29.08.2013 Views

Summary

Summary

Summary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the reciprocal comparision of the sampling plots the average density of<br />

worms in all seasons was chosen (Figure 3.2). In comparision with natural forests of<br />

similar growth type, the average earthworm density in Saulkalne sampling plots is<br />

relatively high. Even in the monitoring sampling plot with vegetation corresponding<br />

to a natural forest type, the density in all seasons is heightened. Obsviously, also in<br />

Saulkalne sampling plots, changes in the earthworm populations are observed before<br />

changes in the vegetation.<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Saulk 1 Saulk 2 Saulk 3 Saulk 4 Saulk 5<br />

Figure 3.2. All season mean density of earthworms per sample in Saulkalne sample plots.<br />

In highly transformed forests, closer to the emission source, the earthworm<br />

population has a tendency to increase. In the closest sampling plot to the factory, the<br />

density is little lower than in the next two, what may be due to the emited pollution<br />

of factorie in they direct closiness. In the both furthest sampling plots, where the soil<br />

pollution level is lower, the earthworm density is lower. However, ANOVA analysis<br />

did not show significant differences among the sampling plots.<br />

Comparing seasonal earthworm changes, it is evident, that in the sampling<br />

plots Saulkalne 1 and Saulkalne 2, the density gradually increases. Such a<br />

nonchaectaristic earthworm population dynamics to the pine forest biotypes<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!