18.09.2013 Views

Greening Blue Energy - BioTools For Business

Greening Blue Energy - BioTools For Business

Greening Blue Energy - BioTools For Business

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

impact of noise emissions on marine organisms that<br />

inhabit or migrate through the area. (See Annexe 1,<br />

section 2.3. for more details).<br />

Cables transmitting power between WTC devices<br />

and to the mainland may have an effect on marine<br />

organisms, such as migratory fish, elasmobranches,<br />

crustaceans and marine mammals that use magnetic<br />

fields for navigation or finding prey (Kalmijn,<br />

2000, Gill et al., 2005, Öhman et al 2007, Gill et<br />

al. 2009). No significant effects on marine organisms<br />

from exposure to electromagnetic fields have<br />

been established (Bochert and Zettler, 2004; Gill et<br />

al., 2005; Gill et al. 2009), but further research is<br />

needed to investigate how the relatively dense networks<br />

of cables within WTC parks may affect navigation<br />

and foraging by electrosensitive species. (See<br />

Annexe 1, Section 2.4. for more details)<br />

Figure 5: Example of a wave activated body, the point absorber (Seabased Ltd).<br />

Studies on collision risks between marine organisms,<br />

such as mammals and fish, and submerged<br />

structures are rare (Gill, 2005). <strong>For</strong> wave power,<br />

it appears unlikely that installations would result<br />

in large numbers of collision fatalities to marine<br />

organisms. However, fish and mammals may be<br />

harmed colliding with or entangling in mooring<br />

chains (Wilson et al. 2007). Some concerns that tidal<br />

fences and turbines blocking channels may harm or<br />

hamper migration by wild life have, on the other<br />

hand, been raised (e.g. Pelc & Fujita 2002, Inger<br />

et al. 2009). It is not certain that the slow moving<br />

turbines cause any impacts, as no effects on either<br />

fish or water movement were recorded in conjunction<br />

with a prototype built by Nova <strong>Energy</strong>, in the St.<br />

Lawrence Seaway (<strong>Blue</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Canada 2001).<br />

To decrease collision fatalities and barrier effects<br />

on fish, developers could construct systems where<br />

the space between the caisson wall and rotor foil<br />

is large enough for fish to pass through (e.g. Pelc<br />

& Fujita 2002). Turbines could also be geared for<br />

low velocities (25-50 rpm) which would keep the<br />

fish fatalities to a minimum (see Pelc & Fujita 2002).<br />

It has been suggested that larger animals, such as<br />

marine mammals, could be kept away from the<br />

rotors through fences (Pelc & Fujita 2002), but this<br />

may, on the other hand, cause barrier effects in<br />

narrow channels. The use of sonar sensors to shut<br />

the system down when mammals approach the<br />

devices has also been mentioned as an option (Pelc<br />

& Fujita 2002).<br />

Identifying and managing biodiversity risks and opportunities of offshore renewable energy - GREENING BLUE ENERGY 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!