18.09.2013 Views

Greening Blue Energy - BioTools For Business

Greening Blue Energy - BioTools For Business

Greening Blue Energy - BioTools For Business

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

simulated sound from 2 MW wind turbines, but<br />

they did not display fear behaviour (Koschinski et al.<br />

2003). Acoustic signals increased in intensity, which<br />

could be an exploratory behaviour. Tougaard et al.<br />

(2009) expected no behavioural responses of seals<br />

and porpoises to occur apart from in the immediate<br />

vicinity of turbines, and studies by Tougaard and<br />

colleagues (2003) and the Danish Monitoring Program<br />

(Dong <strong>Energy</strong> et al. 2006) suggested no effects<br />

on seals and porpoises of the wind farm in operation<br />

at Horns Reef in Denmark. Boat traffic during<br />

maintenance seemed to have only small effect on<br />

porpoises (Tougaard et al. 2004). At Horns Rev,<br />

porpoise abundance returned to preconstruction<br />

levels shortly after the installations were finalised<br />

(Dong <strong>Energy</strong> et al. 2006). At the Nysted wind farm<br />

in the southern Baltic Sea, on the other hand, the<br />

abundance of porpoises had not reached pre-construction<br />

levels two years after construction (e.g.<br />

Dong <strong>Energy</strong> et al. 2006). It was speculated that<br />

the Nysted area may not be important enough for<br />

the porpoises to remain in the area and withstand<br />

the disturbance. Baseline data is, however, not sufficient<br />

to firmly attribute this distribution change<br />

neither to the presence of the wind farm nor to<br />

the production noise. Preliminary results from the<br />

Dutch monitoring programme at the offshore wind<br />

farm Egmond aan Zee suggest a significant increase<br />

in porpoise abundance after the construction<br />

(Musalears 2009)<br />

Several whale species (e.g. beluga whale (Delphinapterus<br />

leucas), killer whale (Orcinus orca, humpback<br />

whale (Megaptera novaengliae) have notably<br />

Green turtle. Photo: Jerker Tamelander, IUCN<br />

displayed behavioural and avoidance responses to<br />

low frequency sounds from anthropogenic activities,<br />

such as oil and gas exploration and boat traffic<br />

(see Samuel et al. 2005 for references). While<br />

habitat use patterns for whales may not generally<br />

overlap with the relatively shallow areas used for<br />

wind farms (apart from floating turbines), noise disturbance<br />

might still impact behaviour, including the<br />

migration patterns, of these species.<br />

Conclusions<br />

From studies of wind farms to date, there is no<br />

evidence of marine mammals avoiding wind farms<br />

during operation due to noise, and any long-term<br />

avoidance behaviour of porpoises and seals should<br />

be very local. Hence, based on current knowledge,<br />

impacts on whole assemblages of porpoises, dolphins<br />

and seals are considered small. Although<br />

there are limitations in survey design, several<br />

field studies and reviews on the subject has been<br />

conducted. Certainty: 3. One should be extra cautious<br />

with regard to whales, however, as impacts of<br />

sounds on migration are not understood (See also<br />

conclusions in 7.9., Certainty: 1).<br />

Identifying and managing biodiversity risks and opportunities of offshore renewable energy - GREENING BLUE ENERGY 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!