Planning Agenda - Eurobodalla Shire Council - NSW Government

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT, PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 1 AUGUST 2006 Page 15 P06/53 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO: 861/06– BROULEE 02.6410.D MULTI-PURPOSE HARDCOURT & CLASSROOM ADDITIONS 02.6410.B Policy Development Control Plans The only DCP applicable to this proposal is the Eurobodalla Parking Code. The Code bases parking requirements for educational establishments on student numbers. This proposal does not generate an increase in student numbers and therefore does not create additional parking requirements. Yellow-Bellied Glider Conservation Policy The proposal does not require the removal of any trees and therefore does not impact on the Yellow-Bellied Glider Conservation Policy. Consultation This application was notified and advertised in accordance with Council’s Advertising and Notification DCP. One submission was received in respect of the application. The submission outlined concerns in regard to the following: 1. The size of the proposed court compared to the existing hardcourt. Comment: The sizes of both courts are similar. 2. Are the new courts replacing the existing court? Comment: While not necessarily replacing the existing courts that are fenced off and not in use due to complaints from nearby residents the school requires a usable hardcourt which this proposal aims to provide. Usage of the court is therefore expected to reflect the previous use of the existing court e.g. primarily basketball and tennis. The future use of the existing court area is yet to be determined and requires further consultation between the school, Council, and residents. Determination of this DA is not considered to be dependent on this issue. 3. Lighting, out-of-hours usage. Comment: No lighting is proposed and the applicant proposes use of the courts between 8am-5pm Monday to Saturday only. This will be reflected in the terms of any consent issued. 4. Will the courts be built before or after other approved school buildings are built? Comment: The court can potentially be built before any other approved buildings are constructed. This is not considered to be an issue, given the distance of approx. 100m between the proposal and the property boundary adjoining neighbouring residences. It is acknowledged, however, that construction of the future primary module will provide additional screening and buffering between the proposal and adjoining residences.
DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT, PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 1 AUGUST 2006 Page 16 P06/53 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO: 861/06– BROULEE 02.6410.D MULTI-PURPOSE HARDCOURT & CLASSROOM ADDITIONS 02.6410.B 5. Should be built closer to George Bass Drive. Comment: There is approx. 100m between the proposal and nearby residences and there are no identified unsatisfactory amenity impacts that would justify refusal or a request to relocate the proposal further west. An alternative location closer to George Bass Drive would place the proposal west of the approved future admin & chapel buildings which may compromise the functionality of the courts due to the distance to student classrooms and other student recreational areas. There may also be issues of student safety in areas close to the major road. Construction of the courts in this area would necessitate the removal of a significant number of trees in an area previously approved as a landscape zone on a site that is subject to the sugar glider conservation policy. The proposed site for the court is already cleared. 6. Courts still too close to residential properties. Comment: Refer points 4 & 5. Proposed location is considered satisfactory. Financial Section 64 & 94 contributions are deemed N/A due to the minor nature of the additions and non-intensification of use as defined by student numbers. CONCLUSION The proposal complies with the objectives of the LEP and with planning policy applying to the land. An assessment of the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of S79c of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 does not reveal any identified adverse or unsatisfactory impacts. RECOMMENDED THAT Development Application No 861/06 for Multi Purpose Hardcourt and Classroom Additions on Lot 1 DP 1037342, No. 61 Train Street, Broulee dated 24 May 2006 as shown on Plan Number 06/861 and described in details accompanying the application be APPROVED under Section 80(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 for the following reasons and subject to the listed conditions: To ensure the proposed development: (a) achieves the objects of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979; (b) complies with the provisions of all relevant environmental planning instruments; (c) is consistent with the aims and objectives of Council’s Development Control Plans, Codes and Policies. To ensure the protection of the amenity and character of land adjoining and in the locality of the proposed development. To minimise any potential adverse environmental, social or economic impacts of the proposed development.
Page 1 and 2: EUROBODALLA SHIRE COUNCIL AGENDA En
Page 3 and 4: Reports to Committee are presented
Page 5 and 6: LGSA Local Government & Shires Asso
Page 7 and 8: EUROBODALLA SHIRE COUNCIL ENVIRONME
Page 9 and 10: CONFIDENTIAL BRIEFINGS Reason for C
Page 11 and 12: ENVIRONMENT, PLANNING AND ADMINISTR
Page 13 and 14: DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT,
Page 15 and 16: DANo FileNo Type Applicant Location
Page 17 and 18: DANo FileNo Type Applicant Location
Page 19 and 20: No. Of Apps 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1
Page 21 and 22: No. of Apps 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 DAs -
Page 23 and 24: DA Turnarounds - Monthly Statistics
Page 25 and 26: ENVIRONMENT REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT,
Page 33: DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT,
Page 78 and 79: STRATEGIC REPORT TO ENVIRONMENT, PL

Planning Agenda - Eurobodalla Shire Council - NSW Government

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?