22.08.2013 Views

Legal Committee - World Model United Nations

Legal Committee - World Model United Nations

Legal Committee - World Model United Nations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and assistance measures. It does not take a definite stand<br />

on weaponry, though it does establish a ban on superfluous<br />

injury and affirms the need to protect the environment. It<br />

reaffirms that the right of parties to the conflict to choose<br />

methods or means of warfare is not unlimited. It states<br />

that “the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish<br />

between the civilian population and combatants and between<br />

civilian objects and military objectives.” 36<br />

Protocol I also states that attacks “which may be expected<br />

to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians,<br />

damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which<br />

could be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct<br />

military advantage anticipated” are prohibited. 37 This<br />

statement reinforces the principle of proportionality and<br />

the prohibition of indiscriminate attacks. It also sets up a<br />

passing legal argument against the use of nuclear weapons<br />

or other weapons of mass destruction. With all these rules,<br />

the Protocol enforces that war should be waged against the<br />

enemy, and not against defenseless people.<br />

“[Attacks] which<br />

may...cause...loss of<br />

civilian life, injury to<br />

civilians, damage to<br />

civilian objects...which<br />

could be excessive<br />

in relation to the...<br />

military advantage...are<br />

prohibited.”<br />

Additional Protocol II, relating to the protection of victims<br />

of non-international armed conflicts, supplements Article<br />

3 of the four Geneva Conventions. Part I of this Protocol<br />

describes the scope of the Protocol as extending to all armed<br />

conflicts not covered by Article 1 of Protocol I and which<br />

take place in the territory of a High Contracting Party, a<br />

term designating a party to an agreement, between its armed<br />

forces and rebellious armed forces or other organized armed<br />

groups that exercise such control over a part of its territory<br />

as to enable them to carry out sustained and intensive<br />

military operations and to implement this Protocol. 38 Part<br />

I also outlines the Protocol’s limitations as not applying to<br />

internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and<br />

sporadic acts of violence and other acts of a similar nature.<br />

The Protocol focuses on removing any discrimination based<br />

on sex, color, race, or beliefs and on specific protection for<br />

those who, after the armed conflict, have had their liberty<br />

taken away or restrained for reasons relating to the conflict<br />

at hand. The Protocol includes a Non-Intervention section,<br />

which states that nothing in the Protocol shall be used for the<br />

purpose of affecting the sovereignty of a State or justifying<br />

the intervention of a High Contracting Party in the armed<br />

conflict or in the internal or external affairs of the territory in<br />

which the conflict takes place. In addition, the Protocol lists<br />

fundamental guarantees, such as protection from violence,<br />

acts of terrorism, and threats, to children and those who do<br />

not take or have ceased to take part in hostilities. Children<br />

are guaranteed an education, the reunion of separated family<br />

members, and extensive measures for their safety. 39<br />

Virtually all of the principles encompassed in Article 3 are<br />

rooted in customary law applicable in international armed<br />

conflict. If a dispute arises over the qualification of a conflict<br />

as international or non-international, parties are always<br />

bound to apply the provisions of Article 3. However, the<br />

Protocol II offers some significant improvements regarding<br />

the scale, proliferation, and violence of these conflicts. It<br />

establishes fundamental guarantees for all persons who<br />

take no direct part in hostilities, particularly focusing on<br />

those deprived of their liberty and those against whom<br />

penal prosecutions have been instituted. It offers special<br />

protection to the sick, wounded, and shipwrecked, as well<br />

as to medical and religious personnel, medical units, and<br />

transports. The civilian population, objects indispensable<br />

to survival, works and installations containing dangerous<br />

forces, cultural objects, and places of worship are also given<br />

special provisions. Forced transfers of civilians are generally<br />

prohibited. Protocol II sets the groundwork for exclusively<br />

humanitarian and impartial relief work. Nonetheless, concern<br />

about state sovereignty limited the field of application of<br />

Protocol II. 40<br />

Current Situation<br />

New Threats to Humanitarian Law: Cyber Warfare<br />

The appearance of cyber-war opened up a new realm<br />

of warfare, and computers are the new key weapon in<br />

Harvard <strong>World</strong>MUN 2012 <strong>Legal</strong> 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!