Parliamentary Rules of Procedure - European Parliament - Europa
Parliamentary Rules of Procedure - European Parliament - Europa
Parliamentary Rules of Procedure - European Parliament - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
When selecting a house’s delegation to the concili-<br />
ation committee, there are a number <strong>of</strong> models. in<br />
the German Federal Republic, the Vermittlungsauss-<br />
chuss is composed <strong>of</strong> 16 members <strong>of</strong> the Bundesrat<br />
(one per Land) and an equal number <strong>of</strong> senior<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the Bundestag who conduct all such<br />
negotiations and hence become well versed in the<br />
art <strong>of</strong> negotiation and compromise. conversely, in<br />
the Us congress, House and senate delegations to<br />
the “conference committee” are composed afresh<br />
each time <strong>of</strong> members involved in the matter and<br />
who voted in favour <strong>of</strong> their respective house’s<br />
position.<br />
The <strong>European</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong> chose the middle ground<br />
<strong>of</strong> these two models. it provides for three <strong>of</strong> the<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the conciliation delegation to be per-<br />
manent members drawn from the Vice Presidents<br />
<strong>of</strong> the House (who are experts in the process, procedures,<br />
precedents) while the remaining members<br />
the uS Congress<br />
38<br />
are drawn predominantly from the parliamentary<br />
committee that has dealt with the issue (and therefore<br />
experts on the subject matter). normally this<br />
includes the chair <strong>of</strong> the responsible parliamentary<br />
committee and the member who acted as rapporteur<br />
on the subject. The total delegation must<br />
reflect the political balance and composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entire House and its political groups.<br />
it is conceivable that these matters are not set out<br />
in the rules <strong>of</strong> procedure but rather follow established<br />
practice and custom. However, writing them<br />
into the rules <strong>of</strong> procedure generates more legal<br />
certainty and transparency for the wider public.<br />
Simplified procedures<br />
Many parliaments have simplified procedures for<br />
consideration <strong>of</strong> technical/non controversial legislation.<br />
One way to test whether legislation is controversial<br />
is at the committee stage. if the proposal is<br />
approved by consensus (or by a very high majority)<br />
in committee, it can then be fast-tracked through<br />
the plenary stage <strong>of</strong> proceedings.<br />
The italian <strong>Parliament</strong> provides for the definitive<br />
adoption by committee if there is a sufficient<br />
majority. in the <strong>European</strong> <strong>Parliament</strong>, texts adopted<br />
with fewer than 1/10th <strong>of</strong> committee members