22.08.2013 Views

Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

over the l<strong>and</strong> that they have lived on for centuries.<br />

Another problem is the failure to consult indigenous<br />

communities when developing l<strong>and</strong> rights policies.<br />

Many indigenous communities have their own<br />

local l<strong>and</strong> practices that policymakers completely<br />

disregard in the drafting of their frameworks for l<strong>and</strong><br />

rights. The Samburu of Kenya, for example, use the<br />

Lkiama system, which their ancestors developed<br />

centuries ago. The Lkiama system states that all<br />

tribal l<strong>and</strong>s are collectively owned by the community<br />

<strong>and</strong> entrusts them to a group of elders, who then<br />

distribute them for use to the rest of the tribe. The<br />

Samburu also negotiate directly with other tribes for<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s rights, outside of the jurisdiction of national<br />

laws. The Kenyan government, however, did not take<br />

the Lkiama system or these direct negotiations in<br />

account when developing its new l<strong>and</strong> policy, which<br />

has led to dissention among the Samburu people.<br />

131 Further problems with legal frameworks for local<br />

l<strong>and</strong> rights include overly complicated procedures<br />

for securing these l<strong>and</strong> rights, imprecision in the<br />

definitions of who is entitled to local l<strong>and</strong> rights, <strong>and</strong><br />

conflict over ownership of natural resources within<br />

certain territories. 132<br />

Upon removing indigenous populations from<br />

ancestral l<strong>and</strong>s, governments sometimes resettle<br />

them on l<strong>and</strong>s entirely unfamiliar to the populations.<br />

For example, the Batwa people of Central Africa have<br />

traditionally lived in the forests of Rw<strong>and</strong>a, Ug<strong>and</strong>a,<br />

Burundi, <strong>and</strong> the eastern part of the democratic<br />

Republic of the Congo. In past few decades, these<br />

governments have expelled the Batwa from their<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s because they wished to either undertake a<br />

large infrastructural development program or form<br />

a national park or nature reserve on the territory.<br />

Currently, fewer than 10% of the Batwa still retain<br />

access to traditional forest l<strong>and</strong>s while the rest<br />

have been resettled to villages on the periphery of<br />

mainstream society. 133 These resettled citizens cannot<br />

continue the forms of employment that they used to<br />

undertake in the forest, <strong>and</strong> discrimination from the<br />

majority ethnic group prevents them from obtaining<br />

meaningful work. Most end up working as labor on<br />

other people’s farms <strong>and</strong> have to borrow food in<br />

order to survive. This entraps the Batwa people in a<br />

cycle of debt from which they rarely escape. While<br />

the populations of these African nations are rapidly<br />

rising, the Batwa population is falling, most likely<br />

because of the extreme poverty they face <strong>and</strong> the<br />

subsequent lack of access to food <strong>and</strong> healthcare. 134<br />

The problem of indigenous populations losing their<br />

local l<strong>and</strong> rights is not always forced upon them by<br />

national governments. In some instances, immediate<br />

economic pressures can encourage indigenous<br />

peoples to sell their plots to whomever is willing to pay,<br />

whether it be members of the majority population or a<br />

dominant company. The Olkaria Maasai population of<br />

Kenya, for example, live in Hell’s Gate National Park,<br />

where the Kenya electricity Generating Company<br />

(KenGen), a parastatal organization that produces<br />

the vast majority of the electricity consumed in the<br />

country, has been developing geothermal energy<br />

since before the founding of the park in 1984. After a<br />

long legal dispute, a Kenyan court ruled in 2009 that<br />

the Maasai had rights to the l<strong>and</strong> but, ignoring the<br />

local l<strong>and</strong> customs as discussed above, divided the<br />

l<strong>and</strong> into plots owned by individual members of the<br />

Maasai tribe. While some have retained their l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

resumed traditional agricultural practices, KenGen<br />

has bought out many others, paying them substantial<br />

amounts for their individual titles. This issue has<br />

brought significant intertribal violence <strong>and</strong> conflict to<br />

the region, as those that do not sell were angry with<br />

those that do. 135 Although it seems that the selling of<br />

individual titles benefits the economic situations of<br />

these Maasai, in the long run it will most likely leave<br />

them in a worse position, as most of them do not<br />

have the education or the skills for other occupations<br />

35<br />

Melbourne Host Directorate PTY LTD | Office of Media <strong>and</strong> Design

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!