25.08.2013 Views

BT Meeting 9056 - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)

BT Meeting 9056 - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)

BT Meeting 9056 - European Trade Union Institute (ETUI)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4 Endorsement of CEN-CENELEC-ETSI WG R&P<br />

proposal – Revision of CEN-CENELEC Guide 11<br />

‘Product information relevant to consumers -<br />

Guidelines for standard developers’ (i.e. with<br />

updating of the references)<br />

:for decision<br />

7<br />

<strong>BT</strong> N <strong>9056</strong><br />

2012-11-23<br />

<strong>BT</strong> N 9003<br />

CCMC introduced the document. ANEC, having requested to be excused, sent the following comments related<br />

to this item:<br />

"... the Guide should also make reference to the revision of IEC 62079 (now IEC 82079 "Preparation of<br />

instructions for use -- Structuring, content and presentation"). Being only an editorial comment, the<br />

CENELEC/<strong>BT</strong> agreed to our proposal and we ask the CEN/<strong>BT</strong> to concur."<br />

AFNOR asked if there was any information available related to the use of this Guide. and its relation to the<br />

regulation on product information to be made available to consumers. Feedback from those developing<br />

standards in AFNOR related to consumers indicated that it rarely used.<br />

CCMC admitted to having received no particular feedback on its use and that this should be evaluated by the<br />

members. The proposal presented here was the result of a general decision to update the Guides, mostly<br />

editorially.<br />

It was suggested that the use and relevance of the Guide be taken on board in the Societal Stakeholders'<br />

Group.<br />

NSAI commented that since these Guides were not widely known, TC Secretaries should be made aware of<br />

their existence. The <strong>BT</strong> Chairman acknowledged that this was indeed a matter of training and education. It was<br />

the task of <strong>BT</strong> Members to communicate on this at national level.<br />

DECISION <strong>BT</strong> 22/2012 (72 nd <strong>BT</strong> item: 4.4)<br />

Subject: CEN-CENELEC-ETSI WG 'Rules & Processes' - Editorial revision of CEN-CENELEC Guide 11<br />

<strong>BT</strong>,<br />

noting that<br />

- the CEN-CENELEC-ETSI WG 'Rules & Processes' examined the CCMC proposal for reviewing and updating the<br />

CEN-CENELEC Guides that fall within their remit;<br />

- the editorial review of CEN-CENELEC Guide 11 ‘Product information relevant to consumers - Guidelines for<br />

standard developers’ consisted in the updating of references as well as the replacement of dated references by<br />

undated references when relevant;<br />

- the revised CEN-CENELEC Guide 11 was approved by CENELEC/<strong>BT</strong> at its 142nd meeting;<br />

approves the revision of CEN-CENELEC Guide 11 ‘Product information relevant to consumers - Guidelines for standard<br />

developers’ as presented in Annex 1 to <strong>BT</strong> N 9003.<br />

4.5 CEN-CENELEC-ETSI WG R&P – Report of last<br />

meeting<br />

:for information<br />

CCMC briefly highlighted five main items in the report, which was noted.<br />

4.6 CEN-CENELEC-ETSI WG R&P – Membership<br />

:for decision<br />

This decision is applicable as from: 2012-10-24<br />

<strong>BT</strong> N 9008<br />

<strong>BT</strong> N 9010<br />

Since Peter Ziethen's term as VP Technical expires at the end of 2012, he would be replaced in this group by his<br />

successor, Gudrun Rognvaldardottir. Broader participation in the group was agreed upon (i.e. 5 instead of 3<br />

representatives per ESO) to ensure active participation in the group.<br />

Details with regard to a slightly modified ETSI delegation would follow.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!