004 2005 2006 2007( June)<br />
315 292 1,170 291<br />
Source: UNHCR, 2007.<br />
6.8. O<strong>the</strong>r important migration actors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country<br />
International actors<br />
Delegation of <strong>the</strong> European Commission to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
19017, Moscow<br />
Kadashevskaya nab., 14/1<br />
Tel.: (+7 495) 721 20 00<br />
Fax (+7 495) 721 20 20<br />
E-mail: Delegation-Russia@ec.europa.eu<br />
85 These figures do not <strong>in</strong>clude data on persons forcibly moved to <strong>the</strong> Ingushetiani Republic from <strong>the</strong> Republic<br />
of North Ossetia-Alania, as well as those who applied to <strong>the</strong> FMS for refugee and asylum seeker status, due to<br />
events <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chechen Republic <strong>in</strong> 1994-1996 and 1999-2001.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
89
International Organization for <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> Moscow (IOM)<br />
2-ya Zvenigorodskaya St., 12<br />
Moscow, 123100<br />
Tel.: (495) 797-8722; (495) 253-1335<br />
Fax: (495) 253-3522<br />
http://www.iomrussia.ru; http://www.iom.<strong>in</strong>t<br />
International Labour Organization (ILO)<br />
107031 Moscow<br />
Petrovka 15, apt. 23<br />
Tel.: +7 (495) 933-0810<br />
Fax.: +7 (495) 933-0820<br />
E-mail: moscow@ilo.org<br />
United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC)<br />
Regional Office for Russia and Belarus<br />
28 Ostozhenka, Moscow, Russia, 119034<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 787 2121<br />
Fax.: +7(495) 787 2129<br />
E-mail: office@unodc.ru<br />
United Nations Office for <strong>the</strong> Coord<strong>in</strong>ation of Humanitarian Affairs<br />
(OCHA) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
6 pereulok Obukha Moscow 105064<br />
Tel.: (+7 495) 956 6405<br />
Fax: (+7 495) 956 6355<br />
E-mail: ocharf@un.org<br />
http://www.ocha.ru<br />
Office of <strong>the</strong> United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights<br />
(UNHCHR)<br />
119034 Moscow 28 Ostozhenka St.,<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 787 21 00<br />
Fax +7(495) 787 2101<br />
http://www.unrussia.ru<br />
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)<br />
Moscow<br />
Ostozhenka St. 28, 119034<br />
Tel.: 7(495) 787 21 00<br />
Fax: 7(495) 787 21 01<br />
E-mail: office@undp.ru<br />
90 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
St. Petersburg<br />
Fontanka St. 21, 191011<br />
Tel.: (812) 570 59 19<br />
Fax: (812) 570 55 47<br />
E-mail: unoffice@peterl<strong>in</strong>k.ru<br />
Vladikavkaz<br />
Tel.: (8672) 45 14 26<br />
Fax: (8672) 54 60 97<br />
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky<br />
Karl Marx Av. 29/1, Room 207<br />
Tel: (41522) 91 9 70<br />
Fax: (41522) 90 827<br />
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)<br />
4/17 Pokrovsky Blvd., Build<strong>in</strong>g 1, Office 19/20101000<br />
Moscow, <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Tel.: +7 495 933 8818<br />
Fax: +7 495 933 8819<br />
E-mail: moscow@unicef.org<br />
http://www.unicef.org/russia/ru/<br />
Collective Security Treaty Organization<br />
103012, Moscow, Varvarka St, 7,<br />
Tel.: +7(495) 625-7620, (495) 606-9771<br />
E-mail: odkb@gov.ru<br />
National Actors<br />
NGOs work<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
A very large number of NGOs are work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> counter-traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. The follow<strong>in</strong>g list, compiled by <strong>the</strong> IOM Office <strong>in</strong> Moscow,<br />
shows some of NGOs that are active <strong>in</strong> different parts of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
Yekater<strong>in</strong>burg, Sverdlovskaya oblast – “Ekater<strong>in</strong>a”<br />
Contact person: Ermakova Lyudmila Mikhaylovna<br />
Tel.: 8 (343) 220 30 28<br />
E-mail: lusy@etel.ru, lusy@isnet.ru<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
1
Astrakhan - “Oratorium”<br />
Contact person: Perepyolk<strong>in</strong> Eduard<br />
Tel.: 8 (906) 457 09 34<br />
E-mail: oratorium@<strong>in</strong>box.ru<br />
Petrozavodsk, Karelia- Karelskiy Centre for Gender Studies<br />
Contact person: Boychenko Larisa Dmitrievna<br />
Tel.: 8 (8142) 773 919<br />
