Summary
Summary
Summary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For the reciprocal comparision of the sampling plots the average density of<br />
worms in all seasons was chosen (Figure 3.2). In comparision with natural forests of<br />
similar growth type, the average earthworm density in Saulkalne sampling plots is<br />
relatively high. Even in the monitoring sampling plot with vegetation corresponding<br />
to a natural forest type, the density in all seasons is heightened. Obsviously, also in<br />
Saulkalne sampling plots, changes in the earthworm populations are observed before<br />
changes in the vegetation.<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Saulk 1 Saulk 2 Saulk 3 Saulk 4 Saulk 5<br />
Figure 3.2. All season mean density of earthworms per sample in Saulkalne sample plots.<br />
In highly transformed forests, closer to the emission source, the earthworm<br />
population has a tendency to increase. In the closest sampling plot to the factory, the<br />
density is little lower than in the next two, what may be due to the emited pollution<br />
of factorie in they direct closiness. In the both furthest sampling plots, where the soil<br />
pollution level is lower, the earthworm density is lower. However, ANOVA analysis<br />
did not show significant differences among the sampling plots.<br />
Comparing seasonal earthworm changes, it is evident, that in the sampling<br />
plots Saulkalne 1 and Saulkalne 2, the density gradually increases. Such a<br />
nonchaectaristic earthworm population dynamics to the pine forest biotypes<br />
33