BT Meeting 9056 - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)
BT Meeting 9056 - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)
BT Meeting 9056 - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2<br />
<strong>BT</strong> N <strong>9056</strong><br />
2012-11-23<br />
1.5 Follow-up of actions <strong>BT</strong> N 9002<br />
The <strong>BT</strong> Chairman referred to an action pending from the 66 th <strong>BT</strong>, item 4.4 on use of the TC Working Area, which<br />
was indicated in green. Not all Working Groups were using the IT tools provided and the Chairman asked the<br />
Members to provide the necessary support to WG Convenors to use them. The use of e-mails for circulating<br />
documents was no longer acceptable.<br />
AFNOR pointed out that Annex 3 to the Follow-up of actions was no longer correct. The Chairman pointed out<br />
that this would be dealt with further on in the agenda and that modifications to the list would be made with regard<br />
to the WG R&P for which he would be replaced by Gudrun Rognvaldardottir.<br />
<strong>BT</strong> Chairman announced that the ISO-CEN Joint Coordination Group (JCG) would no longer meet annually,<br />
since there was sufficient coordination between its members. The group would be considered as dormant but<br />
could meet if needed. There was therefore no need to review its composition, which could be removed from the<br />
list in future.<br />
2 REPORT OF THE CHAIR<br />
2.1 Report of the Chairman<br />
Peter Ziethen gave his last report as Chairman of CEN/<strong>BT</strong>, starting his presentation with statistics. A major<br />
achievement of the commitment of <strong>BT</strong> with the support of CCMC, was the continual shortening of development<br />
time. However, for CWAs, the development time had increased considerably and was no longer much faster<br />
than for ENs.<br />
Figures indicated that more than 97% of the work was not co-financed by EC/EFTA, thus limiting the risks -<br />
evoked in the breakout session related to the new Regulation - with regard to penalties for not meeting<br />
objectives. Funding is driven by the private sector.<br />
Other main items of significance were:<br />
- Gudrun Rognvaldardottir would succeed Peter Ziethen as CEN Vice President Technical and CEN/<strong>BT</strong><br />
Chairperson as from 2013;<br />
- There had been only one candidate for the position of CEN Vice President Policy and his appointment is to<br />
be confirmed;<br />
Questions to the Chairman followed with regard to CEN stakeholder classification, Members' self-assessment,<br />
and whether the impact assessment for the new Regulation would involve associate members.<br />
DECISION <strong>BT</strong> 16/2012 (72nd <strong>BT</strong> item: 2)<br />
Subject: Matching the Regulation on standardization<br />
<strong>BT</strong>,<br />
considering the newly adopted Regulation on Standardisation and its application as of 1st January 2013;<br />
asks CCMC to prepare information and guidance on its practical implementation for further consideration by the CEN<br />
and CENELEC <strong>BT</strong>s.<br />
3 CEN/<strong>BT</strong> ACTION PLAN 2010-2013<br />
Action 1.1.1 To reduce the development time<br />
This decision is applicable as from: 2012-10-24<br />
As a general statement, the <strong>BT</strong> Chairman pointed out that the current CEN/<strong>BT</strong> Action Plan runs up to 2013 but<br />
suggested that - as his term as Chairman comes to an end - during the 73 rd <strong>BT</strong> meeting in 2013, the current<br />
actions should be reviewed and new ones defined.<br />
Annick Hamel, Champion of Action 1.1.1, gave a presentation, including two recommendations with regard to a<br />
review of the CEN and CENELEC processes taking account ISO/TMB and IEC/SMB decisions. Due to<br />
comments from members of the WG on the report, these recommendations were not presented at this meeting<br />
for <strong>BT</strong> decision. The final report would be presented following a further meeting of the WG before end 2012.<br />
<strong>BT</strong> Chairman thanked Annick Hamel for the presentation, stating that there still appeared to be a need for further<br />
speeding up the standardization process due to expectations from the Commission. CEN was also expected to<br />
synchronise processes with ISO and this should be one of the priorities of the group.