Moscow- “Coalition Angel”<br />
Contact person: Kuzbit Oleg Romanovich<br />
Tel.: (495) 915 43 74, 783 5865<br />
E-mail: program@angelcoalition.org, okouzbit@nagelcoalition.ru<br />
http://www.angelcoalition.org<br />
Moscow- “Sisters”<br />
Contact person: Mokhova Mariya Lyvovna<br />
Tel.: 7 (095) 901 02 01<br />
E-mail: syostri@gmail.com; maha64@mail.ru<br />
Moscow- “Kesher”<br />
Director: Svetlana Yakimenko<br />
Tel.: 8 (095) 254 99 58, 8 (916) 128 25 58<br />
E-mail: svetakesher@onl<strong>in</strong>e.ru, svetakesher@<strong>in</strong>box.ru,www.projectkesher.org<br />
Khabarovsk, Far East – W<strong>in</strong>rock<br />
Director: Shchet<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>a Olga Petrovna<br />
Tel.: (4212) 30 63 73, 31-08-18, 30-85-67<br />
E- mail: oschet<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>a@success.w<strong>in</strong>rock.ru<br />
Vladivostok, Far East – “Far Eastern Crisis Centre”<br />
Director: Bazhenova Svetlana Kupriyanovna<br />
Tel.: (4232) 43 20 33, (4232) 903312<br />
E-mail: fe-centre@mail.ru<br />
Aks<strong>in</strong>ya<br />
Contact person: Ir<strong>in</strong>a Mardar<br />
Tel.: 8-926-4538351<br />
92 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Kazan- “Fatima”<br />
Contact person : Galitskaya Mar<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Tel.: (843) 2536085, (843)2464401<br />
E-mail : Fatima@bancorp.ru<br />
Novosibirsk- “Siberian Women’s League”<br />
Contact person: Head of <strong>the</strong> Council Yurtayeva Larisa<br />
Tel.: (383) 208 09 91<br />
E-mail: liga@onl<strong>in</strong>e.nsk.su<br />
Chelyab<strong>in</strong>sk- “Women’s Commonwealth”<br />
Contact person: Vasilyeva Larisa Semyonovna<br />
Tel.: (3512) 62 00 96<br />
E-mail: vls05@mail.ru<br />
Irkutsk- “Angara”<br />
Contact person: Uralova Svetlana Valent<strong>in</strong>ovna<br />
Tel.: (3952) 38 79 02, 39 78 35, (3952) 46-55-09<br />
E-mail: uralova@<strong>in</strong>box.ru<br />
Saratov- “Women’s Crisis Centre”<br />
Contact person: Pylayeva Oksana Yuryevn<br />
Tel.: (8452) 27 91 70<br />
E-mail: gamerazum@rambler.ru<br />
Murmansk- “Crisis Centre- Priyut”<br />
Contact person: Shtylyova Lyubov Vasilyevna<br />
Tel.: (8152) 22 71 36, 22 68 75<br />
E-mail: krc@unis.ru<br />
Nizhniy Novgorod- “<strong>Russian</strong> Children’s Fund”<br />
Contact person: Dernova N<strong>in</strong>a Ivanovna<br />
Tel.: (8312) 33 14 80<br />
E-mail: dernova@<strong>in</strong>fonet.nnof.ru<br />
Yaroslavl- “Center for Sexual Culture Formation”<br />
Contact person: Shelkova Valent<strong>in</strong>a Anamovna<br />
Tel.: (4852) 55 66 91; Fax: 55 50 64, 53 13 21<br />
Mobile: 33 13 46; Hotl<strong>in</strong>e: (8910) 973 13 46<br />
E-mail: ovsnnk@mail.ru, ovsnnk@rus21.ru<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Krasnoyarsk- “Verba”<br />
Contact person : Palchik Natalya Borisovna<br />
Tel. : (3912) 34 25 38<br />
E-mail : palchiknata@mail.ru<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
7. annex: soMe aDDitional <strong>Migration</strong><br />
statistiCs<br />
Annex Table 1. Foreign citizens and stateless persons who obta<strong>in</strong>ed temporary asylum<br />
and were registered with <strong>the</strong> Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service of Russia, 2001-2007<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />
Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons<br />
Total 725 1,232 723 1,228 599 1,061 584 1,020 700 1,174<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
near-abroad<br />
countries<br />
Far-abroad<br />
countries<br />
9 14 7 12 8 13 13 26 44 75<br />
716 1218 716 1,216 591 1,048 571 994 656 1,099<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service (http://www.fms-rf.ru/about/ofstat/vu_stat/vu_reg_count.php)<br />
Annex Table 2. Conferment of <strong>Russian</strong> citizenship, 2005-2006<br />
2005 2006<br />
Acquired <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> citizenship 493,948 365,255<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
In a simplified procedure 376,948 283,004<br />
In a common procedure 614 152<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational treaties 116,376 82,099<br />
Out of those who acquired <strong>the</strong> citizenship:<br />
Adults 316,517 273,960<br />
Children under 18 96,298 90,145<br />
Students 15,774 11,798<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service.<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
