26.08.2013 Views

Download PDF, 1698 kB - Evira

Download PDF, 1698 kB - Evira

Download PDF, 1698 kB - Evira

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9 MATERIAL<br />

9.1 Sampling and response rate<br />

9.1.1 The quality monitoring of the grain harvest<br />

Viljaseula - Finnish Grain Quality in 2012<br />

The farms covered by the monitoring were selected randomly from the Farm Register<br />

of the Information Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (Tike). Farms with<br />

less than five hectares of cultivated area were not part of the sampling. In 2012 about<br />

1,700 farms were part of the sampling. Samples were sent in from 23 per cent of the<br />

farms selected for the quality monitoring. The scale of the study and the time it takes to<br />

take the samples and to send them have an impact on the response rate. The<br />

distribution of the sizes of the farms and the samples sent in are shown in figure 36.<br />

Every year, farms that have not sent in samples during the preceding four years are<br />

chosen for the sampling. There is however also a small permanent group of farms in<br />

the sampling. The quality monitoring of the grain harvest received 841 samples in<br />

2012.<br />

9.1.2 Quality monitoring of the organic grain harvest<br />

In addition to the usual sampling, requests for samples were sent to about 300 farms<br />

for the purpose of the quality monitoring of organically grown grain. These were<br />

selected regionally from Tike’s register of organic production. Samples were received<br />

from 29 per cent of the farms selected for the quality monitoring. The distribution of the<br />

sizes of the farms and the number of samples sent in are shown in figure 37. We<br />

received 167 samples for the quality monitoring of organic grain.<br />

9.2 Grain samples and form for background information<br />

For the purpose of the monitoring, a total of 5,600 sample bags were sent in July to the<br />

selected farms based on the sampling. The number of sample bags depended on the<br />

size of the farm. The farm sizes were divided into the categories 5–9.9 ha, 10–19.9 ha,<br />

20–29.9 ha, 30–49.9 ha, 50–99.9 ha and farms exceeding 100 ha. Requests for two<br />

samples were sent to the two smallest categories, requests for three samples to the<br />

category in the middle and requests for four samples were sent to the two following.<br />

Farms over 100 hectares received requests for 5 samples. The sizes of the farms in<br />

the distribution of the sampling and that from which samples were received are<br />

presented in figures 32–34. Every request for samples was accompanied by a request<br />

form requiring background information specific to the batch of grain, which supplied us<br />

with valuable information on factors related to the grain production (more detail in<br />

chapter 1.4).<br />

Taking samples is an important factor that affects the reliability of the results. This is<br />

why instructions on how to take the samples were sent to the farmers in the letter to the<br />

growers. It had been requested that the samples would have been sent in by mid-<br />

October, but this was changed to a later date due to the special characteristics of the<br />

growing period. The harvesting period was drawn out very much due to the weather<br />

conditions during the growing period of 2012, and it was therefore decided to still<br />

accept samples in November.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!