Annex Table 3. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>in</strong>dicators of temporary labour migration to Russia, 2005-2007<br />
Employers with permits to engage foreign<br />
labour<br />
2005 2006<br />
6 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
2007 (January<br />
to october)<br />
35,886 45,205 27,830<br />
Foreign labour permits issued, total 44,323 56,379 21,200<br />
Foreign workers employed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
report<strong>in</strong>g period<br />
702,500 1,014,013 2,024,069<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> CIS countries 343,665 537,722 1,663,404<br />
Foreign labour permits issued to foreign<br />
citizens, total<br />
430,147 583,609 1,871,752<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> CIS countries 238,115 317,398 1,611,805<br />
Organizations licensed to employ <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Russian</strong> citizens to work abroad as of <strong>the</strong><br />
end of <strong>the</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g period<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service, http://www.fms.gov.ru/about/ofstat/stat_1_rd/<strong>in</strong>dex.php<br />
558 616 600<br />
Annex Table 4. Number of engaged foreign labour and average monthly salary <strong>in</strong> 2006 by regions of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>*<br />
subjects of <strong>the</strong> russian<br />
federation<br />
number of employed<br />
foreign workers<br />
average monthly nom<strong>in</strong>al<br />
salary accounted <strong>in</strong> 2006,<br />
roubles.<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> – total 1,014,013 10,727.7<br />
Central Federal District<br />
<strong>the</strong> Belgorod Region 4,284 8,428.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Bryansk region 974 6,385.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Vladimir region 4,358 7,515.5<br />
<strong>the</strong> Voronezh Region 3,539 6,666.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ivanovo Region 1,439 6,545.2<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kaluga Region 4,991 8,483.8<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kostroma region 1,481 7,492.4<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kursk region 1,256 7,150.6<br />
<strong>the</strong> Lipetsk Region 1,833 8,617.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Moscow region 85,067 11,752.4<br />
<strong>the</strong> Orel region 853 6,786.6<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ryazan Region 5,430 7,763.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Smolensk Region 911 7,827.6<br />
<strong>the</strong> Tambov region 1,188 6,267.5<br />
<strong>the</strong> Tver region 3,670 8,115.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Tula region 4,115 7,723.3<br />
<strong>the</strong> Yaroslavl region 3,378 9,012.8<br />
City of Moscow 355,384 18,698.6
North-western Federal District<br />
<strong>the</strong> Republic of Karelia 2,187 10,706.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Komi Republic 2,961 14,247.3<br />
<strong>the</strong> Arkhangelsk Region 2,426 11,901.2<br />
<strong>the</strong> Vologda Region 4,226 10,777.6<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad Region 8,492 9,373.5<br />
<strong>the</strong> Murmansk Region 1,453 10,612.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Novgorod Region 1,536 14,983.9<br />
<strong>the</strong> Pskov Region 1,458 8,843.8<br />
St. Petersburg 34,811 6,974<br />
The Len<strong>in</strong>grad region 12,983 12,978.9<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Federal District<br />
Republic of Adygeya 190 6,350.7<br />
Republic of Dagestan 1,684 4,884.4<br />
Republic of Ingushetia 103 6,720.2<br />
Kabard<strong>in</strong>o-Balkarian Republic 103 5,862<br />
Republic of Kalmykia 628 5,626.6<br />
Karachai-Circassian Republic 94 6,051.8<br />
Republic of North Ossetia-Alania 630 5,893.8<br />
Chechen Republic 2 8,078<br />
Krasnodar Territory 22,455 8,065.2<br />
Stavropol Territory 3,364 6,844.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Astrakhan region 3,943 8,193<br />
<strong>the</strong> Volgograd region 7,673 7,679.4<br />
<strong>the</strong> Rostov region 3,642 7,485.3<br />
Privolzhsky Federal District<br />
Republic of Bashkortostan 13,475 8,474.8<br />
Republic of Marij El 103 6,526.1<br />
Republic of Mordovia 899 6,362<br />
Republic of Tatarstan 14,784 8,839.1<br />
Udmurtian Republic 2,817 7,881.6<br />
Chuvash Republic 316 6,407.2<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kirov Region 707 9,584.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Nizhni Novgorod Region 11,919 7,187.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Orenburg Region 4,693 8,147.9<br />
<strong>the</strong> Penza Region 1,157 7,752.8<br />
<strong>the</strong> Perm Region 9,106 6,492.3<br />
<strong>the</strong> Samara Region 7,883 9,630.5<br />
The Saratov region 951 7,170.8<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
The Ulyanovsk region 2,213 6,733.9<br />
Uralian Federal District<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kurgan Region 737 7,267.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Sverdlovsk Region 52,845 10,942.5<br />
<strong>the</strong> Tyumen Region 9,634 2,3854<br />
<strong>the</strong> Chelyab<strong>in</strong>sk Region 15,707 26,936.8<br />
<strong>the</strong> Khanty-Mansijsk Autonomous<br />
District<br />
<strong>the</strong> Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous<br />
District<br />
Siberian Federal District<br />
98 <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong><br />
29,348 32,929.6<br />
26,443 9,364.9<br />
Republic of Altai 765 7527<br />
Republic of Buryatia 3,525 9,333.6<br />
Republic of Tuva 408 8,956.8<br />
Republic of Khakassia 332 9,511.5<br />
Altai Territory 5,861 6,149<br />
Krasnoyarsk Territory 22,805 12,454<br />
<strong>the</strong> Irkutsk region 12,901 11,069.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kemerovo region 5,027 10,328.4<br />
<strong>the</strong> Novosibirsk region 12,786 9,120.5<br />
<strong>the</strong> Omsk region 5,649 8,980.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Tomsk region 1,667 11,495.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Chita region 20,569 10,039.4<br />
Far East Federal District<br />
<strong>the</strong> Republic of Sakha Yakutia 14,861 16,154.6<br />
The Primorskiy Territory 37,900 10,887.3<br />
Khabarovsk Territory 13,643 12,512.6<br />
<strong>the</strong> Amur region 18,454 11,069<br />
<strong>the</strong> Kamchatka Region 549 19,692.4<br />
<strong>the</strong> Magadan region 1786 18,516<br />
<strong>the</strong> Sakhal<strong>in</strong> Region 16,816 19,001.7<br />
<strong>the</strong> Jewish Autonomous Region 6,326 9,829.1<br />
<strong>the</strong> Chukotka Autonomous District 4,451 25,113.8<br />
Source: Federal <strong>Migration</strong> Service; Social and Economic Situation <strong>in</strong> Russia, January 2007, Rosstat, 2007<br />
* Data by autonomous areas, except for <strong>the</strong> Khanty-Mansi and Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Areas, are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />
relevant areas.
Annex Table 5. Immigrants at age 14 and older, by citizenship<br />
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
All migrants 158,505 111,883 104,550 155,056 163,687<br />
<strong>Russian</strong> citizens 142,731 94,425 93,293 142,108 149,212<br />
Foreign citizens 13,225 14,738 9,063 10,303 9,931<br />
Stateless persons 2,549 2,720 2,194 2,645 1,728<br />
Not <strong>in</strong>dicated 2,816<br />
Source: Population and <strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>. Moscow, <strong>the</strong> Rosstat, 2004-2006<br />
Annex Table 6. Remittances from and to Russia sent through money transfer systems<br />
Remittances from<br />
Russia<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g.: non-CIS<br />
counties<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Postal Service of Russia, 2003-2007, <strong>in</strong> million dollars<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006<br />
2007 (Januaryseptember)<br />
1,310 2,070 3,549 6,005 6,317<br />
… … 323 622 584<br />
CIS countries … … 3,226 5,382 5,733<br />
Remittances to Russia 588 777 1,041 1,304 1,193<br />
Includ<strong>in</strong>g: non-CIS<br />
counties<br />
… … 645 746 592<br />
CIS countries … … 396 559 600<br />
<strong>Migration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Russian</strong> <strong>Federation</strong>: A <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Profile</strong> <strong>2008</strong>
17 route des Morillons CH-1211 Geneva 19, Switzerland<br />
Tel: +41 22 717 9111 • Fax: +41 22 798 6150<br />
E-mail: hq@iom.<strong>in</strong>t • Internet: http://www.iom.<strong>in</strong>t US $20.00